With the global population projected to reach nine billion by 2050, the search for alternative protein sources has become critical. This study evaluated the digestibility of cricket protein powder compared with that of whey protein powder. Cricket protein powder had a slightly lower protein content but higher fat content than whey protein powder. Although both contained all essential amino acids, their quantities varied. The most abundant essential amino acid was leucine in both samples. The essential amino acid index (EAAI) for cricket protein powder reached 79% when utilising crude protein for calculation. When using the amino acid sum calculation method, it increased by nearly 13%. The EAAI for whey protein was then 94% when calculated based on crude protein, with a slight increase observed when using the amino acid sum calculation method. Cricket protein exhibited a gradual increase in digestibility during intestinal digestion, reaching nearly 80%, whereas whey protein digestibility surpassed 97%. Despite the lower digestibility of cricket protein compared with whey protein, it remains sufficiently high for consideration as a valuable protein source. This study highlights the potential of cricket proteins and underscores the importance of assessing their protein content and digestibility in evaluating their nutritional value.

Department of Chemistry Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamycka 129 165 00 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Microbiology Nutrition and Dietetics Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamycka 129 165 00 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Montowska M., Kowalczewski P.Ł., Rybicka I., Fornal E. Nutritional value, protein and peptide composition of edible cricket powders. Food Chem. 2019;289:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.062. PubMed DOI

Hawkey K.J., Lopez-Viso C., Brameld J.M., Parr T., Salter A.M. Insects: A Potential Source of Protein and Other Nutrients for Feed and Food. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2021;9:333–354. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083930. PubMed DOI

Ariëns R.M.C., Bastiaan-Net S., van den Berg-Somhorst D.B.P.M., El Bachrioui K., Boudewijn A., van den Dool R.T.M., de Jong G.A.H., Wichers H.J., Mes J.J. Comparing nutritional and digestibility aspects of sustainable proteins using the INFOGEST digestion protocol. J. Funct. Foods. 2021;87:104748. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104748. DOI

Hermans W.J.H., Senden J.M., Churchward-Venne T.A., Paulussen K.J.M., Fuchs C.J., Smeets J.S.J., van Loon J.J.A., Verdijk L.B., van Loon L.J.C. Insects are a viable protein source for human consumption: From insect protein digestion to postprandial muscle protein synthesis in vivo in humans: A double-blind randomized trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021;114:934–944. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab115. PubMed DOI PMC

Oonincx D.G., van Itterbeeck J., Heetkamp M.J., van den Brand H., van Loon J.J., van Huis A. An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e14445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014445. PubMed DOI PMC

FAO . Expert Consultation Meeting: Assessing the Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2012.

Raheem D., Raposo A., Oluwole O.B., Nieuwland M., Saraiva A., Carrascosa C. Entomophagy: Nutritional, ecological, safety and legislation aspects. Food Res. Int. 2019;126:108672. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108672. PubMed DOI

Fernández-García E., Carvajal-Lérida I., Pérez-Gálvez A. In vitro bioaccessibility assessment as a prediction tool of nutritional efficiency. Nutr. Res. 2009;29:751–760. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.09.016. PubMed DOI

Manditsera F.A., Luning P.A., Fogliano V., Lakemond C.M.M. Effect of domestic cooking methods on protein digestibility and mineral bioaccessibility of wild harvested adult edible insects. Food Res. Int. 2019;121:404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.052. PubMed DOI

Rodríguez-Rodríguez M., Barroso F.G., Fabrikov D., Sánchez-Muros M.J. In Vitro Crude Protein Digestibility of Insects: A Review. Insects. 2022;13:682. doi: 10.3390/insects13080682. PubMed DOI PMC

Kröger T., Dupont J., Büsing L., Fiebelkorn F. Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review. Front. Nutr. 2021;8:759885. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.759885. PubMed DOI PMC

Guiné R.P.F. Textural Properties of Bakery Products: A Review of Instrumental and Sensory Evaluation Studies. Appl. Sci. 2022;12:8628. doi: 10.3390/app12178628. DOI

Siddiqi R.A., Singh T.P., Rani M., Sogi D.S., Bhat M.A. Diversity in grain, flour, amino acid composition, protein profiling, and proportion of total flour proteins of different wheat cultivars of North India. Front. Nutr. 2020;7:141. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00141. PubMed DOI PMC

Amoah I., Cobbinah J.C., Yeboah J.A., Essiam F.A., Lim J.J., Tandoh M.A., Rush E. Edible Insect Powder for Enrichment of Bakery Products—A Review of Nutritional, Physical Characteristics and Acceptability of Bakery Products to Consumers. Future Foods. 2023;8:100251. doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100251. DOI

Murugu D.K., Onyango A.N., Ndiritu A.K., Osuga I.M., Xavier C., Nakimbugwe D., Tanga C.M. From Farm to Fork: Crickets as Alternative Source of Protein, Minerals, and Vitamins. Front. Nutr. 2021;8:704002. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.704002. PubMed DOI PMC

Pilco-Romero G., Chisaguano-Tonato A.M., Herrera-Fontana M.E., Chimbo-Gándara L.F., Sharifi-Rad M., Giampieri F., Battino M., Vernaza M.G., Álvarez-Suárez J.M. House cricket (Acheta domesticus): A review based on its nutritional composition, quality, and potential uses in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023;142:104226. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104226. DOI

Ardoin R., Marx B.D., Boeneke C., Prinyawiwatkul W. Effects of cricket powder on selected physical properties and US consumer perceptions of whole-wheat snack crackers. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021;56:4070–4080. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.15032. DOI

Sah B.N.P., McAinch A.J., Vasiljevic T. Modulation of bovine whey protein digestion in gastrointestinal tract: A comprehensive review. Int. Dairy J. 2016;62:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.07.003. DOI

Boirie Y. Chapter 16—Whey Protein and Muscle Protection. In: Walrand S., editor. Nutrition and Skeletal Muscle. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2019. pp. 271–281.

Ververis E., Boué G., Poulsen M., Pires S.M., Niforou A., Thomsen S.T., Tesson V., Federighi M., Naska A. A systematic review of the nutrient composition, microbiological and toxicological profile of Acheta domesticus (house cricket) J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022;114:104859. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104859. DOI

van Huis A. Edible insects are the future? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016;75:294–305. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116000069. PubMed DOI

Ritvanen T., Pastell H., Welling A., Raatikainen M. The nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of two cricket species—Acheta domesticus and Gryllus bimaculatus. Agric. Food Sci. 2020;29:1–5. doi: 10.23986/afsci.89101. DOI

Stone A.K., Tanaka T., Nickerson M.T. Protein quality and physicochemical properties of commercial cricket and mealworm powders. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019;56:3355–3363. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03818-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Almeida C.C., Monteiro M.L.G., da Costa-Lima B.R.C., Alvares T.S., Conte-Junior C.A. In vitro digestibility of commercial whey protein supplements. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015;61:7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.11.038. DOI

Liu H., Zhang J., Chen Q., Hu A., Li T., Guo F., Wang Q. Preparation of Whole-Cut Plant-Based Pork Meat and Its Quality Evaluation with Animal Meat. Gels. 2023;9:461. doi: 10.3390/gels9060461. PubMed DOI PMC

Adhikari S., Schop M., de Boer I.J.M., Huppertz T. Protein Quality in Perspective: A Review of Protein Quality Metrics and Their Applications. Nutrients. 2022;14:947. doi: 10.3390/nu14050947. PubMed DOI PMC

Ndiritu A., Kinyuru J., Kenji G., Njihia Gichuhi P. Extraction technique influences the physico-chemical characteristics and functional properties of edible crickets (Acheta domesticus) protein concentrate. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2017;11:2013–2021. doi: 10.1007/s11694-017-9584-4. DOI

Poelaert C., Beckers Y., Despret X., Portetelle D., Francis F., Bindelle J. In vitro evaluation of fermentation characteristics of two types of insects as potential novel protein feeds for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:198–201. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9533. DOI

Marono S., Piccolo G., Loponte R., Meo C., Attia Y., Nizza A., Bovera F. In Vitro Crude Protein Digestibility of Tenebrio molitor and Hermetia illucens Insect Meals and its Correlation with Chemical Composition Traits. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2015;14:3889. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2015.3889. DOI

Barber T.M., Kabisch S., Pfeiffer A.F.H., Weickert M.O. The Health Benefits of Dietary Fibre. Nutrients. 2020;12:3209. doi: 10.3390/nu12103209. PubMed DOI PMC

Stull V.J., Finer E., Bergmans R.S., Febvre H.P., Longhurst C., Manter D.K., Patz J.A., Weir T.L. Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:10762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29032-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Huecker M., Sarav M., Pearlman M., Laster J. Protein Supplementation in Sport: Source, Timing, and Intended Benefits. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2019;8:382–396. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00293-1. PubMed DOI

Animal Feeding Stuffs–Determination of Nitrogen Content and Calculation of Crude Protein Content–Part 1: Kjeldahl Method. International Organization for Standardization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2005.

Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Amino Acids Content. International Organization for Standardization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2005.

Brodkorb A., Egger L., Alminger M., Alvito P., Assunção R., Balance S., Bohn T., Bourlieu-Lacanal C., Boutrou R., Carrière F., et al. INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:991–1014. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1. PubMed DOI