Person-centred online lifestyle coaching in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: protocol of the multicentre PanCareFollowUp lifestyle intervention feasibility study

. 2022 Dec 16 ; 8 (1) : 260. [epub] 20221216

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid36527164

Grantová podpora
824982 H2020 Societal Challenges

Odkazy

PubMed 36527164
PubMed Central PMC9756491
DOI 10.1186/s40814-022-01221-x
PII: 10.1186/s40814-022-01221-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary habits are known to be disadvantageous for the development of late adverse effects in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. To make interventions, aimed at improving lifestyle, fit into the daily life of survivors, interventions should be designed and delivered in a person-centred way with a limited time burden. As part of the European PanCareFollowUp project, an eHealth intervention was developed to support sustainable changes to physical activity levels and/or diet of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. This feasibility study aims to gain insight into the feasibility and potential effect sizes of the PanCareFollowUp lifestyle intervention. METHODS: The PanCareFollowUp lifestyle intervention consists of person-centred 3-6 screen-to-screen sessions with a certified lifestyle coach. The intervention will be evaluated with a single-arm pre-post feasibility study conducted at two survivorship care clinics in the Netherlands. A total of 60 participants who are (i) diagnosed with cancer <25 years, (ii) ≥ 5 years post-treatment, (iii) aged 16-55 years, and (iv) have a low physical activity level and/or unhealthy dietary intake manifested by overweight will be recruited. Using reports, hospital records, and questionnaires for survivors, coaches, and late effect doctors, feasibility will be based on (i) adherence to intervention, (ii) acceptability, (iii) practicality, (iv) integration/implementation, (v) demand, and (vi) attrition. The potential effect sizes of the intervention will be explored by determining the percentage of survivors that reach the personalized lifestyle goals that were set with the coach. Physical activity level, dietary intake, BMI, general self-efficacy, self-management, and motivation level will be assessed at three time points with questionnaires, reports, and/or an accelerometer. DISCUSSION: Data of this study will be gathered to assess the feasibility and potential effect sizes. This will allow for further intervention refinement as needed as well as to inform a future large-scale intervention study and a manual for implementation at other centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) number: NL8932 (ICTRP Search Portal (who.int)). Registered on September 29, 2020.

Centre of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Radboud University Medical Centre Reinier Postlaan 4 6500 HB Nijmegen the Netherlands

Department of Haematology Radboud University Medical Centre Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10 6525 GA Nijmegen Nederland

Department of Health Technology and Services Research Technical Medical Centre University of Twente P O Box 217 7500 AE Enschede the Netherlands

Department of Paediatrics Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam UMC Meibergdreef 9 1105 AZ Amsterdam the Netherlands

Faculty of Medicine Utrecht University and Utrecht Medical Centre Universiteitsweg 98 3584 CG Utrecht the Netherlands

Great North Children's Hospital Royal Victoria Infirmary Queen Victoria Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP UK

International Clinical Research Centre St Anne's University Hospital Masaryk University Pekařská 53 656 91 Brno Czech Republic

PanCare Jacobus Bellamylaan 16 1401 AZ Bussum the Netherlands

Population Health Sciences Institute Newcastle University Ridley Building 1 Queen Victoria Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU4 UK

Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology Heidelberglaan 25 3584 CS Utrecht the Netherlands

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Radboud University Medical Centre Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10 6525 GA Nijmegen the Netherlands

Translational and Clinical Research Institute Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre Herschel Building Brewery Lane Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU UK

Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre Newcastle University Centre for Cancer Newcastle University Herschel Building Brewery Lane Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. PubMed DOI

Miller KD, et al. Cancer survivorship and models of survivorship care: a review. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;38(6):627–633. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000153. PubMed DOI

Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(10):1996–2005. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0729. PubMed DOI PMC

Trama A, et al. Is the cancer survival improvement in European and American adolescent and young adults still lagging behind that in children? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(1):e27407. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27407. PubMed DOI

Miller KD, et al. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(6):443–459. doi: 10.3322/caac.21637. PubMed DOI

Vassal G, et al. The SIOPE strategic plan: a European cancer plan for children and adolescents. J Cancer Policy. 2016;8:17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2016.03.007. DOI

Geenen MM, et al. Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA. 2007;297(24):2705–2715. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2705. PubMed DOI

Hudson MM, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2371–2381. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6296. PubMed DOI PMC

Oeffinger KC, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1572–1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa060185. PubMed DOI

Woodward E, et al. Late effects in survivors of teenage and young adult cancer: does age matter? Ann Oncol. 2011;22(12):2561–2568. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr044. PubMed DOI

Jones LW, et al. Exercise and risk of major cardiovascular events in adult survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(32):3643–3650. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7511. PubMed DOI PMC

Slater ME, et al. Physical activity, fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors in adult survivors of childhood cancer with a history of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(7):1278–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.007. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith WA, et al. Lifestyle and metabolic syndrome in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study. Cancer. 2014;120(17):2742–2750. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28670. PubMed DOI PMC

Schindera C, et al. Physical fitness and modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the SURfit study. Cancer. 2021;127(10):1690–1698. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33351. PubMed DOI

Tonorezos ES, et al. Contribution of diet and physical activity to metabolic parameters among survivors of childhood leukemia. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(2):313–321. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0116-6. PubMed DOI PMC

van Kalsbeek RJ, et al. European PanCareFollowUp recommendations for surveillance of late effects of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2021;154:316–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.004. PubMed DOI

Badr H, et al. Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(4):523–534. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0289-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Robien K, et al. Poor adherence to dietary guidelines among adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008;30(11):815–822. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31817e4ad9. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang FF, et al. Do childhood cancer survivors meet the diet and physical activity guidelines? A review of guidelines and literature. Int J Child Health Nutr. 2012;1(1):44–58. PubMed PMC

Mizrahi D, et al. How physically active do Australian and new Zealander childhood cancer survivors perceive themselves? A report from the ANZCHOG survivorship study. Complement Ther Med. 2019;44:196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.04.020. PubMed DOI

Brown MC, et al. Childhood cancer survivors’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence using the theoretical domains framework. Health Psychol Rev. 2022:1–24. PubMed

Ekman I, et al. Person-centered care--ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10(4):248–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008. PubMed DOI

Loonen JJ, et al. Cancer survivorship care: person centered care in a multidisciplinary shared care model. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(1):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3046. PubMed DOI PMC

Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(4):351–379. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465774. PubMed DOI

Beleigoli AM, et al. Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e298. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9609. PubMed DOI PMC

Costello AG, et al. Shared care of childhood cancer survivors: a telemedicine feasibility study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6(4):535–541. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0013. PubMed DOI PMC

van Kalsbeek RJ, et al. The European multistakeholder PanCareFollowUp project: novel, person-centred survivorship care to improve care quality, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and accessibility for cancer survivors and caregivers. Eur J Cancer. 2021;153:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.030. PubMed DOI

Chan AW, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoffmann TC, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. PubMed DOI

Gale J. HealthChange® methodology for patient-centred care and behaviour change support. Health Change Australia; 2014.

World Health Organisation . Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2018. PubMed

Cleland CL, et al. Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1255. PubMed DOI PMC

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2013; Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/2011-2012/PAQ_G.htm.

Craig P, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010. PubMed DOI

Bouwman E, et al. Nurse-led video-coaching interventions in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (REVIVER): a protocol for mixed methods feasibility research. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:150. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0535-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Michie S, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. PubMed DOI

Carey RN, et al. Behavior change techniques and their mechanisms of action: a synthesis of links described in published intervention literature. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(8):693–707. PubMed PMC

Prochaska JO, D.C. C.C . The transtheoretical approach. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried MR, editors. Handbook of psychotherpay integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 147–171.

Bowen DJ, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Wendel-Vos GC, et al. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1163–1169. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00220-8. PubMed DOI

Schneider PL, Crouter S, Bassett DR. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(2):331–335. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113486.60548.E9. PubMed DOI

van Vugt M. Project Verslag Eettesten: Campagne 1999 [project report eating tests: campaign] Den Haag: Voedingscentrum; 1999.

Van Vugt M, Knoppert J. Een krasfolder geeft inzicht in het voedingsgedrag [a scratch leaflet gives insight in eating behaviour] Voeding nu. 1999;5:30–31.

Horiuchi S, et al. Validity of the six stages of change for exercise. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(4):518–527. doi: 10.1177/1359105312437262. PubMed DOI

Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor: NFER-NELSON; 1995.

Scholz U, et al. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2002;18(30):242–251. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242. DOI

Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. Aust J Psychol. 2005;139(5):439–457. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457. PubMed DOI

Eikelenboom N, et al. Implementation of personalized self-management support using the self-management screening questionnaire SeMaS; a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2013;14:336. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-336. PubMed DOI PMC

Eikelenboom N, et al. Validation of self-management screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0381-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom clinical research network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104. PubMed DOI PMC

Thabane L, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...