Effect of Nanoparticle Weight on the Cellular Uptake and Drug Delivery Potential of PLGA Nanoparticles
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
R15 EB030815
NIBIB NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
37546678
PubMed Central
PMC10398700
DOI
10.1021/acsomega.3c02273
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Biodegradable and biocompatible polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) stand out as a key tool for improving drug bioavailability, reducing the inherent toxicity, and targeting the intended site. Most importantly, the ease of polymer synthesis and its derivatization to add functional properties makes them potentially ideal to fulfill the requirements for intended therapeutic applications. Among many polymers, US FDA-approved poly(l-lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) is a widely used biocompatible and biodegradable co-polymer in drug delivery and in implantable biomaterials. While many studies have been conducted using PLGA NPs as a drug delivery system, less attention has been given to understanding the effect of NP weight on cellular behaviors such as uptake. Here we discuss the synthesis of PLGA NPs with varying NP weights and their colloidal and biological properties. Following nanoprecipitation, we have synthesized PLGA NP sizes ranging from 60 to 100 nm by varying the initial PLGA feed in the system. These NPs were found to be stable for a prolonged period in colloidal conditions. We further studied cellular uptake and found that these NPs are cytocompatible; however, they are differentially uptaken by cancer and immune cells, which are greatly influenced by NPs' weight. The drug delivery potential of these nanoparticles (NPs) was assessed using doxorubicin (DOX) as a model drug, loaded into the NP core at a concentration of 7.0 ± 0.5 wt % to study its therapeutic effects. The results showed that both concentration and treatment time are crucial factors for exhibiting therapeutic effects, as observed with DOX-NPs exhibiting a higher potency at lower concentrations. The observations revealed that DOX-NPs exhibited a higher cellular uptake of DOX compared to the free-DOX treatment group. This will allow us to reduce the recommended dose to achieve the desired effect, which otherwise required a large dose when treated with free DOX. Considering the significance of PLGA-based nanoparticle drug delivery systems, we anticipate that this study will contribute to the establishment of design considerations and guidelines for the therapeutic applications of nanoparticles.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Park J.; Fong P. M.; Lu J.; Russell K. S.; Booth C. J.; Saltzman W. M.; Fahmy T. M. PEGylated PLGA Nanoparticles for the Improved Delivery of Doxorubicin. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2009, 5, 410–418. 10.1016/j.nano.2009.02.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Nguyen T. D. T.; Pitchaimani A.; Bahadur Koirala M.; Muhammad F.; Aryal S. Engineered Biomimetic Nanoabsorbent for Cellular Detoxification of Chemotherapeutics. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 33003–33008. 10.1039/C6RA02026G. DOI
Swami A.; Reagan M. R.; Basto P.; Mishima Y.; Kamaly N.; Glavey S.; Zhang S.; Moschetta M.; Seevaratnam D.; Zhang Y.; Liu J.; Memarzadeh M.; Wu J.; Manier S.; Shi J.; Bertrand N.; Lu Z. N.; Nagano K.; Baron R.; Sacco A.; Roccaro A. M.; Farokhzad O. C.; Ghobrial I. M. Engineered Nanomedicine for Myeloma and Bone Microenvironment Targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111, 10287–10292. 10.1073/pnas.1401337111. PubMed DOI PMC
Hu C.-M. J.; Fang R. H.; Copp J.; Luk B. T.; Zhang L. A Biomimetic Nanosponge That Absorbs Pore-Forming Toxins. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 336–340. 10.1038/nnano.2013.54. PubMed DOI PMC
Aryal S.; Hu C.-M. J.; Fang R. H.; Dehaini D.; Carpenter C.; Zhang D.-E.; Zhang L. Erythrocyte Membrane-Cloaked Polymeric Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug Loading and Release. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 1271–1280. 10.2217/nnm.12.153. PubMed DOI
Aryal S.; Hu C.-M. J.; Zhang L. Polymer–Cisplatin Conjugate Nanoparticles for Acid-Responsive Drug Delivery. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 251–258. 10.1021/nn9014032. PubMed DOI PMC
Aryal S.; Stigliano C.; Key J.; Ramirez M.; Anderson J.; Karmonik C.; Fung S.; Decuzzi P. Paramagnetic Gd(3+) Labeled Red Blood Cells for Magnetic Resonance Angiography. Biomaterials 2016, 98, 163–170. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.002. PubMed DOI
Nguyen T. D. T.; Pitchaimani A.; Aryal S. Engineered Nanomedicine with Alendronic Acid Corona Improves Targeting to Osteosarcoma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 3670710.1038/srep36707. PubMed DOI PMC
Ferrari M. Cancer Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Challenges. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 161–171. 10.1038/nrc1566. PubMed DOI
Chen H.; Shao L.; Li Q.; Wang J. Gold Nanorods and Their Plasmonic Properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2679–2724. 10.1039/C2CS35367A. PubMed DOI
Arvizo R.; Bhattacharya R.; Mukherjee P. Gold Nanoparticles: Opportunities and Challenges in Nanomedicine. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2010, 7, 753–763. 10.1517/17425241003777010. PubMed DOI PMC
Farokhzad O. C.; Langer R. Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 16–20. 10.1021/nn900002m. PubMed DOI
Behzadi S.; Serpooshan V.; Tao W.; Hamaly M. A.; Alkawareek M. Y.; Dreaden E. C.; Brown D.; Alkilany A. M.; Farokhzad O. C.; Mahmoudi M. Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles: Journey Inside the Cell. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4218–4244. 10.1039/c6cs00636a. PubMed DOI PMC
Sakamoto J. H.; van de Ven A. L.; Godin B.; Blanco E.; Serda R. E.; Grattoni A.; Ziemys A.; Bouamrani A.; Hu T.; Ranganathan S. I.; De Rosa E.; Martinez J. O.; Smid C. A.; Buchanan R. M.; Lee S.-Y.; Srinivasan S.; Landry M.; Meyn A.; Tasciotti E.; Liu X.; Decuzzi P.; Ferrari M. Enabling Individualized Therapy through Nanotechnology. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 57–89. 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.12.011. PubMed DOI PMC
Caron W. P.; Morgan K. P.; Zamboni B. A.; Zamboni W. C. A Review of Study Designs and Outcomes of Phase I Clinical Studies of Nanoparticle Agents Compared with Small-Molecule Anticancer Agents. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 3309–3315. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3649. PubMed DOI
Muhammad F.; Nguyen T. D. T.; Raza A.; Akhtar B.; Aryal S. A Review on Nanoparticle-Based Technologies for Biodetoxification. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 40, 489–497. 10.1080/01480545.2016.1277736. PubMed DOI
Akter M.; Sikder M. T.; Rahman M. M.; Ullah A. K. M. A.; Hossain K. F. B.; Banik S.; Hosokawa T.; Saito T.; Kurasaki M. A Systematic Review on Silver Nanoparticles-Induced Cytotoxicity: Physicochemical Properties and Perspectives. J. Adv. Res. 2018, 9, 1–16. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.10.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Wilhelm S.; Tavares A. J.; Dai Q.; Ohta S.; Audet J.; Dvorak H. F.; Chan W. C. W. Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16014.10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14. DOI
Shi J.; Kantoff P. W.; Wooster R.; Farokhzad O. C. Cancer Nanomedicine: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 20–37. 10.1038/nrc.2016.108. PubMed DOI PMC
Kabanov A. V.; Gendelman H. E. Nanomedicine in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Neurodegenerative Disorders. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1054–1082. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.014. PubMed DOI PMC
Chithrani D. B. Nanoparticles for Improved Therapeutics and Imaging in Cancer Therapy. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 4, 171–180. 10.2174/187221010792483726. PubMed DOI
Bala I.; Hariharan S.; Kumar M. N. V. R. PLGA Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery: The State of the Art. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 2004, 21, 387–422. 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v21.i5.20. PubMed DOI
Danhier F.; Ansorena E.; Silva J. M.; Coco R.; Le Breton A.; Préat V. PLGA-Based Nanoparticles: An Overview of Biomedical Applications. J. Controlled Release 2012, 161, 505–522. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.043. PubMed DOI
FDA’s Regulatory Science Program for Generic PLA/PLGA-Based Drug Products. http://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/188841-FDA-s-Regulatory-Science-Program-for-Generic-PLA-PLGA-Based-Drug-Products/ (accessed June 15, 2016).
Platel A.; Carpentier R.; Becart E.; Mordacq G.; Betbeder D.; Nesslany F. Influence of the Surface Charge of PLGA Nanoparticles on Their in Vitro Genotoxicity, Cytotoxicity, ROS Production and Endocytosis. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2016, 36, 434–444. 10.1002/jat.3247. PubMed DOI
Wu J.; Zhang J.; Deng C.; Meng F.; Cheng R.; Zhong Z. Robust, Responsive, and Targeted PLGA Anticancer Nanomedicines by Combination of Reductively Cleavable Surfactant and Covalent Hyaluronic Acid Coating. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3985–3994. 10.1021/acsami.6b15105. PubMed DOI
Marasini R.; Thanh Nguyen T. D.; Rayamajhi S.; Aryal S. Synthesis and Characterization of a Tumor-Seeking LyP-1 Peptide Integrated Lipid–Polymer Composite Nanoparticle. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 469–480. 10.1039/D0MA00203H. DOI
Situ J.-Q.; Wang X.-J.; Zhu X.-L.; Xu X.-L.; Kang X.-Q.; Hu J.-B.; Lu C.-Y.; Ying X.-Y.; Yu R.-S.; You J.; Du Y.-Z. Multifunctional SPIO/DOX-Loaded A54 Homing Peptide Functionalized Dextran-g-PLGA Micelles for Tumor Therapy and MR Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 3591010.1038/srep35910. PubMed DOI PMC
Schleich N.; Sibret P.; Danhier P.; Ucakar B.; Laurent S.; Muller R. N.; Jérôme C.; Gallez B.; Préat V.; Danhier F. Dual Anticancer Drug/Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Loaded PLGA-Based Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 447, 94–101. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.042. PubMed DOI
Nguyen T. D. T.; Pitchaimani A.; Ferrel C.; Thakkar R.; Aryal S. Nano-Confinement-Driven Enhanced Magnetic Relaxivity of SPIONs for Targeted Tumor Bioimaging. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 284–294. 10.1039/c7nr07035g. PubMed DOI
Karfeld-Sulzer L. S.; Waters E. A.; Kohlmeir E. K.; Kissler H.; Zhang X.; Kaufman D. B.; Barron A. E.; Meade T. J. Protein Polymer MRI Contrast Agents: Longitudinal Analysis of Biomaterials in Vivo. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011, 65, 220–228. 10.1002/mrm.22587. PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang Y.; García-Gabilondo M.; Grayston A.; J Feiner I. V.; Anton-Sales I.; A Loiola R.; Llop J.; Ramos-Cabrer P.; Barba I.; Garcia-Dorado D.; Gosselet F.; Rosell A.; Roig A. PLGA Protein Nanocarriers with Tailor-Made Fluorescence/MRI/PET Imaging Modalities. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 4988–5002. 10.1039/C9NR10620K. PubMed DOI
Aryal S.; Key J.; Stigliano C.; Landis M. D.; Lee D. Y.; Decuzzi P. Positron Emitting Magnetic Nanoconstructs for PET/MR Imaging. Small 2014, 10, 2688–2696. 10.1002/smll.201303933. PubMed DOI
Aryal S.; Key J.; Stigliano C.; Ananta J. S.; Zhong M.; Decuzzi P. Engineered Magnetic Hybrid Nanoparticles with Enhanced Relaxivity for Tumor Imaging. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 7725–7732. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.003. PubMed DOI
Mitragotri S.; Lahann J. Physical Approaches to Biomaterial Design. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 15–23. 10.1038/nmat2344. PubMed DOI PMC
Albanese A.; Tang P. S.; Chan W. C. W. The Effect of Nanoparticle Size, Shape, and Surface Chemistry on Biological Systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 14, 1–16. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124. PubMed DOI
Wang J.; Byrne J. D.; Napier M. E.; DeSimone J. M. More Effective Nanomedicines through Particle Design. Small 2011, 7, 1919–1931. 10.1002/smll.201100442. PubMed DOI PMC
Pitchaimani A.; Nguyen T. D. T.; Koirala M.; Zhang Y.; Aryal S. Impact of Cell Adhesion and Migration on Nanoparticle Uptake and Cellular Toxicity. Toxicol. In Vitro 2017, 43, 29–39. 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.05.020. PubMed DOI
Win K. Y.; Feng S.-S. Effects of Particle Size and Surface Coating on Cellular Uptake of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Oral Delivery of Anticancer Drugs. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 2713–2722. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.050. PubMed DOI
Urbánek T.; Trousil J.; Rak D.; Gunár K.; Konefał R.; Šlouf M.; Sedlák M.; Šebestová Janoušková O.; Hrubý M. γ-Butyrolactone Copolymerization with the Well-Documented Polymer Drug Carrier Poly(Ethylene Oxide)-Block-Poly(ε-Caprolactone) to Fine-Tune Its Biorelevant Properties. Macromol. Biosci. 2020, 20, 190040810.1002/mabi.202070009. PubMed DOI
Crucho C. I. C.; Barros M. T. Formulation of Functionalized PLGA Polymeric Nanoparticles for Targeted Drug Delivery. Polymer 2015, 68, 41–46. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.083. DOI
Eshete M.; Bailey K.; Nguyen T. D. T.; Aryal S.; Choi S.-O. Interaction of Immune System Protein with PEGylated and Un-PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles. Adv. Nanopart. 2017, 06, 103.10.4236/anp.2017.63009. DOI
Fang R. H.; Chen K. N. H.; Aryal S.; Hu C.-M. J.; Zhang K.; Zhang L. Large-Scale Synthesis of Lipid–Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles Using a Multi-Inlet Vortex Reactor. Langmuir 2012, 28, 13824–13829. 10.1021/la303012x. PubMed DOI
Aryal S.; Hu C.-M. J.; Fu V.; Zhang L. Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Enhances the Cytotoxicity of Hydrophobic–Hydrophilic Drug Conjugates. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 994–999. 10.1039/C1JM13834K. DOI
Makadia H. K.; Siegel S. J. Poly Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) as Biodegradable Controlled Drug Delivery Carrier. Polymers 2011, 3, 1377–1397. 10.3390/polym3031377. PubMed DOI PMC
Schliecker G.; Schmidt C.; Fuchs S.; Wombacher R.; Kissel T. Hydrolytic Degradation of Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Films: Effect of Oligomers on Degradation Rate and Crystallinity. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 266, 39–49. 10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00379-X. PubMed DOI
Engineer C.; Parikh J.; Raval A. Effect of Copolymer Ratio on Hydrolytic Degradation of Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) from Drug Eluting Coronary Stents. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89, 328–334. 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.06.013. DOI
Vainshtein I.; Roskos L. K.; Cheng J.; Sleeman M. A.; Wang B.; Liang M. Quantitative Measurement of the Target-Mediated Internalization Kinetics of Biopharmaceuticals. Pharm. Res. 2015, 32, 286–299. 10.1007/s11095-014-1462-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Krishnamoorthy K.; Mahalingam M. Selection of a Suitable Method for the Preparation of Polymeric Nanoparticles: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 5, 57–67. 10.5681/apb.2015.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Uribe-Querol E.; Rosales C. Phagocytosis: Our Current Understanding of a Universal Biological Process. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 106610.3389/fimmu.2020.01066. PubMed DOI PMC
Lee H.-J.; Woo Y.; Hahn T.-W.; Jung Y. M.; Jung Y.-J. Formation and Maturation of the Phagosome: A Key Mechanism in Innate Immunity against Intracellular Bacterial Infection. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1298.10.3390/microorganisms8091298. PubMed DOI PMC
Doxorubicin – FDA Prescribing Information, Side Effects and Uses. http://www.drugs.com/pro/doxorubicin.html.
Tejada-Berges T.; Granai C. O.; Gordinier M.; Gajewski W. Caelyx/Doxil for the Treatment of Metastatic Ovarian and Breast Cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2002, 2, 143–150. 10.1586/14737140.2.2.143. PubMed DOI
Tsai L.-H.; Yen C.-H.; Hsieh H.-Y.; Young T.-H. Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA Nanoparticle with Cationic/Anionic Polyelectrolyte Decoration: Characterization, and Its Therapeutic Potency. Polymers 2021, 13, 693.10.3390/polym13050693. PubMed DOI PMC
Mukherjee S.; Kotcherlakota R.; Haque S.; Bhattacharya D.; Kumar J. M.; Chakravarty S.; Patra C. R. Improved Delivery of Doxorubicin Using Rationally Designed PEGylated Platinum Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Melanoma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 108, 11037510.1016/j.msec.2019.110375. PubMed DOI
Siegal T.; Horowitz A.; Gabizon A. Doxorubicin Encapsulated in Sterically Stabilized Liposomes for the Treatment of a Brain Tumor Model: Biodistribution and Therapeutic Efficacy. J. Neurosurg. 1995, 83, 1029–1037. 10.3171/jns.1995.83.6.1029. PubMed DOI
Tian G.; Sun X.; Bai J.; Dong J.; Zhang B.; Gao Z.; Wu J. Doxorubicin-loaded Dual-functional Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization and Antitumor Efficacy in Vitro and in Vivo. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 133–142. 10.3892/mmr.2018.9687. PubMed DOI PMC
Clawson C.; Ton L.; Aryal S.; Fu V.; Esener S.; Zhang L. Synthesis and Characterization of Lipid–Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles with PH-Triggered Poly (Ethylene Glycol) Shedding. Langmuir 2011, 27, 10556–10561. 10.1021/la202123e. PubMed DOI PMC
Trousil J.; Filippov S. K.; Hrubý M.; Mazel T.; Syrová Z.; Cmarko D.; Svidenská S.; Matějková J.; Kováčik L.; Porsch B.; Konefał R.; Lund R.; Nyström B.; Raška I.; Štěpánek P. System with Embedded Drug Release and Nanoparticle Degradation Sensor Showing Efficient Rifampicin Delivery into Macrophages. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2017, 13, 307–315. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.031. PubMed DOI
Trousil J.; Syrová Z.; Dal N.-J. K.; Rak D.; Konefał R.; Pavlova E.; Matějková J.; Cmarko D.; Kubíčková P.; Pavliš O.; Urbánek T.; Sedlák M.; Fenaroli F.; Raška I.; Štěpánek P.; Hrubý M. Rifampicin Nanoformulation Enhances Treatment of Tuberculosis in Zebrafish. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 1798–1815. 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00214. PubMed DOI
Trousil J.; Pavliš O.; Kubíčková P.; Škorič M.; Marešová V.; Pavlova E.; Knudsen K. D.; Dai Y.-S.; Zimmerman M.; Dartois V.; Fang J.-Y.; Hrubý M. Antitubercular Nanocarrier Monotherapy: Study of In Vivo Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics for Rifampicin. J. Controlled Release 2020, 321, 312–323. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.026. PubMed DOI