Neural correlates of social exclusion and overinclusion in patients with borderline personality disorder: an fMRI study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NU20-04-00410
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
PubMed
38037120
PubMed Central
PMC10691118
DOI
10.1186/s40479-023-00240-1
PII: 10.1186/s40479-023-00240-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Borderline personality disorder, Cyberball paradigm, Rejection sensitivity, Social exclusion, Social overinclusion, fMRI,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Interpersonal difficulties of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are closely related to rejection sensitivity. The aim of the present study was to gain further insight into the experience and cerebral processing of social interactions in patients with BPD by using fMRI during experimentally induced experiences of social exclusion, inclusion, and overinclusion. METHODS: The study involved 30 participants diagnosed with BPD (29 female and 1 male; age: M = 24.22, SD = 5.22) and 30 healthy controls (29 female and 1 male; age: M = 24.66, SD = 5.28) with no current or lifetime psychiatric diagnoses. In the fMRI session, all participants were asked to complete a Cyberball task that consisted of an alternating sequence of inclusion, exclusion, and overinclusion conditions. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, participants with BPD reported higher levels of inner tension and more unpleasant emotions across all experimental conditions. At the neural level, the participants with BPD showed lower recruitment of the left hippocampus in response to social exclusion (relative to the inclusion condition) than the healthy controls did. Lower recruitment of the left hippocampus in this contrast was associated with childhood maltreatment in patients with BPD. However, this difference was no longer significant when we added the covariate of hippocampal volume to the analysis. During social overinclusion (relative to the inclusion condition), we observed no significant differences in a group comparison of neural activation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that patients with BPD experience more discomfort than do healthy controls during social interactions. Compared to healthy participants, patients with BPD reported more inner tension and unpleasant emotions, irrespective of the extent to which others included them in social interactions. At a neural level, the participants with BPD showed a lower recruitment of the left hippocampus in response to social exclusion than the healthy controls did. The reduced activation of this neural structure could be related to a history of childhood maltreatment and smaller hippocampal volume in patients with BPD.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(3):497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497. PubMed DOI
Reinhard MA, Dewald-Kaufmann J, Wüstenberg T, Musil R, Barton BB, Jobst A, et al. The vicious circle of social exclusion and psychopathology: a systematic review of experimental ostracism research in psychiatric disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;270(5):521–532. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01074-1. PubMed DOI
American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) 2013.
Malejko K, Neff D, Brown RC, Plener PL, Bonenberger M, Abler B, et al. Neural signatures of social inclusion in borderline personality disorder versus non-suicidal self-injury. Brain Topogr. 2019;32(5):753–761. doi: 10.1007/s10548-019-00712-0. PubMed DOI
Renneberg B, Herm K, Hahn A, Staebler K, Lammers CH, Roepke S. Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012;19(6):473–480. doi: 10.1002/cpp.772. PubMed DOI
Gutz L, Renneberg B, Roepke S, Niedeggen M. Neural processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder and social anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124:421–431. doi: 10.1037/a0038614. PubMed DOI
van Schie CC, De CC, Rombouts SARB, Heiser WJ, Elzinga BM. Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder. Psychol Med. 2020;50(4):625–635. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000448. PubMed DOI PMC
Chapman AL, Dixon-Gordon KL, Butler SM, Walters KN. Emotional reactivity to social rejection versus a frustration induction among persons with borderline personality features. Personal Disord Theory, Res Treat. 2015;6:88–96. doi: 10.1037/per0000101. PubMed DOI
Berenson KR, Downey G, Rafaeli E, Coifman KG, Paquin NL. The rejection–rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011;120:681–690. doi: 10.1037/a0023335. PubMed DOI PMC
Foxhall M, Hamilton-Giachritsis C, Button K. The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Psychol. 2019;58(3):289–326. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12216. PubMed DOI
Feldman SI, Downey G. Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior. Dev Psychopathol. 1994;6(1):231–247. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400005976. PubMed DOI
Crowell SE, Beauchaine TP, Linehan MM. A biosocial developmental model of borderline personality: elaborating and extending linehan’s theory. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(3):495–510. doi: 10.1037/a0015616. PubMed DOI PMC
Ball JS, Links PS. Borderline personality disorder and childhood trauma: evidence for a causal relationship. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2009;11(1):63–68. doi: 10.1007/s11920-009-0010-4. PubMed DOI
Williams KD, Cheung CKT, Choi W. Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the internet. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(5):748–762. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748. PubMed DOI
Mwilambwe-Tshilobo L, Spreng RN. Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: a meta-analysis of Cyberball. Neuroimage. 2021;227:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117666. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang H, Braun C, Enck P. How the brain reacts to social stress (exclusion): a scoping review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80:80–8. PubMed
Vijayakumar N, Cheng TW, Pfeifer JH. Neural correlates of social exclusion across ages: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional MRI studies. Neuroimage. 2017;153:359–68. PubMed PMC
Cacioppo S, Frum C, Asp E, Weiss RM, Lewis JW, Cacioppo JT. A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1–4. doi: 10.1038/srep02027. PubMed DOI PMC
Kawamoto T, Onoda K, Nakashima K, Nittono H, Yamaguchi S, Ura M. Is dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation in response to social exclusion due to expectancy violation? An fMRI study. Front Evol Neurosci. 2012;4:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00011. PubMed DOI PMC
Beyer F, Münte TF, Krämer UM. Increased neural reactivity to socio-emotional stimuli links social exclusion and aggression. Biol Psychol. 2014;96:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.12.008. PubMed DOI
Hyatt CJ, Calhoun VD, Pearlson GD, Assaf M. Specific default mode subnetworks support mentalizing as revealed through opposing network recruitment by social and semantic FMRI tasks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(8):3047–3063. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22827. PubMed DOI PMC
Wrege JS, Ruocco AC, Euler S, Preller KH, Busmann M, Meya L, et al. Negative affect moderates the effect of social rejection on frontal and anterior cingulate cortex activation in borderline personality disorder. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019;19:1273–1285. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00716-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Brown RC, Plener PL, Groen G, Neff D, Bonenberger M, Abler B. Differential neural processing of social exclusion and inclusion in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury and young adults with borderline personality disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:1–9. PubMed PMC
Domsalla M, Koppe G, Niedtfeld I, Vollsta-Klein S, Schmahl C, Bohus M, et al. Cerebral processing of social rejection in patients with borderline personality disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9:1789–97. PubMed PMC
Fertuck EA, Stanley B, Kleshchova O, Mann JJ, Hirsch J, Ochsner K, et al. Rejection distress suppresses medial prefrontal cortex in borderline personality disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023;8:651–9. PubMed PMC
Rappaport BI, Barch DM. Brain responses to social feedback in internalizing disorders: a comprehensive review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;118:784–808. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.012. PubMed DOI
Malejko K, Neff D, Brown R, Plener PL, Bonenberger M, Abler B, et al. Neural correlates of social inclusion in borderline personality disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00653. PubMed DOI PMC
De Panfilis C, Riva P, Preti E, Cabrino C, Marchesi C. When social inclusion is not enough: implicit expectations of extreme inclusion in borderline personality disorder. Personal Disord theory, Res Treat. 2015;6:301–9. PubMed
Weinbrecht A, Niedeggen M, Roepke S, Renneberg B. Feeling excluded no matter what? Bias in the processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;19:343–50. PubMed PMC
Weinbrecht A, Niedeggen M, Roepke S, Renneberg B. Processing of increased frequency of social interaction in social anxiety disorder and borderline personality disorder. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85027-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Bolling DZ, Pitskel NB, Deen B, Crowley MJ, McPartland JC, Mayes LC, et al. Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation. Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2462–2471. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.049. PubMed DOI PMC
First MB, Williams JB, Benjamin LS, Spitzer RL. Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 personality disorders: SCID-5-PD. Washington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2016.
Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 1979;134:382–389. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382. PubMed DOI
Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Brown MZ, Heard HL, Wagner A. Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (SASII): development, reliability, and validity of a scale to assess suicide attempts and intentional self-injury. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(3):303–312. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.303. PubMed DOI
Bohus M, Limberger M, Frank U, Chapman A, Kuhler T, Stieglitz R. Psychometric properties of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL) Psychopathology. 2007;40:126–132. doi: 10.1159/000098493. PubMed DOI
Radimecká M, Jeřábková P, Látalová A, Linhartová P. Psychometric properties of the Czech version of borderline symptom list 23 (BSL-23. Psychoterapie. 2022;16(1):85–101.
Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory – II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
Ptáček R, Raboch J, Vňuková M, Hlinka J, Anders M. Beckova škála deprese BDI-II - standardizace a využití v praxi. Česká a Slov Psychiatr. 2016;112(6):270–274.
Beck A, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer R. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(6):893–889. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893. PubMed DOI
Kamarádová D, Praško J, Látalová K, Panáčková L, Švancara J, Ocisková M, et al. Validizace české verze beckova inventáře úzkosti. Česká a Slov Psychiatr. 2016;112(4):153–158.
Bernstein DP, Fink L, Handelsman L, Foote J, Lovejoy M, Wenzel K, et al. Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(8):1132–1136. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.8.1132. PubMed DOI
Downey G, Feldman SI. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1996;70(6):1327–1343. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327. PubMed DOI
Cyders M, Smith G. Mood-based rash action and its components: positive and negative urgency. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43:839–850. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.008. DOI
Linhartová P, Širůček J, Barteček R, Theiner P, Jeřábková B, Rudišinová D, et al. Czech versions of impulsivity self-report scales the Barratt Scale and the UPPS-P scale and their psychometric properties. Česká a Slov Psychiatr. 2017;113(4):149–157.
Kaufman EA, Xia M, Fosco G, Yaptangco M, Skidmore CR, Crowell SE. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF): validation and replication in adolescent and adult samples. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016;38(4):443–455. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9529-3. DOI
Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD. Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science. 2003;302(5643):290–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1089134. PubMed DOI
Kundu P, Voon V, Balchandani P, Lombardo MV, Poser BA, Bandettini PA. Multi-echo fMRI: a review of applications in fMRI denoising and analysis of BOLD signals. Neuroimage. 2017;154:59–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.033. PubMed DOI
Jamovi. The jamovi project. 2022.
Statistical Parametric Mapping. Available from: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm
MATLAB R2021a. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2021. Available from: https://www.mathworks.com
Kovarova A, Gajdos M, Rektor I, Mikl M. Contribution of the multi-echo approach in accelerated functional magnetic resonance imaging multiband acquisition. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022;43(3):955–973. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25698. PubMed DOI PMC
Poser BA, Versluis MJ, Hoogduin JM, Norris DG. BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55(6):1227–1235. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20900. PubMed DOI
Gajdoš M, Mikl M, Marecek R. Mask_explorer: a tool for exploring brain masks in fMRI group analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;134:155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.07.015. PubMed DOI
NeuroImaging Tools and Resources Collaboratory. Available from: https://www.nitrc.org/projects/movement_info
Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2142–2154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018. PubMed DOI PMC
xjView. Available from: https://www.alivelearn.net/xjview
Rodrigues E, Wenzel A, Ribeiro MP, Quarantini LC, Miranda-Scippa A, de Sena EP, et al. Hippocampal volume in borderline personality disorder with and without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2011;26(7):452–456. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.07.005. PubMed DOI
Ruocco AC, Amirthavasagam S, Zakzanis KK. Amygdala and hippocampal volume reductions as candidate endophenotypes for borderline personality disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Psychiatry Res - Neuroimaging. 2012;201(3):245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.012. PubMed DOI
Fertuck EA, Grinband J, Stanley B. Facial trust appraisal negatively biased in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2013;207(3):195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.004. PubMed DOI PMC
Miano A, Fertuck EA, Arntz A, Stanley B. Rejection sensitivity is a mediator between borderline personality disorder features and facial trust appraisal. J Pers Disord. 2013;27(4):442–456. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_096. PubMed DOI
Naidich TP, Tang CY, Ng JC, Delman BN. Surface Anatomy of the Cerebrum. In: Naidich TP, Castillo M, Cha S, Smirniotopoulos JGBT-I of the B, editors. Imaging of the Brain. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2013. pp. 127–53.
Tang HHY, Richardson R. Reversing the negative psychological sequelae of exclusion: inclusion is ameliorative but not protective against the aversive consequences of exclusion. Emotion. 2013;13(1):139–150. doi: 10.1037/a0029521. PubMed DOI
Bolling DZ, Pitskel NB, Deen B, Crowley MJ, Mayes LC, Pelphrey KA. Development of neural systems for processing social exclusion from childhood to adolescence. Dev Sci. 2011;14(6):1431–1444. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01087.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Anand KS, Dhikav V. Hippocampus in health and disease: an overview. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012;15(4):239–246. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.104323. PubMed DOI PMC
Morgado-Bernal I. Learning and memory consolidation: linking molecular and behavioral data. Neuroscience. 2011;176:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.12.056. PubMed DOI
Toyoda H, Li XY, Wu LJ, Zhao MG, Descalzi G, Chen T, et al. Interplay of amygdala and cingulate plasticity in emotional fear. Neural Plast. 2011;1:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2011/813749. PubMed DOI PMC
Calem M, Bromis K, McGuire P, Morgan C, Kempton MJ. Meta-analysis of associations between childhood adversity and hippocampus and amygdala volume in non-clinical and general population samples. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;14:471–479. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.016. PubMed DOI PMC
Paquola C, Bennett MR, Lagopoulos J. Understanding heterogeneity in grey matter research of adults with childhood maltreatment—A meta-analysis and review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;69:299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.011. PubMed DOI
Schmahl C, Berne K, Krause A, Kleindienst N, Valerius G, Vermetten E, et al. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes in patients with borderline personality disorder with or without posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009;34(4):289–295. PubMed PMC
McFetridge MA, Milner R, Gavin V, Levita L. Borderline personality disorder: patterns of self-harm, reported childhood trauma and clinical outcome. Br J Psychiatry Open. 2015;1(1):18–20. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.000117. PubMed DOI PMC
Teicher MH, Samson JA. Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(3):241–266. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12507. PubMed DOI PMC
McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD. Stress effects on neuronal structure: hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(1):3–23. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.171. PubMed DOI PMC
Thomas N, Gurvich C, Kulkarni J. Borderline personality disorder, trauma, and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:2601–2612. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S198804. PubMed DOI PMC
Cattarinussi G, Delvecchio G, Prunas C, Moltrasio C, Brambilla P. Effects of pharmacological treatments on emotional tasks in borderline personality disorder: a review of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Affect Disord. 2021;288(March):50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.088. PubMed DOI