Fixed-Duration Ibrutinib-Venetoclax in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Comorbidities
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed
38319255
DOI
10.1056/evidoa2200006
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adenine * analogs & derivatives MeSH
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell * drug therapy mortality MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Comorbidity MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Piperidines * therapeutic use adverse effects MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use adverse effects MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use adverse effects MeSH
- Pyrazoles therapeutic use adverse effects MeSH
- Pyrimidines therapeutic use adverse effects administration & dosage MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Adenine * MeSH
- ibrutinib MeSH Browser
- Piperidines * MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents MeSH
- Pyrazoles MeSH
- Pyrimidines MeSH
BACKGROUND: GLOW is a phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib-venetoclax in older patients and/or those with comorbidities with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS: We randomly assigned (1:1) patients 65 years of age or older or those 18 to 64 years of age who also had a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score greater than 6 (CIRS scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more impaired function of organ systems) or creatinine clearance of less than 70 ml/min, to ibrutinib-venetoclax (3 cycles ibrutinib lead-in, then 12 cycles ibrutinib-venetoclax) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (6 cycles). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary end points included undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), response rates, and safety. RESULTS: This study enrolled 211 patients, with 106 randomly assigned to ibrutinib-venetoclax and 105 to chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, there were 22 PFS events for ibrutinib-venetoclax and 67 events for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. PFS was significantly longer for ibrutinib-venetoclax than for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.216; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.131 to 0.357; P<0.001). The improvement in PFS with ibrutinib-venetoclax was consistent across predefined subgroups, including patients 65 years of age or older or with a CIRS score greater than 6. The best uMRD rate in bone marrow by next-generation sequencing was significantly higher for ibrutinib-venetoclax (55.7%) than for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (21.0%; P<0.001). The proportion of patients with sustained uMRD in peripheral blood from 3 to 12 months after end of treatment was 84.5% for ibrutinib-venetoclax and 29.3% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. Four patients treated with ibrutinib-venetoclax required subsequent therapy compared with 27 patients receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.143; 95% CI, 0.050 to 0.410). Adverse events grade 3 or greater occurred for 80 (75.5%) and 73 (69.5%) patients receiving ibrutinib-venetoclax and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, respectively, with neutropenia being most common in both arms (37 [34.9%] and 52 [49.5%]). There were 11 (10.4%) and 12 (11.4%) all-cause deaths in the ibrutinib-venetoclax and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib-venetoclax, an all-oral, once-daily, fixed-duration combination, demonstrated superior PFS and deeper and better sustained responses versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab as first-line CLL treatment in older patients and/or those with comorbidities. (Funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and Pharmacyclics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03462719.)
Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht Netherlands
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona
Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole Toulouse France
Janssen Research and Development Beerse Belgium
Janssen Research and Development Düsseldorf Germany
Janssen Research and Development Raritan NJ
Janssen Research and Development San Diego CA
Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm
Medical University of Łódź Copernicus Memorial Hospital Łódź Poland
Norton Cancer Institute Louisville KY
Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen
Russian Scientific Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology St Petersburg Russia
S P Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital Moscow
Sheba Medical Center Ramat Gan Israel
Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary Alberta Canada
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Leuven Belgium
University Hospital Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
Opinion: What defines high-risk CLL in the post-chemoimmunotherapy era?
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03462719