Short-course performance variation across all race sections: How 100 and 200 m elite male swimmers progress between rounds
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37057072
PubMed Central
PMC10086268
DOI
10.3389/fspor.2023.1146711
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- competition analysis, kinematic analysis, pacing, race parameters, swimming,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: To investigate performance variation in all race sections, i.e., start, clean swimming, and turns, of elite short-course races for all swimming strokes and to determine the effect of performance variation on race results. METHODS: Comparing finalists and non-qualified swimmers, a total of 256 races of male swimmers (n = 128, age: 23.3 ± 3.1, FINA points: 876 ± 38) competing in the European short-course swimming championships were analyzed. The coefficient of variation (CV) and relative change in performance (Δ%) were used to compare intra-individual performance progression between rounds and inter-individual differences between performance levels using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: While most performance variables declined during the races (P < 0.005), performance was better maintained in 200 m compared to 100 m races, as well as in finalists compared to non-qualified swimmers. In 100 m races, Start Times improved between heats, semi-finals, and finals (P < 0.005) and contributed to the improved Split Times of Lap 1 in freestyle (P = 0.001, Δ = -1.09%), breaststroke (P < 0.001; Δ = -2.48%), and backstroke (P < 0.001; Δ = -1.72%). Swimmers increased stroke rate from heats/semi-finals to finals in freestyle (P = 0.015, Δ = 3.29%), breaststroke (P = 0.001, Δ = 6.91%), and backstroke (P = 0.005; Δ = 3.65%). Increases in stroke length and clean-swimming speed were only significant between rounds for breaststroke and backstroke (P < 0.005). In 200 m races, Total Time remained unchanged between rounds (P > 0.05), except for breaststroke (P = 0.008; CV = 0.7%; Δ = -0.59%). Start (P = 0.004; Δ = -1.72%) and Split Times (P = 0.009; Δ = -0.61%) only improved in butterfly. From the turn variables, OUT_5 m times improved towards the finals in breaststroke (P = 0.006; Δ = -1.51%) and butterfly (P = 0.016; Δ = -2.19%). No differences were observed for SR and SL, while clean-swimming speed improved between rounds in breaststroke only (P = 0.034; Δ = 0.96%). DISCUSSION: Performance of finalists progressed between rounds in 100 m but not 200 m races, most probably due to the absence of semi-finals. Progression in 100 m races was mainly attributed to improved Start and Split Times in Lap 1, while turn performances remained unchanged. Within round comparison showed higher performance maintenance in 200 m compared to 100 m events, which showed more pronounced positive pacing. Success of finalists was attributed to their overall higher performance level and superior progression between rounds.
Department for Elite Sport Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen Magglingen Switzerland
Department of Social Sciences in Kinanthropology Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc Czechia
Section for High Performance Sports Swiss Swimming Federation Bern Switzerland
Umimplavat cz Analysis and Consultation for Swimming Technique and Race Performance Prague Czechia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Mytton GJ, Archer DT, St Clair Gibson A, Thompson KG. Reliability and stability of performances in 400-m swimming and 1500-m running. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. (2014) 9(4):674–9. 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0240 PubMed DOI
Menting SGP, Elferink-Gemser MT, Huijgen BC, Hettinga FJ. Pacing in lane-based head-to-head competitions: a systematic review on swimming. J Sports Sci. (2019) 37:2287–99. 10.1080/02640414.2019.1627989 PubMed DOI
Mcgibbon KE, Pyne DB, Shephard ME, Thompson KG. Pacing in swimming: a systematic review. Sports Med. (2018) 48(7):1621–33. 10.1007/s40279-018-0901-9 PubMed DOI
Morais JE, Barbosa TM, Lopes T, Simbana-Escobar D, Marinho DA. Race analysis of the men's 50 m events at the 2021 LEN European championships. Sports Biomech. (2022):1–17. 10.1080/14763141.2022.2125430 PubMed DOI
Dormehl S, Osborough C. Effect of age, sex, and race distance on freestyle stroke parameters in subelite adolescent swimmers during competition. Pediatric Exer Sci. (2015) 27:334–44. 10.1123/pes.2014-0114 PubMed DOI
Figueiredo P, Zamparo P, Sousa A, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. An energy balance of the 200 m freestyle race. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2011) 111:767–77. 10.1007/s00421-010-1696-z PubMed DOI
Wolfrum M, Knefchtle B, Rüst CA, Roseman T, Lepers R. The effects of course length on freestyle swimming speed in elite female and male swimmers – a comparison of swimmers at national and international level. Springerplus. (2013) 2:643. 10.1186/2193-1801-2-643 PubMed DOI PMC
Arellano R, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Barbosa TM, Lopez-Contreras G, Morales-Ortiz E, Gay A, et al. Are the 50 m race segments changed from heats to finals at the 2021 European swimming championships? Front Physiol. (2022) 13:797367. 10.3389/fphys.2022.797367 PubMed DOI PMC
Cuenca-Fernández F, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Gonzalez-Ponce A, Lopez-Belmonte O, Gay A, Arellano R. Progression and variation of competitive 100 and 200 m performance at the 2021 European swimming championships. Sports Biomech. (2021):1–15. 10.1080/14763141.2021.1998591 PubMed DOI
Polach M, Brezina J, Krenik J, Born DP. A Scientific analysis of the improvement of David Popovici; how the teen set the 100 freestyle world record (Fort Lauderdale: Swimming World Magazine) (2022).
Polach M, Thiel D, Krenik J, Born DP. Swimming turn performance: the distinguishing factor in 1500 m world championship freestyle races? BMC Res Notes. (2021) 14:248. 10.1186/s13104-021-05665-x PubMed DOI PMC
Cuenca-Fernández F, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Polach M, Arellano R, Born DP. Turn performance variation in European elite short-course swimmers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19(9):5033. 10.3390/ijerph19095033 PubMed DOI PMC
Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Lopez-Belmonte O, Gay A, Cuenca-Fernandez F, Arellano R. A new model of performance classification to standardize the research results in swimming. Eur J Sport Sci. (2022):1–23. 10.1080/17461391.2022.2046174 PubMed DOI
Born DP, Kuger J, Polach M, Romann M. Start and turn performances of elite male swimmers: benchmarks and underlying mechanims. Sports Biomech. (2021):1–21. 10.1080/14763141.2021.1872693 PubMed DOI
Born DP, Kuger J, Polach M, Romann M. Turn fast and win: the importance of acyclic phases in top-elite female swimmers. Sports. (2021) 9(9):122. 10.3390/sports9090122 PubMed DOI PMC
Born DP, Romann M, Stöggl T. Start fast, swim faster, turn fastest: section analyses and normative data for individual medley. J Sports Sci Med. (2022) 21:233–44. 10.52082/jssm.2022.233 PubMed DOI PMC
Stewart AM, Hopkins WG. Consistency of swimming performance within and between competitions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2000) 32(5):997–1001. 10.1097/00005768-200005000-00018 PubMed DOI
Pyne DB, Trewin CB, Hopkins WG. Progression and variability of competitive performance of olympic swimmers. J Sports Sci. (2004) 22(7):613–20. 10.1080/02640410310001655822 PubMed DOI
Arellano R, Ruíz-Teba A, Morales-Ortíz E, Gay A, Cuenca-Fernandez F, Llorente-Ferrón F, et al. Short course 50 m male freestyle performance comparison between national and regional Spanish swimmers. ISBS Proceedings Archive. (2018) 36(1):139.
Vantorre J, Chollet D, Seifert L. Biomechanical analysis of the swim-start: a review. J Sports Sci Med. (2014) 13(2):223–31. PubMed PMC
Sánchez L, Arellano R, Cuenca-Fernández F. Analysis and influence of the underwater phase of breaststroke on short-course 50 and 100 m performance. Intl J Perform Anal Sport. (2021) 21:307–23. 10.1080/24748668.2021.1885838 DOI
Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Neiva HP, Silva AJ, Morais JE. Comparison of the start, turn and finish performance of elite swimmers in 100 m and 200 m races. J Sports Sci Med. (2020) 19(2):397. PubMed PMC
Papic C, Andersen J, Naemi R, Hodierne R, Sanders RH. Augmented feedback can change body shape to improve glide efficiency in swimming. Sports Biomech. (2021):1–20. 10.1080/14763141.2021.1900355 PubMed DOI
Craig AB, Pendergast DR. Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports. (1979) 11(3):278–83. PubMed
Barbosa TM, Bragada JA, Reis VM, Marinho DA, Carvalho C, Silva AJ. Energetics and biomechanics as determining factors of swimming performance: updating the state of the art. J Sci Med Sport. (2010) 13(2):262–9. 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.01.003 PubMed DOI
Escobar DS, Hellard P, Pyne DB, Seifert L. Functional role of movement and performance variability: adaptation of freestyle swimmers to competitive swimming constraints. J Appl Biomech. (2018) 34(1):53–64. 10.1123/jab.2017-0022 PubMed DOI
Cuenca-Fernández F, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Arellano Colomina R. Strength-velocity relationship of resisted swimming: a regression analysis. ISBS Proceedings Archive. (2020) 38(1):99.
Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Gay A, Cuenca-Fernández F, López-Belmonte Ó, Morales-Ortíz E, López-Contreras G, et al. The relationship between tethered swimming, anaerobic critical velocity, dry-land strength, and swimming performance. Int J Perform Anal Sport. (2022) 22(3):407–21. 10.1080/24748668.2022.2072561 DOI
Mason B, Cossor J. Swim turn performances at the Sydney 2000 Olympic games. In: Blackwell JR, Sanders R, editors. Proceedings of swim sessions: XIX international symposium on biomechanics in sports. San Francisco, CA: International Society of Biomechanics in Sports; (2001). p. 59–65.
Veiga S, Roig A. Effect of the starting and turning performances on the subsequent swimming parameters of elite swimmers. Sports Biomech. (2017) 16(1):34–44. 10.1080/14763141.2016.1179782 PubMed DOI
García-Hermoso A, Saavedra JM, Arellano R, Navarro F. Relationship between swim start wall contact time and final performance in backstroke events in international swimming championships. Int J Perf Anal Sport. (2017) 17(3):232–43. 10.1080/24748668.2017.1331573 DOI
Veiga S, Cala A, Frutos PG, Navarro E. Kinematical comparison of the 200 m backstroke turns between national and regional level swimmers. J Sport Sci Med. (2013) 12(4):730. PubMed PMC
Gonjo T, Olstad BH. Start and turn performances of competitive swimmers in sprint butterfly swimming. J Sports Sci Med. (2020) 19(4):727. PubMed PMC
Veiga S, Roig A. Underwater and surface strategies of 200 m world level swimmers. J Sports Sci. (2016) 34(8):766–71. 10.1080/02640414.2015.1069382 PubMed DOI
Crowley E, Harrison AJ, Lyons M. The impact of resistance training on swimming performance: a systematic review. Sports Med. (2017) 47:2285–307. 10.1007/s40279-017-0730-2 PubMed DOI
López-Belmonte Ó, Gay A, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Cuenca-Fernández F, González-Ponce Á, Arellano R. Pacing profiles, variability and progression in 400, 800 and 1500-m freestyle swimming events at the 2021 European championship. Int J Perf Anal Sport. (2022) 22:90–101. 10.1080/24748668.2021.2010318 DOI