IMPORTANCE: Biosimilars may be lower-cost alternatives to originator biologic products, potentially offering expanded access or reduced economic burden, but have not been evaluated with aflibercept in diabetic macular edema (DME). OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of MYL-1701P, an aflibercept biosimilar, with reference aflibercept (Eylea [Regeneron]) in DME. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a double-masked, randomized clinical trial that included participants at 77 centers across the US, Europe, Japan, and India. Included in the analysis were individuals 18 years and older with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with central DME and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 38 in the study eye using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Study data were analyzed from October to December 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Formulations of MYL-1701P (0.5-mg vial) or reference aflibercept every 4 weeks for 5 consecutive intravitreal injections, followed by every 8 weeks through week 52. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the adjusted difference in least squares mean (SE) change from baseline BCVA letter score at week 8 with an equivalence margin of -3 to +3 letters. Secondary outcomes included change in central subfield thickness (CST), BCVA, number of injections over 52 weeks, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and antidrug antibodies (ADAs). RESULTS: A total of 355 participants (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [9.2] years; 216 male [60.8%]) were randomized to MYL-1701P (179 participants [50.4%]) and aflibercept (176 participants [49.6%]). At week 8, mean (SE) change in BCVA was 6.60 (0.55) letters vs 6.56 (0.55) letters in the MYL-1701P vs aflibercept groups. The adjusted mean difference of 0.04 letters (90% CI, -1.16 to 1.24 letters) met the primary outcome. At week 8, mean (SE) change in CST was -112 (7) μm vs -124 (7) μm in the MYL-1701P vs aflibercept groups (adjusted mean difference, 12 μm; 90% CI, -3 to 26 μm). The incidence of treatment-emergent AEs in the MYL-1701P and aflibercept arms were ocular (30.9% [55 of 178] vs 29.5% [52 of 176]), serious ocular (0.6% [1 of 178] vs 1.1% [2 of 176]), nonocular (65.2% [116 of 178] vs 65.3% [115 of 176]), and serious nonocular (16.9% [30 of 178] vs 11.9% [21 of 176]). The mean (SD) total number of injections was 8.4 (2.1) vs 8.7 (1.8) in the MYL-1701P vs aflibercept groups. The incidence of treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADAs was 2.8% (5 of 177) vs 5.7% (10 of 176) in the MYL-1701P vs aflibercept arms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: MYL-1701P demonstrated clinical equivalence in regard to efficacy, with comparable safety and immunogenicity, to reference aflibercept. These findings support use of MLY-1701P as an alternative to reference aflibercept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03610646.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• diabetická retinopatie * farmakoterapie   diagnóza   patofyziologie   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• inhibitory angiogeneze * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• injekce intravitreální * MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární edém * farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   diagnóza   MeSH
• optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
• receptory vaskulárního endoteliálního růstového faktoru * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• rekombinantní fúzní proteiny * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zraková ostrost * fyziologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

Ciel: Zistiť efekt opakovaných intravitreálnych aplikácii afliberceptu na endotel rohovky u pacientov s diabetickým makulárnym edémom (DME) a edémom makuly pri oklúzii retinálnej vény (RVO). Metodika: Do prospektívneho sledovania v období od januára 2021 do novembra 2023 bolo zaradených 87 naivných očí s diagnózou DME a RVO. Exklúzne kritérium pre zaradenie bol operačný alebo laserový zákrok počas sledovacieho obdobia, nosenie kontaktných šošoviek, ope rácia katarakty pred menej ako 6 mesiacmi, dystrofie alebo iné ochorenia rohovky, ktoré môžu spôsobiť zmeny endotelu. Okrem rutinných vyšetrení sme v deň 1., 4. a 8. injekcie vyšetrovali aj endotel rohovky pomocou bezkontaktnej endotelovej mikroskopie. Vyhodnocovali sme 4 parametre: hustotu endotelových buniek (CD), hexagonalitu (HEX), koeficient variability (CV) a centrálnu hrúbku rohovky (CCT). Najskôr sme vyhodnocovali celý súbor očí a následne sme ho rozdelili podľa 2 kritérií; podľa diagnózy na DME/RVO a podľa šošovky na fakické/pseu dofakické oči. Výsledky: Vyhodnotených bolo 87 očí (68 pacientov). Priemerný vek pacientov v čase diagnózy bol 66,8 ±9,3 rokov. Z celkového počtu 87 bolo 51 (59 %) fakických a 36 (41 %) pseudofakických očí. S diagnózou DME bolo liečených 61 (70 %) očí a s diagnózou RVO 26 (30 %). V prie behu sledovania nedošlo vplyvom liečby k štatisticky signifikantnej zmene priemerných hodnôt CD, HEX, CV, CCT či už v súbore všetkých očí alebo v rozdelení do podskupín podľa diagnózy či stavu šošovky. Záver: Zistili sme, že intravitreálne aplikácie afliberceptu u pacientov s DME a RVO neovplyvňujú parametre rohovkového endotelu ako CCT, HEX, CD, CV hodnotené pomocou endotelovej mikroskopie pri sledovaní po 8 injekciu.

Aim: To determine the effect of repeated intravitreal injections of aflibercept on the corneal endothelium in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: In a prospective study conducted between January 2021 and November 2023, a total of 87 treatment-naive eyes with DME and RVO were evaluated. The exclusion criteria were surgery or laser intervention during the follow-up period, contact lens wear, cataract surgery in the last 6 months, dystrophy, or other corneal condition that may cause endothelial damage. In addition to routine examinations on the day of application, we also measured the corneal endothelium using specular microscopy on the 1st, 4th and 8th day of injection. We evaluated 4 parameters: endothelial cell density (CD), hexagonality (HEX), coefficient of variability (CV) and central corneal thickness (CCT). First of all, we evaluated the entire cohort of eyes, and then divided it according to 2 criteria; the diagnosis into DME/RVO and according to the lens status into phakic/pseudophakic eyes. Results: A total of 87 eyes of 68 patients were evaluated. The average age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 66.8 ±9.3 years. Within the cohort 51 (59%) eyes were phakic and 36 (41%) pseudophakic. A total of 61 (70%) eyes with a diagnosis of DME were treated, and 26 (30%) with RVO. During the follow-up, there were no significant changes in the average values of CD, HEX, CV, CCT due to aflibercept treatment, either in the whole group or in subgroups according to diagnosis or lens condition. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that intravitreal administration of aflibercept in patients with DME and RVO did not have an impact on corneal endothelial parameters, including CCT, HEX, CD and CV. These parameters were measured using endothelial microscopy during an 8-injection observation period.

• Klíčová slova
• aflibercept,
• MeSH
• bevacizumab aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• endoteliální buňky účinky léků   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky farmakologie   klasifikace   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• inhibitory angiogeneze * aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   klasifikace   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• injekce intravitreální * klasifikace   metody   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární edém chemicky indukované   etiologie   MeSH
• mikroskopie klasifikace   metody   MeSH
• počet buněk MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• rohovkový endotel diagnostické zobrazování   účinky léků   MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the therapeutic similarity of CT-P42 compared with reference aflibercept (Eylea) in adult patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Randomized, active-controlled, double-masked, phase III clinical trial PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of either type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus with DME involving the center of the macula. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either CT-P42 or reference aflibercept (2 mg/0.05 ml) by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks (5 doses), then every 8 weeks (4 doses), in the main study period. Results up to week 24 are reported herein. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mean change from baseline at week 8 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the ETDRS chart. Equivalence between CT-P42 and reference aflibercept was to be concluded if the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) (global assumptions) and 2-sided 90% CI (United States Food and Drug Administration [FDA] assumptions) for the treatment difference fell entirely within the equivalence margin of ±3 letters, as assessed in the full analysis set. RESULTS: Overall, 348 patients were randomized (CT-P42: 173; reference aflibercept: 175). Best-corrected visual acuity improved from baseline to week 8 in both groups, with a least squares mean (standard error) improvement of 9.43 (0.798) and 8.85 (0.775) letters in the CT-P42 and reference aflibercept groups, respectively. The estimated between-group treatment difference was 0.58 letters, with the CIs within the predefined equivalence margin of ±3 letters (95% CI, -0.73 to 1.88 [global]; 90% CI, -0.52 to 1.67 [FDA]). Through week 24, other efficacy results for the 2 groups, in terms of change in BCVA and retinal central subfield thickness, as well as ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, supported therapeutic similarity. Pharmacokinetics, usability, safety (including the proportions of patients experiencing ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event [CT-P42: 50.3%; reference aflibercept: 53.7%]), and immunogenicity were also comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study in patients with DME demonstrated equivalence between CT-P42 and reference aflibercept (2 mg/0.05 ml) in terms of efficacy, with similar pharmacokinetic, usability, safety, and immunogenicity profiles. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• diabetická retinopatie * farmakoterapie   diagnóza   komplikace   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• inhibitory angiogeneze * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• injekce intravitreální MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• macula lutea patologie   diagnostické zobrazování   MeSH
• makulární edém * farmakoterapie   diagnóza   etiologie   MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• optická koherentní tomografie metody   MeSH
• receptory vaskulárního endoteliálního růstového faktoru * aplikace a dávkování   antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• rekombinantní fúzní proteiny aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
• zraková ostrost MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

• MeSH
• analgezie * MeSH
• bolest farmakoterapie   MeSH
• COVID-19 * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• neuropilin-1 metabolismus   MeSH
• receptory vaskulárního endoteliálního růstového faktoru metabolismus   MeSH
• SARS-CoV-2 metabolismus   MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A metabolismus   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To provide longer-term data on efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: Setting: Multicentre. Design: Randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, phase III equivalence study. Patient population: ≥50 years old participants with nAMD (n=705), one 'study eye'. INTERVENTION: 1:1 randomisation to monthly intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg SB11 or RBZ. Main outcome measures: Visual efficacy endpoints, safety, immunogenicity and PK up to 52 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Of 705 randomised participants (SB11: n=351; RBZ: n=354), 634 participants (89.9%; SB11: n=307; RBZ: n=327) completed the study until week 52. Previously reported equivalence in primary efficacy remained stable up to week 52 and were comparable between SB11 and RBZ. The adjusted treatment difference between SB11 and RBZ in full analysis set at week 52 of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.6 letters (90% CI -2.1 to 0.9) and of change from baseline in central subfield thickness was -14.9 μm (95% CI -25.3 to -4.5). The incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB11: 32.0% vs RBZ: 29.7%) and serious ocular TEAE (SB11: 2.9% vs RBZ: 2.3%) appeared comparable between treatment groups, and no new safety concerns were observed. The PK and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, with a 4.2% and 5.5% cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 52 for SB11 and RBZ, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer-term results of this study further support the biosimilarity established between SB11 and RBZ.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• inhibitory angiogeneze terapeutické užití   MeSH
• injekce intravitreální MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární degenerace * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• ranibizumab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A MeSH
• vlhká makulární degenerace * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zraková ostrost MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Renální karcinom patří mezi časté nádory uropoetického traktu s postupně narůstající incidencí i prevalencí. Úkolem urologa je toto onemocnění včas diagnostikovat a dle rozsahu tumorózního postižení rozhodnout o způsobu terapie a navržení podoby a frekvence dalšího sledování. V tomto nám pomáhají nejrůznější prognostické faktory a prognostické modely, které umožní stratifikaci rizika a navržení nejoptimálnější terapie. Tento přehledový článek přináší souhrn nejdůležitějších prognostických faktorů pro karcinom ledviny se zaměřením na prognostické biomarkery.

Renal cell carcinoma is a very common tumour with slightly increasing both incidence and prevalence. Our role is in early detection of the disease and selecting the most optimal treatment option and surveillance after therapy. There are several prognostic factors and prognostic models that allow risk stratification. These tools provide information for treatment planning and patient counselling. The review summarizes the most commonly used prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma with a focus on prognostic biomarkers.

• MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * diagnóza   klasifikace   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mikro RNA MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• staging nádorů MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• přehledy MeSH

Regular physical exercise is beneficial to the body. Acute exercise causes oxidant stress in many tissues including the liver by creating an unbalanced status between oxidant and antioxidant levels. Analgesic drugs are commonly consumed to reduce the pain after exercise. Acetaminophen (APAP), commonly used as an over-the-counter analgesic, can cause hepatotoxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect and underlying mechanisms of APAP at subtoxic dose, which is given after the acute and exhaustive exercise on the rat livers. Male Wistar rats weighing 200-250 g were divided into 6 groups each consisting of 7 rats/group; Control, APAP (250 mg/kg, ip), Acute Exercise (AEx), Acute Exhaustive Exercise (AEEx), Acute Exercise and APAP (AEx+APAP) and Acute Exhaustive Exercise and APAP (AEEx+APAP) groups. Rats were exercised at moderate intensity or exhaustive on the treadmill and then received APAP. Tissue MDA levels were significantly increased in AEEx, AEx+APAP and AEEx+APAP groups compared with the control. There was no significant difference in GSH levels between groups. Tissue Sirtuin1 (Sirt1) levels of APAP, AEx and AEEx groups were significantly less than control. There was no significant difference between groups in VEGF levels. Liver damage score was significantly higher in all groups compared with control group. As a result, this study shows that subtoxic dose of APAP treatment alone or in combination with acute or exhaustive treadmill exercise can cause oxidative liver damage by affecting Sirt1 levels and without affecting VEGF levels.

• MeSH
• analgetika metabolismus   MeSH
• játra metabolismus   MeSH
• krysa rodu rattus MeSH
• lékové postižení jater * etiologie   prevence a kontrola   metabolismus   MeSH
• oxidační stres MeSH
• oxidancia MeSH
• paracetamol * toxicita   MeSH
• potkani Wistar MeSH
• sirtuin 1 metabolismus   MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A metabolismus   MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Check Tag
• krysa rodu rattus MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agonists revolutionized therapeutic algorithms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. However, approximately every third IBD patient does not respond to this therapy in the long term, which delays efficient control of the intestinal inflammation. METHODS: We analyzed the power of serum biomarkers to predict the failure of anti-TNF-α. We collected serum of 38 IBD patients at therapy prescription and 38 weeks later and analyzed them with relation to therapy response (no-, partial-, and full response). We used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to quantify 16 biomarkers related to gut barrier (intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, liver fatty acid-binding protein, trefoil factor 3, and interleukin (IL)-33), microbial translocation, immune system regulation (TNF-α, CD14, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, mannan-binding lectin, IL-18, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), osteoprotegerin (OPG), insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2), endocrine-gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor), and matrix metalloproteinase system (MMP-9, MMP-14, and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1). RESULTS: We found that future full-responders have different biomarker profiles than non-responders, while partial-responders cannot be distinguished from either group. When future non-responders were compared to responders, their baseline contained significantly more TGF-β1, less CD14, and increased level of MMP-9, and concentration of these factors could predict non-responders with high accuracy (AUC = 0.938). Interestingly, during the 38 weeks, levels of MMP-9 decreased in all patients, irrespective of the outcome, while OPG, IGF-2, and TGF-β1 were higher in non-responders compared to full-responders both at the beginning and the end of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The TGF-β1 and CD14 can distinguish non-responders from responders. The changes in biomarker dynamics during the therapy suggest that growth factors (such as OPG, IGF-2, and TGF-β) are not markedly influenced by the treatment and that anti-TNF-α therapy decreases MMP-9 without influencing the treatment outcome.

• MeSH
• inhibitory TNF MeSH
• insulinu podobný růstový faktor II * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• matrixová metaloproteinasa 9 MeSH
• transformující růstový faktor beta1 * MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

PURPOSE: To investigate the ocular surface inflammation in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension by analyzing tears and to compare findings with healthy controls. METHODS: Observational case-control study. Tear samples were collected by 5 μl microcapillary tube from 24 patients with glaucoma treated by antiglaucoma drops, 9 non-treated patients with ocular hypertension and 45 healthy controls. Tears were analyzed from right eye by multiplex Bio-Plex system for the presence of 6 cytokines: IL1β, IL10, IL4, IFNγ, MIF and VEGF. RESULTS: Significantly higher concentrations of IL1β and IL10 (glaucoma or ocular hypertension vs. healthy controls, p < 0.0001), VEGF (glaucoma vs. ocular hypertension, p < 0.05; ocular hypertension vs. healthy controls, p < 0.02) and MIF (glaucoma vs. healthy controls, p < 0.03) were detected in patients' tears. Both patient groups have activated to a significantly lower extent the Th1 pathway represented by IFNγ than Th2 pathway represented by IL10 (p < 0.001) and, at the same time, the IFNγ/IL4 ratio was significantly increased in healthy controls (p < 0.001) and patients with ocular hypertension (p < 0.02) compared to glaucoma individuals. CONCLUSION: This study shows that secretion of inflammation-related cytokines by conjunctival cells is increased in both, glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients and can be detected in their tears. Nevertheless, data indicates stronger ocular surface inflammation in non-treated follow-up patients diagnosed with ocular hypertension than in glaucoma subjects treated by antiglaucoma drops.

• MeSH
• antihypertenziva terapeutické užití   MeSH
• cytokiny metabolismus   MeSH
• glaukom s otevřeným úhlem * MeSH
• glaukom * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• interleukin-10 metabolismus   MeSH
• interleukin-4 metabolismus   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nitrooční tlak MeSH
• oční hypertenze * MeSH
• oční roztoky MeSH
• slzy metabolismus   MeSH
• studie případů a kontrol MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A metabolismus   MeSH
• zánět metabolismus   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of effective systemic therapy options for patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, a highly selective and potent oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3, in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (FRESCO-2) at 124 hospitals and cancer centres across 14 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) with histologically or cytologically documented metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who had received all current standard approved cytotoxic and targeted therapies and progressed on or were intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive fruquintinib (5 mg capsule) or matched placebo orally once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day cycles, plus best supportive care. Stratification factors were previous trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both, RAS mutation status, and duration of metastatic disease. Patients, investigators, study site personnel, and sponsors, except for selected sponsor pharmacovigilance personnel, were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. A non-binding futility analysis was done when approximately one-third of the expected overall survival events had occurred. Final analysis occurred after 480 overall survival events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04322539, and EudraCT, 2020-000158-88, and is ongoing but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Aug 12, 2020, and Dec 2, 2021, 934 patients were assessed for eligibility and 691 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive fruquintinib (n=461) or placebo (n=230). Patients had received a median of 4 lines (IQR 3-6) of previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and 502 (73%) of 691 patients had received more than 3 lines. Median overall survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7-8·2) in the fruquintinib group versus 4·8 months (4·0-5·8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·55-0·80; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 286 (63%) of 456 patients who received fruquintinib and 116 (50%) of 230 who received placebo; the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the fruquintinib group included hypertension (n=62 [14%]), asthenia (n=35 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (n=29 [6%]). There was one treatment-related death in each group (intestinal perforation in the fruquintinib group and cardiac arrest in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Fruquintinib treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in overall survival compared with placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. These data support the use of fruquintinib as a global treatment option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ongoing analysis of the quality of life data will further establish the clinical benefit of fruquintinib in this patient population. FUNDING: HUTCHMED.

• MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• kolorektální nádory * MeSH
• kvalita života MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory rekta * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• nádory tračníku * MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• trifluridin škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH