Most cited article - PubMed ID 37882528
A conceptual framework for nomenclatural stability and validity of medically important fungi: a proposed global consensus guideline for fungal name changes supported by ABP, ASM, CLSI, ECMM, ESCMID-EFISG, EUCAST-AFST, FDLC, IDSA, ISHAM, MMSA, and MSGERC
BACKGROUND: The Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex encompasses common dermatophytes causing superficial mycoses in humans and animals. The taxonomy of the complex is unstable, with conflicting views on the species status of some taxa, particularly T. indotineae and T. interdigitale. Due to the presence of intermediate genotypes, neither MALDI-TOF MS nor ITS rDNA sequencing can accurately distinguish all taxa in the complex, potentially contributing to clinical misdiagnoses. OBJECTIVES: This research resolves phylogenetic relationships within the T. mentagrophytes complex. Based on these data, the taxonomical recommendations are suggested. METHODS: In order to resolve the phylogenetic relationship of the T. mentagrophytes complex, we employed Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing (RADseq) to produce a high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dataset from 95 isolates. The SNP-based analyses indicated the presence of two major genetic clusters corresponding to T. mentagrophytes (including T. indotineae) and T. interdigitale. RESULTS: Our results challenge the species status of T. indotineae because of insufficient genetic divergence from T. mentagrophytes. Therefore, we propose designating T. indotineae as T. mentagrophytes var. indotineae (or T. mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII) to avoid further splitting of the complex and taxonomic inflation. Although T. interdigitale shows clearer genetic differentiation, its separation is incomplete and identification of some isolates is ambiguous when using routine methods, leading us to consider it a variety as well: T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using T. mentagrophytes as the overarching species name for all complex isolates. Where precise molecular identification is possible, the use of variety ranks is encouraged. Since identical resistance mechanisms are not specific to any genotype or dermatophyte species, identifying antifungal resistance is more important than differentiating closely related genotypes or populations.
- Keywords
- Trichophyton interdigitale, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, anthropophilic dermatophytes, antifungal resistance, dermatophytosis, population structure, taxonomy, zoophilic dermatophytes,
- MeSH
- Antifungal Agents * pharmacology MeSH
- Arthrodermataceae * genetics classification drug effects MeSH
- DNA, Fungal genetics MeSH
- Phylogeny * MeSH
- Genomics methods MeSH
- Genotype MeSH
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Tinea microbiology MeSH
- Trichophyton * genetics classification drug effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antifungal Agents * MeSH
- DNA, Fungal MeSH
Medically important pathogenic fungi invade vertebrate tissue and are considered primary when part of their nature life cycle is associated with an animal host and are usually able to infect immunocompetent hosts. Opportunistic fungal pathogens complete their life cycle in environmental habitats or occur as commensals within or on the vertebrate body, but under certain conditions can thrive upon infecting humans. The extent of host damage in opportunistic infections largely depends on the portal and modality of entry as well as on the host's immune and metabolic status. Diseases caused by primary pathogens and common opportunists, causing the top approximately 80% of fungal diseases [D. W. Denning, Lancet Infect Dis, 24:e428-e438, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00692-8], tend to follow a predictive pattern, while those by occasional opportunists are more variable. For this reason, it is recommended that diseases caused by primary pathogens and the common opportunists are named after the etiologic agent, for example, histoplasmosis and aspergillosis, while this should not be done for occasional opportunists that should be named as [causative fungus] [clinical syndrome], for example, Alternaria alternata cutaneous infection. The addition of a descriptor that identifies the location or clinical type of infection is required, as the general name alone may cover widely different clinical syndromes, for example, "rhinocerebral mucormycosis." A list of major recommended human and animal disease entities (nomenclature) is provided in alignment with their causative agents. Fungal disease names may encompass several genera of etiologic agents, consequently being less susceptible to taxonomic changes of the causative species, for example, mucormycosis covers numerous mucormycetous molds.
- Keywords
- fungal disease, nomenclature, proposal,
- MeSH
- Fungi * classification pathogenicity MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mycoses * microbiology MeSH
- Opportunistic Infections microbiology MeSH
- Terminology as Topic * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH