European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ)-A Summary of the 2024 Guidelines Update
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi, přehledy
PubMed
39155194
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2024.07.027
PII: S0302-2838(24)02514-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin unresponsive, Bladder cancer, Classification, Cystoscopy, Diagnosis, Follow-up, Guidelines, Intravesical chemotherapy, Prognosis, Radical cystectomy, Transurethral resection, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru * MeSH
- karcinom in situ * terapie patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * terapie patologie MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- urologie normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This publication represents a summary of the updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ. The information presented herein is limited to urothelial carcinoma, unless specified otherwise. The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation. METHODS: For the 2024 guidelines on NMIBC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with NMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of defining patients' risk stratification and treating them appropriately. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This overview of the 2024 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, prognostic factors, treatment, and follow-up of NMIBC. These guidelines are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.
Department of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology APHP Saint Louis Hospital Université de Paris Paris France
Department of Urology Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital AP HP Université de Paris Paris France
Department of Urology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain
Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology The Stokes Centre for Urology Royal Surrey Hospital Guildford UK
EAU Guidelines Office Arnhem The Netherlands
Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery Western General Hospital The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Rosemere Cancer Centre Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Preston UK
Urology GRC 5 Predictive Onco Uro AP HP Pitie Salpetriere Hospital Sorbonne University Paris France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org