Person-centred online lifestyle coaching in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: protocol of the multicentre PanCareFollowUp lifestyle intervention feasibility study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
824982
H2020 Societal Challenges
PubMed
36527164
PubMed Central
PMC9756491
DOI
10.1186/s40814-022-01221-x
PII: 10.1186/s40814-022-01221-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors, Coaching, Diet, Feasibility, Lifestyle, Motivational interviewing, Person-centred care, Physical activity, Screen-to-screen, eHealth,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary habits are known to be disadvantageous for the development of late adverse effects in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. To make interventions, aimed at improving lifestyle, fit into the daily life of survivors, interventions should be designed and delivered in a person-centred way with a limited time burden. As part of the European PanCareFollowUp project, an eHealth intervention was developed to support sustainable changes to physical activity levels and/or diet of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. This feasibility study aims to gain insight into the feasibility and potential effect sizes of the PanCareFollowUp lifestyle intervention. METHODS: The PanCareFollowUp lifestyle intervention consists of person-centred 3-6 screen-to-screen sessions with a certified lifestyle coach. The intervention will be evaluated with a single-arm pre-post feasibility study conducted at two survivorship care clinics in the Netherlands. A total of 60 participants who are (i) diagnosed with cancer <25 years, (ii) ≥ 5 years post-treatment, (iii) aged 16-55 years, and (iv) have a low physical activity level and/or unhealthy dietary intake manifested by overweight will be recruited. Using reports, hospital records, and questionnaires for survivors, coaches, and late effect doctors, feasibility will be based on (i) adherence to intervention, (ii) acceptability, (iii) practicality, (iv) integration/implementation, (v) demand, and (vi) attrition. The potential effect sizes of the intervention will be explored by determining the percentage of survivors that reach the personalized lifestyle goals that were set with the coach. Physical activity level, dietary intake, BMI, general self-efficacy, self-management, and motivation level will be assessed at three time points with questionnaires, reports, and/or an accelerometer. DISCUSSION: Data of this study will be gathered to assess the feasibility and potential effect sizes. This will allow for further intervention refinement as needed as well as to inform a future large-scale intervention study and a manual for implementation at other centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) number: NL8932 (ICTRP Search Portal (who.int)). Registered on September 29, 2020.
PanCare Jacobus Bellamylaan 16 1401 AZ Bussum the Netherlands
Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology Heidelberglaan 25 3584 CS Utrecht the Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. PubMed DOI
Miller KD, et al. Cancer survivorship and models of survivorship care: a review. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;38(6):627–633. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000153. PubMed DOI
Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(10):1996–2005. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0729. PubMed DOI PMC
Trama A, et al. Is the cancer survival improvement in European and American adolescent and young adults still lagging behind that in children? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(1):e27407. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27407. PubMed DOI
Miller KD, et al. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(6):443–459. doi: 10.3322/caac.21637. PubMed DOI
Vassal G, et al. The SIOPE strategic plan: a European cancer plan for children and adolescents. J Cancer Policy. 2016;8:17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2016.03.007. DOI
Geenen MM, et al. Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA. 2007;297(24):2705–2715. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2705. PubMed DOI
Hudson MM, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2371–2381. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6296. PubMed DOI PMC
Oeffinger KC, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1572–1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa060185. PubMed DOI
Woodward E, et al. Late effects in survivors of teenage and young adult cancer: does age matter? Ann Oncol. 2011;22(12):2561–2568. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr044. PubMed DOI
Jones LW, et al. Exercise and risk of major cardiovascular events in adult survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(32):3643–3650. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7511. PubMed DOI PMC
Slater ME, et al. Physical activity, fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors in adult survivors of childhood cancer with a history of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(7):1278–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.007. PubMed DOI PMC
Smith WA, et al. Lifestyle and metabolic syndrome in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study. Cancer. 2014;120(17):2742–2750. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28670. PubMed DOI PMC
Schindera C, et al. Physical fitness and modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the SURfit study. Cancer. 2021;127(10):1690–1698. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33351. PubMed DOI
Tonorezos ES, et al. Contribution of diet and physical activity to metabolic parameters among survivors of childhood leukemia. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(2):313–321. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0116-6. PubMed DOI PMC
van Kalsbeek RJ, et al. European PanCareFollowUp recommendations for surveillance of late effects of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2021;154:316–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.004. PubMed DOI
Badr H, et al. Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(4):523–534. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0289-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Robien K, et al. Poor adherence to dietary guidelines among adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008;30(11):815–822. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31817e4ad9. PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang FF, et al. Do childhood cancer survivors meet the diet and physical activity guidelines? A review of guidelines and literature. Int J Child Health Nutr. 2012;1(1):44–58. PubMed PMC
Mizrahi D, et al. How physically active do Australian and new Zealander childhood cancer survivors perceive themselves? A report from the ANZCHOG survivorship study. Complement Ther Med. 2019;44:196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.04.020. PubMed DOI
Brown MC, et al. Childhood cancer survivors’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence using the theoretical domains framework. Health Psychol Rev. 2022:1–24. PubMed
Ekman I, et al. Person-centered care--ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10(4):248–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008. PubMed DOI
Loonen JJ, et al. Cancer survivorship care: person centered care in a multidisciplinary shared care model. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(1):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3046. PubMed DOI PMC
Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(4):351–379. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465774. PubMed DOI
Beleigoli AM, et al. Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e298. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9609. PubMed DOI PMC
Costello AG, et al. Shared care of childhood cancer survivors: a telemedicine feasibility study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6(4):535–541. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0013. PubMed DOI PMC
van Kalsbeek RJ, et al. The European multistakeholder PanCareFollowUp project: novel, person-centred survivorship care to improve care quality, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and accessibility for cancer survivors and caregivers. Eur J Cancer. 2021;153:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.030. PubMed DOI
Chan AW, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. PubMed DOI PMC
Hoffmann TC, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. PubMed DOI
Gale J. HealthChange® methodology for patient-centred care and behaviour change support. Health Change Australia; 2014.
World Health Organisation . Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2018. PubMed
Cleland CL, et al. Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1255. PubMed DOI PMC
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2013; Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/2011-2012/PAQ_G.htm.
Craig P, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010. PubMed DOI
Bouwman E, et al. Nurse-led video-coaching interventions in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (REVIVER): a protocol for mixed methods feasibility research. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:150. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0535-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Michie S, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. PubMed DOI
Carey RN, et al. Behavior change techniques and their mechanisms of action: a synthesis of links described in published intervention literature. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(8):693–707. PubMed PMC
Prochaska JO, D.C. C.C . The transtheoretical approach. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried MR, editors. Handbook of psychotherpay integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 147–171.
Bowen DJ, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Wendel-Vos GC, et al. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1163–1169. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00220-8. PubMed DOI
Schneider PL, Crouter S, Bassett DR. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(2):331–335. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113486.60548.E9. PubMed DOI
van Vugt M. Project Verslag Eettesten: Campagne 1999 [project report eating tests: campaign] Den Haag: Voedingscentrum; 1999.
Van Vugt M, Knoppert J. Een krasfolder geeft inzicht in het voedingsgedrag [a scratch leaflet gives insight in eating behaviour] Voeding nu. 1999;5:30–31.
Horiuchi S, et al. Validity of the six stages of change for exercise. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(4):518–527. doi: 10.1177/1359105312437262. PubMed DOI
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor: NFER-NELSON; 1995.
Scholz U, et al. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2002;18(30):242–251. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242. DOI
Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. Aust J Psychol. 2005;139(5):439–457. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457. PubMed DOI
Eikelenboom N, et al. Implementation of personalized self-management support using the self-management screening questionnaire SeMaS; a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2013;14:336. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-336. PubMed DOI PMC
Eikelenboom N, et al. Validation of self-management screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0381-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom clinical research network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104. PubMed DOI PMC
Thabane L, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x. PubMed DOI