Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Five-year analysis of the prevention of colorectal sporadic adenomatous polyps trial

N. Arber, J. Spicak, I. Rácz, M. Zavoral, A. Breazna, P. Gerletti, MJ. Lechuga, N. Collins, RB. Rosenstein, CJ. Eagle, B. Levin,

. 2011 ; 106 (6) : 1135-46.

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NS9695 MZ0 CEP Register

Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2000-01-01 to 2017-12-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 1954-01-01 to 2015-10-02
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2000-01-01 to 2017-12-31

OBJECTIVES: Subjects in the Prevention of Colorectal Sporadic Adenomatous Polyps (PreSAP) trial (PRESAP/NCT00141193/www.clinicaltrials.gov) were studied to determine efficacy and safety at a year 5 assessment. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 1,561 subjects with diagnosed colorectal adenomas removed within 3 months of the study's initiation were assessed after ~ 3 years on celecoxib followed by 2 years off. Studied in 107 primary and secondary care settings, subjects were stratified by cardioprotective aspirin use and randomized to receive orally 400 ng celecoxib (933 subjects) or placebo (628 subjects) once daily. Efficacy was measured by colonoscopy at years 1, 3, and 5, and safety was measured by investigators for the on-treatment period and collected by subject self-report over 2 years post-treatment. RESULTS: At year 5, the primary outcome measure was the rate of new adenomas measured cumulatively from baseline. This rate was statistically significantly lower in the celecoxib group (51.4%) than in the placebo group (57.5%; P<0.001). Similarly, the cumulative rate of new advanced adenomas was significantly lower in the celecoxib group (10.0%) than in the placebo group (13.8%; P=0.007). However, the year 5 interval measure, which was not cumulative and did not take the rates of previous years into account, showed that after 2 years off treatment, the celecoxib group (27.0%) was 1.66 times more likely to have new adenomas than the placebo group (16.3%; P<0.0001). Similarly, the percentage of patients with new advanced adenomas was significantly higher in the celecoxib group (5.0%) than in the placebo group (3.8%) (P=0.0072). The evaluation of safety from baseline through year 5 indicated that the risks of serious cardiac disorders (relative risk (RR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.73), selected renal/hypertension events (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09-1.68), and general vascular (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.08-1.68) and cardiac disorders (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.12-2.26) were higher in those taking celecoxib than in those on placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The year 5 cumulative measures of the incidence of new and advanced adenomas were significantly lower in the celecoxib group than in the placebo group, but the year 5 interval rates of these measures were significantly lower in the placebo group than the celecoxib group, perhaps suggesting a release of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition. Consistent with what has been previously reported, increased risk of renal/hypertension events and cardiac disorders associated with celecoxib therapy mandates caution in patient selection.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14070847
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140911110030.0
007      
ta
008      
140911s2011 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/ajg.2011.116 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21503000
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Arber, Nadir $u The Integrated Cancer Prevention Center, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. narber@post.tau.ac.il $7 gn_A_00008080
245    10
$a Five-year analysis of the prevention of colorectal sporadic adenomatous polyps trial / $c N. Arber, J. Spicak, I. Rácz, M. Zavoral, A. Breazna, P. Gerletti, MJ. Lechuga, N. Collins, RB. Rosenstein, CJ. Eagle, B. Levin,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Subjects in the Prevention of Colorectal Sporadic Adenomatous Polyps (PreSAP) trial (PRESAP/NCT00141193/www.clinicaltrials.gov) were studied to determine efficacy and safety at a year 5 assessment. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 1,561 subjects with diagnosed colorectal adenomas removed within 3 months of the study's initiation were assessed after ~ 3 years on celecoxib followed by 2 years off. Studied in 107 primary and secondary care settings, subjects were stratified by cardioprotective aspirin use and randomized to receive orally 400 ng celecoxib (933 subjects) or placebo (628 subjects) once daily. Efficacy was measured by colonoscopy at years 1, 3, and 5, and safety was measured by investigators for the on-treatment period and collected by subject self-report over 2 years post-treatment. RESULTS: At year 5, the primary outcome measure was the rate of new adenomas measured cumulatively from baseline. This rate was statistically significantly lower in the celecoxib group (51.4%) than in the placebo group (57.5%; P<0.001). Similarly, the cumulative rate of new advanced adenomas was significantly lower in the celecoxib group (10.0%) than in the placebo group (13.8%; P=0.007). However, the year 5 interval measure, which was not cumulative and did not take the rates of previous years into account, showed that after 2 years off treatment, the celecoxib group (27.0%) was 1.66 times more likely to have new adenomas than the placebo group (16.3%; P<0.0001). Similarly, the percentage of patients with new advanced adenomas was significantly higher in the celecoxib group (5.0%) than in the placebo group (3.8%) (P=0.0072). The evaluation of safety from baseline through year 5 indicated that the risks of serious cardiac disorders (relative risk (RR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.73), selected renal/hypertension events (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09-1.68), and general vascular (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.08-1.68) and cardiac disorders (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.12-2.26) were higher in those taking celecoxib than in those on placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The year 5 cumulative measures of the incidence of new and advanced adenomas were significantly lower in the celecoxib group than in the placebo group, but the year 5 interval rates of these measures were significantly lower in the placebo group than the celecoxib group, perhaps suggesting a release of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition. Consistent with what has been previously reported, increased risk of renal/hypertension events and cardiac disorders associated with celecoxib therapy mandates caution in patient selection.
650    _2
$a familiární adenomatózní polypóza $x farmakoterapie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011125
650    _2
$a aplikace orální $7 D000284
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a Aspirin $x terapeutické užití $7 D001241
650    _2
$a kolonoskopie $x metody $7 D003113
650    _2
$a kolorektální nádory $x farmakoterapie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D015179
650    _2
$a interval spolehlivosti $7 D016001
650    _2
$a inhibitory cyklooxygenasy 2 $x terapeutické užití $7 D052246
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a rozvrh dávkování léků $7 D004334
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lineární modely $7 D016014
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a invazivní růst nádoru $x patologie $7 D009361
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $7 D009364
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
650    _2
$a neparametrická statistika $7 D018709
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
651    _2
$a Izrael $7 D007557
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Spicak, Julius
700    1_
$a Rácz, István
700    1_
$a Zavoral, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Breazna, Aurora
700    1_
$a Gerletti, Paola
700    1_
$a Lechuga, Maria J
700    1_
$a Collins, Neal
700    1_
$a Rosenstein, Rebecca B
700    1_
$a Eagle, Craig J
700    1_
$a Levin, Bernard
773    0_
$w MED00000249 $t The American journal of gastroenterology $x 1572-0241 $g Roč. 106, č. 6 (2011), s. 1135-46
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21503000 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140911 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140911110433 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1038651 $s 869710
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 106 $c 6 $d 1135-46 $i 1572-0241 $m The American journal of gastroenterology $n Am J Gastroenterol $x MED00000249
GRA    __
$a NS9695 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140911

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...