• This record comes from PubMed

Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilar (DRL_RI) versus MabThera® in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma: the FLINTER study

. 2025 ; 17 () : 17588359251339925. [epub] 20250524

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic-ecollection

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 40421128
PubMed Central PMC12104602
DOI 10.1177/17588359251339925
PII: 10.1177_17588359251339925
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This phase III study (RI-01-006; FLINTER) was conducted to demonstrate equivalent efficacy of DRL_RI to EU-approved rituximab (MabThera®) in patients with previously untreated Stage II-IV, CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL). This study also evaluated safety, immunogenicity, rituximab concentrations, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of DRL_RI compared with MabThera. DESIGN AND METHODS: Previously untreated, stage II-IV, CD20-positive LTB-FL patients (N = 317) were randomized (1:1) to receive DRL_RI (n = 162) or MabThera (n = 155) as intravenous infusions of 375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks (induction period), and thereafter every 8 weeks from Week 12 to Week 36 (maintenance treatment), and followed up till Week 52. The primary end point was best overall response rate (BORR) up to Week 28 based on blinded independent central review. Efficacy equivalence was demonstrated if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for BORR difference was within the prespecified equivalence margin (±17%). Secondary end points included objective and complete responses, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, immunogenicity, mean serum concentrations, and PD. RESULTS: The BORR up to Week 28 was 80.2% versus 79.4% for DRL_RI versus MabThera group; with a difference of 0.89% (90% CI: -6.67 to 8.48; 95% CI: -8.05 to 9.93 within the prespecified margin). Both treatment groups were comparable for all secondary efficacy end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 68.6% of patients; safety, immunogenicity, and mean serum concentrations were similar between groups. Peripheral B-cell counts declined below quantifiable limits in most patients, with a median time to B-cell depletion of 6.9 versus 7.0 days for DRL_RI versus MabThera. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated efficacy equivalence of DRL_RI to MabThera; with comparable safety, immunogenicity, serum concentrations, and PD between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03976102 and EudraCT (2018-004223-36).

See more in PubMed

Dotan E, Aggarwal C, Smith MR. Impact of rituximab (Rituxan) on the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. P T 2010; 35(3): 148–157. PubMed PMC

American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2024, https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2024/2024-cancer-facts-and-figures-acs.pdf (2024, accessed 27 February 2024).

A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood 1997; 89(11): 3909–3918. PubMed

Pileri SA, Zinzani PL, Went P, et al.. Indolent lymphoma: the pathologist’s viewpoint. Ann Oncol 2004; 15(1): 12–18. PubMed

Rituxan® (rituximab) prescribing information, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/103705s5467lbl.pdf (1997, accessed 28 February 2024).

MabThera® (rituximab): summary of product characteristics (SmPC), https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/mabthera-epar-product-information_en.pdf (2009, accessed 28 February 2024).

Dreyling M, Ghielmini M, Rule S, et al.. Newly diagnosed and relapsed follicular lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2021; 32(3): 298–308. PubMed

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): B-cell lymphomas. Version 1, https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf (2024, accessed 18 March 2024).

European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-similar-biological-medicinal-products-rev1_en.pdf (2014, accessed 27 February 2024).

US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product, guidance for industry, https://www.fda.gov/media/82647/download (2015, accessed 27 February 2024).

Viswabandya A, Shah S, Mukhopadhyay A, et al.. Randomized, double-blind, pharmacokinetic equivalence trial comparing DRL-rituximab with MabThera in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Glob Oncol 2019; 5: 1–13. PubMed PMC

Haridas VM, Katta R, Nalawade A, et al.. Pharmacokinetic similarity and comparative pharmacodynamics, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of DRL_RI versus reference rituximab in biologics-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, three-arm study. BioDrugs 2020; 34(2): 183–196. PubMed PMC

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c332. PubMed PMC

Brice P, Bastion Y, Lepage E, et al.. Comparison in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphomas between an initial no-treatment policy, prednimustine, or interferon alfa: a randomized study from the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires. Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(3): 1110–1117. PubMed

US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. FDA guidance on conduct of clinical trials of medical products during COVID-19 pandemic. Guidance for industry, investigators, and institutional review board, https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/fda-covid-guidance-2apr2020.pdf (2020, accessed 28 February 2024).

European Medicines Agency. Guidance on the management of clinical trials during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic; Version 5, https://health.ec.europa.eu/latest-updates/updated-document-guidance-management-clinical-trials-during-covid-19-coronavirus-pandemic-2022-02-10_en (2022, accessed 28 February 2024).

Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, et al.. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group (published correction appears in J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(11): 2351). J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(4): 1244. PubMed

Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al.. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(27): 3059–3068. PubMed PMC

Chan IS, Zhang Z. Test-based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions. Biometrics 1999; 55(4): 1202–1209. PubMed

Ogura M, Sancho JM, Cho SG, et al.. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the biosimilar CT-P10 in comparison with rituximab in patients with previously untreated low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2018; 5(11): e543–e553. PubMed

Sharman JP, Liberati AM, Ishizawa K, et al.. A randomized, double-blind, efficacy and safety study of PF-05280586 (a rituximab biosimilar) compared with rituximab reference product (MabThera®) in subjects with previously untreated CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL). BioDrugs 2020; 34(2): 171–181. PubMed PMC

Niederwieser D, Hamm C, Cobb P, et al.. Efficacy and safety of ABP 798: results from the JASMINE trial in patients with follicular lymphoma in comparison with rituximab reference product (published correction appears in Target Oncol 2020; 15(6): 807). Target Oncol 2020; 15(5): 599–611. PubMed PMC

Colombat P, Brousse N, Salles G, et al.. Rituximab induction immunotherapy for first-line low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma: survival analyses with 7-year follow-up. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(9): 2380–2385. PubMed

Ardeshna KM, Qian W, Smith P, et al.. Rituximab versus a watch-and-wait approach in patients with advanced-stage, asymptomatic, non-bulky follicular lymphoma: an open-label randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(4): 424–435. PubMed

Kahl BS, Hong F, Williams ME, et al.. Rituximab extended schedule or re-treatment trial for low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma: eastern cooperative oncology group protocol e4402. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(28): 3096–3102. PubMed PMC

Kwak LW, Sancho JM, Cho S-G, et al.. Efficacy and safety of CT-P10 versus rituximab in untreated low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma: final results of a randomized phase III study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2022; 22(2): 89–97. PubMed

Yang L, Zheng Z, Li N, et al.. Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars or reference product as first-line treatment in patients with low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther 2022; 47(12): 1923–1931. PubMed

See more in PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03976102

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...