Validity of simplified self-report methods versus standard use method for pain assessment in preschool-aged children

. 2023 Jul ; 28 (3) : e12411. [epub] 20230605

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37278118

Grantová podpora
The research study is dedicated to the project IGA_FZV_2021_003

PURPOSE: Children experience painful invasive procedures very intensely. The aim of health professionals is to help children minimize this traumatic experience. The Simplified Faces Pain Scale (S-FPS) and Simplified Concrete Ordinal Pain Scale (S-COS) tools offer children the possibility of self-assessing their pain. This can then be the basis for tailoring pain relief to the child's individual need. The aim of this study is to present the validation procedure of the S-FPC, S-COS methods. DESIGN AND METHODS: 135 children aged 3-6 years assessed their pain using the self-reported S-FPS and S-COS methods at three consecutive times, and their results were compared with the commonly used Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability assessment scale. Intra-class correlations (ICC) were used to assess inter-rater agreement. Convergent validity was verified using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: This study demonstrated good validity for both the S FPS and S-COS assessment tools. The ICC coefficient showed good inter-rater correlation. Spearman's correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between the scales. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is not possible to clearly select a best method of pain assessment in preschool children. To choose the most appropriate method, it is necessary to take into account the child's cognitive development and preferences.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

von Baeyer, C. L., Chambers, C. T., Forsyth, S. J., Eisen, S., & Parker, J. A. (2013). Developmental data supporting simplification of self-report pain scales for preschool-age children. The journal of Pain, 14(10), 1116-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.04.008

von Baeyer, C. L., Jaaniste, T., Vo, H. L., Brunsdon, G., Lao, H. C., & Champion, G. D. (2017). Systematic review of self-report measures of pain intensity in 3-and 4-year-old children: bridging a period of rapid cognitive development. The Journal of Pain, 18(9), 1017-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.005

Bayram, A., Şahin, M., Altıparmak, S., & Kuru, A. (2020). The validity of simplified self-report pain intensity assessment tools in preschool-age children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 277(9), 2597-2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06029-0

Chan, J. Y., & von Baeyer, C. L. (2016). Cognitive developmental influences on the ability of preschool -aged children to self-report their. Pain, 157(5), 997-1001. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000476

Decruynaere, C., Thonnard, J. L., & Plaghki, L. (2009). How many response levels do children distinguish on faces scales for pain assessment? European Journal of Pain, 13(6), 641-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.07.004

Emmott, A. S., West, N., Zhou, G., Dunsmuir, D., Montgomery, C. J., Lauder, G. R., & von Baeyer, C. L. (2017). Validity of simplified versus standard self-report measures of pain intensity in preschool-aged children undergoing venipuncture. The Journal of Pain, 18(5), 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.12.015

Hedén, L., Essen, L., & Ljungman, G. (2019). Children's self-reports of fear and pain levels during needle procedures. Nursing Open, 7(1), 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.399

Kašparová, P., & Mandysová, P. (2023). Translation and linguistic validation of self-reporting pain tools S-FPS, S-COS for children into Czech. Zdravotnícke listy, 11(1), 63-68.

Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 870-900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030694

Luo, T. Z., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2019). Attention can be subdivided into neurobiological components corresponding to distinct behavioral effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(52), 26187-26194. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902286116

Mandysová, P. (2019). Metody překladu a transkulturní validace zahraničních nástrojů [Methods of translation and transcultural validation of foreign instruments]. Univerzita Pardubice. 128. ISBN 978-80-7560-269-5.

Merkel, S. I., Voepel-Lewis, T., Shayevitz, J. R., & Malviya, S. (1997). The FLACC: A behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatric Nursing, 23(3), 293-297. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9220806/

WHO. (2020). Management of substance abuse: Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Accessed January 8, 2021 from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee -Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P., ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient -reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...