• This record comes from PubMed

Automatic variable extraction from 3D coxal bone models for sex estimation using the DSP2 method

. 2024 Nov ; 138 (6) : 2647-2658. [epub] 20240805

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 39102091
PubMed Central PMC11490455
DOI 10.1007/s00414-024-03301-4
PII: 10.1007/s00414-024-03301-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Thanks to technical progress and the availability of virtual data, sex estimation methods as part of a biological profile are undergoing an inevitable evolution. Further reductions in subjectivity, but potentially also in measurement errors, can be brought by approaches that automate the extraction of variables. Such automatization also significantly accelerates and facilitates the specialist's work. The aim of this study is (1) to apply a previously proposed algorithm (Kuchař et al. 2021) to automatically extract 10 variables used for the DSP2 sex estimation method, and (2) to test the robustness of the new automatic approach in a current heterogeneous population. For the first aim, we used a sample of 240 3D scans of pelvic bones from the same individuals, which were measured manually for the DSP database. For the second aim a sample of 108 pelvic bones from the New Mexico Decedent Image Database was used. The results showed high agreement between automatic and manual measurements with rTEM below 5% for all dimensions except two. The accuracy of final sex estimates based on all 10 variables was excellent (error rate 0.3%). However, we observed a higher number of undetermined individuals in the Portuguese sample (25% of males) and the New Mexican sample (36.5% of females). In conclusion, the procedure for automatic dimension extraction was successfully applied both to a different type of data and to a heterogeneous population.

Erratum In

PubMed

See more in PubMed

Klales A (2020) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic

Obertová Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (2020) Statistics and Probability in Forensic Anthropology

Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements. J Forensic Sci 56:289–296 PubMed

Selliah P, Martino F, Cummaudo M et al (2020) Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection. Int J Legal Med 134:1683–1690. 10.1007/s00414-020-02292-2 PubMed

Berg G (2017) Sex estimation of unknown human skeletal remains. In: Langley N, Tersigni-Tarrant MA (eds) Forensic Anthropology: a comprehensive introduction, second. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 143–161

Franklin D (2022) Estimation of skeletal sex. In: Encyklopedia of forensic sciences, third. pp 292–303

Brůžek J, Santos F, Dutailly B et al (2017) Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 164:440–449. 10.1002/ajpa.23282 PubMed

Galeta P, Brůžek J (2020) Sex estimation using continuous variables: Problems and principles of sex classification in the zone of uncertainty. In: Obertová Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (eds) Statistics and probability in Forensic Anthropology. Academic Press, pp 155–182

Santos F, Guyomarc’h P, Cunha E, Brůžek J (2020) DSP: A probabilistic approach to sex estimation free from population specificity using innominate measurements. In: Klales A (ed) Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton. Academic Press, pp 243–269

Chapman T, Lefevre P, Semal P et al (2014) Sex determination using the probabilistic sex diagnosis (DSP: diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment. Forensic Sci Int 234:189–e1. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.037 PubMed

de Almeida SM, de Carvalho MVD, de Lyra Menezes MCT et al (2020) Validation of the DSP2 Tool in a contemporary identified Skeleton Collection from Northeastern Brazil. Adv Anthropol 10:p169

Kranioti EF, Šťovíčková L, Karell M, Brůžek J (2019) Sex estimation of os coxae using DSP2 software: a validation study of a Greek sample. Forensic Sci Int 297:371 PubMed

Lopes AR, de O, Silva EML, da Nascimento MM S, et al (2024) DSP2 for sex determination of miscegenated contemporary hip bones. Anat Histol Embryol 53:e12979. 10.1111/ahe.12979 PubMed

Machado MPS, Costa ST, Freire AR et al (2018) Application and validation of Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste V2 tool in a miscegenated population. Forensic Sci Int 290. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.043. :351.e1-351.e5 PubMed

Quatrehomme G, Radoman I, Nogueira L et al (2017) Sex determination using the DSP (probabilistic sex diagnosis) method on the coxal bone: efficiency of method according to number of available variables. Forensic Sci Int 272:190–193. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.020 PubMed

Sánchez-Mejorada G, Gómez-Valdés J, Herrera P et al (2011) Valoración del método de diagnóstico sexual probabilístico (DSP) en una colección osteológica mexicana. Estud Antropol Biológica 151 (2011) 15

Mesteková S, Brůžek J, Velemínská J, Chaumoître K (2015) A test of the DSP sexing method on CT images from a modern French sample. J Forensic Sci 60:1295–1299. 10.1111/1556-4029.12817 PubMed

Rodriguez Paz A, Banner J, Villa C (2018) Validity of the probabilistic sex diagnosis method (DSP) on 3D CT-scans from modern Danish population. Rev Med Leg. 10.1016/j.medleg.2018.08.002

Abegg C, Hoxha F, Campana L et al (2023) Measuring pelvises in 3D surface scans and in MDCT generated virtual environment: considerations for applications in the forensic context. Forensic Sci Int 352:111813. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111813 PubMed

Braun S, Schwendener N, Kanz F et al (2023) What we see is what we touch? Sex estimation on the pelvis in virtual anthropology. Int J Legal Med 137:1839–1852. 10.1007/s00414-023-03034-w PubMed PMC

Kotěrová A, Králík V, Rmoutilová R et al (2019) Impact of 3D surface scanning protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: implications for sex and age-at-death Assessment. J Forensic Leg Med 68 PubMed

Murail P, Brůžek J, Houët F, Cunha E (2005) DSP: a tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements. Bull Mémoires La Société d’Anthropologie Paris 17:167–176

Avent PR, Hughes CE, Garvin HM (2022) Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods. J Forensic Sci 67:440–449. 10.1111/1556-4029.14947 PubMed

Boucherie A (2023) Analyse Du dimorphisme sexuel de variables métriques de la base Du crâne: intérêts archéo-anthropologiques et forensiques. Université Libre de Bruxelles

Franchi A, Valette S, Agier R et al (2019) The prospects for application of computational anatomy in forensic anthropology for sex determination. Forensic Sci Int 297:156–160. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.009 PubMed

Kuchař M, Henyš P, Rejtar P, Hájek P (2021) Shape morphing technique can accurately predict pelvic bone landmarks. Int J Leg Med 1–10 PubMed

Mbonani TM, Hagg AC, L’Abbé EN et al (2023) Validation of the utilisation of automatic placement of anatomical and sliding landmarks on three-dimensional models for shape analysis of human pelves. Forensic Imaging 33:200542. 10.1016/j.fri.2023.200542

Cunha E, Wasterlain S (2007) The Coimbra identified osteological collections. In: Grupe G, Peters J (eds) Skeletal series in their socioeconomic context. Documenta Archaeobiologiae. Verlag Marie Leidorf, Rahden, pp 23–33

Perreard Lopreno G (2007) Adaptation structurelle des os Du Membre supérieur Et De La Clavicule à l’activité. University of Geneva

Jatautis Š, Jankauskas R (2018) Eastern Baltic region vs. Western Europe: modelling age related changes in the pubic symphysis and the auricular surface. Anthropol Anzeiger 75. 10.1127/anthranz/2018/0775 PubMed

Edgar H, Daneshvari Berry S, Moes E et al (2020) New Mexico Decedent Image Database. Office of the Medical Investigator, University of New Mexico

Berry SD, Edgar HJH (2021) Announcement: the New Mexico decedent image database. Forensic Imaging 24:200436. 10.1016/j.fri.2021.200436

Kazhdan M, Hoppe H (2013) Screened poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Trans Graph 32. 10.1145/2487228.2487237

Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G et al (2011) A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage 54:2033–2044. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 PubMed PMC

Avants BB, Tustison N, Song G (2009) Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight j 2:365:1–35

Henyš P, Vořechovský M, Kuchař M et al (2021) Bone mineral density modeling via random field: normality, stationarity, sex and age dependence. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 210:106353. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106353 PubMed

Lin LI-K (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268. 10.2307/2532051 PubMed

Perini TA, de Oliveira GL, Ornellas JDS, de Oliveira FP (2005) Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Rev Bras Med Esporte 11:86–90

R Core Team (2024) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

Bonferroni C (1936) Teoria Statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. Pubbl Del R Ist Super Di Sci Econ E Commericiali Di Firenze 8:3–62

Altman DG (1999) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. CRC, London

Hager LD (1989) The evolution of sex differences in the hominid bony pelvis. University of California, Berkeley

Rosenberg K, Trevathan W (2002) Birth, obstetrics and human evolution. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 109:1199–1206. 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.00010.x PubMed

Ridel AF, Demeter F, Galland M et al (2020) Automatic landmarking as a convenient prerequisite for geometric morphometrics. Validation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- based shape analysis of the nasal complex. Forensic Sci Int 306:110095. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110095 PubMed

Brůžek J, Murail P, Houët F, Cleuvenot E (1994) Inter- and intra-observer error in pelvic measurements and its application for the methods of sex determination. Anthropologie 32:215–223

Vacca E, Di Vella G (2012) Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex. Forensic Sci Int 222:401.e1-401.e9. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.06.014. PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...