Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing - Part 2: Analysis, reporting, and quality assessment
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
35857103
PubMed Central
PMC9297263
DOI
10.1007/s00428-022-03344-1
PII: 10.1007/s00428-022-03344-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Best practice, External quality assessment, Liquid biopsy, Molecular diagnostics, Next-generation sequencing, Non-small cell lung carcinoma,
- MeSH
- biologické markery MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- nádory plic * diagnóza farmakoterapie genetika MeSH
- nemalobuněčný karcinom plic * diagnóza genetika patologie MeSH
- vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Názvy látek
- biologické markery MeSH
The diagnostic work-up for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires biomarker testing to guide therapy choices. This article is the second of a two-part series. In Part 1, we summarised evidence-based recommendations for obtaining and processing small specimen samples (i.e. pre-analytical steps) from patients with advanced NSCLC. Here, in Part 2, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to analytical steps of biomarker testing (and associated reporting and quality assessment) of small specimen samples in NSCLC. As the number of biomarkers for actionable (genetic) targets and approved targeted therapies continues to increase, simultaneous testing of multiple actionable oncogenic drivers using next-generation sequencing (NGS) becomes imperative, as set forth in European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines. This is particularly relevant in advanced NSCLC, where tissue specimens are typically limited and NGS may help avoid tissue exhaustion compared with sequential biomarker testing. Despite guideline recommendations, significant discrepancies in access to NGS persist across Europe, primarily due to reimbursement constraints. The use of increasingly complex testing methods also has implications for the reporting of results. Molecular testing reports should include clinical interpretation with additional commentary on sample adequacy as appropriate. Molecular tumour boards are recommended to facilitate the interpretation of complex genetic information arising from NGS, and to collaboratively determine the optimal treatment for patients with NSCLC. Finally, whichever testing modality is employed, it is essential that adequate internal and external validation and quality control measures are implemented.
Amgen BV Breda the Netherlands
Amgen GmbH Rotkreuz Switzerland
Amsterdam University Medical Center VU Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
Department of Pathology Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen UK
Department of Pathology Charles University Medical Faculty Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Medical Oncology Department Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal University of Alcalá Madrid Spain
University Clermont Auvergne INSERM U1240 Centre Jean Perrin Clermont Ferrand France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (2020) Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO cinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Available from: https://www.esmo.org/content/download/347819/6934778/1/ESMO-CPG-mNSCLC-15SEPT2020.pdf. (cited 2021 25 November)
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated molecular testing guideline for the selection of lung cancer patients for treatment with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2018;20:129–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.004. PubMed DOI
Penault-Llorca F, Kerr K, Garrido P, Thunnissen E, Dequeker E, Normanno N, Patton S, Fairley J, Kapp J, de Ridder D, Ryška A, Moch H (2022) Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing — Part 1: Tissue collection and management. Virchows Archiv. 10.1007/s00428-022-03343-2 PubMed PMC
Hardtstock F, Myers D, Li T, Cizova D, Maywald U, Wilke T, Griesinger F. Real-world treatment and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a German retrospective data analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:260. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06738-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Lester J, Escriu C, Khan S, Hudson E, Mansy T, Conn A, Chan S, Powell C, Brock J, Conibear J, Nelless L, Nayar V, Zhuo X, Durand A, Amin A, Martin P, Zhang X, Pawar V. Retrospective analysis of real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer starting first-line systemic therapy in the United Kingdom. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:515. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08096-w. PubMed DOI PMC
Tan L, Alexander M, Officer A, MacManus M, Mileshkin L, Jennens R, Herath D, de Boer R, Fox SB, Ball D, Solomon B. Survival difference according to mutation status in a prospective cohort study of Australian patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Intern Med J. 2018;48:37–44. doi: 10.1111/imj.13491. PubMed DOI
Della Corte CM, Morgillo F. Rethinking treatment for RET-altered lung and thyroid cancers: selpercatinib approval by the EMA. ESMO Open. 2021;6:100041. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100041. PubMed DOI PMC
Kerr KM, Bibeau F, Thunnissen E, Botling J, Ryška A, Wolf J, Öhrling K, Burdon P, Malapelle U, Büttner R. The evolving landscape of biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer in Europe. Lung Cancer. 2021;154:161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.026. PubMed DOI
Amgen (2022) European Commission approves Lumykras (sotorasib) for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer [press release]. Available from: https://www.amgen.com/newsroom/press-releases/2022/01/european-commission-approves-lumykras-sotorasib-for-patients-with-kras-g12cmutated-advanced-nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer. (cited 2022 07 February)
Mosele F, Remon J, Mateo J, Westphalen CB, Barlesi F, Lolkema MP, Normanno N, Scarpa A, Robson M, Meric-Bernstam F, Wagle N, Stenzinger A, Bonastre J, Bayle A, Michiels S, Bieche I, Rouleau E, Jezdic S, Douillard JY, Reis-Filho JS, Dienstmann R, Andre F. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1491–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.014. PubMed DOI
de Ruiter EJ, Mulder FJ, Koomen BM, Speel EJ, van den Hout M, de Roest RH, Bloemena E, Devriese LA, Willems SM. Comparison of three PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1125–1132. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0644-7. PubMed DOI
Salgado R, Bellizzi AM, Rimm D, Bartlett JMS, Nielsen T, Holger M, Laenkholm AV, Quinn C, Cserni G, Cunha IW, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Cree I. How current assay approval policies are leading to unintended imprecision medicine. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1399–1401. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30592-1. PubMed DOI
Kim H, Chung J-H. PD-L1 Testing in non-small cell lung cancer: past, present, and future. J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53:199–206. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.04.24. PubMed DOI PMC
Thunnissen E. How to validate predictive immunohistochemistry testing in pathology? A practical approach exploiting the heterogeneity of programmed death ligand-1 present in non–small cell lung cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;143:11–12. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0410-ED. PubMed DOI
Thunnissen E, Weynand B, Udovicic-Gagula D, Brcic L, Szolkowska M, Hofman P, Smojver-Jezek S, Anttila S, Calabrese F, Kern I, Skov B, Perner S, Dale VG, Eri Z, Haragan A, Leonte D, Carvallo L, Prince SS, Nicholson S, Sansano I, Ryska A. Lung cancer biomarker testing: perspective from Europe. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9:887–897. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.04.07. PubMed DOI PMC
Pisapia P, Pepe F, Baggi A, Barberis M, Galvano A, Gristina V, Mastrilli F, Novello S, Pagni F, Pasini S, Perrone G, Righi D, Russo A, Troncone G, Malapelle U. Next generation diagnostic algorithm in non-small cell lung cancer predictive molecular pathology: the KWAY Italian multicenter cost evaluation study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;169:103525. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103525. PubMed DOI
Tan AC, Lai GGY, Tan GS, Poon SY, Doble B, Lim TH, Aung ZW, Takano A, Tan WL, Ang MK, Tan BS, Devanand A, Too CW, Gogna A, Ong BH, Koh TPT, Kanesvaran R, Ng QS, Jain A, Rajasekaran T, Lim AST, Lim WT, Toh CK, Tan EH, Lim TKH, Tan DSW. Utility of incorporating next-generation sequencing (NGS) in an Asian non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population: incremental yield of actionable alterations and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lung Cancer. 2020;139:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.022. PubMed DOI
Pennell NA, Zhou J, Hobbs B. A model comparing the value of broad next-gen sequencing (NGS)-based testing to single gene testing (SGT) in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:9529. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9529. DOI
Velizheva NP, Rechsteiner MP, Valtcheva N, Freiberger SN, Wong CE, Vrugt B, Zhong Q, Wagner U, Moch H, Hillinger S, Schmitt-Opitz I, Soltermann A, Wild PJ, Tischler V. Targeted next-generation-sequencing for reliable detection of targetable rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma—a single center retrospective study. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214:572–578. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.02.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Bruno R, Fontanini G. Next generation sequencing for gene fusion analysis in lung cancer: a literature review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10:521. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080521. PubMed DOI PMC
Heydt C, Wölwer CB, Velazquez Camacho O, Wagener-Ryczek S, Pappesch R, Siemanowski J, Rehker J, Haller F, Agaimy A, Worm K, Herold T, Pfarr N, Weichert W, Kirchner T, Jung A, Kumbrink J, Goering W, Esposito I, Buettner R, Hillmer AM, Merkelbach-Bruse S. Detection of gene fusions using targeted next-generation sequencing: a comparative evaluation. BMC Med Genomics. 2021;14:62. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00909-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Di Capua D, Bracken-Clarke D, Ronan K, Baird AM, Finn S. The liquid biopsy for lung cancer: state of the art, limitations and future developments. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:3923. doi: 10.3390/cancers13163923. PubMed DOI PMC
Radonic T, Geurts-Giele WRR, Samsom KG, Roemen G, von der Thusen JH, Thunnissen E, Meijssen IC, Sleddens H, Dinjens WNM, Boelens MC, Weijers K, Speel EJM, Finn SP, O'Brien C, van Wezel T, Cohen D, Monkhorst K, Roepman P, Dubbink HJ. RET fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis is a sensitive but highly unspecific screening method for RET fusions in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:798–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1619. PubMed DOI
Turashvili G, Yang W, McKinney S, Kalloger S, Gale N, Ng Y, Chow K, Bell L, Lorette J, Carrier M, Luk M, Aparicio S, Huntsman D, Yip S. Nucleic acid quantity and quality from paraffin blocks: defining optimal fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques. Exp Mol Pathol. 2012;92:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2011.09.013. PubMed DOI
Roche (2021) Roche receives FDA approval for VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay to identify lung cancer patients eligible for targeted treatment with LORBRENA (lorlatinib). Available from: https://diagnostics.roche.com/global/en/news-listing/2021/roche-receives-fda-approval-for-ventana-alk-d5f3-cdx-assay-to-identify-lung-cancer-patients-eligible-for-targeted-treatment-with-lorbrena-lorlatinib.html. (cited 2021 25 November)
Belli C, Penault-Llorca F, Ladanyi M, Normanno N, Scoazec JY, Lacroix L, Reis-Filho JS, Subbiah V, Gainor JF, Endris V, Repetto M, Drilon A, Scarpa A, André F, Douillard JY, Curigliano G. ESMO recommendations on the standard methods to detect RET fusions and mutations in daily practice and clinical research. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.021. PubMed DOI
van der Wekken AJ, Pelgrim R, Hart Nt, Werner N, Mastik MF, Hendriks L, van der Heijden E, Looijen-Salamon M, de Langen AJ, Staal-van den Brekel J, Riemersma S, van den Borne BE, Speel EJM, Dingemans AC, Hiltermann TJN, van den Berg A, Timens W, Schuuring E, Groen HJM. Dichotomous ALK-IHC is a better predictor for ALK inhibition outcome than traditional ALK-FISH in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4251–4258. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-16-1631. PubMed DOI
Mok T, Peters S, Camidge DR, Noé J, Gadgeel S, Ou S-HI, Kim D-W, Konopa K, Pozzi E, Liu T, Loftin IR, Williams C, Shaw AT. Outcomes according to ALK status determined by central immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC enrolled in the phase 3 ALEX study. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.007. PubMed DOI
Malapelle U, Tiseo M, Vivancos A, Kapp J, Serrano MJ, Tiemann M. Liquid biopsy for biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer: a European perspective. J Mol Pathol. 2021;2:255–273. doi: 10.3390/jmp2030022. DOI
Russo A, Incorvaia L, Del Re M, Malapelle U, Capoluongo E, Gristina V, Castiglia M, Danesi R, Fassan M, Giuffre G, Gori S, Marchetti A, Normanno N, Pinto C, Rossi G, Santini D, Sartore-Bianchi A, Silvestris N, Tagliaferri P, Troncone G, Cinieri S, Beretta GD. The molecular profiling of solid tumors by liquid biopsy: a position paper of the AIOM-SIAPEC-IAP-SIBioC-SIC-SIF Italian Scientific Societies. ESMO Open. 2021;6:100164. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100164. PubMed DOI PMC
Li YS, Jiang BY, Yang JJ, Zhang XC, Zhang Z, Ye JY, Zhong WZ, Tu HY, Chen HJ, Wang Z, Xu CR, Wang BC, Du HJ, Chuai S, Han-Zhang H, Su J, Zhou Q, Yang XN, Guo WB, Yan HH, Liu YH, Yan LX, Huang B, Zheng MM, Wu YL. Unique genetic profiles from cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA in leptomeningeal metastases of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a new medium of liquid biopsy. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:945–952. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy009. PubMed DOI
Liu Y, Yang S, Zhao J, He Z, Ma J, Guo Y, Wang W, Yoshizawa A, Prelaj A, Tiseo M, Normanno N, Van Schil PE, Wang Q, Yang X. Cell-free DNA from cerebrospinal fluid can be used to detect the EGFR mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma patients with central nervous system metastasis. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10:914–925. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-62. PubMed DOI PMC
Reckamp KL, Melnikova VO, Karlovich C, Sequist LV, Camidge DR, Wakelee H, Perol M, Oxnard GR, Kosco K, Croucher P, Samuelsz E, Vibat CR, Guerrero S, Geis J, Berz D, Mann E, Matheny S, Rolfe L, Raponi M, Erlander MG, Gadgeel S. A highly sensitive and quantitative test platform for detection of NSCLC EGFR mutations in urine and plasma. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1690–1700. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.05.035. PubMed DOI
Rolfo C, Mack P, Scagliotti GV, Aggarwal C, Arcila ME, Barlesi F, Bivona T, Diehn M, Dive C, Dziadziuszko R, Leighl N, Malapelle U, Mok T, Peled N, Raez LE, Sequist L, Sholl L, Swanton C, Abbosh C, Tan D, Wakelee H, Wistuba I, Bunn R, Freeman-Daily J, Wynes M, Belani C, Mitsudomi T, Gandara D. Liquid biopsy for advanced NSCLC: a consensus statement from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:1647–1662. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.017. PubMed DOI
Larson MH, Pan W, Kim HJ, Mauntz RE, Stuart SM, Pimentel M, Zhou Y, Knudsgaard P, Demas V, Aravanis AM, Jamshidi A. A comprehensive characterization of the cell-free transcriptome reveals tissue- and subtype-specific biomarkers for cancer detection. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2357. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22444-1. PubMed DOI PMC
International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) (2020) IASLC atlas of diagnostic immunohistochemistry. Available from: https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/fonteva-customer-media/00D3i000000D3mbEAC/TRGNDBDv_IASLC_Atlas_2020_Interactive_pdf. (cited 2021 24 November)
Pisapia P, Pepe F, Sgariglia R, Nacchio M, Russo G, Conticelli F, Girolami I, Eccher A, Bellevicine C, Vigliar E, Malapelle U, Troncone G. Next generation sequencing in cytology. Cytopathology. 2021;32:588–595. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12974. PubMed DOI PMC
Scarpa A, Sikora K, Fassan M, Rachiglio AM, Cappellesso R, Antonello D, Amato E, Mafficini A, Lambiase M, Esposito C, Bria E, Simonato F, Scardoni M, Turri G, Chilosi M, Tortora G, Fassina A, Normanno N. Molecular typing of lung adenocarcinoma on cytological samples using a multigene next generation sequencing panel. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e80478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080478. PubMed DOI PMC
Dietel M, Bubendorf L, Dingemans AM, Dooms C, Elmberger G, Garcia RC, Kerr KM, Lim E, Lopez-Rios F, Thunnissen E, Van Schil PE, von Laffert M. Diagnostic procedures for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): recommendations of the European Expert Group. Thorax. 2016;71:177–184. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206677. PubMed DOI PMC
Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, Kulkarni S, Lindeman NI, Roy S, Tsimberidou AM, Vnencak-Jones CL, Wolff DJ, Younes A, Nikiforova MN. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, american society of clinical oncology, and college of american pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19:4–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Mateo J, Chakravarty D, Dienstmann R, Jezdic S, Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N, Ng CKY, Bedard PL, Tortora G, Douillard JY, Van Allen EM, Schultz N, Swanton C, André F, Pusztai L. A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) Ann Oncol. 2018;29:1895–1902. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy263. PubMed DOI PMC
Tack V, Dufraing K, Deans ZC, van Krieken HJ, Dequeker EMC. The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting. Virchows Arch. 2017;471:199–207. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2108-0. PubMed DOI
Irmisch A, Bonilla X, Chevrier S, Lehmann KV, Singer F, Toussaint NC, Esposito C, Mena J, Milani ES, Casanova R, Stekhoven DJ, Wegmann R, Jacob F, Sobottka B, Goetze S, Kuipers J, Sarabia Del Castillo J, Prummer M, Tuncel MA, Menzel U, Jacobs A, Engler S, Sivapatham S, Frei AL, Gut G, Ficek J, Miglino N, Aebersold R, Bacac M, Beerenwinkel N, Beisel C, Bodenmiller B, Dummer R, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Koelzer VH, Manz MG, Moch H, Pelkmans L, Snijder B, Theocharides APA, Tolnay M, Wicki A, Wollscheid B, Rätsch G, Levesque MP. The Tumor Profiler Study: integrated, multi-omic, functional tumor profiling for clinical decision support. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:288–293. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.01.004. PubMed DOI
Dufraing K, Casteren K, Breyne J, D'Haene N, Campenhout CV, Borght SV, Zwaenepoel K, Rouleau E, Schuuring E, Thüsen J, Dequeker E (2021) Molecular pathology testing for non-small cell lung cancer: an observational study of elements currently present in request forms and result reports and the opinion of different stakeholders. Res Square [Preprint]. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-149142/v1 PubMed PMC
de Moor JS, Gray SW, Mitchell SA, Klabunde CN, Freedman AN (2020) Oncologist confidence in genomic testing and implications for using multimarker tumor panel tests in practice. JCO Precis Oncol 4:PO.19.00338. 10.1200/PO.19.00338 PubMed PMC
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2012) Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence [ISO 15189:2012(en)]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15189:ed-3:v2:en. (cited 2021 25 November)
Specchia ML, Frisicale EM, Carini E, Di Pilla A, Cappa D, Barbara A, Ricciardi W, Damiani G. The impact of tumor board on cancer care: evidence from an umbrella review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:73. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4930-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Fumagalli C, Guerini-Rocco E, Barberis M. Making the most of complexity to create opportunities: comprehensive genomic profiling and molecular tumor board for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:609. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040609. PubMed DOI PMC
Hendriks LEL, Dingemans AC, De Ruysscher DKM, Aarts MJ, Barberio L, Cornelissen R, Hartemink KJ, van den Heuvel M, Schuuring E, Smit HJM, van der Wekken AJ, Smit EF. Lung cancer in the Netherlands. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:355–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.012. PubMed DOI
Willemsen A, Krausz S, Ligtenberg MJL, Grunberg K, Groen HJM, Voest EE, Cuppen E, van Laarhoven HWM, van Herpen CML. Molecular tumour boards and molecular diagnostics for patients with cancer in the Netherlands: experiences, challenges, and aspirations. Br J Cancer. 2019;121:34–36. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0489-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Tamborero D, Dienstmann R, Rachid MH, Boekel J, Baird R, Brana I, De Petris L, Yachnin J, Massard C, Opdam FL, Schlenk R, Vernieri C, Garralda E, Masucci M, Villalobos X, Chavarria E, Europe CC, Cancer Core Europe c. Calvos F, Frohling S, Eggermont A, Apolone G, Voest EE, Caldas C, Tabernero J, Ernberg I, Rodon R, Lehtio J. Support systems to guide clinical decision-making in precision oncology: the Cancer Core Europe Molecular Tumor Board Portal. Nat Med. 2020;26:992–994. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0969-2. PubMed DOI
Stevenson MM, Irwin T, Lowry T, Ahmed MZ, Walden TL, Watson M, Sutton L. Development of a virtual multidisciplinary lung cancer tumor board in a community setting. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:e77–e80. doi: 10.1200/jop.2013.000882. PubMed DOI PMC
Jackman DM, Zhang Y, Dalby C, Nguyen T, Nagle J, Lydon CA, Rabin MS, McNiff KK, Fraile B, Jacobson JO. Cost and survival analysis before and after implementation of Dana-Farber clinical pathways for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13:e346–e352. doi: 10.1200/jop.2017.021741. PubMed DOI
Dufraing K, Fenizia F, Torlakovic E, Wolstenholme N, Deans ZC, Rouleau E, Vyberg M, Parry S, Schuuring E, Dequeker EMC, ABSL IQ Biomarker testing in oncology - requirements for organizing external quality assessment programs to improve the performance of laboratory testing: revision of an expert opinion paper on behalf of IQNPath ABSL. Virchows Arch. 2021;478:553–565. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02928-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Van Casteren K, Keppens C, Schuuring E, Deans ZC, Normanno N, Patton SJ, Dequeker EMC, International Quality Network for Pathology ct DNAWG, the European Society of Pathology Foundation A (2020) External quality assessment schemes for biomarker testing in oncology: comparison of performance between formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded-tissue and cell-free tumor DNA in plasma. J Mol Diagn 22:736-747. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.02.011 PubMed
Keppens C, Dequeker EMC, Patton SJ, Normanno N, Fenizia F, Butler R, Cheetham M, Fairley JA, Williams H, Hall JA, Schuuring E, Deans ZC, On behalf of IQNPA, International pilot external quality assessment scheme for analysis and reporting of circulating tumour DNA. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:804. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4694-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V.1.2022. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2021. All rights reserved. Accessed January 25, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way
Keppens C, Tack V, Hart N, Tembuyser L, Ryska A, Pauwels P, Zwaenepoel K, Schuuring E, Cabillic F, Tornillo L, Warth A, Weichert W, Dequeker E (2018) A stitch in time saves nine: external quality assessment rounds demonstrate improved quality of biomarker analysis in lung cancer. Oncotarget 9:20524–20538. 10.18632/oncotarget.24980 PubMed PMC
Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing - Part 1: Tissue collection and management