-
Something wrong with this record ?
Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
RP. Giugliano, CT. Ruff, E. Braunwald, SA. Murphy, SD. Wiviott, JL. Halperin, AL. Waldo, MD. Ezekowitz, JI. Weitz, J. Špinar, W. Ruzyllo, M. Ruda, Y. Koretsune, J. Betcher, M. Shi, LT. Grip, SP. Patel, I. Patel, JJ. Hanyok, M. Mercuri, EM. Antman, . ,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1980-01-03 to 3 months ago
PubMed
24251359
DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1310907
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Anticoagulants adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Stroke prevention & control MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Embolism prevention & control MeSH
- Enoxaparin adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation complications drug therapy MeSH
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
- Cardiovascular Diseases mortality prevention & control MeSH
- Hemorrhage chemically induced MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Warfarin adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. The long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban as compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing two once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in 21,105 patients with moderate-to-high-risk atrial fibrillation (median follow-up, 2.8 years). The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism. Each edoxaban regimen was tested for noninferiority to warfarin during the treatment period. The principal safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: The annualized rate of the primary end point during treatment was 1.50% with warfarin (median time in the therapeutic range, 68.4%), as compared with 1.18% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.99; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 1.07; 97.5% CI, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.005 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend favoring high-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Both once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.).
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14040619
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140114115717.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140107s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24251359
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Giugliano, Robert P
- 245 10
- $a Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation / $c RP. Giugliano, CT. Ruff, E. Braunwald, SA. Murphy, SD. Wiviott, JL. Halperin, AL. Waldo, MD. Ezekowitz, JI. Weitz, J. Špinar, W. Ruzyllo, M. Ruda, Y. Koretsune, J. Betcher, M. Shi, LT. Grip, SP. Patel, I. Patel, JJ. Hanyok, M. Mercuri, EM. Antman, . ,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. The long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban as compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing two once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in 21,105 patients with moderate-to-high-risk atrial fibrillation (median follow-up, 2.8 years). The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism. Each edoxaban regimen was tested for noninferiority to warfarin during the treatment period. The principal safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: The annualized rate of the primary end point during treatment was 1.50% with warfarin (median time in the therapeutic range, 68.4%), as compared with 1.18% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.99; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 1.07; 97.5% CI, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.005 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend favoring high-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Both once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.).
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antikoagulancia $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000925
- 650 _2
- $a fibrilace síní $x komplikace $x farmakoterapie $7 D001281
- 650 _2
- $a kardiovaskulární nemoci $x mortalita $x prevence a kontrola $7 D002318
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a embolie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D004617
- 650 _2
- $a enoxaparin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D017984
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a krvácení $x chemicky indukované $7 D006470
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a cévní mozková příhoda $x prevence a kontrola $7 D020521
- 650 _2
- $a warfarin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D014859
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ruff, Christian T $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Braunwald, Eugene $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Murphy, Sabina A $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Wiviott, Stephen D $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Halperin, Jonathan L $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Waldo, Albert L $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Ezekowitz, Michael D $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Weitz, Jeffrey I $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Špinar, Jindřich $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Ruzyllo, Witold $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Ruda, Mikhail $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Koretsune, Yukihiro $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Betcher, Joshua $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Shi, Minggao $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Grip, Laura T $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Patel, Shirali P $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Patel, Indravadan $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Hanyok, James J $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Mercuri, Michele $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Antman, Elliott M $u - $7 gn_A_00007347
- 700 1_
- $a , $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003517 $t The New England journal of medicine $x 1533-4406 $g Roč. 369, č. 22 (2013), s. 2093-104
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24251359 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140114120421 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1005015 $s 839131
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 369 $c 22 $d 2093-104 $i 1533-4406 $m The New England journal of medicine $n N Engl J Med $x MED00003517
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140107