Nejvíce citovaný článek - PubMed ID 16420974
Traditionally, insects have been thought to be entirely dependent on their innate immune system, which has little capacity for the acquisition of experience from previous infections. However, much experimental evidence has challenged this view, showing that insects can develop long-term, pathogen-specific immune memory, which in some cases can be transmitted to offspring. Although significant progress has been made in this area, the underlying mechanism is still not fully understood, and a number of fundamental questions remain unanswered. In this review, we present an overview of documented cases of insect immune memory and summarize the experimental evidence in support of the prevailing hypotheses on the mechanism of antiviral and antibacterial immune memory in insects. We also highlight key questions that remain unanswered and discuss Drosophila melanogaster as a powerful model organism for investigating the mechanisms of innate immune memory formation. Finally, we evaluate the significance of this research and explore the potential for insect vaccination.
- Klíčová slova
- Dscam, evolutionary biology, hemocytes, immune memory, immunology, inflammation, insect immunity, insect vaccination, trained immunity,
- MeSH
- Drosophila melanogaster * imunologie MeSH
- hmyz * imunologie MeSH
- imunologická paměť * MeSH
- přirozená imunita * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) workers act as passive vectors of Paenibacillus larvae spores, which cause the quarantine disease American foulbrood (AFB). We assessed the relative proportions of P. larvae within the honeybee microbiome using metabarcoding analysis of the 16 S rRNA gene. The microbiome was analyzed in workers outside of the AFB zone (control - AFB0), in workers from asymptomatic colonies in an AFB apiary (AFB1), and in workers from colonies exhibiting clinical AFB symptoms (AFB2). The microbiome was processed for the entire community and for a cut-off microbiome comprising pathogenic/environmental bacteria following the removal of core bacterial sequences; varroosis levels were considered in the statistical analysis. No correlation was observed between AFB status and varroosis level, but AFB influenced the worker bee bacterial community, primarily the pathogenic/environmental bacteria. There was no significant difference in the relative abundance of P. larvae between the AFB1 and AFB0 colonies, but we did observe a 9-fold increase in P. larvae abundance in AFB2 relative to the abundance in AFB1. The relative sequence numbers of Citrobacter freundii and Hafnia alvei were higher in AFB2 and AFB1 than in AFB0, whereas Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella oxytoca, Spiroplasma melliferum and Morganella morganii were more abundant in AFB0 and AFB1 than in AFB2.
