Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine a combined with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for AML In first complete remission: a study from the acute leukemia working party (EBMT)
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study, Multicenter Study
PubMed
38961258
PubMed Central
PMC11452337
DOI
10.1038/s41409-024-02331-1
PII: 10.1038/s41409-024-02331-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute * therapy mortality MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide * therapeutic use MeSH
- Cyclosporine * therapeutic use MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Remission Induction MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Graft vs Host Disease * prevention & control mortality etiology MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Tacrolimus * therapeutic use MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation * methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cyclophosphamide * MeSH
- Cyclosporine * MeSH
- Immunosuppressive Agents MeSH
- Tacrolimus * MeSH
Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may impact the outcome of patients undergoing T-cell replete hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 2427 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission transplanted from a haploidentical (n = 1844) or unrelated donor (UD, n = 583) using cyclosporine A (CSA, 63%) or tacrolimus (TAC, 37%) and PT-Cy/MMF. In univariate analysis, CSA and TAC groups did not differ in 2-year leukemia-free or overall survival, cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse or non-relapse mortality. CI of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD was lower with TAC (6.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.02), without difference in grade II-IV acute GVHD or grade III-IV acute GVHD/severe chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). In multivariate analysis, TAC was associated with a lower risk of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD solely with haploidentical donors (HR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.98], p = 0.04), but not UD (HR 0.49 [95% CI, 0.2-1.21], p = 0.12). There was no significant difference for chronic GVHD. In conclusion, PT-Cy/MMF-based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in favorable OS and GRFS, irrespective of the CNI added. In haploidentical HCT, TAC seemed to prevent severe acute GVHD more effectively than CSA without impact on other outcome parameters.
Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
Goethe University Frankfurt University Hospital Dept of Medicine 2 Frankfurt am Main Germany
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Salamanca Spain
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
IRCCS San Martino Hospital Genova Italy
IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Netherlands
Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch Gliwice Poland
Medicana International Hospital Istanbul Turkey
RM Gorbacheva Research Institute Pavlov University St Petersburg Russian Federation
Sorbonne University Department of Hematology Saint Antoine Hospital INSERM UMR 938 Paris France
See more in PubMed
Dohner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140:1345–77. PubMed
Fasslrinner F, Schetelig J, Burchert A, Kramer M, Trenschel R, Hegenbart U, et al. Long-term efficacy of reduced-intensity versus myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission: retrospective follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e161–e9. PubMed
Phelan R, Chen M, Bupp C, Bolon YT, Broglie L, Brunner-Grady J, et al. Updated trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States with an additional focus on adolescent and young adult transplantation activity and outcomes. Transpl Cell Ther. 2022;28:409 e1–e10. PubMed PMC
Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2008;14:641–50. PubMed PMC
Ciurea SO, Zhang MJ, Bacigalupo AA, Bashey A, Appelbaum FR, Aljitawi OS, et al. Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;126:1033–40. PubMed PMC
Carnevale-Schianca F, Caravelli D, Gallo S, Coha V, D’Ambrosio L, Vassallo E, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil combination prevents graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:459–66. PubMed
Luznik L, Fuchs EJ. High-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide to promote graft-host tolerance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Immunol Res. 2010;47:65–77. PubMed PMC
Nunes NS, Kanakry CG. Mechanisms of graft-versus-host disease prevention by post-transplantation cyclophosphamide: an evolving understanding. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2668. PubMed PMC
Castagna L, Bramanti S, Furst S, Giordano L, Sarina B, Crocchiolo R, et al. Tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine A after haploidentical T-cell replete transplantation with post-infusion cyclophosphamide. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2016;51:462–5. PubMed
Raiola AM, Angelucci E, Sica S, Bacigalupo A. Haploidentical bone marrow transplants with post transplant cyclophosphamide on day + 3 + 5: The Genova protocol. Blood Rev. 2022;s:101031. PubMed
Broers AEC, de Jong CN, Bakunina K, Hazenberg MD, van Marwijk Kooy M, de Groot MR, et al. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide for prevention of graft-versus-host disease: results of the prospective randomized HOVON-96 trial. Blood Adv. 2022;6:3378–85. PubMed PMC
Bolanos-Meade J, Hamadani M, Wu J, Al Malki MM, Martens MJ, Runaas L, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:2338–48. PubMed PMC
Kanate AS, Nagler A, Savani B. Summary of scientific and statistical methods, study endpoints and definitions for observational and registry-based studies in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Hematol Int. 2020;2:2–4. PubMed PMC
Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8. PubMed
Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2003;9:215–33. PubMed
Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706. PubMed
Fine J, Gray R. A proportional hazards model for subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.
Andersen PK, Klein JP, Zhang MJ. Testing for centre effects in multi-centre survival studies: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random effects tests. Stat Med. 1999;18:1489–500. PubMed
Nash RA, Antin JH, Karanes C, Fay JW, Avalos BR, Yeager AM, et al. Phase 3 study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus with methotrexate and cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from unrelated donors. Blood. 2000;96:2062–8. PubMed
Hiraoka A, Ohashi Y, Okamoto S, Moriyama Y, Nagao T, Kodera Y, et al. Phase III study comparing tacrolimus (FK506) with cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2001;28:181–5. PubMed
Hamilton BK, Liu Y, Hemmer MT, Majhail N, Ringden O, Kim D, et al. Inferior outcomes with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2019;25:1744–55. PubMed PMC
Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Battipaglia G, Chiusolo P, Tischer J, Diez-Martin JL, et al. Timing of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide administration in haploidentical transplantation: a comparative study on behalf of the acute leukemia working party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:1915–22. PubMed
Fleischhauer K, Shaw BE, Gooley T, Malkki M, Bardy P, Bignon JD, et al. Effect of T-cell-epitope matching at HLA-DPB1 in recipients of unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:366–74. PubMed PMC
Furst D, Muller C, Vucinic V, Bunjes D, Herr W, Gramatzki M, et al. High-resolution HLA matching in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective collaborative analysis. Blood. 2013;122:3220–9. PubMed
Lorentino F, Labopin M, Ciceri F, Vago L, Fleischhauer K, Afanasyev B, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide GvHD prophylaxis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from 9/10 or 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors for acute leukemia. Leukemia. 2021;35:585–94. PubMed
Bullingham RE, Nicholls AJ, Kamm BR. Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;34:429–55. PubMed
Li H, Mager DE, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, Bemer MJ, McCune JS. Population pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of mycophenolic acid in HCT recipients receiving oral mycophenolate mofetil. J Clin Pharm. 2013;53:393–402. PubMed PMC
McDermott CL, Sandmaier BM, Storer B, Li H, Mager DE, Boeckh MJ, et al. Nonrelapse mortality and mycophenolic acid exposure in nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2013;19:1159–66. PubMed PMC
Nash RA, Johnston L, Parker P, McCune JS, Storer B, Slattery JT, et al. A phase I/II study of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2005;11:495–505. PubMed
Bejanyan N, Weisdorf DJ, Logan BR, Wang HL, Devine SM, de Lima M, et al. Survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a center for international blood and marrow transplant research study. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:454–9. PubMed PMC
Jacobson P, Rogosheske J, Barker JN, Green K, Ng J, Weisdorf D, et al. Relationship of mycophenolic acid exposure to clinical outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Pharm Ther. 2005;78:486–500. PubMed
Sora F, Grazia CD, Chiusolo P, Raiola AM, Bregante S, Mordini N, et al. Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prepared with Busulfan and Fludarabine (BUFLU) or Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine (TBF): a retrospective study. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:698–703. PubMed