Long-term outcomes of the pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the prospective, multicentre FARA-Freedom Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Boston Scientific
PubMed
38385529
PubMed Central
PMC10932745
DOI
10.1093/europace/euae053
PII: 7612551
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Pentaspline PFA catheter, Pulsed field ablation,
- MeSH
- antiarytmika MeSH
- fibrilace síní * chirurgie MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- píštěle * chirurgie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenóza chirurgie MeSH
- tachykardie chirurgie MeSH
- venae pulmonales * chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antiarytmika MeSH
AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Despite randomized controlled trials and real-world data showing the promise of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for this treatment, long-term efficacy and safety data demonstrating single-procedure outcomes off antiarrhythmic drugs remain limited. The aim of the FARA-Freedom Study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of PFA using the pentaspline catheter for PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: FARA-Freedom, a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, enrolled patients with PAF undergoing de novo PVI with PFA, who were followed for 12 months with weekly transtelephonic monitoring and a 72-h Holter ECG at 6 and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events out to 7 days post-ablation and PV stenosis or atrioesophageal (AE) fistula out to 12 months. Treatment success is a composite of acute PVI and chronic success, which includes freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia longer than 30 s, use of antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period, or use of amiodarone or repeat ablation at any time. The study enrolled 179 PAF patients (62 ± 10 years, 39% female) at 13 centres. At the index procedure, all PVs were successfully isolated with the pentaspline PFA catheter. Procedure and left atrial dwell times, with a 20-min waiting period, were 71.9 ± 17.6 and 41.0 ± 13.3 min, respectively. Fluoroscopy time was 11.5 ± 7.4 min. Notably, monitoring compliance was high, with 88.4 and 90.3% with weekly events and 72-h Holter monitors, respectively. Freedom from the composite primary effectiveness endpoint was 66.6%, and 41 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, mostly recurrent atrial fibrillation (31 patients). The composite safety endpoint occurred in two patients (1.1%), one tamponade and one transient ischaemic attack. There was no coronary spasm, PV stenosis, or AE fistula. There were four cases of transient phrenic nerve palsy, but all resolved during the index procedure. CONCLUSION: In this prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter was effective in treating PAF patients despite rigourous endpoint definitions and high monitoring compliance and demonstrated favourable safety. REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT05072964 (sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation).
AF Solutions Boston Scientific Corp St Paul MN USA
Department of Cardiology and Rhythmology Hdz Nrw Bad Oeynhausen Gemany
Department of Cardiology Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology Gentofte Hospital Hellerup Denmark
Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology Nemocnice Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department or Cardiology AZ SINT Jan AV Bruges Belgium
Division of Electrophysiology Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt Belgium
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42:373–498. PubMed
Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A, Whang W, Cuoco FA, Patel C et al. Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1660–71. PubMed
Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Anic A, Petru J, Funasako M et al. Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2021;7:614–27. PubMed
Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Neven K, Reichlin T, Blaauw Y, Hansen J et al. EUropean real-world outcomes with Pulsed field ablatiOn in patients with symptomatic atRIAl fibrillation: lessons from the multi-centre EU-PORIA registry. Europace 2023;25:euad185. PubMed PMC
Schaack D, Schmidt B, Tohoku S, Bordignon S, Urbanek L, Ebrahimi R et al. Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2023;12:e11. PubMed PMC
Ekanem E, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Reichlin T, Neven K, Metzner A et al. Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF). Europace 2022;24:1256–66. PubMed PMC
Turagam MK, Neuzil P, Schmidt B, Reichlin T, Neven K, Metzner A et al. Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation: one-year outcomes from the MANIFEST-PF registry. Circulation 2023;148:35–46. PubMed
Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Tohoku S, Chen S, Bologna F, Urbanek L et al. 5S study: safe and simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation using sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2022;15:e010817. PubMed
Urbanek L, Bordignon S, Schaack D, Chen S, Tohoku S, Efe TH et al. Pulsed field versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up in a 400-patient cohort. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2023;16:389–98. PubMed
Reddy VY, Lehmann JW, Gerstenfeld EP, Mugglin AS, Schneider CW, Achyutha AB et al. A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the ADVENT trial rationale and design. Heart Rhythm O2 2023;4:317–28. PubMed PMC
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2017;14:e275–444. PubMed PMC
January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2019;140:e125–51. PubMed
Reddy VY, Petru J, Funasako M, Kopriva K, Hala P, Chovanec M et al. Coronary arterial spasm during pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2022;146:1808–19. PubMed
Mansour M, Gerstenfeld EP, Patel C, Natale A, Whang W, Cuoco FA et al. Pulmonary vein narrowing after pulsed field versus thermal ablation. Europace 2024;26:euae038. PubMed PMC
Venier S, Vaxelaire N, Jacon P, Carabelli A, Desbiolles A, Garban F et al. Severe acute kidney injury related to haemolysis after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace 2023;26:euad371. PubMed PMC
Mohanty S, Casella M, Compagnucci P, Torlapati PG, Della Rocca DG, La Fazia VM et al. Acute kidney injury resulting from hemoglobinuria after pulsed-field ablation in atrial fibrillation: is it preventable? JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2024. EPUB ahead of print: January 12, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2023.12.008 PubMed DOI
Verma A, Haines DE, Boersma LV, Sood N, Natale A, Marchlinski FE et al. Pulsed field ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: PULSED AF pivotal trial. Circulation 2023;147:1422–32. PubMed PMC
Duytschaever M, De Potter T, Grimaldi M, Anic A, Vijgen J, Neuzil P et al. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter integrated with a 3-dimensional mapping system: 1-year outcomes of the Multicenter inspIRE Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2023;16:e011780. PubMed PMC
Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, Irwin JM, Champagne J, Guerra PG et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1713–23. PubMed
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KRJ et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2235–45. PubMed
Tohoku S, Chun KRJ, Bordignon S, Chen S, Schaack D, Urbanek L et al. Findings from repeat ablation using high-density mapping after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation. Europace 2023;25:433–40. PubMed PMC
Kautzner J, Albenque JP, Natale A, Maddox W, Cuoco F, Neuzil P et al. A novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency catheter ablation system used to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2021;7:352–63. PubMed
Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, Wilber DJ, Lindsay BD, McElderry HT et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:647–56. PubMed
Aguilar M, Macle L, Deyell MW, Yao R, Hawkins NM, Khairy P et al. Influence of monitoring strategy on assessment of ablation success and postablation atrial fibrillation burden assessment: implications for practice and clinical trial design. Circulation 2022;145:21–30. PubMed
O'Neill L, Almorad A, El Haddad M, Wielandts JY, Gillis K, Hilfiker G et al. Impact of catheter ablation on arrhythmia burden in patients with shock-resistant persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023;9:2071–81. PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05072964