Evaluating the factor structure and measurement invariance of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale across multiple countries, languages, and gender identities
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
39054862
PubMed Central
PMC12089668
DOI
10.1177/10731911241259560
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- International Sex Survey, UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, confirmatory factor analysis, impulsive behaviors, measurement invariance analysis,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- faktorová analýza statistická MeSH
- genderová identita * MeSH
- impulzivní chování * MeSH
- jazyk (prostředek komunikace) MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- srovnání kultur MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Model and the various psychometric instruments developed and validated based on this model are well established in clinical and research settings. However, evidence regarding the psychometric validity, reliability, and equivalence across multiple countries of residence, languages, or gender identities, including gender-diverse individuals, is lacking to date. Using data from the International Sex Survey (N = 82,243), confirmatory factor analyses and measurement invariance analyses were performed on the preestablished five-factor structure of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale to examine whether (a) psychometric validity and reliability and (b) psychometric equivalence hold across 34 country-of-residence-related, 22 language-related, and three gender-identity-related groups. The results of the present study extend the latter psychometric instrument's well-established relevance to 26 countries, 13 languages, and three gender identities. Most notably, psychometric validity and reliability were evidenced across nine novel translations included in the present study (i.e., Croatian, English, German, Hebrew, Korean, Macedonian, Polish, Portuguese-Portugal, and Spanish-Latin American) and psychometric equivalence was evidenced across all three gender identities included in the present study (i.e., women, men, and gender-diverse individuals).
Artois University Arras France
Auckland University of Technology New Zealand
Austrian Public Health Institute Vienna Austria
Center for Excessive Gambling Addiction Medicine Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland
Centre for Advanced Research Excellence in Public Health Dhaka Bangladesh
Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming University of Gibraltar Gibraltar Gibraltar
Chuncheon Addiction Management Center South Korea
College of Healthcare Sciences James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
College of Medicine University of Baghdad Iraq
College of Medicine University of Warith Al Anbiyaa Karbala Iraq
Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling Wethersfield Connecticut United States of America
Connecticut Mental Health Center New Haven Connecticut United States of America
Decentralized Big Data Team RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project Tokyo Japan
Departamento de Psicología Básica Clínica y Psicobiología University Jaume 1 of Castellón Spain
Département de Psychologie Université de Montréal Montréal Canada
Département de Psychologie Université du Québec à Trois Rivières Trois Rivières Canada
Department of Addictology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Addictology General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic
Department of Health Services Srinagar India
Department of Neuropsychiatry Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
Department of Personality Assessment and Psychological Treatments University of Valencia Spain
Department of Psychiatry All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
Department of Psychiatry Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital South Korea
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science University of Trento Italy
Department of Psychology College of Humanity and Social Science Fuzhou University China
Department of Psychology Humanities and Social Sciences University of Zagreb Croatia
Department of Psychology University of Nevada Las Vegas Las Vegas Nevada United States of America
Department of Public Health and Informatics Jahangirnagar University Dhaka Bangladesh
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Privada del Norte Lima Perú
Facultad de Medicina Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Perú
Facultad de Psicología Universidad de Talca Chile
Faculty of Philosophy Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje Republic of North Macedonia
Faculty of Philosophy University of Ss Cyril and Methodius in Trnava Slovakia
Florida State University ? Republic of Panama Ciudad del Saber Republic of Panama
Grupo de Investigación Biomédica y de Patología Tunja Colombia
Grupo Medición y Evaluación Psicológica en Contextos Básicos y Aplicados Tunja Colombia
Health Promotion Research Centre University of Galway Ireland
Higher Education Learning Philosophy University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Institute for Behavioural Addictions Sigmund Freud University Vienna Austria
Institute for Neural Computations University of California San Diego United States of America
Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University Warsaw Poland
Institute of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
Institute of Psychology The Polish Academy of Sciences Warszawa Poland
Institute of Psychology University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
Lawson Health Research Institute London Ontario Canada
Leuven School for Mass Communication Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Belgium
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Skopje Republic of North Macedonia
Nottingham Trent University United Kingdom
Psychosis Research Centre University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran
SAMRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders Stellenbosch University South Africa
School of Psychology University of Southampton United Kingdom
School of Social Work Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences University of Haifa Israel
Sharda University Greater Noida India
South East Technological University Waterford Ireland
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia Tunja Colombia
Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra Bolivia
Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut United States of America
Zobrazit více v PubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 DOI
Argyriou E., Um M., Wu W., Cyders M. A. (2020). Measurement invariance of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale across age and sex across the adult life span. Assessment, 27(3), 432–453. 10.1177/1073191119832660 PubMed DOI
Asparouhov T., Muthén B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495–508. 10.1080/10705511.2014.919210 DOI
Beaton D. E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., Ferraz M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 PubMed DOI
Berg J. M., Latzman R. D., Bliwise N. G., Lilienfeld S. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1129–1146. 10.1037/pas0000111 PubMed DOI
Billieux J., Rochat L., Ceschi G., Carré A., Offerlin-Meyer I., Defeldre A.-C., Khazaal Y., Besche-Richard C., Van der Linden M. (2012). Validation of a short French version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(5), 609–615. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.09.001 PubMed DOI
Bőthe B., Koós M., Nagy L., Kraus S. W., Potenza M. N., Demetrovics Z. (2021). International Sex Survey: Study protocol of a large, cross-cultural collaborative study in 45 countries. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(3), 632–645. 10.1556/2006.2021.00063 PubMed DOI PMC
Browne M. W., Cudeck R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. 10.1177/0049124192021002005 DOI
Bteich G., Berbiche D., Khazaal Y. (2017). Validation of a short Arabic UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), Article 244. 10.1186/s12888-017-1407-y PubMed DOI PMC
Calzada G., Rothen S., Radziejewska D., Martins D., Aranda L., Bassini L., Zuka H., Thorens G., Khazaal Y., Zullino D. (2017). Validation of a short French UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in patients with substance use disorder. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(5), 1096–1102. 10.1007/s11469-017-9763-x DOI
Cándido A., Orduña E., Perales J. C., Verdejo-García A., Billieux J. (2012). Validation of a short Spanish version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Trastornos Adictivos, 14(3), 73–78. 10.1016/S1575-0973(12)70048-X DOI
Chen F., Curran P. J., Bollen K. A., Kirby J., Paxton P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. 10.1177/0049124108314720 PubMed DOI PMC
Chen F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. 10.1080/10705510701301834 DOI
Cheung G. W., Rensvold R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 DOI
Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 PubMed DOI
Cohen J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203771587 DOI
Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In Boyle G., Matthews G., Saklofske D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment—Personality measurement and testing (Vol. 2, pp. 179–198). Sage. 10.4135/9781849200479 DOI
Cyders M. A. (2013). Impulsivity and the sexes: Measurement and structural invariance of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Assessment, 20(1), 86–97. 10.1177/1073191111428762 PubMed DOI
Cyders M. A., Littlefield A. K., Coffey S., Karyadi K. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39(9), 1372–1376. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013 PubMed DOI PMC
Cyders M. A., Smith G. T., Spillane N. S., Fischer S., Annus A. M., Peterson C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 107–118. 10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.107 PubMed DOI
d’Acremont M., Van der Linden M. (2005). Adolescent impulsivity: Findings from a community sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(5), 427–435. 10.1007/s10964-005-7260-1 DOI
Donati M. A., Beccari C., Bacherini A., Capitanucci D., Primi C. (2021). Psychometric properties of the short UPPS-P scale in adolescents: Gender, age invariance, and validity among Italian youth. Addictive Behaviors, 120, 106987. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106987 PubMed DOI
d’Orta I., Burnay J., Aiello D., Niolu C., Siracusano A., Timpanaro L., Khazaal Y., Billieux J. (2015). Development and validation of a short Italian UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 2, 19–22. 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.04.003 PubMed DOI PMC
Dugré J. R., Giguére C.-É., Percie du, Sert O., Potvin S., Dumais A., & Consortium Signature. (2019). The psychometric properties of a short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale among psychiatric patients evaluated in an emergency setting. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Article 139. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00139 PubMed DOI PMC
Evenden J. L. (1999). Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146(4), 348–361. 10.1007/PL00005481 PubMed DOI
Finney S. J., di Stefano C. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In Hancock G. R., Mueller R. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Information Age Publishing.
Geurten M., Catale C., Gay P., Deplus S., Billieux J. (2021). Measuring impulsivity in children: Adaptation and validation of a short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in children and investigation of its links with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 25(1), 105–114. 10.1177/1087054718775831 PubMed DOI
Gialdi G., Somma A., Borroni S., Fossati A. (2021). Factor structure, measurement invariance across gender sub-groups, and normative data for the Italian translation of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in Italian community-dwelling adults. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(2). 10.13129/2282-1619/MJCP-3004 DOI
Jeong S., Lee Y. (2019). Consequences of not conducting measurement invariance tests in cross-cultural studies: A review of current research practices and recommendations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(4), 466–483. 10.1177/1523422319870726 DOI
Jorgensen T. D., Pornprasertmanit S., Schoemann A. M., Rosseel Y., Miller P., Quick C., Garnier-Villarreal M., Selig J., Boulton A., Preacher K., Coffman D., Rhemtulla M., Robitzsch A., Enders C., Arslan R., Clinton B., Panko P., Merkle E., Chesnut S., . . .Johnson A. R. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (Version 0.5-6). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
Kempeneers P., Mreyen K., Pallincourt R., Remacle F., Wildemeersch G., Simon J. (2023). Validation of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and clinical correlates of its scores in French-speaking patients starting a residential detoxification program. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45, 503–510. 10.1177/02537176231157411 PubMed DOI PMC
Kenny D. A., Kaniskan B., McCoach D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. 10.1177/0049124114543236 DOI
Kline R. B., Little T. D. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Liu M., Wu W., Zapolski T., Cyders M. A. (2023). Measurement invariance and differential relationship to substance use of the short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale across racial groups. Assessment, 30, 2212–2222. 10.1177/10731911221146339 PubMed DOI PMC
Marsh H. W., Hau K.-T., Grayson D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In McDonald R. P., Maydeu-Olivares A., McArdle J. J. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (1st ed., pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Milfont T. L., Fischer R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130. 10.21500/20112084.857 DOI
Muthén L. K., Muthén B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599–620. 10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8 DOI
Newman D. A. (2014). Missing data: Five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372–411. 10.1177/1094428114548590 DOI
Putnick D. L., Bornstein M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 PubMed DOI PMC
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rochat L., Beni C., Billieux J., Azouvi P., Annoni J.-M., Van der Linden M. (2010). Assessment of impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(5), 778–797. 10.1080/09602011.2010.495245 PubMed DOI
Rochat L., Billieux J., Gagnon J., Van der Linden M. (2018). A multifactorial and integrative approach to impulsivity in neuropsychology: Insights from the UPPS model of impulsivity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(1), 45–61. 10.1080/13803395.2017.1313393 PubMed DOI
Rochat L., Delbeuck X., Billieux J., d’Acremont M., Van der Linden A.-C. J., Van der Linden M. (2008). Assessing impulsivity changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 22(3), 278–283. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318166d692 PubMed DOI
Rosseel Y., Jorgensen T. D., Rockwood N., Oberski D., Byrnes J., Vanbrabant L., Savalei V., Merkle E., Hallquist M., Rhemtulla M., Katsikatsou M., Barendse M., Scharf F., Du H. (2023). lavaan: Latent variable analysis (Version 0.6-15). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lavaan
Sánchez-Domínguez R., Benjet C., Marín-Navarrete R., Nicolini H. (2022). Validity and reliability of the short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in patients with substance use disorders. Journal of Substance Use, 28, 721–729. 10.1080/14659891.2022.2087777 DOI
Schermelleh-Engel K., Moosbrugger H., Müller H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
Smith G. T., McCarthy D. M., Anderson K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102 PubMed DOI
Stevens A. K., Blanchard B. E., Shi M., Littlefield A. K. (2018). Testing measurement invariance of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino college students. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 280–285. 10.1037/pas0000494 PubMed DOI
van Buuren S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn K., Vink G., Schouten R., Robitzsch A., Rockenschaub P., Doove L., Jolani S., Moreno-Betancur M., White I., Gaffert P., Meinfelder F., Gray B., Arel-Bundock V., Cai M., Volker T., Costantini E., van Lissa C., Oberman H. (2023). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations (Version 3.16.0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mice
Wang Y., Long J., Liu Y., Liu T., Billieux J. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Chinese short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale: Factor structure and measurement invariance across gender and age. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, Article 529949. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.529949 PubMed DOI PMC
Watts A. L., Smith G. T., Barch D. M., Sher K. J. (2020). Factor structure, measurement and structural invariance, and external validity of an abbreviated youth version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Psychological Assessment, 32(4), 336–347. 10.1037/pas0000791 PubMed DOI PMC
Whiteside S. P., Lynam D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669–689. 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7 DOI
World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.).
Wu H., Estabrook R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Zsila Á., Bőthe B., Demetrovics Z., Billieux J., Orosz G. (2020). Further exploration of the short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale’s factor structure: Evidence from a large Hungarian sample. Current Psychology, 39(1), 378–388. 10.1007/s12144-017-9773-7 DOI