An increasing number of software tools can be used in forensic anthropology to estimate a biological profile, but further studies in other populations are required for more robust validation. The present study aimed to evaluate the validity of MorphoPASSE software for sex estimation from sexually dimorphic cranial traits recorded on 3D CT models (n = 180) from three populations samples (Czech, French, and Egyptian). Two independent observers performed scoring of 4 cranial traits (2 of them bilateral) in each population sample of 30 males and 30 females. The accuracy of sex estimation using traditional posterior probability threshold (pp = 0.5) ranged from 85.6% to 88.3% and overall classification error from 14.4% to 11.7% for both observers, and corresponds to the previously published values of the method. The MorphoPASSE method is also affected by the subjectivity of the observers, as both observers show agreement in sex assignment in 83.9% of cases, regardless of the accuracy of the estimates. Applying a higher posterior probability threshold (pp 0.95) provided classification accuracy of 97.9% and 93.3% of individuals (for observer A and B respectively), minimizing the risk of error to 2.1% and 6.7%, respectively. However, sex estimation can only be applied to 54% and 66% of individuals, respectively. Our results demonstrate the validity of the MorphoPASSE software for cranial sex estimation outside the reference population. However, the achieved classification success is accompanied by a high risk of errors, the reduction of which is only possible by increasing the posterior probability threshold.

Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 44 Prague 2 Czech Republic

Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria 21568 Egypt

Department of Radiology Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt

UMR 5199 PACEA Université de Bordeaux Bâtiment B2 Allée Geoffroy Saint Hilaire CS 50023 33615 Pessac Cedex France

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Acsádi G, Nemeskéri J (1970) History of human life span and mortality. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest

Anonymous (2010) Sex assessment. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2018/03/13/swganth_sex_assessment.pdf

Anonymous (2020) Australia New Zealand Policing Advisory Agency, Guidelines for Forensic Anthropology Practitioners (ANZPAA). Version 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.anzpaa.org.au/ArticleDocuments/2304/Guidelines%20for%20Forensic%20Anthropology%20%20Practitioners%20-%20March%202020.pdf.aspx

Attia MH, Attia MH, Farghaly YT et al (2022a) Performance of the supervised learning algorithms in sex estimation of the proximal femur: a comparative study in contemporary Egyptian and Turkish samples. Sci Justice 62:288–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.03.003 DOI

Attia MH, Kholief MA, Zaghloul NM et al (2022b) Efficiency of the Adjusted Binary Classification (ABC) approach in osteometric sex estimation: a comparative study of different linear machine learning algorithms and training sample sizes. Biology (Basel) 11:917 PubMed

Avent PR, Hughes CE, Garvin HM (2022) Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods. J Forensic Sci 67:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14947 PubMed DOI

Bareša T, Jerković I, Bašić Ž et al (2024) Walker’s traits for sex estimation in modern Croatian population using MSCT virtual cranial database: validation and development of population-specific standards. Forensic Imaging 36:200578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fri.2024.200578 DOI

Bartholdy BP, Sandoval E, Hoogland MLP, Schrader SA (2020) Getting rid of dichotomous sex estimations: why logistic regression should be preferred over discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Sci 65:1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14482 PubMed DOI PMC

Baumgarten SE, Kenyon-Flatt B (2020) Metric methods for estimating sex utilizing the pelvis. In: Klales A (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, pp 171–184 DOI

Bertsatos A, Chovalopoulou ME, Brůžek J, Bejdová Š (2020) Advanced procedures for skull sex estimation using sexually dimorphic morphometric features. Int J Legal Med 134:1927–1937 PubMed DOI

Bertsatos A, Christaki A, Chovalopoulou ME (2019) Testing the reliability of 3D-ID software in sex and ancestry estimation with a modern Greek sample. Forensic Sci Int 297:132–137 PubMed DOI

Boucherie A (2023) Analyse du dimorphisme sexuel de variables métriques de la base du crâne: intérêts archéo-anthropologiques et forensiques. Dissertation. Université Libre de Bruxelles

Boyd C, Boyd D (2018) Forensic anthropology: theoretical framework and scientific basis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken DOI

Brennan EJ (2023) Differential adult mortality risk from late medieval to early modern Berlin: health consequences at the intersection of urban growth and climate change. Am J Biol Anthropol 180:21

Brůžek J, Murail P (2006) Methodology and reliability of sex determination from the skeleton. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J (eds) Forensic anthropology and medicine: complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, pp 225–242 DOI

Brůžek J, Santos F, Dutailly B et al (2017) Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 164:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23282 PubMed DOI

Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains : proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, organized by Jonathan Haas. Archeological Survey

Byrnes JF, Torres SEM, Johnson LJ et al (2023) New tricks, old bones, reassessing assigned sex at birth estimations of the Erie County Poorhouse cemetery using MorphoPASSE. Am J Biol Anthropol 180:24

Cappella A, Bertoglio B, Di Maso M et al (2022) Sexual dimorphism of cranial morphological traits in an italian sample: a population-specific logistic regression model for predicting sex. Biology (Basel) 11:1202 PubMed

Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220 PubMed DOI

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals

Davidson M, Nakhaeizadeh S, Rando C (2023) Cognitive bias and the order of examination in forensic anthropological non-metric methods: a pilot study. Aust J Forensic Sci 55:255–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2021.1998625 DOI

Dirkmaat, Cabo LL (2012) Forensic anthropology: embracing the new paradigm. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley, Ltd, pp 3–40

Dror IE (2023) The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency. J Forensic Sci 68:1851–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15369 PubMed DOI

Ferembach D, Schwidetzky I, Stloukal M (1980) Recommendations for age and sex diagnoses of skeletons. J Hum Evol 9:517–549 DOI

Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A (2013) Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 229:158.e1-158.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.005 PubMed DOI

Galeta P, Brůžek J (2020) Sex estimation using continuous variables: problems and principles of sex classification in the zone of uncertainty. In: Obertová Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (eds) Statistics and probability in forensic anthropology. Academic Press, pp 155–182 DOI

Garvin (2020) Adult sex estimation from cranial morphological traits. In: Klales A (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, pp 95–112 DOI

Garvin HM, Uhl N, Passalacqua NV et al (2012) Developments in forensic anthropology: age at- death estimation. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology, first. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 202–223 DOI

Garvin, Klales A (2020) Adult skeletal sex estimation and global standardization. In: Parra R, Zapico S, Ubelaker D (eds) Forensic science and humanitarian action: interacting with the dead and the living. Wiley, Ltd, pp 109–209

Garvin, Sholts S, Mosca L (2014) Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size. Am J Phys Anthropol 154:259–269 PubMed DOI

Grabherr S, Cooper C, Ulrich-Bochsler S et al (2009) Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”-a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1155-y PubMed DOI

Grivas CR, Komar DA (2008) Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: Implications for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 53:771–776 PubMed DOI

Guyomarc’h, Brůžek J (2011) Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis. Forensic Sci Int 208:180-e1 DOI

Jantz RL, Ousley SD (2005) FORDISC 3: computerized forensic discriminant functions. Version 3.0. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Jerković I, Bašić Ž, Anđelinović Š, Kružić I (2020) Adjusting posterior probabilities to meet predefined accuracy criteria: a proposal for a novel approach to osteometric sex estimation. Forensic Sci Int 311:110273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110273 PubMed DOI

Jerković I, Bašić Ž, Kružić I, Anđelinović Š (2018) Creating reference data on sex for ancient populations using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis method: a validation test using the results of aDNA analysis. J Archaeol Sci 94:44–50 DOI

Jilala W, Ng’walali P, Russa D, Bushozi P (2021) Sexing contemporary Tanzanian skeletonized remains using skull morphology: a test of the walker sex assessment method. Forensic Sci Int Rep 3:100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2021.100195 DOI

Klales A (2020a) MorphoPASSE: morphological pelvis and skull sex estimation program. In: Klales A (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, pp 271–278 DOI

Klales A (2018a) MorphoPASSE: the morphological pelvis and skull sex estimation database. Version 1.0. Washburn, University, Topeka

Klales A (2020b) Practitioner preferences for sex estimation from human skeletal remains. In: Klales A (ed) Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton. Academic Press, pp 11–23 DOI

Klales A, Cole S (2018) MorphoPASSE: the morphological pelvis and skull sex estimation database manual. Version 1.0. Washburn, University, Topeka

Klales AR (2018b) Introducing MorphoPASSE: the morphological pelvis and skull sex estimation database. In: Proceedings of the 70th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in Seattle. Wa

Klales AR, Ousley SD, Vollner JM (2012) A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice’s nonmetric traits and statistical methods. Am J Phys Anthropol 149:104–114 PubMed DOI

Kotěrová A, Rmoutilová R, Brůžek J (2022) Current trends in methods for estimating age and sex from the adult human skeleton. Anthropologie 60:225–252 DOI

Kotěrová A, Velemínská J, Dupej J et al (2016) Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia. Int J Legal Med 131:251–261 PubMed DOI

Kranioti EF, Apostol MA (2014) Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greeks, Italians, and Spanish: forensic implications. Int J Legal Med 129:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1045-6 PubMed DOI

Krishan K, Chatterjee PM, Kanchan T et al (2016) A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. Forensic Sci Int 261:165.e1-165.e8 PubMed DOI

Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE, Kenyhercz MW (2015) Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans. Int J Legal Med 129:869–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1111-0 PubMed DOI

Lesciotto K (2015) The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony. J Forensic Sci 60:549–555 PubMed DOI

Lewis, Garvin HM (2016) Reliability of the Walker cranial nonmetric method and implications for sex estimation. J Forensic Sci 61:743–751 PubMed DOI

Liebenberg L, Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE (2019) Postcraniometric sex and ancestry estimation in South Africa: a validation study. Int J Legal Med 133:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1865-x PubMed DOI

Lye R, Obertová Z, Bachtiar NA, Franklin D (2024) Validating the use of clinical MSCT scans for cranial nonmetric sex estimation in a contemporary Indonesian population. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03176-5 PubMed DOI

Morrison GS, Weber P, Basu N et al (2021) Calculation of likelihood ratios for inference of biological sex from human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 3:100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100202 PubMed DOI PMC

Murail P, Brůžek J, Houët F, Cunha E (2005) DSP: a tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 17:167–176 DOI

Nikita E, Michopoulou E (2018) A quantitative approach for sex estimation based on cranial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 165:507–517 PubMed DOI

Oikonomopoulou EK, Valakos E, Nikita E (2017) Population-specificity of sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic traits: evaluation of existing and proposal of new functions for sex assessment in a Greek assemblage. Int J Legal Med 131:1731–1738 PubMed DOI

Phenice T (1969) A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 30:297–301 PubMed DOI

R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Verhoff MA (2007) Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 121:477–482 PubMed DOI

Santos F (2021) rdss: an R package to facilitate the use of Murail et al’.s (1999) approach of sex estimation in past populations. Int J Osteoarchaeol 31:382–392 DOI

Slice DE, Ross A (2009) 3D-ID: geometric morphometric classification of crania for forensic scientists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:2124–2129 PubMed PMC

Stevenson JC, Mahoney ER, Walker PL, Everson PM (2009) Prediction of sex based on five skull traits using decision analysis (CHAID). Am J Phys Anthropol 139:434–441 PubMed DOI

Swift L, Obertova Z, Franklin D (2024) Demonstrating the empirical effect of population specificity of anthropological standards in a contemporary Australian population. Int J Legal Med 138:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03031-z PubMed DOI

Tallman S (2019) Cranial nonmetric sexual dimorphism and sex estimation in East and Southeast Asian individuals. Forensic Anthropol 4:204–221

Tallman SD, Go MC (2018) Application of the optimized summed scored attributes method to sex estimation in Asian Crania. J Forensic Sci 63:809–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13644 PubMed DOI

Ubelaker DH, DeGaglia CM (2017) Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Forensic Sci Int 278:407.e1-407.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.012 PubMed DOI

Ubelaker DH, Ross AH, Graver SM (2002) Application of forensic discriminant functions to a Spanish cranial sample. Forensic Sci Commun 4(3). Retrieved from https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/july2002/ubelaker1.htm

Urbanová P, Ross AH, Jurda M, Nogueira MI (2014) Testing the reliability of software tools in sex and ancestry estimation in a multi-ancestral Brazilian sample. Leg Med 16:264–273 DOI

Vargas DS, St John ME, Garcia-Bernabe JR, DiGangi EA (2022) MorphoPASSE skull sexing error. Am J Biol Anthropol 177:159–160

Walker PL (2008) Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 136:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20776 PubMed DOI

Walrath D, Turner P, Bruzek J (2004) Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination. Am J Phys Anthr 125:132–137 DOI

Williams BA, Rogers TL (2006) Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination. J Forensic Sci 51:729–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00177.x PubMed DOI

Wright R (2012) Guide to using the CRANID programs Cr6bInd: for linear and nearest neighbours discriminants analysis. Retrieved from http://www.box.net/shared/static/qyaq6thdds.pdf

Zejdlik K, Nyárádi Z, Gonciar A (2021) Evidence of horsemanship in two Szekler noblemen from the Baroque period. Int J Osteoarchaeol 31:66–76 DOI