The Gradual Release of Alendronate for the Treatment of Critical Bone Defects in Osteoporotic and Control Rats
Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36756052
PubMed Central
PMC9901358
DOI
10.2147/ijn.s386784
PII: 386784
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- alendronate, co-culture, drug delivery system, fibrous scaffold, osteoporosis,
- MeSH
- alendronát * farmakologie MeSH
- emulze farmakologie MeSH
- hydroxyapatit farmakologie MeSH
- inhibitory kostní resorpce * farmakologie MeSH
- krysa rodu Rattus MeSH
- osteoblasty MeSH
- osteogeneze MeSH
- osteoklasty MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- krysa rodu Rattus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- alendronát * MeSH
- emulze MeSH
- hydroxyapatit MeSH
- inhibitory kostní resorpce * MeSH
PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a severe health problem with social and economic impacts on society. The standard treatment consists of the systemic administration of drugs such as bisphosphonates, with alendronate (ALN) being one of the most common. Nevertheless, complications of systemic administration occur with this drug. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new strategies, such as local administration. METHODS: In this study, emulsion/dispersion scaffolds based on W/O emulsion of PCL and PF68 with ALN, containing hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles as the dispersion phase were prepared using electrospinning. Scaffolds with different release kinetics were tested in vitro on the co-cultures of osteoblasts and osteoclast-like cells, isolated from adult osteoporotic and control rats. Cell viability, proliferation, ALP, TRAP and CA II activity were examined. A scaffold with a gradual release of ALN was tested in vivo in the bone defects of osteoporotic and control rats. RESULTS: The release kinetics were dependent on the scaffold composition and the used system of the poloxamers. The ALN was released from the scaffolds for more than 22 days. The behavior of cells cultured in vitro on scaffolds with different release kinetics was comparable. The difference was evident between cell co-cultures isolated from osteoporotic and control animals. The PCL/HA scaffold show slow degradation in vivo and residual scaffold limited new bone formation inside the defects. Nevertheless, the released ALN supported bone formation in the areas surrounding the residual scaffold. Interestingly, a positive effect of systemic administration of ALN was not proved. CONCLUSION: The prepared scaffolds enabled tunable control release of ALN. The effect of ALN was proved in vitro and in in vivo study supported peri-implant bone formation.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Institute of Anatomy 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC., et al. SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16:82. doi:10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Torstrick FB, Guldberg RE. Local strategies to prevent and treat osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2014;12:33–40. doi:10.1007/s11914-014-0191-6 PubMed DOI
Lufkin EG, Wahner HW, O’Fallon WM, et al. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with transdermal estrogen. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:1–9. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-1 PubMed DOI
Ellerington MC, Hillard TC, Whitcroft SI, et al. Intranasal salmon calcitonin for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59:6–11. doi:10.1007/s002239900076 PubMed DOI
Henriksen K, Byrjalsen I, Andersen JR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral salmon calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women taking calcium and vitamin D. Bone. 2016;91:122–129. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2016.07.019 PubMed DOI
Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2149–2157. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2814 PubMed DOI
Langdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB, et al. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, Phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1585–1594. PubMed
Glover SJ, Eastell R, McCloskey EV, et al. Rapid and robust response of biochemical markers of bone formation to teriparatide therapy. Bone. 2009;45:1053–1058. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2009.07.091 PubMed DOI
Turbí C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC, et al. Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther. 2004;26:245–256. doi:10.1016/S0149-2918(04)90023-9 PubMed DOI
Wysowski DK, Greene P. Trends in osteoporosis treatment with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates in the United States, 2002-2012. Bone. 2013;57:423–428. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2013.09.008 PubMed DOI
Roelofs AJ, Thompson K, Gordon S, et al. Molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: current status. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20):6222s–30s. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0843 PubMed DOI
Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Assael LA, et al. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws--2009 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2–12. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.01.009 PubMed DOI
Lui PP, Lee YW, Mok TY, et al. Local administration of alendronate reduced peri-tunnel bone loss and promoted graft-bone tunnel healing with minimal systemic effect on bone in contralateral knee. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:1897–1906. doi:10.1002/jor.22442 PubMed DOI
Özer T, Aktas A, Barıs E, et al. Effects of local alendronate administration on bone defect healing. Histomorphometric and radiological evaluation in a rabbit model. Acta Cir Bras. 2017;32:781–795. doi:10.1590/s0102-865020170090000010 PubMed DOI
van Houdt CIA, Gabbai-Armelin PR, Lopez-Perez PM, et al. Alendronate release from calcium phosphate cement for bone regeneration in osteoporotic conditions. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15398. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33692-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Wang X, Zeng D, Weng W, et al. Alendronate delivery on amino modified mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds to enhance bone regeneration in osteoporosis rats. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46:171–181. doi:10.1080/21691401.2018.1453825 PubMed DOI
Zeng Y, Zhou M, Chen L, et al. Alendronate loaded graphene oxide functionalized collagen sponge for the dual effects of osteogenesis and anti-osteoclastogenesis in osteoporotic rats. Bioactive Mater. 2020;5:859–870. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.010 PubMed DOI PMC
Bobyn JD, Thompson R, Lim L, et al. Local alendronic acid elution increases net periimplant bone formation: a micro-CT analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):687–694. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3120-6 PubMed DOI PMC
Toker H, Ozdemir H, Ozer H, et al. Alendronate enhances osseous healing in a rat calvarial defect model. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(11):1545–1550. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.06.013 PubMed DOI
Yun YP, Kim SJ, Lim YM, et al. The effect of alendronate-loaded polycarprolactone nanofibrous scaffolds on osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells in bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10:1080–1090. doi:10.1166/jbn.2014.1819 PubMed DOI
Jiřík M, Bartoš M, Tomášek P, et al. Generating standardized image data for testing and calibrating quantification of volumes, surfaces, lengths, and object counts in fibrous and porous materials using X-ray microtomography. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81:551–568. doi:10.1002/jemt.23011 PubMed DOI
Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, et al. A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2077–2082. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X PubMed DOI
Regis S, Youssefian S, Jassal M, et al. Fibronectin adsorption on functionalized electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds: experimental and molecular dynamics studies. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(6):1697–1706. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34843 PubMed DOI
Lukasova V, Buzgo M, Vocetkova K, et al. Osteoinductive 3D scaffolds prepared by blend centrifugal spinning for long-term delivery of osteogenic supplements. RSC Adv. 2018;8:21889–21904. doi:10.1039/C8RA02735H PubMed DOI PMC
Radisavljevic A, Stojanovic DB, Perisic S, et al. Cefazolin-loaded polycaprolactone fibers produced via different electrospinning methods: characterization, drug release and antibacterial effect. Eur J Pharmaceutical Sci. 2018;124:26–36. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2018.08.023 PubMed DOI
Žižková R, Hedvičáková V, Blahnová VH, et al. The Effect of Osteoblast Isolation Methods from Adult Rats on Osteoclastogenesis in Co-Cultures. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7875. doi:10.3390/ijms23147875 PubMed DOI PMC
Mir M, Leite FL, Herrmann Junior PSDP. XRD, AFM, IR and TGA study of nanostructured hydroxyapatite. Materials Res. 2012;15(4):6. doi:10.1590/S1516-14392012005000069 DOI
Canbolat MF, Celebioglu A, Uyar T. Drug delivery system based on cyclodextrin-naproxen inclusion complex incorporated in electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;115:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.11.021 PubMed DOI
Senra MR, Lima R, Souza D, et al. Thermal characterization of hydroxyapatite or carbonated hydroxyapatite hybrid composites with distinguished collagens for bone graft. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(4):7190–7200. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.089 DOI
Cicco SR, Vona D, Leone G, et al. In vivo functionalization of diatom biosilica with sodium alendronate as osteoactive material. Mater Sci Eng. 2019;104:109897. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109897 PubMed DOI
Novik H, Clerici M, Fahmi A, et al. High-Throughput Electrospinning of Bioactive Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Proceedings. 2021;78:24.
Boanini E, Torricelli P, Gazzano M, et al. Alendronate–hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and their interaction with osteoclasts and osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials. 2008;29(7):790–796. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.040 PubMed DOI
Heinemann C, Heinemann S, Worch H, et al. Development of an osteoblast/osteoclast co-culture derived by human bone marrow stromal cells and human monocytes for biomaterials testing. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;21:80–93. doi:10.22203/eCM.v021a07 PubMed DOI
Dolci LS, Panzavolta S, Torricelli P, et al. Modulation of Alendronate release from a calcium phosphate bone cement: an in vitro osteoblast-osteoclast co-culture study. Int J Pharm. 2019;554:245–255. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.023 PubMed DOI
Meng G, Wu X, Yao R, et al. Effect of zinc substitution in hydroxyapatite coating on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation under osteoblast/osteoclast co-culture. Regen Biomater. 2019;6:349–359. doi:10.1093/rb/rbz001 PubMed DOI PMC
Borciani G, Montalbano G, Baldini N, et al. Co–culture systems of osteoblasts and osteoclasts: simulating in vitro bone remodeling in regenerative approaches. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020;108:22–45. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.043 PubMed DOI
Asagiri M, Takayanagi H. The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone. 2007;40:251–264. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023 PubMed DOI
Owen R, Reilly GC. In vitro models of bone remodelling and associated disorders. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:134. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00134 PubMed DOI PMC
Hedvičáková V, Žižková R, Buzgo M, et al. The effect of alendronate on osteoclastogenesis in different combinations of M-CSF and RANKL growth factors. Biomolecules. 2021;12(1):11. doi:10.3390/biom12010011 PubMed DOI PMC
Park KW, Yun YP, Kim SE, et al. The effect of alendronate loaded biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds on bone regeneration in a rat tibial defect model. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:26738–26753. doi:10.3390/ijms161125982 PubMed DOI PMC
Zeng Y, Zhou M, Mou S, et al. Sustained delivery of alendronate by engineered collagen scaffold for the repair of osteoporotic bone defects and resistance to bone loss. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108:2460–2472. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36997 PubMed DOI
Shen X, Ma P, Hu Y, et al. Alendronate-loaded hydroxyapatite-TiO2 nanotubes for improved bone formation in osteoporotic rabbits. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:1423–1436. doi:10.1039/C5TB01956G PubMed DOI
Iwamoto J, Seki A, Matsuura M, et al. Influence of ovariectomy on bone turnover and trabecular bone mass in mature cynomolgus monkeys. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:358–367. doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.358 PubMed DOI PMC
Kennedy OD, Brennan O, Rackard SM, et al. Effects of ovariectomy on bone turnover, porosity, and biomechanical properties in ovine compact bone 12 months postsurgery. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:303–309. doi:10.1002/jor.20750 PubMed DOI
Zhang Y, Lai WP, Leung PC, et al. Short- to mid-term effects of ovariectomy on bone turnover, bone mass and bone strength in rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30:898–903. doi:10.1248/bpb.30.898 PubMed DOI
Väänänen HK, Härkönen PL. Estrogen and bone metabolism. Maturitas. 1996;23(Suppl):S65–9. doi:10.1016/0378-5122(96)01015-8 PubMed DOI
Khosla S, Oursler MJ, Monroe DG. Estrogen and the skeleton. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23:576–581. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2012.03.008 PubMed DOI PMC
Perinpanayagam H, Zaharias R, Stanford C, et al. Early cell adhesion events differ between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic osteoblasts. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(6):993–1000. doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00045-6 PubMed DOI
Cheung WH, Miclau T, Chow SK-H, et al. Fracture healing in osteoporotic bone. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 2):S21–6. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(16)47004-X PubMed DOI
Thormann U, El Khawassna T, Ray S, et al. Differences of bone healing in metaphyseal defect fractures between osteoporotic and physiological bone in rats. Injury. 2014;45:487–493. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.033 PubMed DOI
Sajkiewicz P, Heljak MK, Gradys A, et al. Degradation and related changes in supermolecular structure of poly(caprolactone) in vivo conditions. Polym Degrad Stab. 2018;157:70–79. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.09.023 DOI
Seyednejad H, Gawlitta D, Kuiper RV, et al. In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone). Biomaterials. 2012;33:4309–4318. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.002 PubMed DOI
Bölgen N, Menceloğlu YZ, Acatay K, et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation of non-woven materials made of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofibers prepared by electrospinning under different conditions. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2005;16:1537–1555. doi:10.1163/156856205774576655 PubMed DOI
Sung HJ, Meredith C, Johnson C, et al. The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5735–5742. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066 PubMed DOI
Garbuz DS, Hu Y, Kim WY, et al. Enhanced gap filling and osteoconduction associated with alendronate-calcium phosphate-coated porous tantalum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1090–1100. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00415 PubMed DOI
Niu S, Cao X, Zhang Y, et al. Peri-implant and systemic effects of high-/low-affinity bisphosphonate-hydroxyapatite composite coatings in a rabbit model with peri-implant high bone turnover. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):97. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-97 PubMed DOI PMC
Nakao S, Minamide A, Kawakami M, et al. The influence of alendronate on spine fusion in an osteoporotic animal model. Spine. 2011;36(18):1446–1452. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f49c47 PubMed DOI
Oliveira D, Hassumi JS, Gomes-Ferreira PH, et al. Short term sodium alendronate administration improves the peri-implant bone quality in osteoporotic animals. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25:42–52. doi:10.1590/1678-77572016-0165 PubMed DOI PMC
Im S, Lim SH, Lee JI, et al. Effective dosage and administration schedule of oral alendronate for non-nociceptive symptoms in rats with chronic constriction injury. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25:938–944. doi:10.3346/jkms.2010.25.6.938 PubMed DOI PMC
Weiss SG, Kuchar GO, Gerber JT, et al. Dose of alendronate directly increases trabeculae expansivity without altering bone volume in rat femurs. World J Orthop. 2018;9:190–197. doi:10.5312/wjo.v9.i10.190 PubMed DOI PMC