Plant-soil interactions in the native range of two congeneric species with contrasting invasive success
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
GAČR 20-01813S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
PubMed
36745217
PubMed Central
PMC9945059
DOI
10.1007/s00442-023-05329-6
PII: 10.1007/s00442-023-05329-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), Enemy release hypothesis, Mycorrhizal inoculation potential (MIP), Phospholipid/neutral fatty acid analysis (PLFA/NLFA), Plant invasiveness, Structural equation modelling,
- MeSH
- kořeny rostlin MeSH
- mykorhiza * fyziologie MeSH
- půda MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie MeSH
- rostliny MeSH
- zavlečené druhy MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- půda MeSH
The aim of this study was to compare plant-soil interactions in the native range of two congeneric European species differing in their invasive success in the world: a globally invasive Cirsium vulgare and non-invasive C. oleraceum. We assessed changes in soil nutrients and soil biota following soil conditioning by each species and compared performance of plants grown in self-conditioned and unconditioned soil, from which all, some or no biota was excluded. The invasive species depleted more nutrients than the non-invasive species and coped better with altered nutrient levels. The invasive species had higher seedling establishment which benefited from the presence of unconditioned biota transferred by soil filtrate. Biomass of both species increased in soil with self-conditioned soil filtrate and decreased in soil with self-conditioned whole-soil inoculum compared to unconditioned filtrate and inoculum. However, the increase was smaller and the decrease greater for the invasive species. The invasive species allocated less biomass to roots when associated with harmful biota, reducing negative effects of the biota on its performance. The results show that in the native range the invasive species is more limited by self-conditioned pathogens and benefits more from unconditioned mutualists and thus may benefit more from loss of effectively specialized soil biota in a secondary range. Our study highlights the utility of detailed plant-soil feedback research in species native range for understanding factors regulating species performance in their native range and pinpointing the types of biota involved in their regulation.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Adelman MJ, Morton JB. Infectivity of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi - influence of host soil diluent combinations on mpn estimates and percentage colonization. Soil Biol Biochem. 1986;18:77–83. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(86)90106-9. DOI
Aldorfova A, Munzbergova Z. Conditions of plant cultivation affect the differences in intraspecific plant-soil feedback between invasive and native dominants. Flora. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2019.151492. DOI
Aldorfova A, Knobova P, Munzbergova Z. Plant-soil feedback contributes to predicting plant invasiveness of 68 alien plant species differing in invasive status. Oikos. 2020;129:1257–1270. doi: 10.1111/oik.07186. DOI
Aldorfova A, Dostalek T, Munzbergova Z. Effects of soil conditioning, root and shoot litter addition interact to determine the intensity of plant-soil feedback. Oikos. 2022 doi: 10.1111/oik.09025. DOI
Ammerman J (2001) Determination of Nitrate/Nitrite in 0,5 M K2SO4 soil extracts by Flow Injection analysis. QuikChem Method 12-107-04-1-H.
Bergmann J, Verbruggen E, Heinze J, Xiang D, Chen BD, Joshi J, Rillig MC. The interplay between soil structure, roots, and microbiota as a determinant of plant-soil feedback. Ecol Evol. 2016;6:7633–7644. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2456. PubMed DOI PMC
Bever JD, Westover KM, Antonovics J. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J Ecol. 1997;85:561–573. doi: 10.2307/2960528. DOI
Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. doi: 10.1139/y59-099. PubMed DOI
Brinkman EP, Van der Putten WH, Bakker EJ, Verhoeven KJF. Plant-soil feedback: experimental approaches, statistical analyses and ecological interpretations. J Ecol. 2010;98:1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01695.x. DOI
Bronstein JL (2003) The scope for exploitation within mutualistic interactions. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation: 185–202
Burns JH. A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib. 2004;10:387–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00105.x. DOI
Callaway RM, Bedmar EJ, Reinhart KO, Silvan CG, Klironomos J. Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology. 2011;92:1027–1035. doi: 10.1890/10-0089.1. PubMed DOI
Chiuffo MC, Macdougall AS, Hierro JL. Native and non-native ruderals experience similar plant-soil feedbacks and neighbor effects in a system where they coexist. Oecologia. 2015;179:843–852. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3399-y. PubMed DOI
Cortois R, Schroder-Georgi T, Weigelt A, van der Putten WH, De Deyn GB. Plant-soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits. J Ecol. 2016;104:1608–1617. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12643. DOI
Daehler CC. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34:183–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403. DOI
Dassonville N, Vanderhoeven S, Vanparys V, Hayez M, Gruber W, Meerts P. Impacts of alien invasive plants on soil nutrients are correlated with initial site conditions in NW Europe. Oecologia. 2008;157:131–140. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1054-6. PubMed DOI
Dawson W, Schrama M. Identifying the role of soil microbes in plant invasions. J Ecol. 2016;104:1211–1218. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12619. DOI
Dědina J (1987) Selected methods of analytic atom spectrochemistry. Československá spektroskopická společnost
Dostalek T, Knappova J, Munzbergova Z. The role of plant-soil feedback in long-term species coexistence cannot be predicted from its effects on plant performance. Ann Bot. 2022 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac080. PubMed DOI PMC
Dudenhoffer JH, Ebeling A, Klein AM, Wagg C. Beyond biomass: Soil feedbacks are transient over plant life stages and alter fitness. J Ecol. 2018;106:230–241. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12870. DOI
Egan L (2001) Determination of Amonia by Flow Injection Analysis Colorimetry. QuikChem Metod 10-107-06-5-E.
Ehrenberger F, Gorbach S (1973) Methoden der organischen Elementar- und Spurenanalyse. Verlag Chemie Weinheim
Enders M, Havemann F, Ruland F, Bernard-Verdier M, Catford JA, Gomez-Aparicio L, Haider S, Heger T, Kueffer C, Kuhn I, Meyerson LA, Musseau C, Novoa A, Ricciardi A, Sagouis A, Schittko C, Strayer DL, Vila M, Essl F, Hulme PE, van Kleunen M, Kumschick S, Lockwood JL, Mabey AL, McGeoch MA, Palma E, Pysek P, Saul WC, Yannelli FA, Jeschke JM. A conceptual map of invasion biology: Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2020;29:978–991. doi: 10.1111/geb.13082. PubMed DOI PMC
Engelkes T, Morrien E, Verhoeven KJF, Bezemer TM, Biere A, Harvey JA, McIntyre LM, Tamis WLM, van der Putten WH. Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature. 2008;456:946–948. doi: 10.1038/nature07474. PubMed DOI
Feldmann F, Idczak E. Inoculum production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for use in tropical nurseries. Methods Microbiol. 1992;24:339–357. doi: 10.1016/s0580-9517(08)70101-6. DOI
Florianova A, Munzbergova Z. The intensity of intraspecific plant-soil feedbacks in alien Impatiens species depends on the environment. Perspect Plant Ecol Evolut System. 2018;32:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2018.04.004. DOI
Funk JL. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J Ecol. 2008;96:1162–1173. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01435.x. DOI
Funk JL, Vitousek PM. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature. 2007;446:1079–1081. doi: 10.1038/nature05719. PubMed DOI
Gallery RE, Dalling JW, Arnold AE. Diversity, host affinity, and distribution of seed-infecting fungi: A case study with Cecropia. Ecology. 2007;88:582–588. doi: 10.1890/05-1207. PubMed DOI
Garcia-Sanchez M, Cajthaml T, Filipova A, Tlustos P, Szakova J, Garcia-Romera I. Implications of mycoremediated dry olive residue application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on the microbial community composition and functionality in a metal-polluted soil. J Environ Manag. 2019;247:756–765. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.101. PubMed DOI
Gioria M, Osborne BA. Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs. Front Plant Sci. 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00501. PubMed DOI PMC
Giovannetti M, Mosse B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980;84:489–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x. DOI
Hannula SE, Heinen R, Huberty M, Steinauer K, De Long JR, Jongen R, Bezemer TM. Persistence of plant-mediated microbial soil legacy effects in soil and inside roots. Nat Commun. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25971-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Hendriks M, Ravenek JM, Smit-Tiekstra AE, van der Paauw JW, de Caluwe H, van der Putten WH, de Kroon H, Mommer L. Spatial heterogeneity of plant-soil feedback affects root interactions and interspecific competition. New Phytol. 2015;207:830–840. doi: 10.1111/nph.13394. PubMed DOI
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008;50:346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425. PubMed DOI
Janos DP. Plant responsiveness to mycorrhizas differs from dependence upon mycorrhizas. Mycorrhiza. 2007;17:75–91. doi: 10.1007/s00572-006-0094-1. PubMed DOI
Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol. 1997;135:575–586. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00729.x. DOI
Julien MH, Griffiths MW (1998) Biological control of weeds. A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK
Kardol P, Cornips NJ, van Kempen MML, Bakx-Schotman JMT, van der Putten WH. Microbe-mediated plant-soil feedback causes historical contingency effects in plant community assembly. Ecol Monogr. 2007;77:147–162. doi: 10.1890/06-0502. DOI
Kardol P, De Deyn GB, Laliberte E, Mariotte P, Hawkes CV. Biotic plant-soil feedbacks across temporal scales. J Ecol. 2013;101:309–315. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12046. DOI
Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:164–170. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02499-0. DOI
Klironomos JN. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature. 2002;417:67–70. doi: 10.1038/417067a. PubMed DOI
Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM. Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol Lett. 2008;11:980–992. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.x. PubMed DOI
Kulmatiski A, Heavilin J, Beard KH. Testing predictions of a three-species plant-soil feedback model. J Ecol. 2011;99:542–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01784.x. DOI
Kulmatiski A, Kardol P (2008) Getting plant–soil feedbacks out of the greenhouse: experimental and conceptual approaches In: Uea Lüttge (Ed) Progress in Botany. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82:1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13. DOI
Lekberg Y, Bever JD, Bunn RA, Callaway RM, Hart MM, Kivlin SN, Klironomos J, Larkin BG, Maron JL, Reinhart KO, Remke M, van der Putten WH. Relative importance of competition and plant-soil feedback, their synergy, context dependency and implications for coexistence. Ecol Lett. 2018;21:1268–1281. doi: 10.1111/ele.13093. PubMed DOI
Lepinay C, Vondrakova Z, Dostalek T, Munzbergova Z. Duration of the conditioning phase affects the results of plant-soil feedback experiments via soil chemical properties. Oecologia. 2018;186:459–470. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-4033-y. PubMed DOI
Mathakutha R, Steyn C, le Roux PC, Blom IJ, Chown SL, Daru BH, Ripley BS, Louw A, Greve M. Invasive species differ in key functional traits from native and non-invasive alien plant species. J Veg Sci. 2019;30:994–1006. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12772. DOI
McGinn KJ, van der Putten WH, Hulme PE, Shelby N, Weser C, Duncan RP. The influence of residence time and geographic extent on the strength of plant-soil feedbacks for naturalised Trifolium. J Ecol. 2018;106:207–217. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12864. DOI
Meijer SS, Holmgren M, Van der Putten WH. Effects of plant-soil feedback on tree seedling growth under arid conditions. J Plant Ecol. 2011;4:193–200. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtr011. DOI
Montesinos D, Callaway RM. Soil origin corresponds with variation in growth of an invasiveCentaurea, but not of non-invasive congeners. Ecology. 2020 doi: 10.1002/ecy.3141. PubMed DOI
Moore PD, Chapman SB. Methods in plant ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1986.
Moorman T, Reeves FB. Role of endomycorrhizae in revegetation practices in the semi-arid West.2. bioassay to determine the effect of land disturbance on endomycorrhizal populations. Am J Bot. 1979;66:14–18. doi: 10.2307/2442619. DOI
Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (Eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison
Olsson PA, Larsson L, Bago B, Wallander H, van Aarle IM. Ergosterol and fatty acids for biomass estimation of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2003;159:7–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00810.x. PubMed DOI
Oono R, Black D, Slessarev E, Sickler B, Strom A, Apigo A. Species diversity of fungal endophytes across a stress gradient for plants. New Phytol. 2020;228:210–225. doi: 10.1111/nph.16709. PubMed DOI
Parker IM, Gilbert GS. When there is no escape: The effects of natural enemies on native, invasive, and noninvasive plants. Ecology. 2007;88:1210–1224. doi: 10.1890/06-1377. PubMed DOI
Peacher MD, Meiners SJ. Inoculum handling alters the strength and direction of plant-microbe interactions. Ecology. 2020 doi: 10.1002/ecy.2994. PubMed DOI
Perkins LB, Nowak RS. Native and non-native grasses generate common types of plant-soil feedbacks by altering soil nutrients and microbial communities. Oikos. 2013;122:199–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20592.x. DOI
R Core Team A (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Reinhart KO, Callaway RM. Soil biota facilitate exotic Acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecol Appl. 2004;14:1737–1745. doi: 10.1890/03-5204. DOI
Reinhart KO, Packer A, Van der Putten WH, Clay K. Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecol Lett. 2003;6:1046–1050. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00539.x. DOI
Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmanek M. Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev. 2000;75:65–93. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005435. PubMed DOI
Rinella MJ, Reinhart KO. Toward more robust plant-soil feedback research: reply. Ecology. 2019 doi: 10.1002/ecy.2810. PubMed DOI
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02. DOI
Sampedro I, Giubilei M, Cajthaml T, Federici E, Federici F, Petruccioli M, D'Annibale A. Short-term impact of dry olive mill residue addition to soil on the resident microbiota. Biores Technol. 2009;100:6098–6106. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.026. PubMed DOI
Sanders IR. Preference, specificity and cheating in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;8:143–145. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00012-8. PubMed DOI
Sardans J, Bartrons M, Margalef O, Gargallo-Garriga A, Janssens IA, Ciais P, Obersteiner M, Sigurdsson BD, Chen HYH, Penuelas J. Plant invasion is associated with higher plant-soil nutrient concentrations in nutrient-poor environments. Glob Change Biol. 2017;23:1282–1291. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13384. PubMed DOI
Semchenko M, Barry KE, de Vries FT, Mommer L, Moora M, Macia-Vicente JG. Deciphering the role of specialist and generalist plant-microbial interactions as drivers of plant-soil feedback. New Phytol. 2022;234:1929–1944. doi: 10.1111/nph.18118. PubMed DOI
Shannon S, Flory SL, Reynolds H. Competitive context alters plant-soil feedback in an experimental woodland community. Oecologia. 2012;169:235–243. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2195-6. PubMed DOI
Sieg CH, Phillips BG, Moser LP (2003) Exotic invasive plants. In: Frederici P (Ed) Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Snajdr J, Valaskova V, Merhautova V, Cajthaml T, Baldrian P. Activity and spatial distribution of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes during forest soil colonization by saprotrophic basidiomycetes. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2008;43:186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.11.008. DOI
Sturmer SL, Bever JD, Morton JB. Biogeography of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) a phylogenetic perspective on species distribution patterns. Mycorrhiza. 2018;28:587–603. doi: 10.1007/s00572-018-0864-6. PubMed DOI
Suding KN, Harpole WS, Fukami T, Kulmatiski A, MacDougall AS, Stein C, van der Putten WH. Consequences of plant-soil feedbacks in invasion. J Ecol. 2013;101:298–308. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12057. DOI
Tenhumberg B, Louda SM, Eckberg JO, Takahashi M. Monte Carlo analysis of parameter uncertainty in matrix models for the weed Cirsium vulgare. J Appl Ecol. 2008;45:438–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01427.x. DOI
ter Braak CJ, Šmilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca
van de Voorde TFJ, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM. Intra- and interspecific plant-soil interactions, soil legacies and priority effects during old-field succession. J Ecol. 2011;99:945–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01815.x. DOI
van de Voorde TFJ, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM. Soil inoculation method determines the strength of plant-soil interactions. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;55:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.020. DOI
van der Putten WH, Klironomos JN, Wardle DA. Microbial ecology of biological invasions. ISME J. 2007;1:28–37. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.9. PubMed DOI
van Grunsven RHA, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM, Tamis WLM, Berendse F, Veenendaal EM. Reduced plant-soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives. J Ecol. 2007;95:1050–1057. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01282.x. DOI
van Grunsven RHA, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM, Veenendaal EM. Plant-soil feedback of native and range-expanding plant species is insensitive to temperature. Oecologia. 2010;162:1059–1069. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1526-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Wagg C, Bender SF, Widmer F, van der Heijden MGA. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:5266–5270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320054111. PubMed DOI PMC
Wagg C, Schlaeppi K, Banerjee S, Kuramae EE, van der Heijden MGA. Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat Commun. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang P, Zhang XY, Kong CH. The response of allelopathic rice growth and microbial feedback to barnyardgrass infestation in a paddy field experiment. Eur J Soil Biol. 2013;56:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.01.006. DOI
Wang MG, De Deyn GB, Bezemer TM. Separating effects of soil microorganisms and nematodes on plant community dynamics. Plant Soil. 2019;441:455–467. doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04137-3. DOI
Wang MG, Ruan WB, Kostenko O, Carvalho S, Hannula SE, Mulder PPJ, Bu FJ, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM. Removal of soil biota alters soil feedback effects on plant growth and defense chemistry. New Phytol. 2019;221:1478–1491. doi: 10.1111/nph.15485. PubMed DOI PMC
Wild J, Kaplan Z, Danihelka J, Petrik P, Chytry M, Novotny P, Rohn M, Sule V, Bruna J, Chobot K, Ekrt L, Holubova D, Knollova I, Kocian P, Stech M, Stepanek J, Zouhar V. Plant distribution data for the Czech Republic integrated in the Pladias database. Preslia. 2019;91:1–24. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2019.001. DOI
Wilschut RA, van Kleunen M. Drought alters plant-soil feedback effects on biomass allocation but not on plant performance. Plant Soil. 2021;462:285–296. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-04861-9. DOI
Wilson JM, Trinick MJ. Factors affecting the estimation of numbers of infective propagules of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by the most probable number method. Aust J Soil Res. 1983;21:73–81. doi: 10.1071/sr9830073. DOI
Zuppinger-Dingley D, Schmid B, Chen Y, Brandl H, van der Heijden MGA, Joshi J. In their native range, invasive plants are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks. Ecosphere. 2011;2:12. doi: 10.1890/es11-00061.1. DOI