Night-to-Day Ratio Specified by 24-hour Blood Pressure Monitoring, Arterial Stiffness and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as Predictive Factors of Cardiovascular Risk
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
41329534
PubMed Central
PMC12746855
DOI
10.33549/physiolres.935593
PII: 935593
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ambulantní monitorování krevního tlaku * metody MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- cévní index srdce-kotník * metody MeSH
- cirkadiánní rytmus * fyziologie MeSH
- kardiovaskulární nemoci * patofyziologie diagnóza MeSH
- krevní tlak * fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- rizikové faktory kardiovaskulárních chorob MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- tlakový index kotník-paže metody MeSH
- tuhost cévní stěny * fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This study compares the interrelationships among different methods of determining predictive factors of cardiovascular risk: the Night-to-Day ratio (ND-R), Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index (AASI), Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI), and Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI). A total of 8120 blood pressure measurements were obtained from 280 24h-ABPM records (29 values per daily record) of 20 patients who each provided two 7-day/24-hour monitoring sessions. For each of the two 7-day-24h-ABPM records, the ND-R and AASI were determined. CAVI and ABI were always examined at the beginning of each 7-day-24h-ABPM session. All 20 patients (12 men; 8 women; mean age 57+/-2.1 yrs; mean BMI 29.3+/-1.69 kg/m2; mean left ventricle ejection fraction 53+/-3.8 %) had chronic ischemic coronary artery disease. The correlation coefficients did not exceed 0.318. ND-R of SBP showed the highest methodological sensitivity, identifying 65 % of patients at increased risk, compared to 57.5 % for ND-R of DBP, 23.7 % for CAVI, and 2.5 % for AASI (up to 27.5 % by evaluating individual days). The different cardiovascular risk assessment methods (ND-R, AASI, CAVI and ABI) cannot be substituted for one another. No risk was demonstrated using ABI. Repeating the 7-day-24h-ABPM approximately 1 year apart (unless there is a change in medication or in clinical symptoms) revealed a significantly different results of the ND-R and AASI, which can be expected in approximately 25 % of patients. Key words Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring " Night-to-Day blood pressure ratio " Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index " Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index " Ankle Brachial Index " Ischemic heart disease.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Havelková A, Dvorak P, Siegelova J, Dobsak P, Filipensky P, Cornelissen G. Possibilities of Interpreting the Night-to-Day Ratio Specified by 24-Hour Blood Pressure Monitoring. Int J Clin Pract. 2023;2023:6530295. doi: 10.1155/2023/6530295. PubMed DOI PMC
Javorka K. History of Blood Pressure Measurement in Newborns and Infants. Physiol Res. 2023;72:543–555. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935173. PubMed DOI PMC
Di Raimondo D, Casuccio A, Di Liberti R, Musiari G, Zappulla V, D’Angelo A, Pinto A. Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index (AASI) is Unable to Estimate Arterial Stiffness of Hypertensive Subjects: Role of Nocturnal Dipping of Blood Pressure. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2017;13:121–131. doi: 10.2174/1573402113666170621110305. PubMed DOI
Carter SA. Indirect systolic pressures and pulse waves in arterial occlusive diseases of lower extremities. Circulation. 1968;37:624–637. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.37.4.624. PubMed DOI
Yao ST, Hobbs JT, Irvine WT. Ankle systolic pressure measurements in arterial disease affecting the lower extremities. Br J Surg. 1969;56:676–679. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800560910. PubMed DOI
Hayashi K, Handa H, Nagasawa S, Okumura A, Moritake K. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J Biomech. 1980;13:175–184. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90191-8. PubMed DOI
Shirai K, Utino J, Otsuka K, Takata M. A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) J Atheros. 2006;13:101–107. doi: 10.5551/jat.13.101. PubMed DOI
Shirai K, Hiruta N, Song M, Kurosu T, Suzuki J, Tomaru T, Miyashita Y, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a novel indicator of arterial stiffness: theory, evidence and perspectives. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18:924–938. doi: 10.5551/jat.7716. PubMed DOI
Miyoshi T, Ito H, Shirai K, Horinaka S, Horinaka S, Higaki J, Yamamura S, Saiki A, et al. Predictive Value of the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index for Cardiovascular Events in Patients at Cardiovascular Risk. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e020103. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020103. PubMed DOI PMC
Parati G, Stergiou GS, Dolan E, Bilo G. Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018;20:1133–1137. doi: 10.1111/jch.13304. PubMed DOI PMC
Parati G, Bilo G, Kollias A, Pengo M, Ochoa JE, Castiglioni P, Stergiou GS, et al. Blood pressure variability: methodological aspects, clinical relevance and practical indications for management a European Society of Hypertension position paper. J Hypertens. 2023;41:527–544. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003363. PubMed DOI
Otsuka K, Cornelissen G, Halberg F. Chronomics and Continuous Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Vascular Chronomics: From 7-day/24-hour to Lifelong Monitoring. Springer; 2016. p. 870. DOI
Cuspidi C, Sala C, Tadic M, Gherbesi E, De Giorgi A, Grassi G, Mancia G. Clinical and prognostic significance of a reverse dipping pattern on ambulatory monitoring: An updated review. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:713–721. doi: 10.1111/jch.13023. PubMed DOI PMC
Kollias A, Stergiou GS, Dolan E, O’Brien E. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;224:291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.03.039. PubMed DOI
Boos CJ, Hein A, Khattab A. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index, mortality, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes; Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2024;26:89–101. doi: 10.1111/jch.14755. PubMed DOI PMC
Boos CJ, Toon LT, Almahdi H. The relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness, inflammation, blood pressure dipping and cardiovascular outcomes. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01946-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Kips JG, Vermeersch SJ, Reymond P, Boutouyrie P, Stergiopulos N, Laurent S, Van Bortel LM, Segers P. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index does not accurately assess arterial stiffness. J Hypertens. 2012;30:574–580. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834fca18. PubMed DOI
Takaki A, Ogawa H, Wakeyama T, Iwami T, Kimura M, Hadano Y, Matsuda S, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index is a new noninvasive parameter of arterial stiffness. Circ J. 2007;71:1710–1714. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1710. PubMed DOI
Shirai K, Hiruta N, Song M, Kurosu T, Suzuki J, Tomaru T, Miyashita Y, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a novel indicator of arterial stiffness: theory, evidence and perspectives. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18:924–938. doi: 10.5551/jat.7716. PubMed DOI
Ibata J, Sasaki H, Kakimoto T, Matsuno S, Nakatani M, Kobayashi M, Tatsumi K, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index measures arterial wall stiffness independent of blood pressure. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80:265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.12.016. PubMed DOI
Pírek O, Budinskaya K, Nováková Z. Effects of Peroral Hormonal Contraception on Cardiovascular System: Analysis of Selected Cardiovascular Parameters in an Adolescent Cohort; a Pilot Project. Physiol Res. 2022;71(Suppl 2):S203–S210. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934997. PubMed DOI PMC
Park JB, Park HE, Choi SY, Kim MK, Oh BH. Relation between cardioankle vascular index and coronary artery calcification or stenosis in asymptomatic subjects. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:557–567. doi: 10.5551/jat.15149. PubMed DOI
Matsushita K, Ding N, Kim ED, Budoff M, Chirinos JA, Fernhall B, Hamburg NM, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index and cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and cross-sectional studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019;21:16–24. doi: 10.1111/jch.13425. PubMed DOI PMC
Shirai K, Song M, Suzuki J, Kurosu T, Oyama T, Nagayama D, Miyashita Y, et al. Contradictory Effects of beta 1 and alpha 1-Aderenergic Receptor Blockers on Cardio-Ankle Vascular Stiffness Index (CAVI) - CAVI is Independent of Blood Pressure. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18:49–55. doi: 10.5551/jat.3582. PubMed DOI
Saiki A, Ohira M, Yamaguchi T, Nagayama D, Shimizu N, Shirai K, Tatsuno I. New Horizons of Arterial Stiffness Developed Using Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020;27:732–748. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17043. PubMed DOI PMC
Wu H-T, Hsu P-C, Liu A-B, Chen Z-L, Huang R-M, Chen C-P, Tang C-J, Sun C-K. Six-channel ECG-based pulse wave velocity for assessing whole-body arterial stiffness. Blood Press. 2012;21:167–176. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2012.681853. PubMed DOI
Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, Krook SH, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2021;286:1317–1324. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.11.1317. PubMed DOI
Lahoz C, Mostaza JM. Ankle-Brachial Index: A Useful Tool for Stratifying Cardiovascular Risk. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006;59:647–649. doi: 10.1016/S1885-5857(07)60022-X. PubMed DOI
Liu J, An B, Shi B, Li X, Qian L. Influence of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate on PWV Measurement: Assessment Under Real-Time Blood Pressure Monitoring. Physiol Res. 2024;73:963–971. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935372. PubMed DOI PMC
Rakusanova S, Cajka T. Metabolomics and Lipidomics for Studying Metabolic Syndrome: Insights into Cardiovascular Diseases, Type 1 & 2 Diabetes, and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. Physiol Res. 2024;73(Suppl 1):S165–S183. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935443. PubMed DOI PMC
Choi E-K, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Chang S-A, Chun EJ, Kim H-K, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:357–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.086. PubMed DOI