Long-term and large-scale multispecies dataset tracking population changes of common European breeding birds

. 2021 Mar 26 ; 8 (1) : 21. [epub] 20210326

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu dataset, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33772033

Grantová podpora
07.0202/2017/755630/SUB/ENV.D2 European Commission (EC)
07.0202/2017/755630/SUB/ENV.D2 European Commission (EC)
07.0202/2017/755630/SUB/ENV.D2 European Commission (EC)
07.0202/2017/755630/SUB/ENV.D2 European Commission (EC)
07.0202/2017/755630/SUB/ENV.D2 European Commission (EC)
07.0202/2017/755630/SUB/ENV.D2 European Commission (EC)

Odkazy

PubMed 33772033
PubMed Central PMC7997925
DOI 10.1038/s41597-021-00804-2
PII: 10.1038/s41597-021-00804-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Around fifteen thousand fieldworkers annually count breeding birds using standardized protocols in 28 European countries. The observations are collected by using country-specific and standardized protocols, validated, summarized and finally used for the production of continent-wide annual and long-term indices of population size changes of 170 species. Here, we present the database and provide a detailed summary of the methodology used for fieldwork and calculation of the relative population size change estimates. We also provide a brief overview of how the data are used in research, conservation and policy. We believe this unique database, based on decades of bird monitoring alongside the comprehensive summary of its methodology, will facilitate and encourage further use of the Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme results.

Aves Natagora Namur Belgium

BirdLife Austria Vienna Austria

BirdLife Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus

Birdlife Estonia Estonian Ornithological Society Tartu Estonia

BirdLife International Cambridge United Kingdom

BirdLife Norway Trondheim Norway

BirdWatch Ireland on behalf of the National Parks and Wildlife Service Kilcoole Republic of Ireland

British Trust for Ornithology Thetford United Kingdom

Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds BirdLife Bulgaria Sofia Bulgaria

Catalan Ornithological Institute Natural History Museum of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Centrale ornithologique natur and ëmwelt a s b l Kockelscheuer Luxembourg

Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Vertebrate Biology Brno Czechia

Czech Society for Ornithology Prague Czechia

Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten Muenster Germany

Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology Institute for Water and Wetland Research Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands

Department of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden

Department of Conservation Biology University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany

Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Genetics Evolution and Environment Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research University College London London United Kingdom

Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology Faculty of Biology University of Latvia Riga Latvia

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Palacky University Olomouc Czechia

DOF BirdLife Denmark Copenhagen Denmark

DOPPS BirdLife Slovenia Ljubljana Slovenia

Evolutionary Ecology Group Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology Babeş Bolyai University Cluj Napoca Romania

Hellenic Ornithological Society Athens Greece

INBO Brussels Belgium

Institute for Environmental Studies Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Institute of Environmental Sciences University of Nyíregyháza Nyíregyháza Hungary

Latvian Ornithological Society Riga Latvia

LIPU BirdLife Italia Parma Italy

Lithuanian Ornithological Society Vilnius Lithuania

Ministère de l'Environnement du Climat et du Développement durable Luxembourg Luxembourg

MITO2000 Parma Italy

MME BirdLife Budapest Hungary

Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences Warszawa Poland

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Trondheim Norway

Polish Society for the Protection of Birds Marki Poland

Portuguese Society for the Study of Birds Lisbon Portugal

Romanian Ornithological Society Cluj Napoca Romania

RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Sandy United Kingdom

Section of Science Nord University Levanger Norway

SEO BirdLife Madrid Spain

Slovak Ornithological Society BirdLife Slovakia Bratislava Slovak Republic

Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology Nijmegen The Netherlands

Statistics Netherlands The Hague The Netherlands

Swiss Ornithological Institute Sempach Switzerland

The Finnish Museum of Natural History University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

UMR7204 CESCO MNHN CNRS SU Paris France

Vytautas Magnus University Kaunas Lithuania

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Tilman D, et al. Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature. 2017;546:73–81. doi: 10.1038/nature22900. PubMed DOI

Costanza R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997;387:253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0. DOI

Ceballos G, et al. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1400253. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400253. PubMed DOI PMC

Greenwood JJD. Citizens, science and bird conservation. J. Ornithol. 2007;148:S77–S124. doi: 10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9. DOI

Barrow, M. A passion for birds: American ornithology after Audubon. (Princeton Press, 1998).

Gregory RD, van Strien A. Wild bird indicators: using composite population trends of birds as measure of environmental health. Ornithol. Sci. 2010;9:3–22. doi: 10.2326/osj.9.3. DOI

Herrando S, et al. High resolution maps for the second European Breeding Bird Atlas: a first provision of standardised data and pilot modelled maps. Vogelwelt. 2017;137:33–41.

Brlík V, 2020. Long-term and large-scale multispecies dataset tracking population changes of common European breeding birds. Zenodo. PubMed DOI PMC

Sauer JR, Link WA, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ. The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966–2011: Summary Analysis and Species Accounts. North Am. Fauna. 2013;79:1–32. doi: 10.3996/nafa.79.0001. DOI

Voříšek, P., Klvaňová, A., Wotton, S. & Gregory, R. D. A best practice guide for wild bird monitoring schemes. (JAVA Třeboň, 2008).

Gregory RD, et al. Developing indicators for European birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2005;360:269–288. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1602. PubMed DOI PMC

Gregory RD, et al. Population trends of widespread woodland birds in Europe. Ibis (Lond. 1859). 2007;149:78–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00698.x. DOI

Gregory RD, et al. The generation and use of bird population indicators in Europe. Bird Conserv. Int. 2008;18:223–244. doi: 10.1017/S0959270908000312. DOI

Klvaňová A, Voříšek P, Gregory RD, van Strien A, Gmelig Meyling AW. Wild birds as indicators in Europe: latest results from the Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme(PECBMS) Avocetta. 2009;33:7–12.

Gamero A, et al. Tracking Progress Toward EU Biodiversity Strategy Targets: EU Policy Effects in Preserving its Common Farmland Birds. Conserv. Lett. 2017;10:395–402. doi: 10.1111/conl.12292. DOI

Butler SJ, Boccaccio L, Gregory RD, Vorisek P, Norris K. Quantifying the impact of land-use change to European farmland bird populations. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010;137:348–357. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.005. DOI

Søgaard Jørgensen P, et al. Continent-scale global change attribution in European birds - combining annual and decadal time scales. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016;22:530–543. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13097. PubMed DOI

Voříšek, P. et al. Trends in abundance and biomass of widespread European farmland birds: how much have we lost? in BOU Proceedings – Lowland Farmland Birds III 24 (2010).

Gregory RD, et al. An Indicator of the Impact of Climatic Change on European Bird Populations. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004678. PubMed DOI PMC

Pe’er G, et al. EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity. Science. 2014;344:1090–1092. doi: 10.1126/science.1253425. PubMed DOI

Vickery JA, et al. The decline of Afro-Palaearctic migrants and an assessment of potential causes. Ibis. 2014;156:1–22. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12118. DOI

Inger R, et al. Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species’ numbers are rising. Ecol. Lett. 2015;18:28–36. doi: 10.1111/ele.12387. PubMed DOI

Stephens PA, et al. Consistent response of bird population changes to climate change on two continents. Science. 2016;352:84–87. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4858. PubMed DOI

Gregory RD, Skorpilova J, Vorisek P, Butler S. An analysis of trends, uncertainty and species selection shows contrasting trends of widespread forest and farmland birds in Europe. Ecol. Indic. 2019;103:676–687. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.064. DOI

Howard C, et al. Disentangling the relative roles of climate and land cover change in driving the long-term population trends of European migratory birds. Divers. Distrib. 2020;26:1442–1455. doi: 10.1111/ddi.13144. DOI

Vorisek P, Gregory RD, Strien AJ. Van & Gmelig Meyling, A. Population trends of 48 common terrestrial bird species in Europe: results from the Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme. Rev. Catalana d’Ornitologia. 2008;24:4–14.

Jiguet F, et al. Population trends of European common birds are predicted by characteristics of their climatic niche. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010;16:497–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01963.x. DOI

Butchart S, et al. Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science. 2010;328:1164–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.1187512. PubMed DOI

Tittensor DP, et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science. 2014;346:241–245. doi: 10.1126/science.1257484. PubMed DOI

Loh J, et al. The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2005;360:289–295. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1584. PubMed DOI PMC

McRae L, Deinet S, Freeman R. The Diversity-Weighted Living Planet Index: Controlling for Taxonomic Bias in a Global Biodiversity Indicator. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169156. PubMed DOI PMC

Eurostat. Smarter, greener, more inclusive - indicators to support the Europe 2020 strategy, 10.2785/379691 (2019).

Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. & Mustoe, S. Bird Census Techniques. (Academic Press, 2000).

Sutherland, W. Ecological census techniques: A handbook (Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Rosenstock S, Anderson D, Giesen K, Leukering T, Carter M. Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk. 2002;119:46–53. doi: 10.1093/auk/119.1.46. DOI

Van Turnhout CAM, et al. Monitoring common and scarce breeding birds in the Netherlands: applying a post-hoc stratification and weighting procedure to obtain less biased population trends. Rev. Catalana d’Ornitologia. 2008;24:15–29.

Pannekoek, J. & van Strien, A. TRIM 3 manual. TRends and Indices for Monitoring data (2001).

Bogaart, P., van der Loo, M. & Pannekoek, J. rtrim: Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data. R package version 2.0.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rtrim (2018).

Ter Braak, C., van Strien, A., Meijer, R. & Verstrael, T. Bird Numbers 1992. Distribution, Monitoring and Ecological Aspects. in Proceedings 12th International Conference of IBCC and EOAC (1992).

van Strien AJ, Pannekoek J, Gibbons DW. Indexing European bird population trends using results of national monitoring schemes: a trial of a new method. Bird Study. 2010;48:200–213. doi: 10.1080/00063650109461219. DOI

Brlík V, 2021. The most recent population changes of common Spanish breeding birds. Zenodo. DOI

Brlík V, 2021. The most recent population changes of common Cypriot breeding birds. Zenodo. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace