Drug effectiveness of 2nd and 3rd TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis - relationship with the reason for withdrawal from the previous treatment
Jazyk angličtina Země Francie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
38582359
DOI
10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105729
PII: S1297-319X(24)00040-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Epidemiology, Psoriatic arthritis, TNF-inhibitors, Treatment withdrawal,
- MeSH
- antirevmatika terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- indukce remise * metody MeSH
- inhibitory TNF terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- psoriatická artritida * farmakoterapie MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci * MeSH
- TNF-alfa antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antirevmatika MeSH
- inhibitory TNF MeSH
- TNF-alfa MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To investigate real-world retention and remission rates in PsA patients initiating a 2nd or 3rd TNFi and the association with reason for discontinuation from the previous TNFi-treatment. METHODS: Prospectively collected routine care data from 12 European registries were pooled. Retention rates (Kaplan-Meier estimation) and crude/LUNDEX-adjusted rates of Disease Activity Score 28 and Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAS28 and DAPSA28) remission were calculated and compared with adjusted Cox regression analyses and Chi-squared test, respectively). RESULTS: We included 5233 (2nd TNFi) and 1906 (3rd TNFi) patients. Twelve-month retention rates for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi were 68% (95%CI: 67-70%) and 66% (64-68%), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE/LOE had 12-month retention rates of 66%/65% (2nd TNFi), and 65%/63% (3rd TNFi), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to LOE after less vs more than 24 weeks had 12-month retention rates of 54%/69% (2nd TNFi), and 58%/65% (3rd TNFi). Six-month crude/LUNDEX-adjusted DAS28 remission rates were 48%/35% and 38%/27%, and DAPSA28 remission rates were 19%/14% and 14%/10%, for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi. CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of patients remained on TNFi at 12months for both the 2nd and 3rd TNFi, while one-third and one-quarter of patients were in DAS28 remission after 6months on the 2nd and 3rd TNFi. While drug effectiveness was similar in patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE compared to overall LOE, drug effectiveness was better in patients who had stopped the previous TNF due to secondary LOE compared to primary LOE.
Center of Rheumatic Diseases University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania
Department of Rheumatology Geneva University Hospital Geneva Switzerland
GISEA registry Rheumatology Unit DETO University of Bari Bari Italy
Health Technology Assessment Agency Instituto de Salud Carlos 3 Madrid Spain
Inflammation Center Department of Rheumatology Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
Radboudumc Department of Rheumatology PO box 9101 6500 Nijmegen HB The Netherlands
ROB FIN Registry Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology School of Medicine Dokuz Eylul University Izmir Turkey
University of Iceland Faculty of Medicine and Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org