BACKGROUND: The present study explored moderators of the relation between environmental concerns and pro-environmental behaviour that could help close the green gap. METHODS: A sample of 500 individuals (250 women) participated in the study. Apart from socio-demographic characteristics, participants answered questions about their environmental concerns and pro-environmental behaviour, collectivism and individualism, time orientation and emotional responses to climate change. RESULTS: Our results corroborate the view that collectivism, future orientation and prosocial tendencies may form a single component of outward orientation, while individualism and immediate orientation form self-centred orientation. Generally, outwardly oriented individuals and those less self-centred reported more pro-environmental behaviour. However, strongly self-centred individuals, even when reporting elevated helplessness, showed increased involvement in pro-environmental behaviour once their concerns were high. CONCLUSIONS: The study contributes to the literature by pointing out that both outward and self-centred orientations have the potential to insulate individuals against the negative effect helplessness may have on pro-environmental behaviour. This could inform strategies that would both prompt individuals already concerned to act and arouse more concern among those who are not yet preoccupied with climate change.

Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences Dúbravská Cesta 9 841 04 Bratislava Slovakia

Faculty of Economics and Administration Masaryk University Lipová 41a 602 00 Brno střed Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ESS. European Social Survey (2018): ESS-7 2014 documentation report. Edition 3.2. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, Norway for ESS ERIC; 2018.

Chwialkowska A, Bhati WA, Glowik M. The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. J Clean Prod. 2020;268(122305):1–8.

Tam K-P, Chan H-W. Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: a cross-cultural psychology perspective. J Environ Psychol. 2017;53:213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001. DOI

Gifford R. The dragons of inaction. Am Psychol. 2011;66(4):290–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023566. PubMed DOI

Gifford R, Kormos C, McIntyre A. Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2011;2(6):801–827. doi: 10.1002/wcc.143. DOI

Lacroix K, Gifford R, Chen A. Developing and validating the dragons of inaction psychological barriers (DIPB) scale. J Environ Psychol. 2019;63(February):9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.001. DOI

Landry N, Gifford R, Milfont TL, Weeks A, Arnocky S. Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior. J Environ Psychol. 2018;55:18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.003. DOI

Gleim M, Lawson SJ, Gleim M, Lawson SJ. Spanning the gap: an examination of the factors leading to the green gap. J Consum Mark. 2014;31(6/7):503–514. doi: 10.1108/JCM-05-2014-0988. DOI

Nguyen HV, Nguyen CH. Green consumption: closing the intention - behavior gap. Sustain Dev. 2017;2019(27):118–129.

Bouman T, Steg L, Perlaviciute G. From values to climate action. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021;42:102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.010. PubMed DOI

Unanue W, Vignoles VL, Dittmar H, Vansteenkiste M. Life goals predict environmental behavior: cross-cultural and longitudinal evidence. J Environ Psychol. 2016;46:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.02.001. DOI

Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N. Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2014;5(3):411–422. doi: 10.1002/wcc.269. DOI

Pepermans Y, Maeseele P. The politicization of climate change: Problem or solution? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2016;7(4):478–485. doi: 10.1002/wcc.405. DOI

De Groot J, Steg L. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J Environ Psychol. 2010;30(4):368–378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002. DOI

Ucar G, Kaynak Malatyalı M, Özdemir Planalı G, Kanik B. Personality and pro-environmental engagements: the role of the Dark Triad, the Light Triad, and value orientations. Pers Individ Differ. 2022;2023(203):1–6.

Primc K, Ogorevc M, Slabe-Erker R, Bartolj T, Murovec N. How does Schwartz’s theory of human values affect the proenvironmental behavior model? Balt J Manag. 2021;16(2):276–297. doi: 10.1108/BJM-08-2020-0276. DOI

Klöckner CA. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour-a meta-analysis. Glob Environ Change. 2013;23(5):1028–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014. DOI

Chan HW. When do values promote pro-environmental behaviors? Multilevel evidence on the self-expression hypothesis. J Environ Psychol. 2020;71(October 2019).

De Groot J, Steg L. How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav. 2008;40(3):330–354. doi: 10.1177/0013916506297831. DOI

Dietz T, Dan A, Shwom R. Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociol. 2007;72(2):185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026. DOI

Kahneman D, Knetsch J. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manag. 1992;22(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S. DOI

Arısal İ, Atalar T. The exploring relationships between environmental concern, collectivism and ecological purchase intention. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016;235(October):514–521. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.063. DOI

Cho Y, Thyroff A, Rapert MI, Park S, Ju H. To be or not to be green: exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. J Bus Res. 2013;2013(66):1052–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.020. DOI

Komatsu H, Rappleye J, Silova I. Anthropocene culture and the independent self: Obstacles to environmental sustainability? Anthropocene. 2019;26(100198):1–13.

Lacroix K, Gifford R. Psychological barriers to energy conservation behavior: the role of worldviews and climate change risk perception. Vol. 50, Environment and behavior, 2018. pp. 749–780.

Eom K, Kim HS, Sherman DK, Ishii K. Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychol Sci. 2016;27(10):1331–1339. doi: 10.1177/0956797616660078. PubMed DOI

Morren M, Grinstein A. Explaining environmental behavior across borders: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol. 2016;2016(47):91–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.003. DOI

Zheng X, Guo K, Luo H, Pan X, Hertwich E, Jin L, et al. Science of the total environment individualism and nationally determined contributions to climate change. Sci Total Environ. 2021;777(146076):1–9. PubMed

Sivadas E, Bruvold NT, Nelson MR. A reduced version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale: a four-country assessment. J Bus Res. 2008;61(3):201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.016. DOI

Shue H. Unseen urgency: delay as the new denial. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2022;2022:1–6.

Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS. The consideration of future consequences: weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66(4):742–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742. DOI

Demarque C, Apostolidis T, Joule R-V. Consideration of future consequences and pro-environmental decision making in the context of persuasion and binding commitment. J Environ Psychol. 2013;2013(36):214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.019. DOI

Khachatryan H, Joireman J, Casavant K. Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: a three-dimensional social dilemma analysis. J Environ Psychol. 2013;2013(34):97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.001. DOI

Carmi N, Arnon S. Society & natural resources: an the role of future orientation in environmental behavior: analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Soc Nat Resour An Int J. 2014;2014:37–41.

Joireman J, Liu RL. Future-oriented women will pay to reduce global warming: mediation via political orientation, environmental values, and belief in global warming. J Environ Psychol. 2014;2014(40):391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.005. DOI

Lou X, Li LMW. The relationship between identity and environmental concern: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol. 2021;76(101653):1–15.

Hartmann P, Eisend M, Apaolaza V, et al. Warm glow vs. altruistic values: How important is intrinsic emotional reward in proenvironmental behavior? J Environ Psychol. 2017;2017(52):43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.006. DOI

Verplanken B, Marks E, Dobromir AI. On the nature of eco-anxiety: How constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming? J Environ Psychol. 2020;72(101528):1–11.

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. DOI

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146. PubMed DOI

Jamovi. The Jamovi project. 2021.

Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach (2nd.). The Guilford Press; 2018.

Joireman J, Shaffer MJ, Balliet D, Strathman A. Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38(10):1272–1287. doi: 10.1177/0146167212449362. PubMed DOI

Čavojová V, Jurkovič M. Comparison of experienced vs novice teachers in cognitive reflection and rationality. Stud Psychol. 2017;59(3):100–112.

Carlo G, Randall BA. The development of a measure of prosocial pehaviors for late ldolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 2002;31(1):31–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1014033032440. DOI

Babinčák P. Prosocial Tendencies Measure–Revised (PTM- R) - prvá skúsenosť s krátkou metodikou na meranie prosociálneho správania. In: Bartošová K, Čerňák M, Humpolíček P, Kukaňová M, Slezáčková A, editors. Sociální procesy a osobnost Člověk na cestě životem: Křižovatky a mosty. 2011. pp. 7–12.

Kohút M, Šrol J, Čavojová V. How are you holding up? Personality, cognitive and social predictors of a perceived shift in subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic. Pers Individ Difer. 2022;186:111349. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111349. PubMed DOI PMC

Šrol J, Ballová Mikušková E, Čavojová V. When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021;35(3):720–729. doi: 10.1002/acp.3798. PubMed DOI PMC

Šrol J, Ballová Mikušková E, Cavojova V. When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021. PubMed PMC

Pickering GJ, Dale G. Trait anxiety predicts pro-environmental values and climate change action. Pers Individ Difer. 2023;205(February):112101. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112101. DOI

Bandura A. Moral disengagement. How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers; 2016. p. 547.

Peeters W, Diependaele L, Sterckx S. Moral disengagement and the motivational gap in climate change. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2019;22:425–447. doi: 10.1007/s10677-019-09995-5. DOI

Jugert P, Greenaway KH, Barth M, Büchner R, Eisentraut S, Fritsche I. Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. J Environ Psychol. 2016;48:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003. DOI

Loy LS, Spence A. Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. J Environ Psychol. 2020;67(101388):1–8.

Huang T, Leung AK, Eom K, Tam KP. Important to me and my society: How culture influences the roles of personal values and perceived group values in environmental engagements via collectivistic orientation. J Environ Psychol. 2022;80(February):101774. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101774. DOI

Sloot D, Kutlaca M, Medugorac V, Carman P. Recycling alone or protesting together? Values as a basis for pro-environmental social change actions. Front Psychol. 2018;9(JUL):1–10. PubMed PMC

Bouman T, Steg L, Zawadzki SJ. The value of what others value: When perceived biospheric group values influence individuals’ pro-environmental engagement. J Environ Psychol. 2020;71(August):101470. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101470. DOI

Bouman T, van der Werff E, Perlaviciute G, Steg L. Environmental values and identities at the personal and group level. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021;42:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.022. DOI

Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02. DOI

Emotional drivers of the vaccination hesitancy and refusal: A dataset from Slovakia