Development of ELIP to Assess Physical Literacy for Emerging Adults: A Methodological and Epistemological Challenge
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
- Keywords
- Assessment, Delphi method, cognitive interview, validation,
- MeSH
- Exercise MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Health Literacy * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Purpose: Following increased interest in physical literacy (PL), development of appropriate tools for assessment has become an important next step for its operationalization. To forward the development of such tools, the objective of this study was to build the foundations of the Évaluation de la Littératie Physique (ELIP), designed to help reduce existing tensions in approaches to PL assessment that may be resulting in a low uptake into applied settings. Methods: We followed two steps: (1) the development of the first version of ELIP by deploying a Delphi method (n = 30); and (2) the modification of items through cognitive interviews with emerging adults (n = 32). Results: The expert consensus highlighted four dimensions of PL to be assessed-physical; affective; cognitive; and social-with new perspectives, including a preference for broad motor tests over fitness. Conclusion: Results offer new insights into the assessment of emerging adults' PL, but ELIP still requires further work concerning validity, reliability, and sensitivity.
Bern University of Applied Sciences
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
Institute for Teaching and Learning
Liverpool John Moores University
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Unité de Recherche Interfacultaire Santé Société
University of Lille University of Artois University Littoral Côte d'Opale
References provided by Crossref.org