The effect of formaldehyde solution in pitfall traps on the probability of catching woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea)
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Bulgaria Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39959447
PubMed Central
PMC11822373
DOI
10.3897/zookeys.1225.123647
PII: 123647
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Barber traps, epigeic invertebrates, epigeon, model species, terrestrial isopods, trapability,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Pitfall traps containing a fixative solution are commonly used by ecologists to study ground-dwelling invertebrates. The effect of the solution on the animals being caught is a frequent topic of studies. Our study compares the effect of formaldehyde solution, water, and the random probability of catch simulated by using dry traps. Ninety pitfall traps were placed in a floodplain forest ground: one-third used 4% formaldehyde solution as a fixative, one-third used water, and one-third was left without any liquid to simulate the random probability of a catch. A layer of dry wood chips was used in the dry traps to reduce predation between the caught animals. The traps were placed in the field between April and May 2022 and emptied twice a week. Both the numbers of animals and the species caught were found to be significantly affected by the fixative solution in use. Significantly more woodlice were caught in traps filled with water; these traps also attracted significantly more Porcelliumconspersum and Trachelipusrathkii compared to the dry traps. Average day temperature and the order the traps were checked (i.e. date) had an influence on the animals caught as well. Additional laboratory experiments with Porcellioscaber confirmed that terrestrial isopods avoid formaldehyde pitfall traps more than those with water.
See more in PubMed
Adis J. (1979) Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zoologischer Anzeiger 202: 177–184.
Baini F, Del Vecchio M, Vizzari L, Zapparoli M. (2016) Can the efficiency of pitfall traps in collecting vary according to the used mixtures as bait? Rendiconti Lincei 27: 495–499. 10.1007/s12210-016-0504-z DOI
Barber HS. (1931) Traps for cave-inhabiting insects. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 46: 259–266.
Bater JE. (1996) Micro- and macro-arthropods. In: Hall GS. (Ed.) Methods for the Examination of Organismal Diversity in Soils and Sediments.CAB International, Oxford, 163–174.
Bouget C. (2001) Echantillonnage des communautés de Coléoptères Carabiques en milieu forestier. Relation espèces – milieu et variations d’efficacité du piège à fosse. Symbioses 4: 55–64.
Dias ATC, Krab EJ, Mariën J, Zimmer M, Cornelissen JHC, Ellers J, Wardle DA, Berg MP. (2012) Traits underpinning desiccation resistance explain distribution patterns of terrestrial isopods. Oecologia 172: 667–677. 10.1007/s00442-012-2541-3 PubMed DOI
Ďurajková B, Hladký R, Tuf IH. (2022) Higher temperature and substrate vibrations as stress factors for terrestrial isopods – model species matter. ZooKeys 1101: 71–85. 10.3897/zookeys.1101.77549 PubMed DOI PMC
Filgueiras BK, Liberal CN, Aguiar CM, Hernández MI, Iannuzzi L. (2009) Attractivity of omnivore, carnivore and herbivore mammalian dung to Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in a tropical Atlantic rainforest remnant. Revista Brasileira De Entomologia 53: 422–427.10.1590/S0085-56262009000300017 DOI
Gatty C, Grández R. (2020) Efectividad de cebos en la captura de escarabajos saprófagos (Insecta: Coleoptera) en Allpahuayo Mishana, Amazonía peruana. Ciencia Amazónica (Iquitos) 8: 71–84. 10.22386/ca.v8i1.281 DOI
Gerlach A, Voigtländer K, Heidger CM. (2009) Behavioural response of selected epigeic arthropods on pitfall traps (Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Oniscidea, Carabidae, Staphylinidae). In: Tajovský K, Schlaghamerský J, Pižl V. (Eds) Contributions to Soil Zoology in Central Europe III.Institute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre, ASCR, v.v.i., České Budějovice, 41–46.
Hariyama T, Meyer-Rochow VB, Kawauchi T, Takaku Y, Tsukahara Y. (2001) Diurnal changes in retinula cell sensitivities and receptive fields (two-dimensional angular sensitivity functions) in the apposition eyes of Ligiaexotica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Journal of Experimental Biology 204: 239–248. 10.1242/jeb.204.2.239 PubMed DOI
Hatten TD, Bosque-Pérez NA, Labonte JR, Guy SO, Eigenbrode SD. (2007) Effects of tillage on the activity density and biological diversity of carabid beetles in spring and winter crops. Environmental Entomology 36: 356–368. 10.1093/ee/36.2.356 PubMed DOI
Hohbein R, Conway CJ. (2018) Pitfall traps: A review of methods for estimating arthropod abundance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 42: 597–606. 10.1002/wsb.928 DOI
Hornung E. (2011) Evolutionary adaptation of oniscidean isopods to terrestrial life: Structure, physiology and behavior. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 4: 95–130. 10.1163/187498311X576262 DOI
Hornung E, Szlavecz K, Dombos M. (2015) Demography of some non-native isopods (Crustacea, Isopoda,Oniscidea) in a Mid-Atlantic forest, USA. ZooKeys 515: 127–143. 10.3897/zookeys.515.9403 PubMed DOI PMC
Knapp M. (2007) Metoda zemních pastí. [Pitfall Trapping.] Master thesis. Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague. Ms., 69 pp. [in Czech]
Knapp M, Růžička J. (2012) The effect of pitfall trap construction and preservative on catch size, species richness and species composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). European Journal of Entomology 109: 419–426.10.14411/eje.2012.054 DOI
Knapp M, Baranovská E, Jakubec P. (2016) Effects of bait presence and type of preservative solution on ground and carrion beetle samples collected by pitfall trapping. Environmental Entomology 45: 1022–1028.10.1093/ee/nvw047 PubMed DOI
Luff ML. (1975) Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps. Oecologia 19: 345–357. 10.1007/BF00348110 PubMed DOI
Pekár S. (2002) Differential effects of formaldehyde concentration and detergent on the catching efficacy of surface active arthropods by pitfall traps. Pedobiologia 46: 539–547.10.1078/0031-4056-00158 DOI
Rendoš M. (2012) Arthropod communities within the scree slope in NNR Sivec. Master thesis. Faculty of Science, Pavol Josef Šafárik University in Košice. Ms., 81 pp.
Santalla S, Salgado JM, Calvo L, Fernandez MMF. (2002) Changes in the Carabidae community after a large fire in a Pinuspinaster stand. In: Trabaud L, Pradon R. (Eds) Fire and Biological Processes.Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, 215–231.
Silva PG, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Di Mare RA. (2012) Attractiveness of different bait to the Scarabaeinea (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in forest fragments in extreme southern Brazil. Zoological Studies 51: 429–441.
Skuhravý V. (1957) Metoda zemních pastí. [Pitfall Trapping. ] Časopis Československé Společnosti Entomologické 54: 27–40. [in Czech]
Snyder GG. (1959) Relative humidity and survival in isopods. Bios 30: 208–211.
Topping CJ, Sunderland KD. (1992) Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 485–491.10.2307/2404516 DOI
Wright JC, Machin J. (1990) Water vapor absorption in terrestrial isopods. Journal of Experimental Biology 154: 13–30. 10.1242/jeb.154.1.13 DOI