• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Bioenergetic gain of citrate anticoagulated continuous hemodiafiltration--a comparison between 2 citrate modalities and unfractionated heparin

M. Balik, M. Zakharchenko, P. Leden, M. Otahal, J. Hruby, F. Polak, K. Rusinova, Z. Stach, M. Tokarik, J. Vavrova, A. Jabor, HM. Oudemans-van Straaten,

. 2013 ; 28 (1) : 87-95.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13024318

Grantová podpora
NS10014 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2012-10-01 do 2015-08-31
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2003-03-01 do Před 2 měsíci

PURPOSE: To determine bioenergetic gain of 2 different citrate anticoagulated continuous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) modalities and a heparin modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the bio-energetic gain of citrate, glucose and lactate between 29 patients receiving 2.2% acid-citrate-dextrose with calcium-containing lactate-buffered solutions (ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate), 34 on 4% trisodium citrate with calcium-free low-bicarbonate buffered fluids (TSC/Ca(min)/bicarbonate), and 18 on heparin with lactate buffering (Hep/lactate). RESULTS: While delivered CVVHDF dose was about 2000 mL/h, total bioenergetic gain was 262 kJ/h (IQR 230-284) with ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate, 20 kJ/h (8-25) with TSC/Ca(min)/bicarbonate (P < .01) and 60 kJ/h (52-76) with Hep/lactate. Median patient delivery of citrate was 31.2 mmol/h (25-34.7) in ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate versus 14.8 mmol/h (12.4-19.1) in TSC/Ca(min)/bicarbonate groups (P < .01). Median delivery of glucose was 36.8 mmol/h (29.9-43) in ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate, and of lactate 52.5 mmol/h (49.2-59.1) in ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate and 56.1 mmol/h (49.6-64.2) in Hep/lactate groups. The higher energy delivery with ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate was partially due to the higher blood flow used in this modality and the calcium-containing dialysate. CONCLUSIONS: The bioenergetic gain of CVVHDF comes from glucose (in ACD), lactate and citrate. The amount substantially differs between modalities despite a similar CVVHDF dose and is unacceptably high when using ACD with calcium-containing lactate-buffered solutions and a higher blood flow. When calculating nutritional needs, we should account for the energy delivered by CVVHDF.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13024318
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230803073426.0
007      
ta
008      
130703s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.06.003 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22951019
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Balík, Martin $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U nemocnice 2, Prague 2, 120 00, Czech Republic. martin.balik@post.cz $7 xx0075661
245    10
$a Bioenergetic gain of citrate anticoagulated continuous hemodiafiltration--a comparison between 2 citrate modalities and unfractionated heparin / $c M. Balik, M. Zakharchenko, P. Leden, M. Otahal, J. Hruby, F. Polak, K. Rusinova, Z. Stach, M. Tokarik, J. Vavrova, A. Jabor, HM. Oudemans-van Straaten,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To determine bioenergetic gain of 2 different citrate anticoagulated continuous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) modalities and a heparin modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the bio-energetic gain of citrate, glucose and lactate between 29 patients receiving 2.2% acid-citrate-dextrose with calcium-containing lactate-buffered solutions (ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate), 34 on 4% trisodium citrate with calcium-free low-bicarbonate buffered fluids (TSC/Ca(min)/bicarbonate), and 18 on heparin with lactate buffering (Hep/lactate). RESULTS: While delivered CVVHDF dose was about 2000 mL/h, total bioenergetic gain was 262 kJ/h (IQR 230-284) with ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate, 20 kJ/h (8-25) with TSC/Ca(min)/bicarbonate (P < .01) and 60 kJ/h (52-76) with Hep/lactate. Median patient delivery of citrate was 31.2 mmol/h (25-34.7) in ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate versus 14.8 mmol/h (12.4-19.1) in TSC/Ca(min)/bicarbonate groups (P < .01). Median delivery of glucose was 36.8 mmol/h (29.9-43) in ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate, and of lactate 52.5 mmol/h (49.2-59.1) in ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate and 56.1 mmol/h (49.6-64.2) in Hep/lactate groups. The higher energy delivery with ACD/Ca(plus)/lactate was partially due to the higher blood flow used in this modality and the calcium-containing dialysate. CONCLUSIONS: The bioenergetic gain of CVVHDF comes from glucose (in ACD), lactate and citrate. The amount substantially differs between modalities despite a similar CVVHDF dose and is unacceptably high when using ACD with calcium-containing lactate-buffered solutions and a higher blood flow. When calculating nutritional needs, we should account for the energy delivered by CVVHDF.
650    _2
$a akutní poškození ledvin $x terapie $7 D058186
650    _2
$a antikoagulancia $x škodlivé účinky $x ekonomika $x farmakologie $7 D000925
650    _2
$a citráty $x škodlivé účinky $x ekonomika $x farmakologie $7 D002951
650    _2
$a dialyzační roztoky $x škodlivé účinky $x ekonomika $x farmakologie $7 D015314
650    _2
$a energetický příjem $x účinky léků $7 D002149
650    _2
$a energetický metabolismus $x účinky léků $7 D004734
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a náklady na zdravotní péči $7 D017048
650    _2
$a hemodiafiltrace $x škodlivé účinky $x ekonomika $x metody $7 D017583
650    _2
$a heparin $x škodlivé účinky $x ekonomika $x farmakologie $7 D006493
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a vodní a elektrolytová nerovnováha $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D014883
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Zakharchenko, Mikhailo $u - $7 xx0304761
700    1_
$a Leden, Pavel $u -
700    1_
$a Otahal, Michal $u -
700    1_
$a Hruby, Jan $u -
700    1_
$a Polak, Ferdinand $u -
700    1_
$a Rusinova, Katerina $u -
700    1_
$a Stach, Zdenek $u -
700    1_
$a Tokarik, Monika $u -
700    1_
$a Vavrova, Jaroslava $u -
700    1_
$a Jabor, Antonin $u -
700    1_
$a Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M $u -
773    0_
$w MED00002627 $t Journal of critical care $x 1557-8615 $g Roč. 28, č. 1 (2013), s. 87-95
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22951019 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230803073421 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 987998 $s 822698
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 28 $c 1 $d 87-95 $i 1557-8615 $m Journal of critical care $n J Crit Care $x MED00002627
GRA    __
$a NS10014 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130703

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...