• Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering

J. Ferda, K. Linhartová, B. Kreuzberg,

. 2008 ; 68 (3) : 471-475.

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NR8306 MZ0 CEP Register

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the calcium content measured by non-enhanced multidetector-row-computed tomography (MDCT) between patients with significant stenosis of bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). Another aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of the non-enhanced MDCT to distinguish BAV and TAV based on the calcified plaque morphology, and to compare the results with the transesophageal echocardiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) admitted to hospital for evaluation before valve surgery underwent clinical evaluation, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and non-enhanced examination with the 64-detector-row CT using prospective ECG triggering with data acquisition in diastolic phase. The data acquisition started at 55% of the R-R interval. The patients were examined in the supine position in mild inspiration. Data were evaluated using dedicated software for calcium scoring, the volume of calcifications and calcium content were obtained. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (20 males, age 48-83 years) were enrolled. BAV was present in 13 patients, TAV in 24 patients. The calcium score in patients with severe AS (mean gradient >50 mmHg) was higher than in those with moderate AS (1123+/-616 mg versus 634+/-475, P=0.011). Significant correlation between the calcium scores and transaortic gradients was found (r=0.53, P=0.002). The patients with BAV did not differ significantly from those with TAV in the AS severity (58+/-13 versus 53+/-20 mmHg), nor in the valve calcium score (1168+/-717 versus 795+/-530 mg, P=0.093). The overall sensitivity to detect BAV in patients with calcified severe AS was 0.923 (12/13) and specificity 0.958 (23/24). The overall accuracy was 0.945 (35/37). CONCLUSION: We observed higher calcium score in patients with severe AS than with moderate AS. However, no difference in aortic valve calcium score between BAV and TAV was found. Thus, in our sample, the aortic valve calcium score correlated with AS severity, not with aortic valve morphology. Based on the calcified plaque space relationship, the aortic BAV and TAV could be distinguished in most cases.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12026536
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140328091533.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2008 ie f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.09.011 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)17961946
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Ferda, Jirí $u Department of Radiology, Charles University Hospital Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, CZ-306 40 Plzen, Czech Republic. ferda@fnplzen.cz
245    10
$a Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering / $c J. Ferda, K. Linhartová, B. Kreuzberg,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the calcium content measured by non-enhanced multidetector-row-computed tomography (MDCT) between patients with significant stenosis of bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). Another aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of the non-enhanced MDCT to distinguish BAV and TAV based on the calcified plaque morphology, and to compare the results with the transesophageal echocardiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) admitted to hospital for evaluation before valve surgery underwent clinical evaluation, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and non-enhanced examination with the 64-detector-row CT using prospective ECG triggering with data acquisition in diastolic phase. The data acquisition started at 55% of the R-R interval. The patients were examined in the supine position in mild inspiration. Data were evaluated using dedicated software for calcium scoring, the volume of calcifications and calcium content were obtained. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (20 males, age 48-83 years) were enrolled. BAV was present in 13 patients, TAV in 24 patients. The calcium score in patients with severe AS (mean gradient >50 mmHg) was higher than in those with moderate AS (1123+/-616 mg versus 634+/-475, P=0.011). Significant correlation between the calcium scores and transaortic gradients was found (r=0.53, P=0.002). The patients with BAV did not differ significantly from those with TAV in the AS severity (58+/-13 versus 53+/-20 mmHg), nor in the valve calcium score (1168+/-717 versus 795+/-530 mg, P=0.093). The overall sensitivity to detect BAV in patients with calcified severe AS was 0.923 (12/13) and specificity 0.958 (23/24). The overall accuracy was 0.945 (35/37). CONCLUSION: We observed higher calcium score in patients with severe AS than with moderate AS. However, no difference in aortic valve calcium score between BAV and TAV was found. Thus, in our sample, the aortic valve calcium score correlated with AS severity, not with aortic valve morphology. Based on the calcified plaque space relationship, the aortic BAV and TAV could be distinguished in most cases.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a aortální stenóza $x radiografie $7 D001024
650    _2
$a aortografie $x metody $7 D001027
650    _2
$a kalcinóza $x radiografie $7 D002114
650    _2
$a srdeční akcí synchronizované zobrazovací metody $x metody $7 D055424
650    _2
$a kontrastní látky $7 D003287
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mitrální chlopeň $x patologie $7 D008943
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a trikuspidální chlopeň $x radiografie $7 D014261
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Linhartová, Katerina
700    1_
$a Kreuzberg, Boris
773    0_
$w MED00009640 $t European journal of radiology $x 1872-7727 $g Roč. 68, č. 3 (2008), s. 471-475
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17961946 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140328091609 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 948578 $s 783882
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 68 $c 3 $d 471-475 $i 1872-7727 $m European journal of radiology $n Eur J Radiol $x MED00009640
GRA    __
$a NR8306 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/10/04

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...