BACKGROUND: Measuring quality of care indicators is important for clinicians and decision making in health care to improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to identify quality of care indicators for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to validate these in an international cohort treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with failure to validate the pentafecta. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with RNU for EAU high-risk (HR) UTUC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Five quality indicators were consensually approved, including a negative surgical margin, a complete bladder-cuff resection, the absence of hematological complications, the absence of major complications, and the absence of a 12-month postoperative recurrence. After multiple imputations and propensity-score matching, log-rank tests and a Cox regression were used to assess the survival outcomes. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors for pentafecta failure. RESULTS: Among the 1718 included patients, 844 (49%) achieved the pentafecta. The median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who achieved the pentafecta had superior 5-year overall- (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not (68.7 vs. 50.1% and 79.8 vs. 62.7%, respectively, all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, achieving the pentafecta was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and OS. No preoperative clinical factors predicted a failure to validate the pentafecta. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing quality indicators for UTUC may help define prognosis and improve patient care. We propose a pentafecta quality criteria in RNU patients. Approximately half of the patients evaluated herein reached this endpoint, which in turn was independently associated with survival outcomes. Extended validation is needed.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of incorporating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) into the 'quadrifecta' outcomes composite for reporting outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) creating a pentafecta score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre analysis of patients treated with RC, with or without NAC, for bladder cancer between 2002 and 2023. The primary outcome was the effect of adding NAC to a quadrifecta outcomes composite on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The quadrifecta outcomes composite included a yield of ≥16 lymph nodes, negative soft tissue surgical margin, absence of major complication within 30 days from surgery, and no delay in RC. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients were included in the analyses. A total of 233 (39.5%) patients achieved all quadrifecta outcomes and 82 (13.9%) patients were additionally treated with NAC, achieving the pentafecta. Achieving the quadrifecta outcomes composite was significantly associated with better CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.75; P = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.69; P < 0.01). The addition of NAC to the quadrifecta composite outcomes significantly improved the discrimination of patients more likely to have better CSS (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.57; P = 0.002) and OS (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.55; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We propose a new pentafecta that may serve as a tool for standardising outcomes reporting and measuring the quality of RC.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
• cystektomie * metody   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * chirurgie   farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• neoadjuvantní terapie * MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH