Odds-ratio network for postoperative factors revealing differences in the 2-year longitudinal pattern of satisfaction between women and men after total knee arthroplasty

. 2022 Oct 19 ; 12 (1) : 17470. [epub] 20221019

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid36261570
Odkazy

PubMed 36261570
PubMed Central PMC9581980
DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-21541-5
PII: 10.1038/s41598-022-21541-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Timely and accurate assessments of the factors influencing satisfaction, a key indicator of success in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), may help improve TKA outcomes. Here we performed the longitudinal trend analysis of relation between satisfaction and 12 postoperative factors, which positively or negatively influence the patient satisfaction 2 years after TKA. In a real-world registry cohort (women/men: 1121/650), we showed similarities and differences between women and men in the contribution of postoperative factors to satisfaction 2 years after TKA as assessed by odds-ratio-similarity network. In men, the strongest negative factors were pain and complications, followed by mechanical problems. In women, the strongest negative factors were the pain and knee instability, followed by other mechanical problems, complications and low levels of sports activity. In both sexes, physical activity and the Knee Society Score (general and functional) influenced positively satisfaction; long-distance walking was associated with satisfaction only in women. A trend analysis revealed a reduction in the strength of satisfaction-related factors over 2 years of check-ups, particularly in women. Our study demonstrates that the key check-up for assessing the evolution of satisfaction in the 2 years after TKA was at 3 months in both sexes.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature. J. Arthroplasty. 2017;32:3854–3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. PubMed DOI

Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Cornell CN, Padgett DE. Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: A systematic review. HSS J. 2018;14:192–201. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Erivan R, Jacquet C, Villatte G, Ollivier M, Paprosky W. Epidemiology of painful knee after total knee arthroplasty in a tertiary care center: Assessment by decision tree. Knee. 2020;27:1049–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.010. PubMed DOI

Wylde V, Beswick A, Bruce J, Blom A, Howells N, Gooberman-Hill R. Chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3:461–470. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180004. PubMed DOI PMC

Hafkamp FJ, Gosens T, de Vries J, den Oudsten BL. Do dissatisfied patients have unrealistic expectations? A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis in knee and hip arthroplasty patients. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5:226–240. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190015. PubMed DOI PMC

Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2018;100:1455–1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617. PubMed DOI

Khanna K, Diab M. Patient satisfaction: Inception, impact, and correlation with outcomes. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2019;101:e115. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01499. PubMed DOI

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1998;80:63–69. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.0800063. PubMed DOI

Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, Hjollund NH. Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ. 2019;364:k5267. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5267. PubMed DOI

Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: A report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop. Scand. 2000;71:262–267. doi: 10.1080/000164700317411852. PubMed DOI

Nakano N, Shoman H, Olavarria F, Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Khanduja V. Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review. Int. Orthop. 2020;44:1971–2007. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Young-Shand KL, Dunbar MJ, Laende EK, Mills Flemming JE, Astephen Wilson JL. Early identification of patient satisfaction two years after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2021;36:2473–2479. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.057. PubMed DOI

Pronk Y, Peters M, Brinkman JM. Is patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty predictable using patient characteristics and preoperative patient-reported outcomes? J. Arthroplasty. 2021;36:2458–2465. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.064. PubMed DOI

Gallo J, Kriegova E, Kudelka M, Lostak J, Radvansky M. Gender differences in contribution of smoking, low physical activity, and high BMI to increased risk of early reoperation after TKA. J. Arthroplasty. 2020;35:1545–1557. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.056. PubMed DOI

Joshanloo M, Jovanovic V. The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: Analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Arch. Womens Ment. Health. 2020;23:331–338. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w. PubMed DOI

Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989;248:13–14. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004. PubMed DOI

Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J. Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890–895. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90195-4. PubMed DOI

Ochodkova, E., Zehnalova, S. & Kudelka, M. Graph construction based on local representativeness. In 23rd International Conference, COCOON, Computing and Combinatorics (ed Cao, Y. C. J.). Springer (2017).

Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Savino MM, Amenta P. Determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review. Perspect. Public Health. 2017;137:89–101. doi: 10.1177/1757913916634136. PubMed DOI

Robertsson O, W-Dahl, A., Lidgren, L. & Sundberg, M. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register-Annual Report 2018 (Lund University, 2018).

Versluijs Y, Lemmers M, Brown LE, Gonzalez AI, Kortlever JTP, Ring D. The correlation of communication effectiveness and patient satisfaction. J. Patient Exp. 2021;8:2374373521998839. PubMed PMC

Bohm J. Two-factor theory—at the intersection of health care management and patient satisfaction. Clinicoecon. Outcomes Res. 2012;4:277–285. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S29347. PubMed DOI PMC

Lindberg MF, Miaskowski C, Rustoen T, Cooper BA, Aamodt A, Lerdal A. Preoperative risk factors associated with chronic pain profiles following total knee arthroplasty. Eur. J. Pain. 2021;25:680–692. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1703. PubMed DOI PMC

Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: Who is satisfied and who is not? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010;468:57–63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Patient satisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty: Contributing factors. Arch Bone Jt. Surg. 2021;9:379–386. PubMed PMC

Halawi MJ, Jongbloed W, Baron S, Savoy L, Williams VJ, Cote MP. Patient dissatisfaction after primary total joint arthroplasty: The patient perspective. J. Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1093–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.075. PubMed DOI

Khatib Y, Badge H, Xuan W, Naylor JM, Harris IA. Patient satisfaction and perception of success after total knee arthroplasty are more strongly associated with patient factors and complications than surgical or anaesthetic factors. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2020;28:3156–3163. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05804-9. PubMed DOI

Conner-Spady BL, Bohm E, Loucks L, Dunbar MJ, Marshall DA, Noseworthy TW. Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement. Qual. Life Res. 2020;29:705–719. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02359-7. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...