Long-term outcomes of the pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the prospective, multicentre FARA-Freedom Study

. 2024 Mar 01 ; 26 (3) : .

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print

Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38385529

Grantová podpora
Boston Scientific

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Despite randomized controlled trials and real-world data showing the promise of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for this treatment, long-term efficacy and safety data demonstrating single-procedure outcomes off antiarrhythmic drugs remain limited. The aim of the FARA-Freedom Study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of PFA using the pentaspline catheter for PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: FARA-Freedom, a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, enrolled patients with PAF undergoing de novo PVI with PFA, who were followed for 12 months with weekly transtelephonic monitoring and a 72-h Holter ECG at 6 and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events out to 7 days post-ablation and PV stenosis or atrioesophageal (AE) fistula out to 12 months. Treatment success is a composite of acute PVI and chronic success, which includes freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia longer than 30 s, use of antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period, or use of amiodarone or repeat ablation at any time. The study enrolled 179 PAF patients (62 ± 10 years, 39% female) at 13 centres. At the index procedure, all PVs were successfully isolated with the pentaspline PFA catheter. Procedure and left atrial dwell times, with a 20-min waiting period, were 71.9 ± 17.6 and 41.0 ± 13.3 min, respectively. Fluoroscopy time was 11.5 ± 7.4 min. Notably, monitoring compliance was high, with 88.4 and 90.3% with weekly events and 72-h Holter monitors, respectively. Freedom from the composite primary effectiveness endpoint was 66.6%, and 41 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, mostly recurrent atrial fibrillation (31 patients). The composite safety endpoint occurred in two patients (1.1%), one tamponade and one transient ischaemic attack. There was no coronary spasm, PV stenosis, or AE fistula. There were four cases of transient phrenic nerve palsy, but all resolved during the index procedure. CONCLUSION: In this prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter was effective in treating PAF patients despite rigourous endpoint definitions and high monitoring compliance and demonstrated favourable safety. REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT05072964 (sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation).

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Hindricks  G, Potpara  T, Dagres  N, Arbelo  E, Bax  JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist  C  et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J  2021;42:373–498. PubMed

Reddy  VY, Gerstenfeld  EP, Natale  A, Whang  W, Cuoco  FA, Patel  C  et al.  Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med  2023;389:1660–71. PubMed

Reddy  VY, Dukkipati  SR, Neuzil  P, Anic  A, Petru  J, Funasako  M  et al.  Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2021;7:614–27. PubMed

Schmidt  B, Bordignon  S, Neven  K, Reichlin  T, Blaauw  Y, Hansen  J  et al.  EUropean real-world outcomes with Pulsed field ablatiOn in patients with symptomatic atRIAl fibrillation: lessons from the multi-centre EU-PORIA registry. Europace  2023;25:euad185. PubMed PMC

Schaack  D, Schmidt  B, Tohoku  S, Bordignon  S, Urbanek  L, Ebrahimi  R  et al.  Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev  2023;12:e11. PubMed PMC

Ekanem  E, Reddy  VY, Schmidt  B, Reichlin  T, Neven  K, Metzner  A  et al.  Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF). Europace  2022;24:1256–66. PubMed PMC

Turagam  MK, Neuzil  P, Schmidt  B, Reichlin  T, Neven  K, Metzner  A  et al.  Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation: one-year outcomes from the MANIFEST-PF registry. Circulation  2023;148:35–46. PubMed

Schmidt  B, Bordignon  S, Tohoku  S, Chen  S, Bologna  F, Urbanek  L  et al.  5S study: safe and simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation using sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol  2022;15:e010817. PubMed

Urbanek  L, Bordignon  S, Schaack  D, Chen  S, Tohoku  S, Efe  TH  et al.  Pulsed field versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up in a 400-patient cohort. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol  2023;16:389–98. PubMed

Reddy  VY, Lehmann  JW, Gerstenfeld  EP, Mugglin  AS, Schneider  CW, Achyutha  AB  et al.  A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the ADVENT trial rationale and design. Heart Rhythm O2  2023;4:317–28. PubMed PMC

Calkins  H, Hindricks  G, Cappato  R, Kim  YH, Saad  EB, Aguinaga  L  et al.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm  2017;14:e275–444. PubMed PMC

January  CT, Wann  LS, Calkins  H, Chen  LY, Cigarroa  JE, Cleveland  JC  Jr  et al.  2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation  2019;140:e125–51. PubMed

Reddy  VY, Petru  J, Funasako  M, Kopriva  K, Hala  P, Chovanec  M  et al.  Coronary arterial spasm during pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. Circulation  2022;146:1808–19. PubMed

Mansour  M, Gerstenfeld  EP, Patel  C, Natale  A, Whang  W, Cuoco  FA  et al.  Pulmonary vein narrowing after pulsed field versus thermal ablation. Europace  2024;26:euae038. PubMed PMC

Venier  S, Vaxelaire  N, Jacon  P, Carabelli  A, Desbiolles  A, Garban  F  et al.  Severe acute kidney injury related to haemolysis after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace  2023;26:euad371. PubMed PMC

Mohanty  S, Casella  M, Compagnucci  P, Torlapati  PG, Della Rocca  DG, La Fazia  VM  et al.  Acute kidney injury resulting from hemoglobinuria after pulsed-field ablation in atrial fibrillation: is it preventable?  JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2024. EPUB ahead of print: January 12, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2023.12.008 PubMed DOI

Verma  A, Haines  DE, Boersma  LV, Sood  N, Natale  A, Marchlinski  FE  et al.  Pulsed field ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: PULSED AF pivotal trial. Circulation  2023;147:1422–32. PubMed PMC

Duytschaever  M, De Potter  T, Grimaldi  M, Anic  A, Vijgen  J, Neuzil  P  et al.  Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter integrated with a 3-dimensional mapping system: 1-year outcomes of the Multicenter inspIRE Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol  2023;16:e011780. PubMed PMC

Packer  DL, Kowal  RC, Wheelan  KR, Irwin  JM, Champagne  J, Guerra  PG  et al.  Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol  2013;61:1713–23. PubMed

Kuck  KH, Brugada  J, Fürnkranz  A, Metzner  A, Ouyang  F, Chun  KRJ  et al.  Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med  2016;374:2235–45. PubMed

Tohoku  S, Chun  KRJ, Bordignon  S, Chen  S, Schaack  D, Urbanek  L  et al.  Findings from repeat ablation using high-density mapping after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation. Europace  2023;25:433–40. PubMed PMC

Kautzner  J, Albenque  JP, Natale  A, Maddox  W, Cuoco  F, Neuzil  P  et al.  A novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency catheter ablation system used to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2021;7:352–63. PubMed

Natale  A, Reddy  VY, Monir  G, Wilber  DJ, Lindsay  BD, McElderry  HT  et al.  Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol  2014;64:647–56. PubMed

Aguilar  M, Macle  L, Deyell  MW, Yao  R, Hawkins  NM, Khairy  P  et al.  Influence of monitoring strategy on assessment of ablation success and postablation atrial fibrillation burden assessment: implications for practice and clinical trial design. Circulation  2022;145:21–30. PubMed

O'Neill  L, Almorad  A, El Haddad  M, Wielandts  JY, Gillis  K, Hilfiker  G  et al.  Impact of catheter ablation on arrhythmia burden in patients with shock-resistant persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol  2023;9:2071–81. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05072964

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...