Six Sigma model with implement SAPF to enhance power quality and product quality at induction heat treatment process

. 2025 Jul 02 ; 15 (1) : 22607. [epub] 20250702

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40593871

Grantová podpora
Project number CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048 the financial support of the European Union under the REFRESH - Research Excellence For Region Sustainability and High-tech Industries
Project number CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048 the financial support of the European Union under the REFRESH - Research Excellence For Region Sustainability and High-tech Industries
Project number CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048 the financial support of the European Union under the REFRESH - Research Excellence For Region Sustainability and High-tech Industries
Project No. SP2025/033 the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic
Project No. SP2025/033 the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic
Project No. SP2025/033 the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic

Odkazy

PubMed 40593871
PubMed Central PMC12215893
DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-03787-x
PII: 10.1038/s41598-025-03787-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

This study proposes a model to integrate the Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) method into the Analysis phase of the Six Sigma (DMAIC) method to improve product quality and optimize processing conditions during high-frequency quenching heat treatment. One of the breakthroughs of the study is the combination of Industry 4.0 technology and the implementation of Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF) to improve power quality, reduce harmonic distortion (THD), ensure product hardness of 58-62 HRC, and thermal permeability of 1.8-2.2 mm according to standards. Previously, many studies only focused on improving the heat treatment process but did not fully integrate MADM, Six Sigma, and Industry 4.0 technology, nor did any study consider the combination of SAPF to control power quality during high-frequency quenching. Another gap is the lack of quantitative assessment of operator satisfaction after improvement using PLS-SEM. The study applied the Six Sigma DMAIC model combined with MADM to analyze and rank factors affecting product quality. In the improvement phase, the Taguchi method was used to optimize processing conditions, minimizing errors in the production process. At the same time, Industry 4.0 technology and RFID systems were integrated to control production conditions in real time, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the process. Power quality was improved thanks to the implementation of SAPF, helping to control harmonic distortion (THD) below 5% according to the IEEE 519:2022 standard, minimizing the negative impact of voltage on the heat treatment process. In addition, the study also applied PLS-SEM to measure operator satisfaction after implementing the improved system. The research results show that the rate of substandard products has decreased sharply from 90 to 1%, ensuring hardness of 58-62 HRC and thermal permeability of 1.8-2.2 mm. Power quality is better controlled, with the THD value reduced from more than 34% to less than 5%, meeting the IEEE 519:2022 standard. As a result, production costs are optimized, helping to minimize the waste of raw materials and energy. After implementing the improved system, operators' satisfaction levels have also increased significantly, reflected in the PLS-SEM measurement indicators. More importantly, this research model is not only effectively applied in the precision engineering industry but also has the potential to be expanded to many other industries, especially small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises, helping them to increase productivity and improve product quality in the context of Industry 4.0.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F. & Frank, A. G. The expected contribution of industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance.

Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y. & Zhang, Y. The evolution of production scheduling from industry 3.0 through industry 4.0.

Zakoldaev, D. A., Korobeynikov, A. G., Shukalov, A. V., Zharinov, I. O. & Zharinov, O. O. Industry 4.0 vs Industry 3.0: the role of personnel in production,

Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S. & Pellerin, R. Enhancing the Decision-Making process through industry 4.0 technologies.

Dalmarco, G., Ramalho, F. R., Barros, A. C. & Soares, A. L. Providing industry 4.0 technologies: the case of a production technology cluster.

Tong, D., Gu, J. & Yang, F. Numerical simulation on induction heat treatment process of a shaft part: involving induction hardening and tempering.

Rojas-Arias, N., Coury, F. G., Vanmeensel, K., Amancio-Filho, S. T. & Gargarella, P. Heat treating additive-manufactured alloys: A comprehensive review.

Fomin, A. Superhard Titania coatings produced on titanium using induction heat treatment.

Cheng, G. J., Liu, L. T., Qiang, X. J. & Liu, Y. Industry 4.0 Development and Application of Intelligent Manufacturing,

Dantas, T. E. T. et al. How the combination of circular economy and industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the sustainable development goals.

Rudnev, V. Evolution of Induction Heating and Heat Treating as a Subject of Mathematical Modeling, Optimization and Design,

Palange, A. & Dhatrak, P. Lean manufacturing a vital tool to enhance productivity in manufacturing.

Widiwati, I. T. B., Liman, S. D. & Nurprihatin, F. The implementation of lean six Sigma approach to minimize waste at a food manufacturing industry.

Psarommatis, F. & Azamfirei, V. Zero defect manufacturing: A complete guide for advanced and sustainable quality management.

LeBlanc, S., Yee, S. K., Scullin, M. L., Dames, C. & Goodson, K. E. Material and manufacturing cost considerations for thermoelectrics.

Nakandala, D., Rashid, M. A. & de Silva, P. G. T. The role of lean, agility and learning ambidexterity in industry 4.0 implementations.

Kuosmanen và, N. & Maczulskij, T. Going green while getting Lean: decomposing carbon and green total factor productivity. PubMed

Barrani, L., Ostadi, B. & Aghdasi, M. Developing a strategic roadmap towards integration in industry 4.0: A dynamic capabilities theory perspective.

Pech, M. & Vrchota, J. Classification of Small- and Medium-Sized enterprises based on the level of industry 4.0 implementation.

Agarwal, A. & Ojha, R. Prioritizing implications of Industry-4.0 on the sustainable development goals: A perspective from the analytic hierarchy process in manufacturing operations.

Pongboonchai-Empl, T., Antony, J., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Komkowski, T. & Tortorella, G. L. Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into Lean Six Sigma DMAIC: A systematic review,

Li, G., Reimann, M. & Zhang, W. When remanufacturing Meets product quality improvement: the impact of production cost.

Vinogradova, I. Multi-Attribute Decision-Making methods as a part of mathematical optimization.

Kousar, S., Ansar, A., Kausar, N. & Freen, G. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for smog mitigation: A comprehensive analysis of health, economic, and ecological impacts.

Ye, J., Zhan, J. & Xu, Z. A novel multi-attribute decision-making method based on fuzzy rough sets.

Jiang, J., Ren, M. & Wang, J. Interval number multi-attribute decision-making method based on TOPSIS.

Shahba, S., Arjmandi, R., Monavari, M. & Ghodusi, J. Application of multi-attribute decision-making methods in SWOT analysis of mine waste management (case study: Sirjan’sGolgohar iron mine, Iran).

Zhu, J., Ma, X., Zhan, J. & Yao, Y. A three-way multi-attribute decision making method based on regret theory and its application to medical data in fuzzy environments.

Dabić-Miletić, S. & Raković, K. Ranking of autonomous alternatives for the realization of intralogistics activities in sustainable warehouse systems using the TOPSIS method.

Duc, M. L., Bilik, P. & Martinek, R. Analysis of factors affecting electric power quality: PLS-SEM and deep learning neural network analysis.

Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Luthra, S. & Kumar, A. Impact of digital assistant attributes on millennials’ purchasing intentions: A Multi-Group analysis using PLS-SEM, artificial neural network and FsQCA. PubMed PMC

Yumak, N. & Aslantaş, K. A review on heat treatment efficiency in metastable Β titanium alloys: the role of the treatment process and parameters.

Khan, O. et al. Experimental investigation and multi-performance optimization of the leachate recirculation-based sustainable landfills using the Taguchi approach and an integrated MCDM method. PubMed PMC

Minamoto, H. & Kawamura, S. Effects of material strain rate sensitivity in low-speed impact between two identical spheres.

Li, R., Yamashita, S., Yoshida, K. & Kita, H. Effect of counterbody on friction and wear properties of copper-MgP-graphite composites prepared by powder metallurgy,

ELLIOTT, A. Heat Treatment of sodium chloride windows to increase resistance to atmospheric action, Nature 157, 299, 1–2 2, (1946). 10.1038/157299a0

El-Bagoury, N., Waly, M. & Nofal, A. Effect of various heat treatment conditions on the microstructure of cast polycrystalline IN738LC alloy.

Xiang, C., Gupta, N., Coelho, P. & Cho, K. Effect of microstructure on tensile and compressive behavior of WE43 alloy in as cast and heat treated conditions.

Naar, R. & Bay, F. Numerical optimization for induction heat treatment processes.

Magnabosco, I., Ferro, P., Tiziani, A. & Bonollo, F. Induction heat treatment of an ISO C45 steel bar: experimental and numerical analysis.

Zakeri, S. et al. A decision analysis model for material selection using simple ranking process. PubMed PMC

Fomin, A. et al. Simulation and experimental study of induction heat treatment of titanium disks.

Kunst, R. et al. Improving devices communication in industry 4.0 wireless networks.

Li, L. et al. Exogenous melatonin improves peanut field productivity and quality at reduced nitrogen application.

Khanduja, D., Singh, S. & Garg, R. K. Analysis of critical success factors for successful integration of lean six Sigma and industry 4.0 for organizational excellence.

Ferencez, K., Domokos, J. & Kovacs, L. Review of Industry 4.0 Security Challenges,

Harikannan, N., Vinodh, S. & Antony, J. Analysis of the relationship among industry 4.0 technologies, sustainable manufacturing practices and organizational sustainable performance using structural equation modelling.

Zhong, Y., Oh, S. & Moon, H. Service transformation under industry 4.0: investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model.

Rikalovic, A., Suzic, N., Bajic, B. & Piuri, V. Industry 4.0 implementation challenges and opportunities: A technological perspective.

Unhelkar, B. et al. Enhancing supply chain performance using RFID technology and decision support systems in the industry 4.0–A systematic literature review.

Zhang, J. et al. Robust RFID based 6-DoF localization for unmanned aerial vehicles.

Panagoulias, D. P., Virvou, M. & Tsihrintzis, G. A. A novel framework for artificial intelligence explainability via the technology acceptance model and rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine using machine learning.

Grassi, A., Guizzi, G., Carmela, L., Santillo & Vespoli, S. A Semi-Heterarchical Production Control Architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems,

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...