LoQANT: An ImageJ Plugin for Quantifying Nuclear Staining in Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
41226833
PubMed Central
PMC12610205
DOI
10.3390/ijms262110799
PII: ijms262110799
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, nuclear positivity, staining quantification,
- MeSH
- barvení a značení * metody MeSH
- buněčné jádro * metabolismus MeSH
- fluorescenční protilátková technika * metody MeSH
- imunohistochemie * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačové zpracování obrazu * metody MeSH
- software * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
A large number of regulatory proteins are found in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Changes in their nuclear abundance are important for cellular signalling, biological activity, and disease mechanisms. Accurate quantification of nuclear staining is therefore essential in studies of cellular function, therapeutic targeting, drug design, and drug resistance. However, manual scoring is time-consuming, unsuitable for high-throughput applications, and introduces potential bias. As expected, manual scoring by six observers with varying levels of expertise led to highly variable results. Moreover, it was far from achieving good interobserver reliability. To overcome these limitations, LoQANT (Localisation and Quantification of Antigen Nuclear sTaining), an open, freely available ImageJ plugin, was developed for reliable and efficient quantification of nuclear signals. LoQANT is a single cell-based approach to assess the proportion of cells with a positive nuclear signal, independent of cytoplasmic staining, in both immunohistochemically and fluorescently stained samples across various sample types. It also provides semiquantitative and quantitative measurements of nuclear staining intensity. The script, its version for batch analysis, and complete user guide are available at GitHub.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Fu X., Liang C., Li F., Wang L., Wu X., Lu A., Xiao G., Zhang G. The Rules and Functions of Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1445. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051445. PubMed DOI PMC
Ding B., Sepehrimanesh M. Nucleocytoplasmic Transport: Regulatory Mechanisms and the Implications in Neurodegeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4165. doi: 10.3390/ijms22084165. PubMed DOI PMC
Conforti F., Wang Y., Rodriguez J.A., Alberobello A.T., Zhang Y.W., Giaccone G. Molecular Pathways: Anticancer Activity by Inhibition of Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:4508–4513. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0408. PubMed DOI
Molenaar C., Weeks K.L. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling: The ins and outs of quantitative imaging. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018;45:1087–1094. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12969. PubMed DOI
Aeffner F., Wilson K., Martin N.T., Black J.C., Hendriks C.L.L., Bolon B., Rudmann D.G., Gianani R., Koegler S.R., Krueger J., et al. The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017;141:1267–1275. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0386-RA. PubMed DOI
Paizs M., Engelhardt J.I., Siklós L. Quantitative assessment of relative changes of immunohistochemical staining by light microscopy in specified anatomical regions. J. Microsc. 2009;234:103–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03146.x. PubMed DOI
Jaraj S.J., Camparo P., Boyle H., Germain F., Nilsson B., Petersson F., Egevad L. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interpretation of immunohistochemical stains of prostate cancer. Virchows. Arch. 2009;455:375–381. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0833-8. PubMed DOI
Butter R., Hondelink L.M., van Elswijk L., Blaauwgeers J.L.G., Bloemena E., Britstra R., Bulkmans N., van Gulik A.L., Monkhorst K., de Rooij M.J., et al. The impact of a pathologist’s personality on the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2022;166:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.002. PubMed DOI
Varghese F., Bukhari A.B., Malhotra R., De A. IHC Profiler: An open source plugin for the quantitative evaluation and automated scoring of immunohistochemistry images of human tissue samples. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096801. PubMed DOI PMC
Law A.M.K., Yin J.X.M., Castillo L., Young A.I.J., Piggin C., Rogers S., Caldon C.E., Burgess A., Millar E.K.A., O’Toole S.A., et al. Andy’s Algorithms: New automated digital image analysis pipelines for FIJI. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:15717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15885-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Handala L., Fiore T., Rouillé Y., Helle F. QuantIF: An ImageJ Macro to Automatically Determine the Percentage of Infected Cells after Immunofluorescence. Viruses. 2019;11:165. doi: 10.3390/v11020165. PubMed DOI PMC
Huang L.K., Wang M.J.J. Image thresholding by minimizing the measures of fuzziness. Pattern Recognit. 1995;28:41–51. doi: 10.1016/0031-3203(94)E0043-K. DOI
Prewitt J.M., Mendelsohn M.L. The analysis of cell images. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1966;128:1035–1053. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11715.x. PubMed DOI
Ridler T.W., Calvard S. Picture Thresholding Using an Iterative Selection Method. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1978;8:630–632. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1978.4310039. DOI
Li C.H., Tam P.K.S. An iterative algorithm for minimum cross entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 1998;19:771–776. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8655(98)00057-9. DOI
Kapur J.N., Sahoo P.K., Wong A.K.C. A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 1985;29:273–285. doi: 10.1016/0734-189X(85)90125-2. DOI
Glasbey C.A. An Analysis of Histogram-Based Thresholding Algorithms. CVGIP Graph. Models Image Process. 1993;55:532–537. doi: 10.1006/cgip.1993.1040. DOI
Kittler J., Illingworth J. Minimum error thresholding. Pattern Recognit. 1986;19:41–47. doi: 10.1016/0031-3203(86)90030-0. DOI
Tsai W.-H. Moment-preserving thresolding: A new approach. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 1985;29:377–393. doi: 10.1016/0734-189X(85)90133-1. DOI
Otsu N. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1979;9:62–66. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076. DOI
Doyle W. Operations Useful for Similarity-Invariant Pattern Recognition. J. ACM. 1962;9:259–267. doi: 10.1145/321119.321123. DOI
Shanbhag A.G. Utilization of Information Measure as a Means of Image Thresholding. CVGIP Graph. Models Image Process. 1994;56:414–419. doi: 10.1006/cgip.1994.1037. DOI
Zack G.W., Rogers W.E., Latt S.A. Automatic measurement of sister chromatid exchange frequency. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1977;25:741–753. doi: 10.1177/25.7.70454. PubMed DOI
Jui-Cheng Y., Fu-Juay C., Shyang C. A new criterion for automatic multilevel thresholding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995;4:370–378. doi: 10.1109/83.366472. PubMed DOI
Fedchenko N., Reifenrath J. Different approaches for interpretation and reporting of immunohistochemistry analysis results in the bone tissue—A review. Diagn. Pathol. 2014;9:221. doi: 10.1186/s13000-014-0221-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Price P., Ganugapati U., Gatalica Z., Kakadekar A., Macpherson J., Quenneville L., Rees H., Slodkowska E., Suresh J., Yu D., et al. Reinventing Nuclear Histo-score Utilizing Inherent Morphologic Cutoffs: Blue-brown Color H-score (BBC-HS) Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. AIMM. 2023;31:500–506. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001095. PubMed DOI PMC
Avilés-Salas A., Muñiz-Hernández S., Maldonado-Martínez H.A., Chanona-Vilchis J.G., Ramírez-Tirado L.A., Hernández-Pedro N., Dorantes-Heredia R., Ruí Z.M.J.M., Motola-Kuba D., Arrieta O. Reproducibility of the EGFR immunohistochemistry scores for tumor samples from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017;13:912–920. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5512. PubMed DOI PMC
Schmidt U., Weigert M., Broaddus C., Myers G. Cell Detection with Star-Convex Polygons; Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018; Granada, Spain. 16–20 September 2018; Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 265–273.
Arganda-Carreras I., Kaynig V., Rueden C., Eliceiri K.W., Schindelin J., Cardona A., Sebastian Seung H. Trainable Weka Segmentation: A machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2424–2426. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180. PubMed DOI
Stringer C., Wang T., Michaelos M., Pachitariu M. Cellpose: A generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods. 2021;18:100–106. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x. PubMed DOI
Ruifrok A.C., Johnston D.A. Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 2001;23:291–299. PubMed
Landini G., Martinelli G., Piccinini F. Colour deconvolution: Stain unmixing in histological imaging. Bioinformatics. 2020;37:1485–1487. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa847. PubMed DOI
van der Loos C.M. Multiple immunoenzyme staining: Methods and visualizations for the observation with spectral imaging. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2008;56:313–328. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2007.950170. PubMed DOI PMC
Tan Y., Wang M., Yang K., Chi T., Liao Z., Wei P. PPAR-α Modulators as Current and Potential Cancer Treatments. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:599995. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.599995. PubMed DOI PMC
Cizkova K., Foltynkova T., Hanyk J., Kamencak Z., Tauber Z. When Activator and Inhibitor of PPARα Do the Same: Consequence for Differentiation of Human Intestinal Cells. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1255. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091255. PubMed DOI PMC
Umemoto T., Fujiki Y. Ligand-dependent nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, PPARalpha and PPARgamma. Genes Cells. 2012;17:576–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2012.01607.x. PubMed DOI
Xu H.E., Stanley T.B., Montana V.G., Lambert M.H., Shearer B.G., Cobb J.E., McKee D.D., Galardi C.M., Plunket K.D., Nolte R.T., et al. Structural basis for antagonist-mediated recruitment of nuclear co-repressors by PPARα. Nature. 2002;415:813–817. doi: 10.1038/415813a. PubMed DOI
Maik-Rachline G., Zehorai E., Hanoch T., Blenis J., Seger R. The nuclear translocation of the kinases p38 and JNK promotes inflammation-induced cancer. Sci. Signal. 2018;11:eaao3428. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aao3428. PubMed DOI
Chiacchiera F., Matrone A., Ferrari E., Ingravallo G., Lo Sasso G., Murzilli S., Petruzzelli M., Salvatore L., Moschetta A., Simone C. p38α blockade inhibits colorectal cancer growth in vivo by inducing a switch from HIF1α- to FoxO-dependent transcription. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1203–1214. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.36. PubMed DOI
Han Z., Meng L., Huang X., Tan J., Liu W., Chen W., Zou Y., Cai Y., Huang S., Chen A., et al. Inhibition of p38 MAPK increases the sensitivity of 5-fluorouracil-resistant SW480 human colon cancer cells to noscapine. Oncol. Lett. 2022;23:52. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.13170. PubMed DOI PMC
Phan T., Zhang X.H., Rosen S., Melstrom L.G. P38 kinase in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer Gene Ther. 2023;30:1181–1189. doi: 10.1038/s41417-023-00622-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Cizkova K., Tauber Z. Fibrates Affect Levels of Phosphorylated p38 in Intestinal Cells in a Differentiation-Dependent Manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:7695. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097695. PubMed DOI PMC
Cromey D.W. Avoiding twisted pixels: Ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 2010;16:639–667. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9201-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Bankhead P., Loughrey M.B., Fernández J.A., Dombrowski Y., McArt D.G., Dunne P.D., McQuaid S., Gray R.T., Murray L.J., Coleman H.G., et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:16878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Stirling D.R., Swain-Bowden M.J., Lucas A.M., Carpenter A.E., Cimini B.A., Goodman A. CellProfiler 4: Improvements in speed, utility and usability. BMC Bioinform. 2021;22:433. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04344-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Koo T.K., Li M.Y. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J. Chiropr. Med. 2016;15:155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Erratum in J. Chiropr. Med. 2017, 16, 346. PubMed DOI PMC
Schober P., Boer C., Schwarte L.A. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018;126:1763–1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864. PubMed DOI