Semi-natural grasslands occupy large parts of the European landscape but little information exists about seasonal variations in their nutritive value during the growing season. This paper presents results of novel data showing the effect of 13 years of previous contrasting management intensities on herbage nutritional value in relation to different dates of first defoliation (by grazing or haymaking). The treatments were: extensive management and intensive management from previous years (1998-2011). Both treatments were cut in June followed by intensive/extensive grazing for the rest of the grazing season (July-October). To evaluate forage quality in the first defoliation date, biomass sampling was performed in the year 2012 for 23 weeks from May to mid-October, and in 2013 for seven weeks from May to mid-June. Sampling was performed from plots that were not under management during the sampling year. Previous extensive management was associated with significantly reduced forage quality for in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre and reduced divalent cations (Ca, Mg) and Na during the first seven weeks of the grazing season and the forage was suitable only for beef cattle. Due to low forage IVOMD, the forage is suitable only for cattle maintenance or for low quality hay when the start of grazing was postponed from seven weeks of vegetative growth to 13 weeks, regardless of the previous intensity. Herbage harvested after 13 weeks of the grazing season was of very low quality and was unsuitable as a forage for cattle when it was the only source of feed. Agri-environmental payments are necessary to help agricultural utilisation to maintain semi-natural grasslands by compensating for deterioration of forage quality, not only for the postponement of the first defoliation (either as cutting or grazing) after mid-June, but also when extensive management is required.

Deparment of Microbiology Nutrition and Dietetics Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Praha Czechia

Department of Botany Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czechia

Department of Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Praha Czechia

Department of Nutrition and Feeding of Farm Animals Institute of Animal Science Praha Czechia

Grassland Research Station Liberec Department of Weeds and Vegetation of Agroecosystems Crop Research Institute Praha Czechia

Institute of Entomology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic České Budějovice Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Smit HJ, Metzger MJ, Ewert F. Spatial distribution of grassland productivity and land use in Europe. Agric Syst. 2008; 98: 208–219. 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.07.004 DOI

Dudek T, Wolanski P, Rogut K. The content of macro- and micro minerals in the sward of different types of semi-natural meadows of temperate climate in SE Poland. Agronomy-Basel. 2020; 10 (2): 273. 10.3390/agronomy10020273 DOI

Le Clec’h S, Finger R, Buchmann N, Gosal AS, Hörtnagl L, Huguenin-Elie O, et al.. Assessment of spatial variability of multiple ecosystem services in grasslands of different intensities. J Environ Manage. 2019; 251: 109372. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109372 PubMed DOI

Isselstein J, Jeangros B, Pavlu V. Agronomic aspects of biodiversity targeted management of temperate grasslands in Europe—A review. Agron Res. 2005; 3 (2): 139–151.

Lakner S, Zinngrebe Y, Koemle D. Combining management plans and payment schemes for targed grassland conservation within the Habitats Directive in Saxony, Eastern Germany. Land Use Pol. 2020; 97: 104642. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104642 DOI

Frame J. Improved grassland management. Ipswich, UK: Farming Press Books; 1992.

Bokdam J, Wallis De Vries MF. Forage quality as a limiting factor for cattle grazing in isolated Dutch nature reserves. Conserv Biol. 1992; 6:399–408. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030399.x DOI

Tallowin JRB, Jefferson RG. Hay production from lowland semi-natural grasslands: a review of implication for ruminant livestock systems. Grass Forage Sci. 1999; 54: 99–115. 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1999.00171.x DOI

Fiems LO, De Boever JL, De Vliegher A, Vanacker JM, De Brabander DL, Carlier L. Agri-environmental grass hay: Nutritive value and intake in comparison with hay from intensively managed grassland. Arch Anim Nutr. 2004; 58: 233–244. 10.1080/00039420410001701369 PubMed DOI

Mládek J, Hejcman M, Hejduk S, Duchoslav M, Pavlů V. Community seasonal development enables late defoliation without loss of forage quality in semi-natural grasslands. Folia Geobot. 2011; 46:17–34. 10.1007/s12224-010-9083-4 DOI

Boob M, Elsaesser M, Thumm U, Hartung J, Lewandowski I. Harvest time determines quality and usability of biomass from lowland hay meadows. Agriculture-Basel. 2019; 9:198 10.3390/agriculture9090198 DOI

Duru M, Ducrocq H. A nitrogen and phosphorus herbage nutrient index as a tool for assessing the effect of N and P supply on the dry matter yield of permanent pastures. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 1997; 47: 59–69. 10.1007/BF01985719 DOI

Koidou M, Mountousis I, Dotas V, Zagorakis K, Yiakoulaki M. Temporal variations of herbage production and nutritive value of three grasslands at different elevation zones regarding grazing needs and welfare of ruminants. Arch Anim Breed. 2019; 62: 215–226. 10.5194/aab-62-215-2019 PubMed DOI PMC

Schaub S, Finger R, Leiber F, Probst S, Kreuzer M, Weigelt A, et al.. Plant diversity effects on forage quality, yield and revenues of semi-natural grasslands. Nature Communication. 2020; 11: 768. 10.1038/s41467-020-14541-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Pavlů V, Hejcman M, Pavlů L, Gaisler J, Nežerková P. Effect of continuous grazing on forage quality, quantity and animal performance. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2006; 113: 349–355. 10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.010 DOI

Chytrý M, editor. Vegetace České republiky. 1. Travinná a keříčková vegetace (in Czech) [Vegetation of the Czech Republic. 1. Grassland and Heathland Vegetation]. Praha, CZ: Academia; 2007.

Pavlů V, Hejcman M, Pavlů L, Gaisler J. Restoration of grazing management and its effect on vegetation in an upland grassland. Appl Veg Sci. 2007; 10: 375–382. 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2007.tb00436.x DOI

Kassahun T, Pavlů V, Hejcman M. Seasonal dynamics of herbage biomass under long-term intensive and extensive grazing management. In Klumpp G, Pott T, Oeding S, editors. Bio-based economy for a sustainable future, ELLS scientific student conference. Hohenheim, Germany: University of Hohenheim; 2016. p. 39.

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis (15th ed.) Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical; 1990.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74 (10): 3583–3597. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 PubMed DOI

Goering KH, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some application). Agric. Handbook. No. 379. Washington DC, USA: ARS-USDA; 1970.

Aufrere J, Michalet-Doreau B. Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1988; 20 (3): 203–218. 10.1016/0377-8401(88)90044-2 DOI

Nousiainen J, Rinne M, Helämäki M, Huhtanen P. Prediction of the digestibility of the primary growth of grass silages harvested at different stages of maturity from chemical composition and pepsin-cellulase solubility. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2003; 103: 97–111. 10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00283-3 DOI

Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos. 2005; 108: 643–647. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13727.x DOI

Dell Inc., 2016. Dell Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13.1 software. dell.com.

Ma L, Yuan F, Liang H, Rong Y. The effects of grazing management strategies on the vegetation, diet quality, intake and performance of free grazing sheep. Livest Sci. 2014; 161:185–192. 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.025 DOI

Henkin Z, Ungar ED, Dvash L, Perevolotsky A, Yehuda Y, Sternberg M, et al.. Effects of cattle grazing on herbage quality in a herbaceous Mediterranean rangeland. Grass Forage Sci. 2011; 66 (4): 516–525. 10.5194/aab-62-215-2019 DOI

Schlegel P, Wyss U, Arrigo Y, Hess HD. Mineral concentrations of fresh herbage from mixed grassland as influenced by botanical composition, harvest time and growth stage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016; 219: 226–233. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.022 DOI

Rychnovská M. Úvod–Travinné porosty mírného pásma (In Czech) [Introduction–Temperate grasslands]. In: Rychnovská M, Balátová E, Úlehlová B, Pelikán J, editors. Ekologie lučních porostů [Ecology of meadow]. Praha, CZ: Academia; 1985. pp. 11–12.

Whitehead DC. Nutrient elements in grassland, soil-plant-animal relationships. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2000.

Rymer C. The measurement of forage digestibility in vivo. In: Givens DI, Owen E, Axford RFE, Omed HM, editors. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2000. pp. 113–134.

National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th Revised Edition). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000.

Agricultural Research Council. The nutrient requirement of ruminant livestock. Slough, England: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1980.

Motazedian I, Sharrow SH. Defoliation frequency and intensity effects on pasture forage quality. J Range Manag. 1990; 43 (3): 198–201. 10.2307/3898671 DOI

Stejskalová M, Hejcmanová P, Pavlů V, Hejcman M. Grazing behavior and performance of beef cattle as a function of sward structure and herbage quality under rotational and continuous stocking on species-rich upland pasture. Anim Sci J. 2013; 84: 622–629. 10.1111/asj.12048 PubMed DOI

Bruinenberg MH, Valk H, Korevaar H, Struik PC. Factors affecting digestibility of temperate forages from seminatural grasslands: a review. Grass Forage Sci. 2002; 57: 292–301. 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00327.x DOI

Pelve ME, Olsson I, Spörndly E, Eriksson T. In vivo and in vitro digestibility, nitrogen balance and methane production in non-lactating cows and heifers fed forage harvested from heterogeneous semi-natural pastures. Livest Sci. 2012;144: 48–56 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.10.012 DOI

Andueza D, Rodrigues AM, Picard F, Rossignol N, Baumont R, Cecato U, et al.. Relationships between botanical composition, yield and forage quality of permanent grasslands over the first growth cycle. Grass Forage Sci. 2014; 71:366–378. 10.1111/gfs.12189 DOI

Elgersma A, Søegaard K. Effects of species diversity on seasonal variation in herbage yield and nutritive value of seven binary grass-legume mixtures and pure grass under cutting. Eur J Agron. 2016; 78:73–83. 10.1016/j.eja.2016.04.011 DOI

Jancovic J, Holubek R. Some quality parameters of chosen meadow plant species after long-term fertilization of semi-natural grassland. Rost Výr. 1999; 45 (2): 79–83.

Biel W, Jaroszewska A, Łysoń E, Telesiński A. The chemical composition and antioxidant properties of common dandelion leaves compared with sea buckthorn. Can J Plant Sci. 2017; 97:1165–1174. 10.1139/cjps-2016-0409 DOI

Thumm U, Tonn B. Grünlandaufwüchse-Futter oder Bioenergie? Schreiber KF, Brauckmann HJ, Broll G, Krebs S, Poschlod P, editors. In Artenreiches Grünland in der Kulturlandschaft. Ubstadt-Weiher, Germany: Verlag Regionalkultur; 2009.pp. 305–313.

Kudrna V, Čermák B, Doležal O, editors. Produkce krmiv a výživa skotu (in Czech) [Feed production and cattle nutrition]. Praha, CZ: Agrospoj; 1998.

National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (7th Edition). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.

Schaffers AP. Soil biomass, and management of semi-natural vegetation. Part I. Interrelationships. Plant Ecol. 2002; 158: 229–246. 10.1023/A:1015576520936 DOI

Míka V. Minerální látky (In Czech) [Minerals]. In: Míka V. editor. Kvalita píce [Forage quality]. Praha, CZ: Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských informací; 1997. pp. 97–101.

Pelletier S, Bélanger G, Tremblay GF, Brégard A, Allard G. Diatary cation-anion difference of Timothy as affected by development stage and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Agron J. 2006; 98: 774–780. 10.2134/agronj2005.0229 DOI

Suttle N. Mineral nutrition in livestock. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2010.

Grunes DL, Stout PR, Brownell JR. Grass tetany of ruminants. Advanced Agronomy. 1970; 22: 33–374. 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60272-2 DOI

Voisin A. Grass tetany. Springfield, Illinois, USA: Charles C. Thomas Publisher; 1963.

Ata S, Farooq F, Javed S. Elemental profile of 24 common medicinal plants of Pakistan and its direct link with traditional uses. J Med Plants Res. 2011; 5(26):6164–6168. 10.5897/JMPR11.866 DOI

Harrington KC, Thatcher A, Kemp PD. Mineral composition and nutritive value of some common pasture weeds. N Z Plant Prot. 2006; 59: 261–265. 10.30843/nzpp.2006.59.4414 DOI

Grzegorczyk S, Alberski J, Olszewska M. Accumulation of potassium, calcium and magnesium by selected species of grassland legumes and herbs. J Elem. 2013; 18: 69–78. 10.5601/jelem.2013.18.1.05 DOI

Wilman D, Derrick W. Concentration and availability to sheep of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na in chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. J Agric Sci. 1994; 122(2): 217–223. 10.1017/S0021859600087396 DOI

Pirhofer-Walzl K, Søegaard K, Høgh-Jensen H, Eriksen J, Sanderson MA, Rasmussen J. Forage herbs improve mineral composition of grassland herbage. Grass Forage Sci. 2011; 66: 415–423. 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00799.x DOI

McDowell LR, Valle G. Major minerals in forages. In: Givens DI, Owen E, Axford RF, Omed HM, editors. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2000. pp. 373–397.