Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

. 2021 May 01 ; 39 (13) : 1426-1436. [epub] 20210325

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33764805

Grantová podpora
MC_UU_00016/11 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MC_U137961146 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
G1000729 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MR/L008963/1 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MC_UU_12009/11 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom

PURPOSE: Treatment options are limited for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS). This phase III, placebo-controlled trial evaluated CC-486 (oral azacitidine), a hypomethylating agent, in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System LR-MDS and RBC transfusion-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to CC-486 300-mg or placebo for 21 days/28-day cycle. The primary end point was RBC transfusion independence (TI). RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen patients received CC-486 (n = 107) or placebo (n = 109). The median age was 74 years, median platelet count was 25 × 109/L, and absolute neutrophil count was 1.3 × 109/L. In the CC-486 and placebo arms, 31% and 11% of patients, respectively, achieved RBC-TI (P = .0002), with median durations of 11.1 and 5.0 months. Reductions of ≥ 4 RBC units were attained by 42.1% and 30.6% of patients, respectively, with median durations of 10.0 and 2.3 months, and more CC-486 patients had ≥ 1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increases from baseline (23.4% v 4.6%). Platelet hematologic improvement rate was higher with CC-486 (24.3% v 6.5%). Underpowered interim overall survival analysis showed no difference between CC-486 and placebo (median, 17.3 v 16.2 months; P = .96). Low-grade GI events were the most common adverse events in both arms. In the CC-486 and placebo arms, 90% and 73% of patients experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event. Overall death rate was similar between arms, but there was an imbalance in deaths during the first 56 days (CC-486, n = 16; placebo, n = 6), most related to infections; the median pretreatment absolute neutrophil count for the 16 CC-486 patients was 0.57 × 109/L. CONCLUSION: CC-486 significantly improved RBC-TI rate and induced durable bilineage improvements in patients with LR-MDS and high-risk disease features. More early deaths occurred in the CC-486 arm, most related to infections in patients with significant pretreatment neutropenia. Further evaluation of CC-486 in MDS is needed.

Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital Alessandria Italy

Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton New Jersey

Celgene a Bristol Myers Squibb Company Boudry Switzerland

Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy

Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli Reggio Calabria Italy

Hematology Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata Rome Italy

Hematology Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy

Hôpital St Louis Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris Paris France

Hospital da Luz Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Salamanca Spain

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio Seville Spain

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY

Leipzig University Hospital Leipzig Germany

Marienhospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

MDS Unit Hematology AOU Careggi University of Florence Florence Italy

Medical Department Hematology Charles University General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Monash University and Monash Health Melbourne Australia

MRC Molecular Haematology Unit and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals Oxford United Kingdom

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia

Sackler School of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Canada

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel

University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City KS

University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Gangat N, Patnaik MM, Tefferi A: Myelodysplastic syndromes: Contemporary review and how we treat. Am J Hematol 91:76-89, 2016 PubMed

Greenberg P Cox C LeBeau MM, et al. : International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 89:2079-2088, 1997 PubMed

Jansen AJ Essink-Bot ML Beckers EA, et al. : Quality of life measurement in patients with transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 121:270-274, 2003 PubMed

Malcovati L Germing U Kuendgen A, et al. : Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 25:3503-3510, 2007 PubMed

Al Ameri A Jabbour E Garcia-Manero G, et al. : Significance of thrombocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes: Associations and prognostic implications. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 11:237-241, 2011 PubMed PMC

Gonzalez-Porras JR Cordoba I Such E, et al. : Prognostic impact of severe thrombocytopenia in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer 117:5529-5537, 2011 PubMed

National Comprehensive Cancer Network : NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Myelodysplastic Syndromes Version 2.2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/mds.pdf, 2020

Kantarjian H Fenaux P Sekeres MA, et al. : Safety and efficacy of romiplostim in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia. J Clin Oncol 28:437-444, 2010 PubMed

Oliva EN Alati C Santini V, et al. : Eltrombopag versus placebo for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia (EQoL-MDS): Phase 1 results of a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 superiority trial. Lancet Haematol 4:e127-e136, 2017 PubMed

Jung HA Maeng CH Kim M, et al. : Platelet response during the second cycle of decitabine treatment predicts response and survival for myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Oncotarget 6:16653-16662, 2015 PubMed PMC

van der Helm LH Alhan C Wijermans PW, et al. : Platelet doubling after the first azacitidine cycle is a promising predictor for response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in the Dutch azacitidine compassionate named patient programme. Br J Haematol 155:599-606, 2011 PubMed

Garcia-Manero G Gore SD Kambhampati S, et al. : Efficacy and safety of extended dosing schedules of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 30:889-896, 2016 PubMed PMC

Garcia-Manero G Scott BL Cogle CR, et al. : CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with pretreatment thrombocytopenia. Leuk Res 72:79-85, 2018 PubMed

Garcia-Manero G Gore SD Cogle C, et al. : Phase I study of oral azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29:2521-2527, 2011 PubMed PMC

Garcia-Manero G Savona MR Gore SD, et al. : CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with hematological malignancies who had received prior treatment with injectable hypomethylating agents (HMAs): Results from phase 1/2 CC-486 studies. Blood 128:905, 2016

ONUREG® (Azacitidine Tablets) Prescribing Information. Summit, NJ, Celgene Corporation (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb).

Santini V, Kantarjian HM, Issa JP: Changes in DNA methylation in neoplasia: Pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Ann Intern Med 134:573-586, 2001 PubMed

Stresemann C, Lyko F: Modes of action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacytidine and decitabine. Int J Cancer 123:8-13, 2008 PubMed

Saunthararajah Y: Key clinical observations after 5-azacytidine and decitabine treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes suggest practical solutions for better outcomes. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013:511-521, 2013 PubMed

Laille E Shi T Garcia-Manero G, et al. : Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with extended dosing of CC-486 in patients with hematologic malignancies. PLoS One 10:e0135520, 2015 PubMed PMC

Greenberg PL Tuechler H Schanz J, et al. : Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 120:2454-2465, 2012 PubMed PMC

Cheson BD Greenberg PL Bennett JM, et al. : Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood 108:419-425, 2006 PubMed

Vardiman JW Thiele J Arber DA, et al. : The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: Rationale and important changes. Blood 114:937-951, 2009 PubMed

Cella D: The functional assessment of cancer therapy-anemia (FACT-An) scale: A new tool for the assessment of outcomes in cancer anemia and fatigue. Semin Hematol 34:13-19, 1997. (3 suppl 2) PubMed

Brucker PS Yost K Cashy J, et al. : General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof 28:192-211, 2005 PubMed

Fenaux P Platzbecker U Mufti GJ, et al. : Luspatercept in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med 382:140-151, 2020 PubMed

Platzbecker U Symeonidis A Oliva EN, et al. : A phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 31:1944-1950, 2017 PubMed PMC

Fenaux P Santini V Spiriti MAA, et al. : A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of epoetin-alpha in anemic patients with low-risk MDS. Leukemia 32:2648-2658, 2018 PubMed PMC

Platzbecker U Fenaux P Ades L, et al. : Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials. Blood 133:1020-1030, 2019 PubMed PMC

Papaemmanuil E Gerstung M Malcovati L, et al. : Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 122:3616-3627, 2013 PubMed PMC

Bejar R Lord A Stevenson K, et al. : TET2 mutations predict response to hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Blood 124:2705-2712, 2014 PubMed PMC

Haferlach T Nagata Y Grossmann V, et al. : Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 28:241-247, 2014 PubMed PMC

Bejar R: Implications of molecular genetic diversity in myelodysplastic syndromes. Curr Opin Hematol 24:73-78, 2017 PubMed PMC

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01566695

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace