AIM: To compare open-source AndroidAPS (AAPS) and commercially available Control-IQ (CIQ) automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in a prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical trial. METHODS: Adults with type 1 diabetes who had been using AAPS by their own decision entered the first 3-month AAPS phase then were switched to CIQ for 3 months. The results of this treatment were compared with those after the 3-month AAPS phase. The primary endpoint was the change in time in range (% TIR; 70-80 mg/dL). RESULTS: Twenty-five people with diabetes (mean age 34.32 ± 11.07 years; HbA1c 6.4% ± 3%) participated in this study. CIQ was comparable with AAPS in achieving TIR (85.72% ± 7.64% vs. 84.24% ± 8.46%; P = .12). Similarly, there were no differences in percentage time above range (> 180 and > 250 mg/dL), mean sensor glucose (130.3 ± 13.9 vs. 128.3 ± 16.9 mg/dL; P = .21) or HbA1c (6.3% ± 2.1% vs. 6.4% ± 3.1%; P = .59). Percentage time below range (< 70 and < 54 mg/dL) was significantly lower using CIQ than AAPS. Even although participants were mostly satisfied with CIQ (63.6% mostly agreed, 9.1% strongly agreed), they did not plan to switch to CIQ. CONCLUSIONS: The CODIAC study is the first prospective study investigating the switch between open-source and commercially available AID systems. CIQ and AAPS were comparable in achieving TIR. However, hypoglycaemia was significantly lower with CIQ.
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin MeSH
- hypoglykemika terapeutické užití MeSH
- inzulin terapeutické užití MeSH
- inzulinové infuzní systémy MeSH
- inzuliny * MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- selfmonitoring glykemie metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
V populaci diabetiků 2. typu je častěji než v běžné populaci diagnostikováno jak srdeční selhání, tak i chronické onemocnění ledvin (CKD). Screening CKD musí směřovat k časnému záchytu onemocnění s cílem zvrátit, nebo alespoň významně zpomalit jeho průběh a oddálit přechod do selhání ledvin s nutností chronické dialyzační anebo transplantační léčby. Finerenon je nesteroidní, selektivní antagonista mineralokortikoidního receptoru. Efekty finerenonu u nemocných s diabetem 2. typu byly zkoumány ve velkých registračních klinických studiích fáze III FIDELIO-DKD, FIGARO-DKD a následně v jejich sdružené analýze FIDELITY. Na základě výsledků publikovaných prospektivních randomizovaných kontrolovaných studií s finerenonem je jeho použití u pacientů s CKD a diabetem 2. typu zmíněno v několika recentních doporučeních. Zástupci expertního panelu zahrnujícího Českou nefrologickou společnost, Českou diabetologickou společnost ČLS JEP, Českou internistickou společnost ČLS JEP a Českou kardiologickou společnost v souladu s recentními mezinárodními doporučeními považují finerenon za jeden z pilířů léčby pacientů s chronickým onemocněním ledvin a diabetem 2. typu pro jeho nefroprotektivní a kardioprotektivní účinky.
Both heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are detected more often in the type 2 diabetic population than in the general population. CKD screening should focus on its early detection to reverse, or at least significantly slow down its course and delay stage 5 CKD with the need for chronic dialysis or transplant treatment. Finerenone is a nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. The effects of finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes were investigated in the large registration phase III clinical trials FIDELIO-DKD, FIGARO-DKD and subsequently in their pooled analysis FIDELITY. Based on the results of published prospective randomized controlled trials with finerenone, its use in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes is mentioned in several recent recommendations. Representatives of an expert panel including the Czech Nephrological Society, the Czech Diabetological Society, the Czech Internal Medicine Society and the Czech Cardiology Society, in accordance with recent international recommendations, consider finerenone to be one of the pillars of the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes for its nephroprotective and cardioprotective effects.
- Klíčová slova
- finerenon,
- MeSH
- chronická renální insuficience * farmakoterapie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 2. typu * farmakoterapie komplikace MeSH
- dialýza ledvin MeSH
- komplikace diabetu farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- naftyridiny farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Frequent scanning of FreeStyle Libre (FSL) flash glucose monitoring sensors is known to be important whilst wearing an active sensor, but adherence to sensor reapplication is also critical to effective glucose monitoring. We report novel measures of adherence for users of the FSL system and their association with improvements in metrics of glucose control. METHODS: Anonymous data were extracted for 1600 FSL users in the Czech Republic with ≥ 36 completed sensors from October 22, 2018 to December 31, 2021. "Experience" was defined by the number of sensors used (1-36 sensors). "Adherence" was defined by time between the end of one sensor and the start of the next (gap time). User adherence was analyzed for four experience levels after initiating FLASH; Start (sensors 1-3); Early (sensors 4-6); Middle (sensors 19-21); End (sensors 34-36). Users were split into two adherence levels based on mean gap time during Start period, "low" (> 24 h, n = 723) and "high" (≤ 8 h, n = 877). RESULTS: Low-adherence users reduced their sensor gap times significantly: 38.5% applied a new sensor within 24 h during sensors 4-6, rising to 65.0% by sensors 34-36 (p < 0.001). Improved adherence was associated with increased %TIR (time in range; mean + 2.4%; p < 0.001), reduced %TAR (time above range; mean - 3.1%; p < 0.001), and reduced glucose coefficient of variation (CV; mean - 1.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With experience, FSL users became more adherent in sensor reapplication, with associated increases in %TIR, and reductions in %TAR and glucose variability.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
