BACKGROUND: In concordance with the results of large, observational studies, a 2015 European survey suggested variation in resuscitation/end-of-life practices and emergency care organization across 31 countries. The current survey-based study aimed to comparatively assess the evolution of practices from 2015 to 2019, especially in countries with "low" (i.e., average or lower) 2015 questionnaire domain scores. METHODS: The 2015 questionnaire with additional consensus-based questions was used. The 2019 questionnaire covered practices/decisions related to end-of-life care (domain A); determinants of access to resuscitation/post-resuscitation care (domain B); diagnosis of death/organ donation (domain C); and emergency care organization (domain D). Responses from 25 countries were analyzed. Positive or negative responses were graded by 1 or 0, respectively. Domain scores were calculated by summation of practice-specific response grades. RESULTS: Domain A and B scores for 2015 and 2019 were similar. Domain C score decreased by 1 point [95% confidence interval (CI): 1-3; p = 0.02]. Domain D score increased by 2.6 points (95% CI: 0.2-5.0; p = 0.035); this improvement was driven by countries with "low" 2015 domain D scores. In countries with "low" 2015 domain A scores, domain A score increased by 5.5 points (95% CI: 0.4-10.6; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In 2019, improvements in emergency care organization and an increasing frequency of end-of-life practices were observed primarily in countries with previously "low" scores in the corresponding domains of the 2015 questionnaire.

• Klíčová slova
• emergency care, ethics, resuscitation, surveys and questionnaires, terminal care,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

These European Resuscitation Council Ethics guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the ethical, routine practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care of adults and children. The guideline primarily focus on major ethical practice interventions (i.e. advance directives, advance care planning, and shared decision making), decision making regarding resuscitation, education, and research. These areas are tightly related to the application of the principles of bioethics in the practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care.

UNLABELLED: Diese Ethikleitlinien des Europäischen Rats für Wiederbelebung enthalten evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen für die ethische, routinemäßige Praxis der Wiederbelebung und für die Betreuung von Erwachsenen und Kindern am Lebensende. Die Leitlinie konzentriert sich in erster Linie auf wichtige Maßnahmen in Bezug auf ethische Praktiken (d. h. Patientenverfügung, vorausschauende Behandlungsplanung* und gemeinsame Entscheidungsfindung), die Entscheidungsfindung in Bezug auf Wiederbelebung, Ausbildung und Forschung. Diese Bereiche stehen in engem Zusammenhang mit der Anwendung der Prinzipien der Bioethik in der Praxis der Wiederbelebung und der Betreuung am Lebensende. ZUSATZMATERIAL ONLINE: Zusätzliche Informationen sind in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s10049-021-00888-8) enthalten.

• Klíčová slova
• Advance care planing, Advance directives, Shared decision making,
• Publikační typ
• anglický abstrakt MeSH
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

PURPOSE: Functional outcomes vary between centers after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and are partially explained by pre-existing health status and arrest characteristics, while the effects of in-hospital treatments on functional outcome are less understood. We examined variation in functional outcomes by center after adjusting for patient- and arrest-specific characteristics and evaluated how in-hospital management differs between high- and low-performing centers. METHODS: Analysis of observational registry data within the International Cardiac Arrest Registry was used to perform a hierarchical model of center-specific risk standardized rates for good outcome, adjusted for demographics, pre-existing functional status, and arrest-related factors with treatment center as a random effect variable. We described the variability in treatments and diagnostic tests that may influence outcome at centers with adjusted rates significantly above and below registry average. RESULTS: A total of 3855 patients were admitted to an ICU following cardiac arrest with return of spontaneous circulation. The overall prevalence of good outcome was 11-63% among centers. After adjustment, center-specific risk standardized rates for good functional outcome ranged from 0.47 (0.37-0.58) to 0.20 (0.12-0.26). High-performing centers had faster time to goal temperature, were more likely to have goal temperature of 33 °C, more likely to perform unconscious cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention, and had differing prognostication practices than low-performing centers. CONCLUSIONS: Center-specific differences in outcomes after OHCA after adjusting for patient-specific factors exist. This variation could partially be explained by in-hospital management differences. Future research should address the contribution of these factors to the differences in outcomes after resuscitation.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardiac arrest, Center variability, Out of hospital arrest,
• MeSH
• internacionalita MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• registrace statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie * MeSH
• zástava srdce mimo nemocnici epidemiologie   terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH