Time in remission as an alternative outcome measure for rheumatoid arthritis: a 10-year prospective study of 2618 new users of anti-TNF
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
34599798
DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/keab737
PII: 6380444
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Czech Republic, RA, anti-TNF, biological therapy, disease activity, interpolation, outcome measure, prediction, registry, remission,
- MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents * therapeutic use MeSH
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care MeSH
- Remission Induction MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid * drug therapy MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antirheumatic Agents * MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Achieving targeted disease activity (DA) is the primary therapeutic strategy in RA. Point measurements of DA are done at out-patient visits, however true DA between visits remains unobserved. This study sought to describe and validate a new outcome measure, i.e. time in remission (TIR). METHODS: Patients were enrolled in the Czech ATTRA-RA registry. TIR was calculated using linear interpolation of the DAS28-ESR determined at outpatient visits. Correlation coefficients were computed between TIR and DAS28-CRP, HAQ, Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA). Using logistic regression, TIR was used as a predictor of remission (SDAI ≤3.3) and non-disability (HAQ <0.5). The predictive value of TIR was compared with point and sustained remission using the cross-validated area under receiver-operating curves. RESULTS: Since 2010, 2618 RA patients started anti-TNF therapy and were followed until 2020 or until treatment discontinuation. During the first 6 months of therapy, 56% of patients had no remission (TIR = 0), and 22% of patients reached sustained remission (TIR = 1), while 22% of patients had point remissions with 0 < TIR < 1. EULAR good responders and moderate/non-responders spent 64 ± 42% and 6 ± 18% of time in remission, respectively. The mean TIR grew during the follow-up and was correlated with DAS28-CRP, SDAI, HAQ, PGA, and PhGA (P < 0.0001). TIR at 3 and 6 months predicted remission (SDAI ≤3.3) and non-disability (HAQ <0.5) at 13 and 19 months better than point or sustained remission. CONCLUSIONS: TIR is an intuitive way of estimating unobserved DA between scheduled visits; its calculation only requires two consecutive DA values (https://www.medevio.cz/tir-calculator/). TIR is a valid predictor of RA outcomes.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague
Department of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org