The chicken caecum is colonised by hundreds of different bacterial species. Which of these are targeted by immunoglobulins and how immunoglobulin expression shapes chicken caecal microbiota has been addressed in this study. Using cell sorting followed by sequencing of V3/V4 variable region of 16S rRNA, bacterial species with increased or decreased immunoglobulin coating were determined. Next, we determined also caecal microbiota composition in immunoglobulin knockout chickens. We found that immunoglobulin coating was common and major taxa were coated with immunoglobulins. Similarly, more taxa required immunoglobulin production for caecum colonisation compared to those which became abundant in immunoglobulin-deficient chickens. Taxa with low immunoglobulin coating such as Lactobacillus, Blautia, [Eubacterium] hallii, Megamonas, Fusobacterium and Desulfovibrio all encode S-layer proteins which may reduce interactions with immunoglobulins. Although there were taxa which overgrew in Ig-deficient chickens (e.g. Akkermansia) indicating immunoglobulin production acted to exclude them from the chicken caecum, in most of the cases, immunoglobulin production more likely contributed to fixing the desired microbiota in the chicken caecum.

• MeSH
• Bacteria classification   genetics   MeSH
• Cecum * microbiology   MeSH
• Immunoglobulins * MeSH
• Chickens * microbiology   immunology   MeSH
• RNA, Ribosomal, 16S * genetics   MeSH
• Gastrointestinal Microbiome * MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Immunoglobulins * MeSH
• RNA, Ribosomal, 16S * MeSH

Sections of chicken gut differ in many aspects, e.g., the passage of digesta (continuous vs. discontinuous), the concentration of oxygen, and the density of colonising microbiota. Using an unbiased LC-MS/MS protocol, we compared protein expression in 18 ileal and 57 caecal tissue samples that originated from 7-day old ISA brown chickens. We found that proteins specific to the ileum were either structural (e.g., 3 actin isoforms, villin, or myosin 1A), or those required for nutrient digestion (e.g., sucrose isomaltase, maltase-glucoamylase, peptidase D) and absorption (e.g., fatty acid-binding protein 2 and 6 or bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase). On the other hand, proteins characteristic of the caecum were involved in sensing and limiting the consequences of oxidative stress (e.g., thioredoxin, peroxiredoxin 6), cell adhesion, and motility associated with wound healing (e.g., fibronectin 1, desmoyokin). These mechanisms are coupled with the activation of mechanisms suppressing the inflammatory response (galectin 1). Rather prominent were also expressions of proteins linked to hydrogen sulphide metabolism in caecum represented by cystathionin beta synthase, selenium-binding protein 1, mercaptopyruvate sulphurtransferase, and thiosulphate sulphurtransferase. Higher mRNA expression of nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2, the main oxidative stress transcriptional factor in caecum, further supported our observations.

• Keywords
• caecum, chicken, hydrogen sulphide, ileum, stress response, wound healing,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH