Turn Fast and Win: The Importance of Acyclic Phases in Top-Elite Female Swimmers
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
31.10.74.ng
Swiss Olympic (National Sport Association)
PubMed
34564327
PubMed Central
PMC8472918
DOI
10.3390/sports9090122
PII: sports9090122
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- analysis, biomechanics, coaching, data, training,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of start and turn performances on race times in top-elite female swimmers and provide benchmarks for all performance levels, all swimming strokes, and all race distances of the European Short-Course Championships (EC). The individual races (n = 798) of all female competitors (age: 20.6 ± 3.9 years, FINA points: 792 ± 78) were video-monitored for subsequent analysis of start and turn performances. Benchmarks were established across all competitors of each event based on the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. Start and turn performances contributed up to 27.43% and 56.37% to total race time, respectively. Mechanistic analysis revealed that the fastest swimmers had the lowest contribution of the acyclic phases to race time. Therefore, relative to their faster race times, these swimmers were even faster during starts and turns. Multiple linear regression analysis showed large effects of turn performance on 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 m race times (β = 0.616, 0.813, 0.988, 1.004, and 1.011, respectively), while the effect of start performance continuously decreased the longer the race distance. As turn performance may be the distinguishing factor in modern short-course races, benchmarks should be used to set goals and establish training guidelines depending on the targeted race time.
Department for Competitive Swimming Czech Swimming Federation 160 17 Prague Czech Republic
Department for Elite Sport Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen 2532 Magglingen Switzerland
Section for High Performance Sports Swiss Swimming Federation 3063 Bern Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Microplustiming Event 134-Women-50 m Freestyle-Final. [(accessed on 14 May 2021)]. Available online: http://glasgow2019.microplustiming.com/index.php?s=Q2hlY2tKc29uVG9Mb2FkKCdBU0YnLCAnMDAxJywgJzAwNScsICcwMDEnLCAnJywgJycsICdXb21lbsKgLcKgNTAgbSBTdGlsZSBMaWJlcm8gLSBGaW5hbCcsICdXb21lbsKgLcKgNTBtIEZyZWVzdHlsZSAtIEZpbmFsJywgJ1dvbWVuwqAtwqA1MCBtIE5hZ2UgTGlicmUgLSBGaW5hbCcpOw==&cat=&page=&spec=&bat=&td=CAL_CIS_DAY&hg=&descIT=&descEN=&descFR=&curCatSel_M_F=18:20&sport=Swimming.
Tor E., Pease D.L., Ball K.A. Comparing three underwater trajectories of the swimming start. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 2015;18:725–729. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.10.005. PubMed DOI
Gonjo T., Olstad B.H. Start and Turn Performances of Competitive Swimmers in Sprint Butterfly Swimming. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2020;19:727–734. PubMed PMC
Morais J.E., Marinho D.A., Arellano R., Barbosa T.M. Start and turn performances of elite sprinters at the 2016 European Championships in swimming. Sports Biomech. 2019;18:100–114. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1435713. PubMed DOI
Veiga S., Roig A. Underwater and surface strategies of 200 m world level swimmers. J. Sports Sci. 2016;34:766–771. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1069382. PubMed DOI
Born D.P., Kuger J., Polach M., Romann M. Start and turn performances of elite male swimmers: Benchmarks and underlying mechanims. Sports Biomech. 2021;6:1–19. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1872693. PubMed DOI
FINA Swimming and Facilities Rules. [(accessed on 4 February 2021)]. Available online: https://www.fina.org/swimming/rules and https://www.fina.org/rules/facility-rules.
Lavoie J.M., Montpetit R.R. Applied physiology of swimming. Sports Med. 1986;3:165–189. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198603030-00002. PubMed DOI
Toussaint H.M., Beek P.J. Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming. Sports Med. 1992;13:8–24. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199213010-00002. PubMed DOI
Holmer I. Swimming physiology. Ann. Physiol. Anthropol. 1992;11:269–276. doi: 10.2114/ahs1983.11.269. PubMed DOI
Toussaint H.M., Hollander A.P. Energetics of competitive swimming. Implications for training programmes. Sports Med. 1994;18:384–405. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199418060-00004. PubMed DOI
Timing S. OSB11 Starting Block. [(accessed on 28 February 2021)]. Available online: https://www.swisstiming.com/download/instruction-manuals/
Burkhardt D., Born D.P., Singh N.B., Oberhofer K., Carradori S., Sinistaj S., Lorenzetti S. Key performance indicators and leg positioning for the kick-start in competitive swimmers. Sports Biomech. 2020:1–15. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1761435. PubMed DOI
Barlow H., Halaki M., Stuelcken M., Greene A., Sinclair P.J. The effect of different kick start positions on OMEGA OSB11 blocks on free swimming time to 15m in developmental level swimmers. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2014;34:178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.02.002. PubMed DOI
Wolfrum M., Knechtle B., Rust C.A., Rosemann T., Lepers R. The effects of course length on freestyle swimming speed in elite female and male swimmers—A comparison of swimmers at national and international level. Springerplus. 2013;2:643. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-643. PubMed DOI PMC
Gonjo T., Olstad B.H. Race Analysis in Competitive Swimming: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;18:69. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010069. PubMed DOI PMC
Olstad B.H., Wathne H., Gonjo T. Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:6257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176257. PubMed DOI PMC
Morais J.E., Barbosa T.M., Forte P., Bragada J.A., Castro F.A.S., Marinho D.A. Stability analysis and prediction of pacing in elite 1500 m freestyle male swimmers. Sports Biomech. 2020:1–18. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1810749. PubMed DOI
Pollock S., Gaoua N., Johnston M.J., Cooke K., Girard O., Mileva K.N. Training Regimes and Recovery Monitoring Practices of Elite British Swimmers. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2019;18:577–585. PubMed PMC
Hopkins W. A Scale Magnitude for Effect Statistics. [(accessed on 18 June 2020)]. Available online: http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html.
Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications Ltd.; Los Angeles, CA, USA: 2013.
Nicol E., Ball K., Tor E. The biomechanics of freestyle and butterfly turn technique in elite swimmers. Sports Biomech. 2019:1–14. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1561930. PubMed DOI
Buhl C., Knechtle B., Rust C.A., Rosemann T., Lepers R. A comparison of medley and freestyle performance for national and international swimmers between 1994 and 2011. Open Access J. Sports Med. 2013;4:79–87. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S41171. PubMed DOI PMC
Bishop C., Cree J., Read P., Chavda S., Edwards M., Turner A. Strength and Conditioning for Sprint Swimming. Strength Cond. J. 2013;35:1–6. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000019. DOI
Nugent F.J., Comyns T.M., Warrington G.D. Quality versus Quantity Debate in Swimming: Perceptions and Training Practices of Expert Swimming Coaches. J. Hum. Kinet. 2017;57:147–158. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0056. PubMed DOI PMC
Trinidad A., Veiga S., Navarro E., Lorenzo A. The Transition from Underwater to Surface Swimming During the Push-off Start in Competitive Swimmers. J. Hum. Kinet. 2020;72:61–67. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0125. PubMed DOI PMC
Jones J.V., Pyne D.B., Haff G.G., Newton R.U. Comparison Between Elite and Subelite Swimmers on Dry Land and Tumble Turn Leg Extensor Force-Time Characteristics. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018;32:1762–1769. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002041. PubMed DOI
Veiga S., Cala A., Frutos P.G., Navarro E. Comparison of starts and turns of national and regional level swimmers by individualized-distance measurements. Sports Biomech. 2014;13:285–295. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2014.910265. PubMed DOI
FINA. 14th FINA World Swimming Championships (25 m) 2018. [(accessed on 23 August 2021)]. Available online: https://www.fina.org/competitions/132/14th-fina-world-swimming-championships-25m-2018/medals.
Turn Performance Variation in European Elite Short-Course Swimmers