In monocentric organisms with asymmetric meiosis, the kinetochore proteins, such as CENH3 and CENP-C, evolve adaptively to counterbalance the deleterious effects of centromere drive, which is caused by the expansion of centromeric satellite repeats. The selection regimes that act on CENH3 and CENP-C genes have not been analyzed in organisms with holocentric chromosomes, although holocentrism is speculated to have evolved to suppress centromere drive. We tested both CENH3 and CENP-C for positive selection in several species of the holocentric genus Caenorhabditis using the maximum likelihood approach and sliding-window analysis. Although CENP-C did not show any signs of positive selection, positive selection has been detected in the case of CENH3. These results support the hypothesis that centromere drive occurs in Nematoda, at least in the telokinetic meiosis of Caenorhabditis.
- MeSH
- Caenorhabditis elegans genetics metabolism MeSH
- Centromere metabolism physiology MeSH
- Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone genetics metabolism physiology MeSH
- Chromosomes metabolism MeSH
- Organisms, Genetically Modified MeSH
- Histones genetics physiology MeSH
- Meiosis genetics physiology MeSH
- Movement physiology MeSH
- Chromosome Segregation genetics physiology MeSH
- Selection, Genetic MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
UNLABELLED: Transmission of genetic material from one generation to the next is a fundamental feature of all living cells. In eukaryotes, a macromolecular complex called the kinetochore plays crucial roles during chromosome segregation by linking chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Little is known about this process in evolutionarily diverse protists. Within the supergroup Discoba, Euglenozoa forms a speciose group of unicellular flagellates-kinetoplastids, euglenids, and diplonemids. Kinetoplastids have an unconventional kinetochore system, while euglenids have subunits that are conserved among most eukaryotes. For diplonemids, a group of extremely diverse and abundant marine flagellates, it remains unclear what kind of kinetochores are present. Here, we employed deep homology detection protocols using profile-versus-profile Hidden Markov Model searches and AlphaFold-based structural comparisons to detect homologies that might have been previously missed. Interestingly, we still could not detect orthologs for most of the kinetoplastid or canonical kinetochore subunits with few exceptions including a putative centromere-specific histone H3 variant (cenH3/CENP-A), the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2, the chromosomal passenger complex members Aurora and INCENP, and broadly conserved proteins like CLK kinase and the meiotic synaptonemal complex proteins SYCP2/3 that also function at kinetoplastid kinetochores. We examined the localization of five candidate kinetochore-associated proteins in the model diplonemid, Paradiplonema papillatum. PpCENP-A shows discrete dots in the nucleus, implying that it is likely a kinetochore component. PpMad2, PpCLKKKT10/19, PpSYCP2L1KKT17/18, and PpINCENP reside in the nucleus, but no clear kinetochore localization was observed. Altogether, these results point to the possibility that diplonemids evolved a hitherto unknown type of kinetochore system. IMPORTANCE: A macromolecular assembly called the kinetochore is essential for the segregation of genetic material during eukaryotic cell division. Therefore, characterization of kinetochores across species is essential for understanding the mechanisms involved in this key process across the eukaryotic tree of life. In particular, little is known about kinetochores in divergent protists such as Euglenozoa, a group of unicellular flagellates that includes kinetoplastids, euglenids, and diplonemids, the latter being a highly diverse and abundant component of marine plankton. While kinetoplastids have an unconventional kinetochore system and euglenids have a canonical one similar to traditional model eukaryotes, preliminary searches detected neither unconventional nor canonical kinetochore components in diplonemids. Here, we employed state-of-the-art deep homology detection protocols but still could not detect orthologs for the bulk of kinetoplastid-specific nor canonical kinetochore proteins in diplonemids except for a putative centromere-specific histone H3 variant. Our results suggest that diplonemids evolved kinetochores that do not resemble previously known ones.
