Dimensions of invasiveness: Links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe's alien and native floras
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
34050023
PubMed Central
PMC8179145
DOI
10.1073/pnas.2021173118
PII: 2021173118
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- distribution–abundance relationship, enemy release, forms of rarity, invasion success, leaf economic spectrum,
- MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- fylogeografie * MeSH
- rostliny klasifikace MeSH
- zavlečené druhy * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Understanding drivers of success for alien species can inform on potential future invasions. Recent conceptual advances highlight that species may achieve invasiveness via performance along at least three distinct dimensions: 1) local abundance, 2) geographic range size, and 3) habitat breadth in naturalized distributions. Associations among these dimensions and the factors that determine success in each have yet to be assessed at large geographic scales. Here, we combine data from over one million vegetation plots covering the extent of Europe and its habitat diversity with databases on species' distributions, traits, and historical origins to provide a comprehensive assessment of invasiveness dimensions for the European alien seed plant flora. Invasiveness dimensions are linked in alien distributions, leading to a continuum from overall poor invaders to super invaders-abundant, widespread aliens that invade diverse habitats. This pattern echoes relationships among analogous dimensions measured for native European species. Success along invasiveness dimensions was associated with details of alien species' introduction histories: earlier introduction dates were positively associated with all three dimensions, and consistent with theory-based expectations, species originating from other continents, particularly acquisitive growth strategists, were among the most successful invaders in Europe. Despite general correlations among invasiveness dimensions, we identified habitats and traits associated with atypical patterns of success in only one or two dimensions-for example, the role of disturbed habitats in facilitating widespread specialists. We conclude that considering invasiveness within a multidimensional framework can provide insights into invasion processes while also informing general understanding of the dynamics of species distributions.
Biodiversity Macroecology and Biogeography University of Goettingen D 37077 Göttingen Germany
Bioscience and Territory EnivixLab University of Molise 86090 Pesche Italy
Centre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany 2163 Vácrátót Hungary
Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use University of Goettingen D 37077 Göttingen Germany
Chair of Crop Science and Plant Biology Estonian University of Life Sciences 51006 Tartu Estonia
Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Andong National University Andong 36729 Korea
Department of Biology University of Copenhagen 2100 Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Biology University of Pisa Via 56126 Pisa Italy
Department of Bioscience and Territory EnvixLab University of Molise 86039 Termoli Italy
Department of Biosciences Durham University Durham DH1 3LE United Kingdom
Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences University of Insubria 1 21100 Varese Italy
Department of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Masaryk University 611 37 Brno Czech Republic
Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University CZ 128 44 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Forest Biodiversity University of Agriculture in Kraków 31 425 Kraków Poland
Department of Geography King's College London London WC2B 2BG United Kingdom
Department of Physical Geography Goethe University 60438 Frankfurt am Main Germany
Department of Vegetation Ecology Botanical Garden University of Wrocław 50 137 Wrocław Poland
Ecology Department of Biology University of Konstanz D 78457 Konstanz Germany
Ecology Department of Biology University of Konstanz D 78457 Konstanz Germany;
Environmental Biology Sapienza University of Rome 00185 Roma Italy
Escuela de Biología Universidad de Costa Rica 11501 2060 San José Costa Rica
Faculty for Viticulture and Enology University of Nova Gorica 5000 Nova Gorica Slovenia
Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Rostock 18059 Rostock Germany
Faculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bozen 39100 Bolzano Italy
Foundation for Biodiversity Research 50 231 Wrocław Poland
Four Peaks Environmental Science and Data Solutions Wenatchee WA 98801
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig 04103 Leipzig Germany
Institute of Botany Nature Research Centre 12200 Vilnius Lithuania
Institute of Ecology and Evolution Friedrich Schiller University Jena DE 07743 Jena Germany
Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology Ulm University 89081 Ulm Germany
M G Kjolodny Institute of Botany National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 01601 Kyiv Ukraine
Plant Biology and Ecology University of the Basque Country 48080 Bilbao Spain
Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University 6700AA Wageningen The Netherlands
Real Jardín Botánico Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 28014 Madrid Spain
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre 60325 Frankfurt am Main Germany
Vegetation Analysis and Phytodiversity University of Göttingen 37073 Göttingen Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Meyerson L. A., Mooney H. A., Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 199–208 (2007).
van Kleunen M., et al. ., The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 93, 1421–1437 (2018). PubMed
van Kleunen M., et al. ., Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success. Nat. Commun. 11, 3201 (2020). PubMed PMC
Richardson D. M., et al. ., Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6, 93–107 (2000).
Cox G. W., Ricklefs R. E., Species diversity and ecological release in Caribbean land bird faunas. Oikos 28, 113–122 (1977).
Ricklefs R. E., Cox G. W., Stage of taxon cycle, habitat distribution, and population density in the Avifauna of the West Indies. Am. Nat. 112, 875–895 (1978).
Vermeij G. J., When biotas meet: Understanding biotic interchange. Science 253, 1099–1104 (1991). PubMed
Mummenhoff K., Franzke A., Gone with the bird: Late tertiary and quaternary intercontinental long-distance dispersal and allopolyploidization in plants. Syst. Biodivers. 5, 255–260 (2007).
Renner S. S., Plant dispersal across the tropical Atlantic by wind and sea currents. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, S23–S33 (2004).
Williamson M., Fitter A., The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77, 1661–1666 (1996).
Jeschke J. M., Strayer D. L., Carpenter S. R., Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 7198–7202 (2005). PubMed PMC
Stohlgren T. J., et al. ., Widespread plant species: Natives versus aliens in our changing world. Biol. Invasions 13, 1931–1944 (2011).
Sax D. F., et al. ., Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 465–471 (2007). PubMed
Blackburn T. M., et al. ., A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 333–339 (2011). PubMed
Colautti R. I., MacIsaac H. J., A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers. Distrib. 10, 135–141 (2004).
Catford J. A., et al. ., Disentangling the four demographic dimensions of species invasiveness. J. Ecol. 104, 1745–1758 (2016).
Sofaer H. R., Jarnevich C. S., Pearse I. S., The relationship between invader abundance and impact. Ecosphere 9, e02415 (2018).
Rabinowitz D., “Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles” in Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, M. E. Soulé, Ed. (Sinauer Associates, 1986), pp. 182–204.
Rabinowitz D., “Seven forms of rarity” in Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation, H. Synge, Ed. (Wiley, 1981), pp. 205–217.
Carboni M.et al. .; DivGrass Consortium , What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: Traits, introduction history and filtering processes. Ecol. Lett. 19, 219–229 (2016). PubMed PMC
van Kleunen M., Bossdorf O., Dawson W., The ecology and evolution of alien plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 25–47 (2018).
Gaston K. J., “What is rarity?” in Rarity, Population and Community Biology Series, Gaston K. J., Ed. (Springer Netherlands, 1994), pp. 1–21.
Slatyer R. A., Hirst M., Sexton J. P., Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: A general ecological pattern. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1104–1114 (2013). PubMed
Brown J. H., On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124, 255–279 (1984).
Gaston K. J., The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos 76, 211–220 (1996).
Gaston K. J., et al. ., Abundance–occupancy relationships. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 39–59 (2000).
Rapoport E. H., Borioli G., Monjeau J. A., Puntieri J. E., Oviedo R. D., The design of nature reserves: A simulation trial for assessing specific conservation value. Biol. Conserv. 37, 269–290 (1986).
Gotelli N. J., Simberloff D., The distribution and abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: A test of the core-satellite hypothesis. Am. Nat. 130, 18–35 (1987).
Collins S. L., Glenn S. M., A hierarchical analysis of species’ abundance patterns in grassland vegetation. Am. Nat. 135, 633–648 (1990).
Boeken B., Shachak M., The dynamics of abundance and incidence of annual plant species during colonization in a desert. Ecography 21, 63–73 (1998).
Thompson K., Hodgson J. G., Gaston K. J., Abundance–range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England. J. Ecol. 86, 439–448 (1998).
Passy S. I., A hierarchical theory of macroecology. Ecol. Lett. 15, 923–934 (2012). PubMed
Yu J., Dobson F. S., Seven forms of rarity in mammals. J. Biogeogr. 27, 131–139 (2000).
Sporbert M., et al. ., Testing macroecological abundance patterns: The relationship between local abundance and range size, range position and climatic suitability among European vascular plants. J. Biogeogr. 47, 2210–2222 (2020).
Crooks J. A., Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12, 316–329 (2005).
Rouget M., et al. ., Invasion debt–Quantifying future biological invasions. Divers. Distrib. 22, 445–456 (2016).
Svenning J.-C., Sandel B., Disequilibrium vegetation dynamics under future climate change. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1266–1286 (2013). PubMed
Pyšek P., Richardson D. M., “Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand?” in Biological Invasions, Ecological Studies, Nentwig W., Ed. (Springer, 2007), pp. 97–125.
van Kleunen M., Weber E., Fischer M., A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 235–245 (2010). PubMed
Palma E., Vesk P. A., White M., Baumgartner J. B., Catford J. A., Plant functional traits reflect different dimensions of species invasiveness. Ecology 102, e03317 (2021). PubMed
Liao H., et al. ., Different functional characteristics can explain different dimensions of plant invasion success. J. Ecol. 109, 1524–1536 (2021).
Díaz S., et al. ., The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016). PubMed
Wright I. J., et al. ., The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827 (2004). PubMed
Chave J., et al. ., Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12, 351–366 (2009). PubMed
Dullinger S., et al. ., Post-glacial migration lag restricts range filling of plants in the European Alps. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 829–840 (2012).
Estrada A., et al. ., Species’ intrinsic traits inform their range limitations and vulnerability under environmental change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 849–858 (2015).
Enders M., et al. ., A conceptual map of invasion biology: Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 978–991 (2020). PubMed PMC
Procheş Ş., Wilson J. R. U., Richardson D. M., Rejmánek M., Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 5–10 (2008).
Thuiller W., et al. ., Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: A quest for evidence. Divers. Distrib. 16, 461–475 (2010).
Elton C. S., The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (University of Chicago Press, 1958).
Keane R. M., Crawley M. J., Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 164–170 (2002).
Mlynarek J. J., et al. ., Enemy escape: A general phenomenon in a fragmented literature? Facets 2, 1015–1044 (2017).
Tomiolo S., Ward D., Species migrations and range shifts: A synthesis of causes and consequences. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 33, 62–77 (2018).
Mueller J. M., Hellmann J. J., An assessment of invasion risk from assisted migration. Conserv. Biol. 22, 562–567 (2008). PubMed
Chytrý M., et al. ., European vegetation archive (EVA): An integrated database of European vegetation plots. Appl. Veg. Sci. 19, 173–180 (2016).
van Kleunen M., et al. ., The global naturalized alien flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100, e02542 (2019). PubMed
Euro+Med , Euro+Med PlantBase—The information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity (2006) (June 1, 2019).
Kattge J., et al. ., TRY–A global database of plant traits. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2905–2935 (2011).
Kattge J.et al. .; Nutrient Network , TRY plant trait database–Enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020). PubMed
Seebens H., et al. ., No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8, 14435 (2017). PubMed PMC
Bock C. E., Ricklefs R. E., Range size and local abundance of some North American songbirds: A positive correlation. Am. Nat. 122, 295–299 (1983).
Gaston K. J., “The non-independence of abundance and range size” in Rarity, Population and Community Biology Series, Gaston K. J., Ed. (Springer Netherlands, 1994), pp. 57–77.
Gaston K. J., Blackburn T. M., Gregory R. D., Greenwood J. J. D., The anatomy of the interspecific abundance–range size relationship for the British avifauna: I. Spatial patterns. Ecol. Lett. 1, 38–46 (1998).
Brown J. H., Hall C. A. S., Sibly R. M., Equal fitness paradigm explained by a trade-off between generation time and energy production rate. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 262–268 (2018). PubMed
Johnson C. N., Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance. Nature 394, 272–274 (1998).
Brown J. H., Kodric-Brown A., Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58, 445–449 (1977).
Gonzalez A., Lawton J. H., Gilbert F. S., Blackburn T. M., Evans-Freke I., Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science 281, 2045–2047 (1998). PubMed
Forcella F., Wood J. T., Colonization potentials of alien weeds are related to their “native” distributions: Implications for plant quarantine. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 50, 35–40 (1984).
Pyšek P., et al. ., The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Divers. Distrib. 15, 891–903 (2009).
Borregaard M. K., Rahbek C., Causality of the relationship between geographic distribution and species abundance. Q. Rev. Biol. 85, 3–25 (2010). PubMed
Higgins S. I., Nathan R., Cain M. L., Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84, 1945–1956 (2003).
Vargas P., Heleno R., Traveset A., Nogales M., Colonization of the Galápagos islands by plants with no specific syndromes for long-distance dispersal: A new perspective. Ecography 35, 33–43 (2012).
Holmes E. E., Wilson H. B., Running from trouble: Long-distance dispersal and the competitive coexistence of inferior species. Am. Nat. 151, 578–586 (1998). PubMed
Thomson F. J., Moles A. T., Auld T. D., Kingsford R. T., Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass. J. Ecol. 99, 1299–1307 (2011).
Timmermann A., Damgaard C., Strandberg M. T., Svenning J.-C., Pervasive early 21st-century vegetation changes across Danish semi-natural ecosystems: More losers than winners and a shift towards competitive, tall-growing species. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 21–30 (2015).
Hejda M., et al. ., Invasion success of alien plants: Do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 372–382 (2009).
Denelle P., Violle C., Munoz F., Generalist plants are more competitive and more functionally similar to each other than specialist plants: Insights from network analyses. J. Biogeogr. 47, 1922–1933 (2020).
Kalusová V., et al. ., Naturalization of European plants on other continents: The role of donor habitats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 13756–13761 (2017). PubMed PMC
Hulme P. E., Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasions: Is it all Jack? Funct. Ecol. 22, 3–7 (2008).
Pyšek P., et al. ., Naturalization of central European plants in North America: Species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time. Ecology 96, 762–774 (2015). PubMed
Dostál P., Dawson W., van Kleunen M., Keser L. H., Fischer M., Central European plant species from more productive habitats are more invasive at a global scale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 64–72 (2013).
Firn J., et al. ., Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities. Ecol. Lett. 14, 274–281 (2011). PubMed
Ricciardi A., Simberloff D., Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 248–253 (2009). PubMed
Coley P. D., Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a Lowland Tropical Forest. Ecol. Monogr. 53, 209–234 (1983).
Lind E. M., et al. ., Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: A growth-defence trade-off is the norm. Ecol. Lett. 16, 513–521 (2013). PubMed
Kunstler G., et al. ., Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition. Nature 529, 204–207 (2016). PubMed
Blumenthal D., Ecology. Interrelated causes of plant invasion. Science 310, 243–244 (2005). PubMed
Blumenthal D., Mitchell C. E., Pyšek P., Jarosík V., Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 7899–7904 (2009). PubMed PMC
Cappelli S. L., Pichon N. A., Kempel A., Allan E., Sick plants in grassland communities: A growth-defense trade-off is the main driver of fungal pathogen abundance. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1349–1359 (2020). PubMed
MacDougall A. S., Turkington R., Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86, 42–55 (2005).
Bauer J. T., Invasive species: “back-seat drivers” of ecosystem change? Biol. Invasions 14, 1295–1304 (2012).
van Kleunen M., et al. ., Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525, 100–103 (2015). PubMed
Pyšek P., et al. ., Naturalized alien flora of the world. Preslia 89, 203–274 (2017).
Brummitt R., World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), ed. 2, 2001).
Chytrý M., et al. ., EUNIS Habitat Classification: Expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats. Appl. Veg. Sci. 23, 648–675 (2020).
Leinster T., Cobbold C. A., Measuring diversity: The importance of species similarity. Ecology 93, 477–489 (2012). PubMed
Pinheiro J., Bates D., S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar; R Core Team, nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-127. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 20 May 2021.
Paradis E., Schliep K., Ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019). PubMed
Smith S. A., Brown J. W., Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018). PubMed
Heleno R., Vargas P., How do islands become green? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 518–526 (2015).
Tkalcic M., Tasic J. F., “Colour spaces: perceptual, historical and applicational background” in The IEEE Region 8 EUROCON 2003. Computer as a Tool, B. Zajc, M. Tkalčič, Eds. (IEEE, 2003), vol. 1, pp. 304–308.
