BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has emerged as a viable solution for reconstructing the most complex facial injuries. Previous work has demonstrated that surgical revisions are necessary to optimize outcomes. The authors' group has updated the previous report of revisions in their cohort, quantified and described which revisions were performed for functional, aesthetic, or mixed indications, and described the rationale, safety, and long-term outcomes of these revisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the authors' 10 face transplants from April of 2009 to February of 2023 was performed. The patients' medical records, preoperative facial defects, and operative reports (index and secondary revisions) were reviewed. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One patient underwent irreversible acute-on-chronic allograft rejection and received a second face transplant. The average number of revisions was 5.2 per patient (range, 2 to 11 procedures). The median time interval from transplantation to first revision was 4 months (range, 1 to 21 months). Median follow-up was 106 months (range, 39 to 142 months). Most interventions consisted of debulking the allograft or revising the periorbital tissues. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the authors report longer-term data on revision procedures needed in face transplant recipients. Patients should expect to undergo revisions for both functional and aesthetic considerations. Although the majority of revisions are performed within 2 years after transplantation, revisions can be safely performed at any time point. Shared decision-making between the patient and provider team is essential in deciding which revisions are performed and when. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- estetika MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- poranění obličeje * chirurgie MeSH
- rejekce štěpu MeSH
- reoperace * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- transplantace obličeje * metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
To date, little is known about the mechanisms of rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation, particularly for antibody mediated rejection. Additionally, no clear guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation. A systematic review of electronic databases (Embase and PubMed) was conducted to evaluate the relationship of donor specific antibodies and C4d deposition in correlation with cellular rejection following hand and face transplantation reported by centers between 1998 and July 2023. We extracted data on serum donor specific antibodies at the time of biopsy proven rejection according to Banff classification and C4d staining of target tissues. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare rejection grade between groups divided by status of C4d deposition and serum donor specific antibodies, and Fisher's Exact test was used to assess association between the two markers. This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 26 patients (5 face, 21 hand) were identified and data on 90 acute rejection episodes with information on Banff grade, donor specific antibody status, and C4d deposition were available. Donor specific antibodies were found to be associated with higher rejection grade (p = 0.005). C4d was not found to be associated with higher rejection grade (p = 0.33). Finally, no significant association was found between concurrent status of the two markers (p = 0.23). These findings suggest that the presence of donor specifc antibodies may be associated with higher grades of acute cellular rejection following hand and face transplantation. More consistent reporting on rejection episodes is needed in order to better understand antibody-mediated rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: The loss of an upper extremity is a severely disabling condition made medically challenging by the limited window for replantation. This study aims to investigate the burden of traumatic major upper extremity amputations in the United States and uncover possibilities for improvements in treatment. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was screened for International Classification of Diseases-9/10 diagnosis/procedure codes for traumatic and nontraumatic major upper extremity amputations and replantations within the years 2008 to 2017. The resulting pool of cases was analyzed for multiple variables, including level of injury, patient demographics, hospital type and location, length of stay, costs, comorbidities, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 15 155 major upper extremity amputations were recorded, of which 15.20% (n = 2305) were traumatic amputations-almost half of them related to the upper arm (49.6%; P = .0002). The great majority of replantations, however, was conducted at the lower arm level (87.4%; P < .0001), with an overall replantation rate of 22.3%. Nontraumatic amputations were overall associated with significantly higher burden of comorbidities relative to traumatic amputations except for long-term alcohol use (P < .0001). Both, amputations and replantations, were predominantly treated in large urban teaching hospitals, and were significantly more likely to occur in white men. The Southern region of the United States was handling the highest proportion of amputations in the United States, but had the lowest likelihood of replantation. CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of the national trends in major traumatic upper extremity amputations and replantations, revealing potential health care shortcomings.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Recipients of Vascularized Composite Allotransplants require effective immunosuppressive therapy to prevent graft rejection. This systematic review summarizes the current body of literature on immunosuppressive regimens used in face and hand transplants while summarizing their outcome in terms of rejection, renal failure, and infections. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies from 1998 until July 1st, 2023. We included all studies that discussed immunosuppressive strategies in face and hand transplant recipients according to PRISMA. RESULTS: The standard triple maintenance therapy was mostly adjusted due to nephrotoxicity or high incidence of rejection. The most common alternative treatments utilized were sirolimus (25/91; 27.5%) or everolimus (9/91; 9.9%) following hand- and photophoresis (7/45; 15.6%), sirolimus (5/45; 11.1%) or belatacept (1/45; 2.2%) following face transplantation. Episodes of rejection were reported in 60 (65.9%) of hand- and 33 (73%) of face transplant patients respectively. Graft loss of 12 (13.2%) hand and 4 (8.9%) face transplants was reported. Clinical CMV infection was observed in 6 (6.6%) hand and 7 (15.5%) face transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the herein presented data, facial grafts exhibited a heightened incidence of rejection episodes and CMV infections. Facial mucosa adds complexity to the immunological graft composition highlighting the need of individualized immunosuppressive regimens and further research.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Burn management has significantly advanced in the past 75 years, resulting in improved mortality rates. However, there are still over one million burn victims in the United States each year, with over 3,000 burn-related deaths annually. The impacts of individual patient, hospital, and regional demographics on length of stay (LOS) and total cost have yet to be fully explored in a large nationally representative cohort. Thus, this study aimed to examine various hospital and patient characteristics using a sample of over 20,000 patients. Inpatient data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2015 were analyzed, and only patients with an ICD-9 code for second- or third-degree burns were included. In addition, a major operating room procedure must have been indicated on the discharge summary for patients to be included in the final dataset, ensuring that only severe burns requiring complex care were analyzed. Analysis of covariance models was used to evaluate the impact of various patient, hospital, and regional variables on both LOS and cost. The study found that skin grafts and fasciotomy significantly increased the cost of hospitalization. Having burns on the face, neck, and trunk significantly increased costs for patients with second-degree burns, while burns on the trunk resulted in the longest LOS for patients with third-degree burns. Infections in the hospital and additional procedures, such as flaps and skin grafts, also led to longer stays. The study also found that the prevalence of postoperative complications, such as electrolyte imbalance, was high among patients with burn surgery.
- MeSH
- délka pobytu MeSH
- fasciotomie MeSH
- hospitalizace MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- popálení * chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
Burn management has significantly advanced in the past 75 years, resulting in improved mortality rates. However, there are still over one million burn victims in the US each year, with over 3,000 burn-related deaths annually. The impacts of individual patient, hospital, and regional demographics on length of stay (LOS) and total cost have yet to be fully explored in a large nationally representative cohort. Thus, this study aimed to examine various hospital and patient characteristics using a sample of over 20,000 patients. Inpatient data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008-2015 was analyzed, and only patients with an ICD-9 code for second or third-degree burns were included. Additionally, a major operating room procedure must have been indicated on the discharge summary for patients to be included in the final dataset, ensuring that only severe burns requiring complex care were analyzed. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to evaluate the impact of various patient, hospital, and regional variables on both LOS and cost. The study found that skin grafts and fasciotomy significantly increased the cost of hospitalization. Having burns on the face, neck, and trunk significantly increased costs for patients with second-degree burns, while burns on the trunk resulted in the longest LOS for patients with third-degree burns. Infections in the hospital and additional procedures, such as flaps and skin grafts, also led to longer stays. The study also found that the prevalence of post-operative complications, such as electrolyte imbalance, was high among burn surgery patients.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has emerged as a viable solution for reconstructing the most complex facial injuries. Prior work has demonstrated that surgical revisions are necessary to optimize outcomes. The authors' group has updated the previous report of revisions in their cohort, quantified and described which revisions were performed for functional, aesthetic, or mixed indications, and described the rationale, safety, and long-term outcomes of these revisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the authors' ten face transplants was performed from April 2009 to February 2023. The patients' medical records, preoperative facial defects, and operative reports (index and secondary revisions) were reviewed. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One patient underwent irreversible acute on chronic allograft rejection and received a second face transplant. The average number of revisions was 5.2 per patient (range, 2 to 11 procedures). The median time interval from transplantation to first revision was 4 months (range, 1 to 21 months). Median follow-up was 106 months (range 39 to 142 months). Most interventions consisted of debulking the allograft or revising the periorbital tissues. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we report longer term data on revision surgeries needed in face transplant recipients. Patients should expect to undergo revisions for both functional and aesthetic considerations. Although the majority of revisions are performed within two years following transplantation, revisions can be safely performed at any time point. Shared decision-making between the patient and provider team is essential in deciding which revisions are performed and when.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
