Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, klinické zkoušky, fáze III, multicentrická studie
PubMed
39411812
PubMed Central
PMC11771356
DOI
10.1200/jco-24-01887
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- karboplatina aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory endometria * genetika farmakoterapie terapie patologie radioterapie MeSH
- oprava chybného párování bází DNA * MeSH
- paclitaxel aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
- karboplatina MeSH
- paclitaxel MeSH
- pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC) is an inflamed phenotype with poor outcomes when meeting high-risk criteria and limited treatment options in the adjuvant setting. We report protocol-prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with dMMR tumors from the phase III ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04634877) in newly diagnosed, high-risk EC after surgery with curative intent. Patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo (six cycles) plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (four to six cycles) once every 3 weeks, then pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo once every 6 weeks (six cycles), respectively. MMR status was a stratification factor. Patients received radiotherapy at investigator discretion. Investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) was a primary end point. No formal hypothesis testing was performed for subgroup analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, 141 patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 140 in the placebo arm had dMMR tumors. At this interim analysis, hazard ratio for DFS favored pembrolizumab (0.31 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.69]); median DFS was not reached in either group. Two-year DFS rates were 92.4% (95% CI, 84.4 to 96.4) and 80.2% (95% CI, 70.8 to 86.9), respectively. No new safety signals occurred. Longer-term follow-up of outcomes will be evaluated at final analysis. Preplanned subgroup analysis on the basis of the study's stratification factors suggests that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improves DFS and is clinically relevant for patients with dMMR tumors in the curative-intent setting.
Ankara University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
Arizona Center for Cancer Care Phoenix AZ
Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group Leuven Belgium
Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group Prague Czech Republic
Centro Oncologico Internacional Mexico City Mexico
Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Evang Kliniken Essen Mitte Essen Germany
Department of Gynecology Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan
Department of Gynecology Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha Hunan PR China
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel
Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology University of Padova Padova Italy
Division of Gynecologic Oncology Ohio State University and James Cancer Hospital Columbus OH
Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS Rome and Humanitas University Rozzano Italy
German Gynecological Oncology Group Essen Germany
GOG Foundation Philadelphia PA
Gynecologic Cancer Research Center Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Branch Taiwan
Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Athens Greece
Israeli Society of Gynecology Oncology Israel
Maricopa Integrated Health System Phoenix AZ
Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Milan Italy
Medical Oncology 2 Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS Padova Italy
Medical Oncology Oncopole CLAUDIUS REGAUD IUCT Oncopole Toulouse France
Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach FL
Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies Rome Italy
National Cancer Research Institute London United Kingdom
National Investigators Group for the Study of Ovarian and Breast Cancers Paris France
Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology Copenhagen Denmark
Polish Group of Gynaecological Oncology Warsaw Poland
Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group Madrid Spain
Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Taoyuan Taiwan
The University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix AZ
Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology Istanbul Turkey
Turku University Hospital FICAN West Cancer Centre Turku Finland
University College London Hospitals and University College London London United Kingdom
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Leon-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al. Molecular classification of the PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer: Impact on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3388–3397. PubMed PMC
Jamieson A, Huvila J, Leung S, et al. Molecular subtype stratified outcomes according to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2023;170:282–289. PubMed
Howitt BE, Shukla SA, Sholl LM, et al. Association of polymerase e-mutated and microsatellite-instable endometrial cancers with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:1319–1323. PubMed
Song Y, Gu Y, Hu X, et al. Endometrial tumors with MSI-H and dMMR share a similar tumor immune microenvironment. Onco Targets Ther. 2021;14:4485–4497. PubMed PMC
Lee JHS, Li JJX, Chow C, et al. Long-term survival and clinicopathological implications of DNA mismatch repair status in endometrioid endometrial cancers in Hong Kong Chinese women. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1385. PubMed PMC
Nagle CM, O'Mara TA, Tan Y, et al. Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018;29:e39. PubMed PMC
Backes FJ, Haag J, Cosgrove CM, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency identifies patients with high-intermediate-risk (HIR) endometrioid endometrial cancer at the highest risk of recurrence: A prognostic biomarker. Cancer. 2019;125:398–405. PubMed
Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:860–877. PubMed
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Uterine Neoplasms. Version 2.2024 2024. https://www.nccn.org/
de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): Patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1273–1285. PubMed PMC
Matei D, Filiaci V, Randall ME, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation for locally advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2317–2326. PubMed PMC
Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:2159–2170. PubMed PMC
Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, et al. Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:2145–2158. PubMed
Westin SN, Moore K, Chon HS, et al. Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer: The phase III DUO-E trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:283–299. PubMed PMC
Van Gorp T, Cibula D, Lv W, et al. ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: A randomised, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol. 2024;35:968–980. PubMed
Brahmer JR, Long GV, Hamid O, et al. Safety profile of pembrolizumab monotherapy based on an aggregate safety evaluation of 8937 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2024;199:113530. PubMed PMC
NIH US National Library of Medicine . Testing the addition of the immunotherapy drug, pembrolizumab, to the usual radiation treatment for newly diagnosed early stage high intermediate risk endometrial cancer.https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04214067
Slomovitz BM, Cibula D, Simsek T, et al. KEYNOTE-C93/GOG-3064/ENGOT-en15: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of first-line pembrolizumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in mismatch repair deficient advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40 suppl 16; abstr TPS5623.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04634877