Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: A comparative analysis of permeability quantification based on K trans and PS

. 2025 Jun ; 93 (6) : 2610-2622. [epub] 20250218

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39963048

Grantová podpora
GA22-10953S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
LM2023050 Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

PURPOSE: Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a promising method for neurotherapeutic delivery. The standard for quantifying induced BBB permeability is the K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ parameter, which reflects both permeability and plasma flow. The influence of plasma flow can be eliminated by estimating the PS parameter. However, this parameter has been largely unexplored in this application. This study aims to compare permeability estimates based on K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ and PS in focused ultrasound-induced BBB opening experiments. METHODS: We used the extended Tofts model (ETM) and the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) to estimate K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ and PS parameters, respectively. Permeability estimates were compared using simulated concentration curves, simulated DCE-MRI data, and real datasets. We explored the influence of spatially-regularized model fitting on the results. RESULTS: For opened BBB, K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ was minimally influenced by plasma flow under the tested conditions. However, fitting the ETM often introduced outliers in K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ estimates in regions with closed BBB. The 2CXM outperformed the ETM at high signal-to-noise ratios, but its higher complexity led to lower precision at low signal-to-noise ratios. Both these issues were successfully compensated by spatially-regularized model fitting. CONCLUSION: Both K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ and PS seem to be eligible options for the quantification of BBB opening, and the correct choice depends on the specifics of the acquired DCE-MRI data. Additionally, spatial regularization has demonstrated its importance in enhancing the accuracy and reproducibility of results for both models.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Gorick CM, Breza VR, Nowak KM, et al. Applications of focused ultrasound‐mediated blood–brain barrier opening. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;191:114583. PubMed PMC

Konofagou EE, Tunga Y‐S, Choia J, Deffieuxa T, Baseria B, Vlachosa F. Ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1332‐1345. PubMed PMC

Lipsman N, Meng Y, Bethune AJ, et al. Blood–brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease using MR‐guided focused ultrasound. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2336. PubMed PMC

Meng Y, MacIntosh BJ, Shirzadi Z, et al. Resting state functional connectivity changes after MR‐guided focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier opening in patients with Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage. 2019;200:275‐280. PubMed

Conti A, Kamimura HA, Novell A, Duggento A, Toschi N. Magnetic resonance methods for focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening. Front Phys Ther. 2020;8:547674.

Sun T, Samiotaki G, Wang S, Acosta C, Chen CC, Konofagou EE. Acoustic cavitation‐based monitoring of the reversibility and permeability of ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:9079‐9094. PubMed PMC

Chu PC, Chai WY, Tsai CH, Kang ST, Yeh CK, Liu HL. Focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening: association with mechanical index and cavitation index analyzed by dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic‐resonance imaging. Sci Rep. 2016;6:4151. PubMed PMC

Jackson A, Parker G, Buckley D. Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced Magnetic Resonance in Oncology. Springer; 2005.

Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. Classic models for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:1004‐1027. PubMed

Huh H, Park TY, Seo H, et al. A local difference in blood–brain barrier permeability in the caudate putamen and thalamus of a rat brain induced by focused ultrasound. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19286. PubMed PMC

Choi HJ, Han M, Seo H, Park CY, Lee E‐H, Park J. The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound‐mediated blood–brain barrier disruption. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19:103. PubMed PMC

Vlachos F, Tung Y, Konofagou E. Permeability assessment of the focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening using dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:5451‐5466. PubMed PMC

Vlachos F, Tung YS, Konofagou E. Permeability dependence study of the focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening at distinct pressures and microbubble diameters using DCE‐MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:821‐830. PubMed PMC

Lee P‐Y, Wei H‐J, Pouliopoulos Antonios N, et al. Deep Learning Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose for Contrast‐Enhanced Blood–Brain Barrier Opening. 2023.

Yang F‐Y, Ko C‐E, Huang S‐Y, Chung I‐F, Chen G‐S. Pharmacokinetic changes induced by focused ultrasound in glioma‐bearing rats as measured by dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92910. PubMed PMC

Wang S, Wu C‐C, Zhang H, et al. Focused ultrasound induced‐blood–brain barrier opening in mouse brain receiving radiosurgery dose of radiation enhances local delivery of systemic therapy. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20190214. PubMed PMC

Park J, Aryal M, Vykhodtseva N, Zhang Y‐Z, McDannold N. Evaluation of permeability, doxorubicin delivery, and drug retention in a rat brain tumor model after ultrasound‐induced blood‐tumor barrier disruption. J Control Release. 2017;250:77‐85. PubMed PMC

Chen K‐T, Chai W‐Y, Lin Y‐J, et al. Neuronavigation‐guided focused ultrasound for transcranial blood–brain barrier opening and immunostimulation in brain tumors. Science . Advances. 2021;7:eabd0772. PubMed PMC

Chai W‐Y, Chu P‐C, Tsai M‐Y, et al. Magnetic‐resonance imaging for kinetic analysis of permeability changes during focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening and brain drug delivery. J Control Release. 2014;192:1‐9. PubMed

Chai W‐Y, Chu P‐C, Tsai C‐H, et al. Image‐guided focused‐ultrasound CNS molecular delivery: an implementation via dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic‐resonance imaging. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4151. PubMed PMC

Fan CH, Lin WH, Ting CY, et al. Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound imaging for the detection of focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening. Theranostics. 2014;4:1014‐1025. PubMed PMC

Yoon K, Lee W, Chen E, et al. Localized blood–brain barrier opening in ovine model using image‐guided transcranial focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:2391‐2404. PubMed PMC

Aryal M, Park J, Vykhodtseva N, Zhang Y‐Z, McDannold N. Enhancement in blood‐tumor barrier permeability and delivery of liposomal doxorubicin using focused ultrasound and microbubbles: evaluation during tumor progression in a rat glioma model. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:2511‐2527. PubMed PMC

Samiotaki G, Karakatsani ME, Buch A, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis and drug delivery efficiency of the focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening in non‐human primates. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;37:273‐281. PubMed PMC

Pacia CP, Zhu L, Yang Y, et al. Feasibility and safety of focused ultrasound‐enabled liquid biopsy in the brain of a porcine model. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7449. PubMed PMC

Hývlová D, Vitouš J, Jiřík R. Comparison of pharmacokinetic models for quantification of blood‐brain‐barrier opening induced by focused ultrasound. Proceedings II of the 29st Conference STUDENT EEICT 2023: Selected papers:133‐136Brno University of Technology; 2023.

Feng L. Golden‐angle radial MRI: basics, advances, and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;56:45‐62. PubMed PMC

Uecker M. BART: Computational magnetic resonance imaging. https://mrirecon.github.io/bart/

Bartoš M, Rajmic P, Šorel M, Mangová M, Keunen O, Jiřík R. Spatially regularized estimation of the tissue homogeneity model parameters in DCE‐MRI using proximal minimization. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82:2257‐2272. PubMed

Hývlová D. PerfSim. https://github.com/NMRISIBrno/PerfSim.git

Vitouš J, Jiřík R, Stračina T, et al. T1 mapping of myocardium in rats using self‐gated golden‐angle acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2024;91:368‐380. PubMed

Jiřík R. Perfusion Lab. https://perflab.isibrno.cz/

Maier O, Schoormans J, Schloegl M, et al. Rapid T1 quantification from high resolution 3D data with model‐based reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81:2072‐2089. PubMed PMC

Ewing JR, Bagher‐Ebadian H. Model selection in measures of vascular parameters using dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI: experimental and clinical applications. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:1028‐1041. PubMed PMC

Luypaert R, Ingrisch M, Sourbron S, De Mey J. The Akaike information criterion in DCE‐MRI: does it improve the haemodynamic parameter estimates? Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:3609. PubMed

Glatting G, Kletting P, Reske SN, Hohl K, Ring C. Choosing the optimal fit function: comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F‐test. Med Phys. 2007;34:4285‐4292. PubMed

Fluckiger JU, Schabel MC, DiBella EVR. Toward local arterial input functions in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32:924‐934. PubMed

Adam JF, Elleaume H, Duc GL, et al. Absolute cerebral blood volume and blood flow measurements based on synchrotron radiation quantitative computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:499‐512. PubMed

Cremer Jill E, Seville MP. Regional brain blood flow, blood volume, and haematocrit values in the adult rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3:254‐256. PubMed

Jiřík R, Soucek K, Mezl M, et al. Blind deconvolution in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and ultrasound. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol 2014. IEEE; 2014:4276‐4279. PubMed

Jiřík R, Taxt T, Macíček O, et al. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE‐MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;62:46‐56. PubMed

Haroon J, Aboody K, Flores L, et al. Use of transcranial low‐intensity focused ultrasound for targeted delivery of stem cell‐derived exosomes to the brain. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1‐8. PubMed PMC

Hývlová D, Jiřík R, Vitouš J, et al. DCE‐MRI data of focused ultrasound‐induced blood–brain barrier opening in mice (real & simulated). doi:10.5281/zenodo.136831032024 PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...