Abdominal wall tension increases using Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization principles in different postural positions
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Observational Study, Journal Article
PubMed
35998419
DOI
10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102655
PII: S2468-7812(22)00155-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Abdominal wall tension, Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization, Intra-abdominal pressure, Postural stabilization, Pressure sensors,
- MeSH
- Abdominal Wall * MeSH
- Abdominal Muscles MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Posture physiology MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Abdominal Oblique Muscles MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an important mechanism stabilizing the spine and trunk. IAP regulation depends on the coordination of abdominal muscles, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences in abdominal wall tension (AWT) of various postural positions, first without any correction, then after verbal and manual instructions according to Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) principles. METHODS: In a cross-sectional observational study, thirty healthy individuals (mean age = 22.73 ± 1.91 years) were fitted with two Ohmbelt sensors contralaterally above the inguinal ligament and in the upper lumbar triangle. AWT was measured during five postural positions: sitting, supine with legs raised, squat, bear and hang position. First, spontaneous AWT was measured, then again after manual and verbal instructions following DNS principles. RESULTS: AWT increased significantly with DNS instructions compared to spontaneous activation. Both sensors recorded significant increases (p < .01; Cohen's d = -1.13 to -2.06) in all observed postural situations. The increase in activity occurred simultaneously on both sensors, with no significant differences noted in pressure increases between the sensors. The greatest activation for both sensors occurred in the bear position. Significant increases in activity were identified for both sensors in the supine leg raise position and in the bear position compared to spontaneous activation in sitting (p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences (for both sensors) between women and men in any position. CONCLUSION: The amount of AWT significantly increases after verbal and manual instructions according to DNS. The greatest abdominal wall activation was achieved in the bear position.
References provided by Crossref.org