OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sonolysis using a low intensity 2 MHz pulsed wave ultrasound beam during carotid endarterectomy. DESIGN: Multicentre, phase 3, double blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 16 European centres. PARTICIPANTS: 1004 patients (mean age 68 years; 312 (31%) female) were enrolled in the study between 20 August 2015 and 14 October 2020 until the interim analysis was performed. INTERVENTIONS: Sonolysis (n=507) versus sham procedure (n=497). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the composite incidence of ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and death within 30 days. The incidence of new ischaemic lesions on follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging was the main substudy endpoint, and incidence of intracranial bleeding was the main safety endpoint. RESULTS: The results favoured the sonolysis group for the primary endpoint (11 (2.2%) v 38 (7.6%); risk difference -5.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.3% to -2.8%; P<0.001), as well as in the substudy for magnetic resonance imaging detected new ischaemic lesions (20/236 (8.5%) v 39/224 (17.4%); risk difference -8.9%, -15% to -2.8%; P=0.004). Sensitivity analysis resulted in a risk ratio for sonolysis of 0.25 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.56) for ischaemic stroke and 0.23 (0.07 to 0.73) for transient ischaemic attack within 30 days. Sonolysis was found to be safe, and 94.4% of patients in the sonolysis group were free from serious adverse events 30 days after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Sonolysis was safe for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and resulted in a significant reduction in the composite incidence of ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and death within 30 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02398734.
- MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- ischemická cévní mozková příhoda prevence a kontrola epidemiologie MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis chirurgie MeSH
- tranzitorní ischemická ataka * prevence a kontrola etiologie MeSH
- ultrazvuková terapie metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
Aim of the study: To present our rescue approach of carotid artery occlusion as well as to discuss other possible techniques that can be applied in similar situations.Materials and methods: Two cases from our institution with acute complications during carotid micro-endarterectomy (CEA).Results: Two cases from our institution with acute postoperative complications during CEA that were successfully addressed are presented with imaging and detailed description of the surgical techniques used.Conclusion: CEA are common surgical procedures pursued to achieve revascularization of carotid arteries when occluded partially or fully by an atherosclerotic plaque. As with any surgical procedure, associated complications exist in small percentage of the cases. These can include blood flow limitation due to an insufficient artery wall after atherosclerotic plaque extraction as well as distal kinking of the internal carotid artery. A direct end-to-end ACE-ACI bypass with occlusion of the proximal ACI and distal ACE stump preserves distal flow to the ACI, however the original arteriotomy of ACC must be completely sutured up to the arterial stumps.
- Klíčová slova
- Carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery kinking, vascular surgery,
- MeSH
- anastomóza chirurgická MeSH
- arteria carotis interna diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- aterosklerotický plát * MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: Our objectives were to assess the abnormalities of subcortical nuclei by combining volume and shape analyses and potential association with cognitive impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with severe ACS of the unilateral internal carotid artery and 31 controls were enrolled between January 2017 to August 2018. All participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, blood lipid biochemical measurements, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure subcortical volumes and sub-regional shape deformations. Basic statistics, correction for multiple comparisons. Seventeen ACS patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within one week after baseline measurements, cognitive assessments and MRI scans were repeated 6 months after CEA. RESULTS: The ACS patients had higher apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (ApoB/ApoA1) ratio and worse performance in all cognitive domains than controls. Moreover, the ACS patients showed more profound thalamic atrophy assessed by shape and volume analysis, especially in the medial dorsal thalamus. No significant differences were found in other subcortical nuclei after multiple comparisons correction. At baseline, thalamic atrophy correlated with cognitive impairment and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio. Furthermore, mediation analysis at baseline showed that the association of carotid intima-media thickness with executive functioning was mediated by thalamic volume. After CEA, cognitive improvement and increase in the bilateral medial dorsal thalamic volume were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study identified the distinct atrophy of subcortical nuclei and their association with cognition in patients with ACS. Assessments of the thalamus by volumetric and shape analysis may provide an early marker for cerebral ischemia and reperfusion after CEA.
- Klíčová slova
- asymptomatic carotid stenosis, cognitive impairment, endarterectomy, magnetic resonance imaging, thalamus,
- MeSH
- asymptomatické nemoci MeSH
- atrofie MeSH
- intimomediální šíře tepenné stěny MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody MeSH
- kognitivní dysfunkce * diagnóza etiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie metody MeSH
- neuropsychologické testy MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis * komplikace diagnóza chirurgie MeSH
- thalamus * diagnostické zobrazování patologie MeSH
- velikost orgánu MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Both general and local anesthesia are used in our department for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The decision as to which anesthetic technique to use during surgery is made individually. The aim of our study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and preference with the anesthesia type used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The satisfaction of a group of 205 patients with regard to anesthesia used and their future preferences were evaluated prospectively through a questionnaire. The reasons for dissatisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: CEA was performed under general anesthesia (GA) in 159 cases (77.6%) and under local anesthesia (LA) in 46 cases (22.4%). In the GA group, 148 patients (93.1%) were satisfied; 30 patients (65.2%) in the LA group were satisfied (p < 0.0001). The reason for dissatisfaction with GA were postoperative nausea and vomiting (7 patients), postoperative psychological alteration (3), and fear of GA (1). The reasons for dissatisfaction with LA were intraoperative pain (9 patients), intraoperative discomfort and stress (5), and intraoperative breathing problems (2). Of the GA group, 154 (96.9%) patients would prefer GA again, and of the LA group, 28 (60.9%) patients would prefer LA if operated on again (p < 0.0001). Overall, 172 patients (83.9%) would prefer GA in the future, and 33 patients (16.1%) would prefer LA. CONCLUSION: Overall patient satisfaction with CEA performed under both GA and LA is high. Nevertheless, in the GA group, patient satisfaction and future preference were significantly higher. Both GA and LA have advantages and disadvantages for CEA. An optimal approach is to make use of both anesthetic techniques based on their individual indications and patient preference.
- MeSH
- celková anestezie * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální anestezie * MeSH
- pooperační období MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- spokojenost pacientů * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the results of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis treatment at our institution according to the treatment modality-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vs. carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: During 2003-2015, a total of 1894 procedures were performed for ICA stenosis. CEA was done in 1064 cases and CAS in 830 cases.The primary outcome was disabling stroke (mRS > 2) or myocardial infarction within 30 days of treatment. Secondary outcomes were transitory ischemic attacks (TIAs), minor strokes (stroke without impaired activities of daily living), and any other significant complications. RESULTS: Major mortality and morbidity were divided according to their treatment groups; this reached 0.9% in the CEA and 2.5% in the CAS group (p = 0.007). Minor stroke was recorded at 1.5% and 2.7% in the CEA and CAS groups (p = 0.077), TIAs in 1.0% (CEA) and 4.0% (CAS) (p < 0.001), and any complication in 12.4% (CEA) and 13.0% (CAS) (p = 0.694). CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a safe procedure in patients who meet the correct treatment indications. In all subgroup analyses CEA proved to be equal to or better than CAS. This study supports the idea of CEA being the preferred treatment and CAS being reserved for selected cases only.
- Klíčová slova
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS), Carotid endarterectomy (CEA), Complication, Outcome, Stroke,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- endovaskulární výkony metody mortalita MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody mortalita MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis mortalita chirurgie MeSH
- stenty MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is accepted as a primary modality to treat carotid stenosis. The accuracy of measuring carotid stenosis is important for indication of the CEA procedure. Different diagnostic tools have been developed and used in the past 2 decades for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis. Only a few studies, however, have focused on the comparison of different diagnostic tools to histological findings of carotid plaque. METHOD: Patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis were investigated primarily by computed tomography angiography (CTA). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were performed as well. Atherosclerotic plaque specimens were transversally cut into smaller segments and histologically processed. The slides were scanned and specimens showing maximal stenosis were determined; the minimal diameter and the diameter of the whole plaque were measured. High quality histological specimen and histological measurement was considered to be the prerequisite for inclusion into the analysis. The preoperative findings were compared with histological measurement. CTA and histological measurements were obtained from 152 patients. DSA measurements were available in 138 of these cases, MRA in 107 and DUS in 88. A comparison between preoperative and histological findings was performed. In addition, correlation coefficients were computed and tested. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found for each of the diagnostic procedures. The strongest correlation coefficient and the best allocation of stenosis into clinical significant groups (<50 %, 50-69 %, ≥70 %) was observed for CTA. Mean differences in the whole cohort between preoperative and histological measurements were as follows: CTA underestimated histological measurement by 2.4 % (based on European Carotid Surgery Trial [ECST] methodology) and 11.9 % (based on North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] methodology). DSA underestimated the histological measurement by 7 % (ECST) and 12.2 % (NASCET). MRA overestimated the histological measurement by 2.6 % (ECST) and underestimated by 0.6 % (NASCET). DUS overestimated the stenosis by 1.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: CTA yields the best accuracy in detection of carotid stenosis, provided that all axial slices of the stenosis are checked and carefully analysed. DSA underestimates moderate and mild ICA stenosis, whereas DUS overestimates high-grade ICA stenosis. For MRA, a relatively low correlation coefficient was observed with histological findings. We conclude that CTA-ecst technique is the most reliable technique for carotid stenosis measurement.
- Klíčová slova
- Atherosclerotic plaque, CT angiography, Carotid stenosis, Digital subtraction angiography, Doppler ultrasonography, Magnetic resonance angiography, Measurement accuracy,
- MeSH
- CT angiografie * MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční angiografie * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- ultrasonografie dopplerovská * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Diagnosis and treatment of carotid stenosis is under incessant development. Especially in last years, we have noticed significant changes in opinions based on the results of meta-analyses of old evidence and the new evidence as well. Important factor involved is the fast development of new endovascular therapies. In reaction to these changes, several medical societies published their guidelines for the management of carotid stenosis. Even though, all of them are based practically on the same published medical evidence, they are not always similar in recommendations. The aim of our work was to summarize actual recommendations regarding management of carotid stenosis. The management of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients is being discussed separately where appropriate because these two groups of patients are very different. The recommendations for selection of type of intervention between carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting were covered in detail as well.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative use of the intraluminal shunt may reduce the risk of a stroke by reducing cerebral blood flow compromise, but it may also increase the risk of atherosclerotic arterial wall damage with subsequent stroke during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). There is still no evidence to support routine or selective shunting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 754 CEAs were performed in a prospective study from 2005 to 2011 at our department. All procedures were done under regional anesthesia with selective carotid artery shunting according to neurologic status after internal carotid artery clamping. Magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of brain parenchyma using diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI) sequence was performed upon hospital admission and 24 hours after the surgical procedure. Acute new MR DWI lesions were evaluated according to the classification published by Szabo et al. A routine neurologic evaluation was recorded as well. RESULTS: The intraluminal shunt was used in 46 of 754 patients (6.1%). A new ischemic lesion was detected in 45 patients (6%). Most of these lesions were neurologically asymptomatic (80%). A new lesion on MR DWI in the subgroup of shunted patients was detected in 15 cases (32.6%) and in the subgroup of nonshunted patients in 30 cases (4.2%). Most of these lesions were due to embolization or hypoperfusion during shunt insertion. CONCLUSION: Use of the intraluminal shunt was the most important risk factor for the new MR DWI lesion in the entire group of CEAs. Results support the strategy of a selective use of intraluminal shunts.
- MeSH
- arteriae carotides patologie chirurgie MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda etiologie MeSH
- difuzní magnetická rezonance * MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- předoperační období MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis patologie chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Silent infarction in the brain can be detected in around 34 per cent of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and 54 per cent after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). This study compared the risk of new infarctions in the brain in patients undergoing CEA or CAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis exceeding 70 per cent were screened for inclusion in this prospective study. Patients with indications for intervention, and eligible for both methods, were allocated randomly to CEA or CAS. Neurological examination, cognitive function tests and MRI of the brain were undertaken before and 24 h after intervention. RESULTS: Of 150 randomized patients, 73 (47 men; mean age 64·9(7·1) years) underwent CEA and 77 (58 men; 66·4(7·5) years) had CAS. New infarctions on MRI were found more frequently after CAS (49 versus 25 per cent; P = 0·002). Lesion volume was also significantly greater after CAS (P = 0·010). Multiple logistic regression analyses identified intervention in the right ICA as the only independent predictor of brain infarction (odds ratio 2·10, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 4·25; P = 0·040). Stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in one patient after CEA and in two after CAS. No significant differences were found in cognitive test results between the groups. CONCLUSION: These data confirm a higher risk of silent infarction in the brain on MRI after CAS in comparison with CEA, but without measurable change in cognitive function. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01591005 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
- MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody MeSH
- kognitivní poruchy etiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční angiografie MeSH
- mozkový infarkt patologie chirurgie MeSH
- neurologické vyšetření MeSH
- neuropsychologické testy MeSH
- pooperační komplikace etiologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis patologie chirurgie MeSH
- stenty * MeSH
- tranzitorní ischemická ataka etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Surgical carotid endarterectomy is traditionally considered the standard approach for the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease based on its long history of favorable outcomes. Many of the patients could, however, be offered carotid artery stenting (CAS), which has over time evolved into an elaborate method. With proper selection of patients, CAS provides comparable long-term outcomes and very low risk of periprocedural complication. This article summarises the current knowledge, trends and innovations in CAS.
- MeSH
- balónková angioplastika metody MeSH
- karotická endarterektomie metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis chirurgie terapie MeSH
- stenty * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
