Comparing pulsed field electroporation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: design and rationale of the BEAT PAROX-AF randomized clinical trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, protokol klinické studie, srovnávací studie, multicentrická studie
Grantová podpora
945125
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation
PubMed
38646926
PubMed Central
PMC11068269
DOI
10.1093/europace/euae103
PII: 7655711
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Pulmonary vein isolation, Pulsed field ablation, Radiofrequency current, Randomized trial,
- MeSH
- fibrilace síní * chirurgie patofyziologie diagnóza terapie MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- venae pulmonales chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- protokol klinické studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
AIMS: Using thermal-based energy sources [radiofrequency (RF) energy/cryo energy] for catheter ablation is considered effective and safe when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, treatment success remains limited and complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into non-target tissues. We aim to compare pulsed field ablation (PFA) with RF ablation in terms of efficacy and safety for patients with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BEAT PAROX-AF trial is a European multicentre, superiority, open-label randomized clinical trial in two parallel groups. A total of 292 participants were recruited in 9 high-volume European clinical centres in 5 countries. Patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to PFA (FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System©, Boston Scientific) or RF using the CLOSE protocol with contact force sensing catheter (SmartTouch© catheter and CARTO© Biosense Webster). The primary endpoint will be the 1-year recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, and the major secondary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of acute (<7 days) procedure-related serious adverse events, or pulmonary vein stenosis, or atrio-oesophageal fistula up to 12 months. Additionally, five sub-studies investigate the effect of PFA on oesophageal safety, cerebral lesions, cardiac autonomic nervous system, durability of PVI as assessed during redo ablation procedures, and atrial and ventricular function. The study began on 27 December 2021 and concluded recruitment on 17 January 2024. Results will be available in mid-2025. CONCLUSION: The BEAT PAROX-AF trial aims to provide critical insights into the optimal treatment approach for patients with paroxysmal AF.
Cardiology Department Na Homolce Hospital Homolka Hospital Prague Czechia
Clinical Research and Innovation Department CHU Bordeaux Bordeaux France
Department of Cardiology AZ Sint Jan Hospital Bruges Belgium
Department of Cardiology Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt Saale Bad Neustadt an der Saale Germany
Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czechia
Department of Cardiology University Hospital Rangueil Toulouse France
Department of Electrophysiology Boston Scientific Corporation St Paul MN USA
Division of Cardiology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Heart Rhythm Department Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France
IHU LIRYC University Bordeaux CHU Bordeaux Bordeaux France
IHU LIRYC University Bordeaux INSERM CRCTB U 1045 Bordeaux France
Inria Université Côte d'Azur Epione Team Sophia Antipolis France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, Chouairi S, Gencel L, Hocini ML et al. A focal source of atrial fibrillation treated by discrete radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 1997;95:572–6. PubMed
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2020;42:374–498. PubMed
Haissaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998;339:659–66. PubMed
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim Y-H, Saad EB, Aguinaga L et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ep Europace 2017;20:e1–160. PubMed PMC
Kuck K-H, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KRJ et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2235–45. PubMed
Verma A, Jiang C-Y, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1812–22. PubMed
Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale A et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;303:333–40. PubMed
Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, Hoyt R, Tyler J, Durrani S et al. Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2021;384:316–24. PubMed
Park J-W, Yu HT, Kim T-H, Uhm J-S, Joung B, Lee M-H et al. Mechanisms of long-term recurrence 3 years after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020;6:999–1007. PubMed
Weerasooriya R, Khairy P, Litalien J, Macle L, Hocini M, Sacher F et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up? Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011;57:160–6. PubMed
Pappone C, Oral H, Santinelli V, Vicedomini G, Lang CC, Manguso F et al. Atrio-esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2004;109:2724–6. PubMed
Hoffmann R, Parade U, Bauerle H, Winter K-D, Rauschenbach U, Mischke K et al. Safety and acute efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation at community hospitals. Europace 2021;23:1744–50. PubMed
Tilz RR, Schmidt V, Pürerfellner H, Maury P, Chun KU, Martinek M et al. A worldwide survey on incidence, management, and prognosis of oesophageal fistula formation following atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the POTTER-AF study. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2458–69. PubMed PMC
Reddy VY, Anic A, Koruth J, Petru J, Funasako M, Minami K et al. Pulsed field ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:1068–80. PubMed
Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Anic A, Petru J, Funasako M et al. Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. Clin Electrophysiol 2021;7:614–27. PubMed
Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K et al. Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. PubMed PMC
Füting A, Reinsch N, Höwel D, Brokkaar L, Rahe G, Neven K. First experience with pulsed field ablation as routine treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace 2022;24:1084–92. PubMed
Phlips T, Taghji P, El Haddad M, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y et al. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the ‘CLOSE’-protocol. Europace 2018;20:f419–f27. PubMed
Willems S, Khairy P, Andrade JG, Hoffmann BA, Levesque S, Verma A et al. Redefining the blanking period after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: insights from the ADVICE (Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination) trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016;9:e003909. PubMed
Seligman WH, Das-Gupta Z, Jobi-Odeneye AO, Arbelo E, Banerjee A, Bollmann A et al. Development of an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) atrial fibrillation working group. Eur Heart J 2020;41:1132–40. PubMed PMC
Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004;42:851–9. PubMed
Spertus J, Dorian P, Bubien R, Lewis S, Godejohn D, Reynolds MR et al. Development and validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:15–25. PubMed
Investigators A . Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Circulation 2004;109:1509–13. PubMed
Oral H, Pappone C, Chugh A, Good E, Bogun F, Pelosi Jr F et al. Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2006;354:934–41. PubMed
Investigators AFF-uIoRM . A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825–33. PubMed
Mörtsell D, Arbelo E, Dagres N, Brugada J, Laroche C, Trines SA et al. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a study of outcome and safety based on the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry and the Swedish catheter ablation registry. Europace 2019;21:581–9. PubMed
Schmidt M, Dorwarth U, Andresen D, Brachmann J, Kuck KH, Kuniss M et al. Cryoballoon versus RF ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2014;25:1–7. PubMed
Kuck K-H, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Schlüter M, Fürnkranz A, Chun KRJ et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2858–65. PubMed PMC
Jaïs P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, Daoud E, Khairy P, Subbiah R et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation 2008;118:2498–505. PubMed
Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019;321:1261–74. PubMed PMC
Cochet H, Nakatani Y, Sridi-Cheniti S, Cheniti G, Ramirez FD, Nakashima T et al. Pulsed field ablation selectively spares the oesophagus during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace 2021;23:1391–9. PubMed PMC
Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Koruth JS, Petru J, Funosako M, Cochet H et al. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:315–26. PubMed
Katic J, Sikiric I, Lisica L, Zaja I, Puljiz Z, Jurisic Z et al. Pulsed field ablation as the first choice regarding oesophageal safety for atrial fibrillation ablation? Europace 2022;24:euac053. 254.
Guo F, Wang J, Deng Q, Feng H, Xie M, Zhou Z et al. Effects of pulsed field ablation on autonomic nervous system in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Heart Rhythm 2023;20:329–38. PubMed
Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A, Whang W, Cuoco FA, Patel C et al. Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1660–71. PubMed