Repeat procedures after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: MANIFEST-REDO study

. 2025 Aug 04 ; 27 (8) : .

Status In-Process Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39824172

Grantová podpora
Boston Scientific

AIMS: Initial clinical studies of pulsed field ablation (PFA) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) indicated a >90% durability rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, these studies were largely conducted in single centres and involved a limited number of operators. We aimed to describe the electrophysiological findings and outcomes in patients undergoing repeat ablation after an initial PF ablation for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the MANIFEST-REDO study, we investigated patients who underwent repeat ablation due to clinical recurrence-AF or atrial tachycardia (AT)-following first-ever PVI with a pentaspline PFA catheter (Farawave, Boston Scientific Inc.). At 22 centres, 427 patients (age 64 ± 11 years; 37% female) were included. Of note, the recurrent arrhythmia leading to the repeat ablation was paroxysmal AF (51%), persistent AF (30%), or AT (19%). At the repeat procedure, the PV reconnection rates were 30% (left superior pulmonary vein), 28% (left inferior pulmonary vein), 33% (right superior pulmonary vein), and 32% (right inferior pulmonary vein). In 45% of patients, all PVs were durably isolated at the beginning of the repeat procedure, with the previous use of any imaging or mapping modality being univariately associated with durable PVI. After a post-redo follow-up period of 284 (90-366) days, the primary effectiveness endpoint (freedom from documented AF/AT lasting ≥30 s after 3-month blanking without class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs or symptoms) was achieved in 65% of patients, with significant differences between groups (PAF 65% vs. PersAF 56% vs. AT 76%; P = 0.04). Persistent AF as recurrent arrhythmia after the initial PFA ablation predicted AT/AF recurrence after repeat ablation [hazard ratio 1.241 (95% confidence interval 1.534-1.005); P = 0.045]. The procedural complication rate was 2.8%. CONCLUSION: In repeat procedures for AF/AT performed after an index procedure with PFA for AF, PV reconnections are not uncommon. Repeat procedures can be performed safely and with an acceptable subsequent success rate.

Asklepios Hospital St Georg Hamburg Germany

Cardiology Department Na Homolce Hospital Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Catharina Hospital Eindhoven The Netherlands

Clinic for Electrophysiology Herz und Diabeteszentrum NRW Ruhr University Bochum Bad Oeynhausen Germany

Department for Cardiovascular Diseases University Hospital Center Split Split Croatia

Department for Electrophysiology Heart Center University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany

Department of Cardiology and Angiology Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen University Duisburg Essen Duisburg Germany

Department of Cardiology Herlev Gentofte University Hospital Hellerup Denmark

Department of Cardiology Jessa Hospitals Hasselt Belgium

Department of Cardiology Rouen Hospital Rouen France

Department of Cardiology University Hospital Rangueil Toulouse France

Department of Cardiology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

Department of Medicine and Cardiology Goethe University Frankfurt Germany

Department of Rhythmology Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Asklepios Klinik Altona Hamburg Germany

Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Auenbruggerplatz 15 8036 Graz Austria

German Center for Cardiovascular Research DZHK Partner Site Rhine Main Germany

German Center for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Lübeck Lübeck Germany

Heart Center Bad Neustadt Rhoen Clinic Campus Bad Neustadt Bad Neustadt an der Saale Germany

Heart Rhythm Department Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France

I2MC INSERM UMR 1297 Toulouse France

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA

IHU LIRYC CHU Bordeaux University of Bordeaux Bordeaux France

IKEM Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Neuron Medical Brno Czech Republic

University Heart and Vascular Center University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

University Heart Center Lübeck Department of Rhythmology University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Germany

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Van Gelder  IC, Rienstra  M, Bunting  KV, Casado-Arroyo  R, Caso  V, Crijns  HJGM  et al.  2024 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J  2024;45:3314–414. PubMed

Tzeis  S, Gerstenfeld  EP, Kalman  J, Saad  EB, Sepehri Shamloo  A, Andrade  JG  et al.  2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace  2024;26:euae043.

Chun  KRJ, Miklavčič  D, Vlachos  K, Bordignon  S, Scherr  D, Jais  P  et al.  State-of-the-art pulsed field ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: ongoing evolution and future perspective. Europace  2024;26:euae134. PubMed PMC

Koruth  JS, Kuroki  K, Iwasawa  J, Enomoto  J, Viswanathan  R, Brose  R  et al.  Preclinical evaluation of pulsed field ablation: electrophysiological and histological assessment of thoracic vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol  2019;12:e007781. PubMed PMC

Vetta  G, Della Rocca  DG, Parlavecchio  A, Magnocavallo  M, Sorgente  A, Pannone  L  et al.  Multielectrode catheter-based pulsed electric field vs. cryoballoon for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace  2024;26:euae293. PubMed PMC

Reddy  VY, Gerstenfeld  EP, Natale  A, Whang  W, Cuoco  FA, Patel  C  et al.  Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med  2023;389:1660–71. PubMed

Erhard  N, Frison  E, Asselineau  J, Aouar  B, Boveda  S, Cochet  H  et al.  Comparing pulsed field electroporation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: design and rationale of the BEAT PAROX-AF randomized clinical trial. Europace  2024;26:euae103. PubMed PMC

Urbanek  L, Bordignon  S, Schaack  D, Chen  S, Tohoku  S, Efe  TH  et al.  Pulsed field versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up in a 400-patient cohort. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol  2023;16:389–98. PubMed

Della Rocca  DG, Marcon  L, Magnocavallo  M, Menè  R, Pannone  L, Mohanty  S  et al.  Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison. Europace  2023;26:euae016. PubMed PMC

Metzner  A, Fiala  M, Vijgen  J, Ouss  A, Gunawardene  M, Hansen  J  et al.  Long-term outcomes of the pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the prospective, multicentre FARA-Freedom Study. Europace  2024;26:euae053. PubMed PMC

Schmidt  B, Bordignon  S, Tohoku  S, Chen  S, Bologna  F, Urbanek  L. 5S study: safe and simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation using sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol  2022;15:e010817. PubMed

Ekanem  E, Reddy  VY, Schmidt  B, Reichlin  T, Neven  K, Metzner  A  et al.  Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF). Europace  2022;24:1256–66. PubMed PMC

Turagam  MK, Neuzil  P, Schmidt  B, Reichlin  T, Neven  K, Metzner  A  et al.  Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation: one-year outcomes from the MANIFEST-PF registry. Circulation  2023;148:35–46. PubMed

Schmidt  B, Bordignon  S, Neven  K, Reichlin  T, Blaauw  Y, Hansen  J  et al.  EUropean real-world outcomes with Pulsed field ablatiOn in patients with symptomatic atRIAl fibrillation: lessons from the multi-centre EU-PORIA registry. Europace  2023;25:euad185. PubMed PMC

Kueffer  T, Bordignon  S, Neven  K, Blaauw  Y, Hansen  J, Adelino  R  et al.  Durability of pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed-field ablation: results from the multicenter EU-PORIA registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2024;10:698–708. PubMed

Tohoku  S, Chun  KRJ, Bordignon  S, Chen  S, Schaack  D, Urbanek  L  et al.  Findings from repeat ablation using high-density mapping after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation. Europace  2023;25:433–40. PubMed PMC

Magni  FT, Scherr  D, Manninger  M, Sohns  C, Sommer  P, Hovakimyan  T  et al.  Electrophysiological findings during re-do procedures after single-shot pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation with pulsed field ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol  2023;66:1729–37. PubMed PMC

Ruwald  MH, Haugdal  M, Worck  R, Johannessen  A, Hansen  ML, Sørensen  SK  et al.  Characterization of durability and reconnection patterns at time of repeat ablation after single-shot pulsed field pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol  2024;67:379–87. PubMed PMC

Lemoine  MD, Obergassel  J, Jaeckle  S, Nies  M, Taraba  S, Mencke  C  et al.  Pulsed-field- vs. cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: lessons from repeat procedures. Europace  2024;26:euae221. PubMed PMC

Maurhofer  J, Tanner  H, Kueffer  T, Madaffari  A, Thalmann  G, Kozhuharov  N  et al.  Pulsed-field ablation for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm O2  2024;5:257–65. PubMed PMC

Turagam  MK, Neuzil  P, Schmidt  B, Reichlin  T, Neven  K, Metzner  A, et al.  Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: a MANIFEST-PF sub-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2024;24:S2405–500X. PubMed

Ekanem  E, Neuzil  P, Reichlin  T, Kautzner  J, van der Voort  P, Jais  P  et al.  Safety of pulsed field ablation in more than 17,000 patients with atrial fibrillation in the MANIFEST-17K study. Nat Med  2024;30:2020–9. PubMed PMC

Reddy  VY, Dukkipati  SR, Neuzil  P, Anic  A, Petru  J, Funasako  M  et al.  Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2021;7:614–27. PubMed

Kawamura  I, Neuzil  P, Shivamurthy  P, Petru  J, Funasako  M, Minami  K  et al.  Does pulsed field ablation regress over time? A quantitative temporal analysis of pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm  2021;18:878–84. PubMed

Rauber  M, Manninger  M, Eberl  AS, Scherr  D. Zero-fluoroscopy ablation with multielectrode pulse field ablation system: case series. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol  2024;47:117–20. PubMed

Badertscher  P, Serban  T, Isenegger  C, Krisai  P, Voellmin  G, Osswald  S  et al.  Role of 3D electro-anatomical mapping on procedural characteristics and outcomes in pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace  2024;26:euae075. PubMed PMC

Boersma  L, Andrade  JG, Betts  T, Duytschaever  M, Pürerfellner  H, Santoro  F  et al.  Progress in atrial fibrillation ablation during 25 years of Europace journal. Europace  2023;25:euad244. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...